Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

24 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

Political and Personal.

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

Political and Personal. "WESTMINSTER'S" NOTES OF THE WEiJJK. fbe Attack on Mr. Chamberlain—Mr. Bal- four's Apology—Germany and the Chinese Peace Treaty. Mr. Balfour's apology, delivered yesterday at the meeting of the Primrose League, Wag profuse and uncompromising enough, one would think.. to satisfy the most exacting critic in the Liberal Unionist party, and to allay the wrath even of the "Birmingham Daily Post." With his habitual generosity, the Conservative leader humbles himself to the dust before Mr. Chamberlain, and confesses that without the help of the member for Bir- mingham he could have done nothing; and he is righteously indignant with Conservative men of letters who forget that a debt of grati- tude is due to the Liberal Unionists for keep- ing a Conservative Government in power during six long years, and who think that such aid can now be dispensed with. For my own part, I don't know who those Con- servatives are who fail to see that the Liberal Unionists-are still indispensable. Without their votes in the House of Commons, how is tue Upposition to force a dissolution of Par- liament But Mr. Balfour doe¡; no-, go to ■tlw loot of the matter when he pleads that no revision ot tne compact of lbtto is possible in the present period 01 transition, and that the aroiurary seating asiue of certain seats as the appanage of the jumeral Unionists till the time cuiiies lur their fusion with the Conservatives and tor ttie formation of one Government representing ootti wings of the Unionist party is necessary. What tile Conservatives ask, in some cases with a good deal of impatience, is when that tuiie will come? Sir Henry James talked of fusion at the beginning of this year, but was promptly repudiated uy his leaaers, whose intention, apparently, is to tight the next election as tne chiefs of a distinct party, and tiien to eater into negotiations at tne head of it tomiiuabie Parliamentary following. Now, many Conservatives contend, and not without leason, that in these circumstances the com- pact looo gives Mr. Chamberlain an unfair advantage, as it secures him a number of seats in the House of Commons out of all propor- tion to his real strength in the constituencies. It will hardly be denied that Liberal Unionism, as distinguished from Conservatism, is a steadily ooninishing force in che country, rnc/st of the rank and tile of the Liberal Unionists having now attached themselves dehnitely to one side or the other. Mr. George Peel's address to the electors of Leamington was from beginning to end a Tory manifesto, and Conservatives feel that candidates who « bink "vith them on all points should call thems-eives Conservatives, and should not seek M gain political positions of exceptional prominence and superior chances of distinc- tion by declaring that they wish to share the fortunes; of Mr. Chamberlain. This feeling was complicated at Leamington by the unwise attempt of Mr. Balfour, in which he has been utterly and deservedly defeated, to thrust a candidate on the constituency against their will; out it is a general feeling ail over the country, and it must be reckoned with. If Mr. ikuiour and 1\1'. Chamberlain live, as we are torn they au, in a close intimacy of perfectly unciouded friendship, and look jorward to tne time when they can sit togethev on the Treasury bench as members of the same Government, why do they not at once frame a compact of union in place of the compact of mere alliance which is now out of date? Mr. Balfour, in his enumera- tion of the subjects on which aJl Unionists are agreed, such as "social reform, the main- tenance of institutions, the preservation of individual iibertv, and resistance tor Socialism," certainly meant to include tlie maintenance of the Established Cnurch in Wales. iNI r. t/iiamberiiiin holds views of his own on this question which his followers have already refused to accept, and the last obstacle to tfee desired fusion would be removed if he would frankly say that he does not wish this question to remain an open one when a Unionist Government comes into power. The Conservatives, have said .enough for the present; it is for the leaders of the Liberal Unionists to make the next move. The spread-eagleism of the young German Kniperor is responsible for the extraordinary and ridiculous position in which Germany has placed herself by joining France and Russia in their protest against the treaty of peace concluded between Japan and China.. Con- sidering that the Germans refused to permit the intervention of any European Power when they dismembered France and extorted from her a prodigious indemnity in 1871, it seems an amazing piece of impertinence on their part to interfere in a quarrel which abso- lutely does not concern them. The Germans make a great parade of their ''commercial interests" in the Far East, but these are abso- lutely insignificant. If you add together the direct trade carried on by China with Great Britain and that of British India and the great Colonial entrepots of Hong Kong and Singapore, you will find that the British Empire has an overwhelming preponderance over all its rivals. Our proportion of the trade with China is, in fact, fully six times as great as that of the whole Continent of Europe taken together. The United States rank next to us, but their share is only one- tenth of that of the British Empire. Almost the same remarks are applicable to the trade of Japan, although in this case the United States have a considerably larger propor- tional share. It is obvious, therefore, that, if we regard our commercial interests as adequately protected by a treaty under which we shall enjoy no special privileges, Germany, France, and Russia can have nothing to fear. The talk of commerce being endangered' by Japanese ambition is, of course, a mere pre- text; what Russia wants is an increase of territory, but why Germany should back her up is a puzzle, unless her action is attributable to the spiteful jealousy with which she, equally with France, regards England's com- mercial supremacy, and to her belief that she can do this country an injury by supporting the aggressive designs of Russia. This is the true explanation of the excessive anxiety shown by the Kaiser to display the German flag in the North Pacific. The Continental press inveighs against England for her selfish- ness in breaking away from the European concord; but what sort of brotherhood have Continental nations shown towards England in their Colonial policy? Japan will be a far better neighbour to us in the East than either France, Russia, or Germany. At the beginning of the war, when Lord Rosebery boasted at the Guild-hall of England's rapprochement with Russia, I ven- tured to point oue that the great Northern Power could not be depended upon, and that our natural ally in the Northern Pacific was the United States. Lord Rosebery himself must now have come round to this way of thinking. The great American Republic has behaved so well to m in the Nicaraguan squabble that a good understanding between the two principal English-speaking nations seems now within reach; and, if England and j America made no secret of their goodwill towards Japan, the threats now uttered by some of the Con- tinental Powers of Europe would be of very little consequence. Without wishing to speak in terras of dis- paragement of the relief of Chitral. I must say that I am astounded at the free use of the words "glory" and "heroism" in connec- tion with what has been done. Some critics do not hesitate to describe the latest feats of arms of British Indian troops as rivalling the famous exploits of the men who defended or relieved Lucknow in 1857. People who indulge in tall talk of this kind cannot have read history or known what hard fighting means. If this sort of thing goes on, when a French expeditionary force has hewed its way through the pathless forests of Mada- gascar and massacred a few thousand Hovas. we shall be told that such a march has never been equalled since Napoleon conquered Italy. What has been done in Chitral? A garrison has made a stout defence of a fort against a numerous but undisciplined enemy, Vho were entirely unprovided with artillery. It seems like sacrilege to compare this performance with the siege of Lucknow. Then, Colonel Kelly has, with splendid energy, overcome great physical obstacles in advancing from Gilgit to Chitral, but he had hardly any fight- ing on the road, all the armed men having gone either to take part in the siege of Chitral or to help in opposing the army under Sir Robert Low. This army had a smart action in the Maiakand Pass, but the oppo- sition it has encountered has been, on the whole, by reason mainly of the overwhelming superiority of its weapons of war, mere child's play in comparison with the desperate fight- ing Sir Neville Chamberlain's force endured in the celebrated Umbeyla campaign. Our soldiers, no doubt, fight as well as ever; but let us, in our praises of them, observe some sense of proportion. The press, however, seems to be united in a conspiracy to conceal the blundering policy of the Indian Govern- ment under applause of the deeds done by the Army. Conservatives are always ready to do full justice to acts of military prowess, and Radicals vie with them for the moment because they feel very uneasy at the ultra- Jingoism of that most pacific of Ministers, Mr. H. H. Fouler, in giving his sanction to the Chitral campaign. Now that we have got Chitral, the interesting question is to know what we are going to do with it. We can never abandon it altogether, or we may have all our work to begin over again at any moment; but the cost of holding it, and of keeping open the short road by which Sir Robert Low advanced, will be a serious bur- den for the Indian taxpayer to bear. The report of the Opium Commission is the first rebuff that has been given to the fanaticism of the ignorant enthusiasts in this country who speak of the use of any kind of stimulant as if it were a crime. 'nl" Would that we could have in this country as dispassionate an inquiry into the actual re- sults of the habit of using alcohol as that which ha.s rescued India from the intolerant zeal of the Anti-Opium Society. In review- ing the evidence as to the purposes for which opium is taken, the Commissioners find that, in addition to its popular use in many parts of India as a remedy in cases of specific maladies, as t, domestic medicine, and also for ceremonial observances, there is an almost equally prevalent use in the greater part of the country as a stimulant or restorative, either after middle life or in cases of special stress of fatigue or weather. The drug is found to be harmful, harmless, or beneficial according to the measure and discretion with which it is used. The descriptions of moral and physical degradation due to the use of opium, which have been served up hot and strong to suit the taste for horrors of British audiences, have not, the Commission con- sider, been confirmed by medical experience, by the evidence of witnesses representing the people of India, or by those responsible for the government and welfare of that country. They find, on the contrary, that opium, as consumed in India, leads to no apparent moral or physical degradation, nor is it abused to an extent sufficient to justify measures of restriction different from those deemed necessary by sensible men in the case of alcohol or any other stimulant in general use throughout a large and civilised com- munity. It does not cause any specific disease, and is neither productive of insanity nor promotive of suicide, crime, or abnormal infant mortality, as alleged by the persons anxious for its total prohibition. For the present, therefore, the Indian opium revenue is safe, and that is something to be thank- ful for. The election of the Anti-Parnellite candi- date for East Wicklow is disappointing. I cannot help thinking that, when a dispute breaks out between the two sections of Nationalists in districts out of Ulster, tlie best policy for the Unionists is not to start a candidate of their own, but to look on and see the quarrel fought fairly out. If I were an Irish Conservative, and could not make up my mind in such circumstances to abstain from voting, I should certainly support the Parnellite, on the ground that as a rule he may now be relied upon to go into the Opposition lobby when a division on a party question is taken in the House of Commons. As Lord Farrer gets a good deal of credit justj now for having puzzled the bi-metal- lists by asking them to fix a ratio between gold and silver, perhaps I may be pardoned for mentioning that Mr. J. M. Maclean made the very same point six years ago in his speech in the House of Commons on Mr. Chaplin's motion in favour of bi-metallism. Mr. Maclean quoted the report of the Royal Commission, then recently issued, to show that even the Commissioners who supported a double standard were afraid even to make the attempt to fix a ratio between the two metals, and he urged that their failure to do this was fatal to the cause of bi-metallism. This vieow was supported by Mr W. H. Smith, at that time Leader of the House.

Advertising

jCardiff Representation.

TIN-PLATE^ TRADE.

LOCAL WEDDING.

PRESBYTERIAN CONCERT.

FRENCH CYCLIST MURDERED.

Advertising

Finances of Cardiff, :

SPRAGS IN COLLIERIES.

SUCCESS OF A YOUNG MUSICIAN.

Advertising

:Government in Danger.

Advertising

INHERITANCE OF MRS. DUN BAR.

Advertising

,--A WORKS EXPLOSION.

GOLF.

Advertising

ARREST OF A PRINCE.

THE OLD AND MEW VOIjTTNTEE®…

DEATH OP LORD MONCRIEFF-

Murder and Suicide by a Mother*

Advertising