Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

8 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE…

Rhestrau Manwl, Canlyniadau a Chanllawiau
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE WAR? In the well-known letters which appeared in the Times and in a subsequent volume, a writer, signing himself Scrutator," strove to prove that Count Bismarck was chiefly responsible for the late war, and that, far from doing anything to avert the contest, he even provoked it. In reply, the North German Correspondent publishes a sum- mary of a letter by Detector," undertaking to refutt Scrutator." This summary is as follows :— SCRUTATOR'S POINTS AND DETECTOR'S COUNTERPOINTS. S. 1. That the Hohenzollern candidature was a legiti- mate grievance to France, and was acknowledged to be such by the Neutral Powers. D. 1. That the Hohenzollern candidature, even if it had been a legitimate grievance to France so long as it was persisted in, did not justify that Power in declaring war after it was withdrawn. S. 2. That the French Government, in spite of sundry indiscretions which Count Bismarck dexterously used against it, really desired a pacific solution of the ques. tion. D. 2. That had the French Government really desired a pacific solution of the question it would have been satis- fied with its diplomatic success in the withdrawal of the objectionable candidature. S. 3. That Count Bismarck got up the Hohenzollern intrigue with his eyes wide open to all the consequences that have followed. D. 3. That Count Bismarck was a complete stranger to the so-called Hohenzollern intrigue. S. 4. That Prussia never withdrew, directly or indi- rectly, the candidature of Prince Leopold of Hohenzol- lern, and that the eventual retirement of the Prince took place in such a way as to leave the grievance of France precisely where it was at the commencement of the quarrel. D. 4. That Prussia, having neither originated nor sup- ported directly or indirectly the candidature of Prince Leopold of Hohenzollern, was in nowise bound to with- draw that candidature. S. 5. That, nevertheless, France still sought a pacific solution, and solicited the good offices of England for that purpose. D. 5. That England, whose good offices France soli- cited, declared the honour of France to be completely satisfied by the spontaneous renunciation by the Prince of Hohenzollern of his candidature. S. 6. That Count Bismarck rudely rejected the media. tion of England, and precipitated the war by the gratui- tous invention and publication of a fictitious affront offered by the King of Prussia to the French Ambassador at Ems. D. 6. That there was nothing rude in Count Bismarck's treatment of the recommendation of England. The North-German Chancellor replied honestly that any further concession on the part of Prussia would be viewed throughout Germany in the light of a national humiliation. S. 7. That the deliberate intention of Prussia to pro- voke a war with France is proved by other circumstances, and particularly by Count Bismarck's rejection of repeated offers from France to join in a policy of mutual disarma- ment. D. 7. That the pacific disposition of Prussia is proved inter alia, by the following passage in an official report which Colonel Stoffel, French Military Attache at Berlin, addressed to his Government in 1870:—"1. War is in- evitable, and may be brought about by a very trifling cir- cumstance. 2. Prussia has no intention of attacking France she does not desire war, and will do everything to avoid it. 3. But Prussia is intelligent enough to see that the war she does not invite will infallibly come, and she is sparing no exertions to forestall a hostile surprise when the fateful conjuncture has arrived. 4. France, by reason of her thoughtlessness, and particularly her igno. rance of the situation, has not the same insight into these matters as Prussia." S. 8. That at the commencement of the war both the King of Prussia and Count Bismarck publicly admitted that the French people were really peaceably disposed and requiring tranquillity; an admission which is incon- sistent with the subsequent demand for French territory on the plea that the French nation desired and approved the war against Germany. D. 8. That the peasantry, the industrial and com- mercial classes, and probably a majority of the people of France, were peaceably disposed and requiring tran- quillity," but that the Imperial Court, the French army, as well as the Chambers, unfortunately desired and ap- proved the war against Germany. S. 9. That Count Bismarck requires French territory, not as a security against French aggressiveness, but as a means of keeping up the military system of Prussia and keeping down German Liberalism. D. 9. That the ratification of the south-western fron. tier of Germany has been insisted on solely on strategical grounds, and in order to guard Germany against future French aggression. S. 10. That in her determination to seize French ter- ritory Germany is not merely declining to "set a new and better example to all future conquerors," but is on the contrary, taking a long stride backwards in civiliza- tion, and is really violating a principle which was quietly taking its place in the political ethics of modern Europe. D. 10. That in annexing only such portions of the con. quered territory as are indispensable for her safety and are inhabited by a German-speaking population, Germany has exhibited exemplary moderation and has eschewed the example set by France, who, whenever victorious in war, has invariably enforced the rights of conquest n with extreme rigour.

TROUBLES IN ALGERIA.

--THE INSURRECTION IN PARIS.

[No title]

GOOD BEHAVIOUR OF THE INSURGENTS

[No title]

---I SPIRIT OF THE PRESS.

[No title]