Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

20 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

[No title]

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

J'n tho HOUSE OF LORDS, July 5, the Earl of Morley, reply- ing tp the Earl of Camperdown confirmed the statement that anitfnber ofmen who took part in the Aldershot Review of Monday ha j been admitted to the hospital suffering from the effects ot the extreme heat, and that four of them had since died. The Duke of Cambridge was at Aldershot for the fleld-day, and he could assure their lordships that when he first heard of the matter he could not believe the sad circum- stances mentioned by his noble friend the Under-Secretary. When he came back to London everybody he met said to bim, "What a warm day you must have had at Alder- shot." But he had not experienced any unpleasant heat there, and en asking his Staff he found that they agreed with him as to the temperature at Aldershot. It was only as he came near London he felt the weather unpleasantly warm. He had been at field exercises fifty times on hotter days. He happened to remark on this occasion that he never saw so few men fall out. It waa a simple fleld-day, it was very short, and there was no review Lord De La Warr asked for authentic information as to the alleged statement of M. Tissot, the French Ambassador atj Constantinople, to the effect that instructions had been given to the general in command of the French troops to cross the Tunisian frontier into Tripoli, if necessary, for the preserva- tion of order. He also asked as to the reported military organization in Tripoli under the Turkish governor. He thought that the proceedings in respect of Tripoli raised a very serious question, and one in which the interests of this country were deeply involved. He concluded by moving for papers. Lord Stanley of Alderley said it was impossible that any provocation could have been given for a French invasion of IriHe asked whether the Secretary for Foreign Affaivs could give their lordships any information as to a treaty between France and Spain for the partition of Morocco. Lord Granville said that the Government, like, he be lievect, all their lordships, regarded the cases of Tunis and Tripoli ns of a different character, and thought that-the circumstances of Tunis were not applicable to Tripoli. There was however, no obligation on Ministers of the Crown to triv' i"fo-rn>ation which they had not received. He had no Information of the treaty referred to by Lord Stanley of Alderlev, and did not believe in its existence. He had never heard of the alleged statement of M. Tissot. Be had heard that a Turkish General of Division and two battalions were landed in Tripoli on the 28th ult. j-f De La Wait wished for the oificial papers sontaiuiDg that intelligence, there was no objection to its production. The motion was agreed to. The Lord Chancellor laid en the table, and Lord Cairns expired his approval of. a Bill constituting the Master ef the Hoils for the time being a Judge of Appeal, and not of First, instance. The Hill was read a first time. Lord Granville, amid cheers, announced that the most recent accounts of the condition of the President of the United States were slightly more favourable. Their lordships adjourned at a quarter to seven o'clock. In the HOUSE OF COMMONS, at the Morning Sitting, Mir. Maclvn- said he had been entrusted with a petition from Bradford of a somewhat remarkable character. It was In the main a workman's petition, but it represented alike the demand of the employer and of those who wished for work and wages, but were denied their daily bread by the pressure of unfair foreign competition with those industries on which the prosperity of Yorkshire depended. Be was told that this petition was nearly 210 yM-da teot, and bore about 21,ooe signatures, and that it had been signed in the streets of Bradford by persons of every shade of political opinion. He trusted this House would not turn a deaf ear to the cry for justice which those who sent this petition asked him to raise humbly and respectfully en thek behalf. They saw no reason why French looms should be at work while theirs stood idle, and they asked this honourable House te renew no treaty with France which allowed France to tax our manufactures while we re- ceived theirs duty free to the displacement of our own industries. The Speaker said the hon. member was not entitled to de- bate the question. Mr. Mac Iver said he did not wish to debate anything, but merely to state the prayer of this petition. The petitioners asked for equal treatment-for fair play they saw no reason why the working men of France should receive the wages which ought to be spent in this country. They asked. therefore, that no treaty should be made with France with- out the previous approval and consent of Parliament; and that no engagement should hp entered into from which we could not withdraw on twe lve months' notice if we found it did not suit us. (" Order.") There was much he should wish to say. (Renewed criesef "Order.") The Speaker said he must call on the hon. member to con- be himself to the prayer of the petition. Mr. Maclver said he most heartily and cordially concurred in the prayer of this petition. The day had come when this House could no longer turn a deaf ear to the working popu- lation of these lands or look on coldly while each industry was in turn destroyed. Why had not the people of Bradford entrusted this petition to the hon. member opposite (Mr. Illingworth) ? Because they wished to protest emphatically against such views as his and because they no longer be- lieved that a system ot free imports and ot restricted exports was entitled to be called free trade. Mr. Childers said petitioners could not protest. The Speaker remarked that he had already called the hon. member to order twiee. Mr. Mac Iver said he begged respectfully to ask that the petition be read by the Clerk at the table. The Clerk then read the petition. In answer to a question from Mr. W. JI. Smith, Mr Trevelyan said the Admiralty had received a telegram from Lord Clanwilliam which stated that there was no foundation for the rameur of an accident to one of the Royal sailor Princes. Colonel Makins having asked whether the report was true that Mr. Bradlaugh had written a letter to the Chair, The Speaker said he was about to read it when the question was given to him, but before he began Lord R. Churchill asked whether it would be competent to any member to object to the letter being printed in the journals, and to move that no notice need be taken of it. The Speaker said that when the letter had been read it would be printed with the Votes in the usual way. He then read the letter, which was as follows To the Right Honourable the Speaker of the House of Commons. "Sir,—I beg most respectfully to submit to your notice the following points:- "1. I am advised that the interruption on the 27th of April and my removal on the 10th of May last from the House by the Sergeant-at-Arms, when engaged according to law and in precise compliance with the relos and orders of the House in attempting to perform the duty of taking my seat, was on each occasion absolutely illegal, and was an in- fringement of my rights and in breach of my privileges as a duly returned member of the House. "2. I am advised that the House of Commons had not any authority, either by statute or according to its own pre- cedents, to pass any resolution interrupting me or authorize ing the Serjeant-at-Arms so to remove me, I being then in the exercise of my lawful right and attempting the orderly performance of my legal duty. "3 I am advised that I should have been justified in re- sisting the use of the illegal and therefore unjustifiable physical force on the part of the Serjeant-at-Arms. "4. I am advised that, notwithstanding the illegality of the said forcible removal of myself by the Serjeant-at- Aras, I have no remedy in any court of law against the said Serjeant-at-Arms, as the privileges ef the House of Commons protect its officer even in wrongful acts, if such acts are done in pursuance of the order of the House. U i. I am adTiseMhat the order of the House of the 10th of May last, a copy of which order has been served upon me, does not authorise the Serjeant-at-arms to use force or to employ force to prevent my re-entry into the House, to the table of which I have been properly introduced, for the purpose of completely complying with the law in order to take my seat at the time and in the manner provided by the Standing Orders. 6. That if such order should be construed to authorise the said Serjeant-at-Arms to attempt by foree to prevent me from entering the House to oonpleto and fulfil the duty required from me by law, in the DaauMff provided by the Standing Orders, than that any such user of force would be absolutely illegal, and may be lawfully resisted and overcome by me. "I beg, therefore, Sir, most respectfully to give notioe that I claim to disregard the order of the Bouse on the 10th day of May last, and to treat the same as net requiring obedi- ence from me, on the ground that such order is absolutely illegal. I do not dispute the power of the House in its pleasure to vacate my seat if once I hare taken it. In such case it wonld be for the electors of Northampton to decide on a new election as to whom they would wish farther to represent them. I do not question, nor should J resist, the authority of the House to arrest me this right it has exercised over Englishmen far more important than myself; but I do deny, and, if it unhappily becomes neces- sary, shall feel it my duty to resist, the claim to prevent me, in spite of the law and by physical force alone, from eomplying with the return and mandate of say constituents, whose lawful representative I am. In the name of the law, Sir, and of my constituents, I also most respectfully give notice that I shall, in the manner and at the time provided by the Standing erders of the House, again present myself at the table of the House to complete the fulfilment of the duty imposed on me by law, and in the course of the performance of which duty I have been most improperly and illegally interrupted and hindered. "1. having obtained the leave of my constituents to this effect, would have waited and would still wait the reason- able pleasure of the House as to any legislation with refer- ence to the manner of my taking my seat; but, as the House does not express any opinion on this subject, and does not challenge in any way the lawfulness of my return, it is due to my constituents that I should insist on the performance of my duty in my unchallenged lawful right, and thus put an end to a state of things without precedent in the history of Parliament. I have the honour to be, Sir, your most obedient ser- vant, Cm. KRAMAPttm." July 4. 1881." The Speaker added: I have deemed it my duty to com municate this letter to the House, because it contests the authority and orders of the House. I may add, also, that I have given special directions to the Serjeant-at-Arms to enforce the order of the 10th of May. Lord R. Churchill gave notice that he would move to omit the letter from the Votes but the Speaker said this would be an unprecedented motion, and the proper course would be to move to expunge it. Lord R. Churchill said he would do this; and Mr. 0erst having asked that the Clerk at the table should read the resolution, Sir S. Northcote and Mr. Gladstone joined in advising the House to leave the matter in the hands ef its Executive.. The House went again into Committee en the Irish Land Bill, and after a discussion on the Seventh Clause it was added to the Bill upon a division by t89 to 157. The Eighth Clause was agreed to, and progress was reported. At the Evening Sitting the consideration of the Land Bill was resumed, when Clauses 9, 10, and 11 were agreed to, and shortly after the Committee adjourned. The House adjourned at one o'clock.

DRINKING FOUNTAINS AND CATTLE…

ABSTRACT of the CENSUS RETURNS.

[No title]

THE STORM ON TUESDAY NIGHT.

THE POPE ON THE ASSASSINATION…

THE RUSSIAN HARVEST.

I iDEATH OF PRESIDENT GARFIELD'S…

DEATH OF DR. CUMMING.

PROPOSED UNDERGROUND RAILWAY…

Pisallraams fiMigem

----IJYfPERIAL PARLIAMENT.

[No title]

jSUNDAY CLOSING.

[No title]

MR. GLADSTONE and MR. BRADLAUGH.

[No title]

[No title]

[No title]

SIR S. WATERLOW ON TECHNICAL…