Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

9 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

THE AGITATION IN IRELAND.

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

THE AGITATION IN IRELAND. MR. WILFRID BLUNTS APPEAL. The hearing of the appeal of Mr. Wilfrid Blunt against the decision of Mr. Dillon, R.M., and Mr. Sheehy, R.M., for obstructing the police in the dis- charge of their duty in dispersing a meeting at Wood- ford, co. Galway, commenced on Tuesday atPortumna, before Mr. Rice Henn, County Court judge. The Court-house was crowded, those present including, besides Mr. Blunt and Lady Anne Blunt, Mr. Shaw Lsfevie, M.P., Mr. Evelyn, M.P., Mr. Thomas Lough (Hon. Sec. English Home Rule Union), Mr. P. O'Brien, M.P., and Mr. Maclnnes, M.P. A r police were stationed in the Courthouse, constabies in all having been drafted into f»e ™n' ^r- Sheehy, M.P., who had been brought ^om Clonmel Gaol, and who is to be examined as a ■jy| ess f°r the defence, occupied a seat in court. .rs' Sheehy was accommodated with a seat beside hun. Mr. Blunt and Lady Anne Blunt sat in a side seat during the early part. of the day, but when the resumed after lunch Mr. Blunt took a seat his counsel. As Mr. Blunt and his party passed 1 rn ^rom court morning and evening they were oudiy cheered by the crowds which had collected in the street. The cheers from the outside while the proceedings were going on were at times so loud as to interfere with the business of the Court, and on one occasion Mr. Henn directed the attention ot the county inspector to the circumstance. A stranger in court, who declared that he was an iglish loyalist, spoke from the body of the court, and said he had never seen anything like the way the police were maltreating the people. Mr. Henn remarked that the proceedings of the court must not be interrupted. Mr. Harrington, M.P., stated that District-Inspector Wade was causing his men to beat the people in the most shameful manner, and he asked the police authorities, if they did not wish to ^fe bad work, to remove him from being in charge, e matter, however, dropped. Mr. Atkinson, Q.C., who with Mr. Carson appeared for the prosecution, stated the case for the Crown. ■He related the circumstances preceding the holding of the meeting on Sunday, October 23, as showing the alleged unlawful character of the meeting. A meeting had, he said, been held on the previous Sun- day at midnight, at which Mr. Blunt was present. That meeting was addressed by Mr. W. O'Brien, M.P., and others, and was convened for the same purpose- that of encouraging the tenants in their resistance to the sheriff. At that meeting Mr. O'Brien reminded the audience that it was the anniversary of the found- ing of the Plan of Campaign. Counsel read the placard convening the meeting for the 23rd. It was headed English Home Rule Union," and stated that an" indignation meeting would be held on Sunday, the 23rd October, 1887, under the auspices of the English Home Rule Union, to protest against the cruel and heartless evictions carried out during the week by Lord CJanricarde. Mr. Wilfrid Blunt, dele- gate of the Union, will preside, and several English members of Parliament will address the meeting." The placard concluded with the words, Assemble, Irishmen, in your thousands to listen to a message of encouragement from your friends. God save Ireland!" Counsel read the Lord- Lieutenant's order proclaiming the meeting, and di- recting it to be suppressed. Counsel detailed the circumstances attending the suppression of the meet- ing, the advent of Mr. Blunt on the platform, his re- moval from it by the police, Mr. Blunt's mounting it a second time, and his removal a second time by the police; and, continuing, submitted that the placard convening the meeting was merely a thin colourable pretence, and that the meeting of the 23rd October was but an adjournment of the illegal midnight meet- ing of the previous Sunday. In the interval several evictions had been carried out, and it was clear that just as the meeting of the 16th October was calculated to incite the people to resist the sheriff at the pending evictions, so the meeting of the 23rd was calculated to incite the people to resist at the evictions, a. number Of which still remained to be carried out. Mr. Atkin- 8 f1 uVaS Pro.cee(hng to read from the speeches delivered ao the meeting of the 16th, when The MacDermott, y C., who, with Mr. T. Harrington, M.P., appeared for Mr. Blunt, objected. Mr. Henn ruled that that could not be evidence against Mr. Blunt. Mr. Atkin- son rejoined that he only proposed to make them evi- dence as to the character of the meeting of the 23rd, in order to show that it was an unlawful meeting. He then cited a number of cases to show that a meeting was unlawful if called for an unlawful Purpose, or being called for a lawful purpose was, 1 ^ie circumstances surrounding it, calcu- a ed to cause terror or alarm to her Majesty's Objects. He proposed, he added, to show the ptate of the district. The MacDermott, interfer- ing, said that if that question was opened up they Would be there for a fortnight. Mr. Atkinson, continu- ing, said there had been 11 undetected murders in the district, an immensity of boycotting, and injuries to Cittle. Counsel was proceeding to refer to the ques- tion of the meeting, a national League meeting under a colourable pretence, when Mr. Harrington pointed °,it that if it was a National League meeting no pro- clamation was necessary. The case, moreover, had not been gone into in the court below. Mr. Henn re- marked that surely Mr. Blunt had not come there to meet this new case. Mr. Atkinson then read the er addressed by Mr. Blunt on the morning of the meeting to Mr. Byrne, the divisional magistrate, in watch he intimated his intention to hold the meeting In spite of the proclamation. Counsel concluded by stating that the defendant had been sentenced to two months' imprisonment in the court below. On that point he had nothing to say, but left it entirely 1 71 Honour should he come to the conclusion at the finding of the court below was right. Counsel for the Crown then called police witnesses to prove that Mr. Blunt persisted in speaking at a i-a •+n? a^er.ik bad been proclaimed, and forcibly sisted them in the execution of their duty. All the Policemen denied using any violence towards Mr. (l °r his wife, both of whom, they said were s Jamming." The proceedings were then adjourned u ltu Wedr esday. The hearing of Mr. Wilfrid Blunt's appeal was con- ued at Portumna on Wednesday, when, among the witnesses examined, Mr. N. L. Townsend, Resident Magistrate, stated that after the order had been given to clear the platform he saw stones throw: at the Police, and one constable was struck. He afterwards saw a county inspector's helmet cut and his head bleeding. He was in charge of the police at evic- tions three days previously, when great resistance Was offered. Evidence as to outrages committed in the Woodford district and as to the boycotting of police was also given. At the rising of the Court it was stated that the Crown case would close next morning, and it was expected the appellant's case Would finish by Friday evening.

[No title]

THE NEW PRESIDENT AND THE…

AN OLD MAN SUFFOCATED.

ROBBERY AND MURDER IN MOROCCO.

AN INGENIOUS MONARCH.

ATROCIOUS CRUELTY TO A CHILD.

EPITOME OF NEWS.

THE MARKETS.