Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

9 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

[No title]

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

By WESTMINSTER. LONDON, SATURDAY. Most people will agree with the "Daily JSTews" in the opinion that the speech made t>y Sir William Harcourt at the dinner given in his honour by the Radical members of the 'House of Commons was quite worthy of shimself and his hosts. One expected nothing fetter from Sir William, who throughout long career has never shown' a spark of jthe magnanimity which, is an attribute of any reallv great character, than that he should ,play the braggart and make a purely partisan and petty deliverance on what might have been a great historical occasion. One can .imagine to what noble use a. truly great .;Jead«r like Mr. Gladstone would have put such an opportunity. But Sir William Har- court has never been a statesman. He is a successful soldier of fortune, who by a strange course of events has dropped into the posItIOn of leader of a set of men with whom he has no real sympathy, but who find him useful in carrying into effect a policy mat suits their interest. Naturally, and by train- ing an aristocrat in his tastes and connec- tions, Sir William aspired at different neriods of his life to lead either the Whigs or the Conservatives; but, by an odd freak of .fate. he never got a chance of promotion to ;the position he had always hoped to win of deader of the House of Commons till the secession of the Liberal Unionists offered (him a, prospect of advancement. Sir William epeaks very bitterly of secession and seces- sionists. but personally he ought to be veiy much obliged to Mr. Chamberlain and the other Liberals of the front rank who pre- ferred patriotism to party and abandoned 1Ifr. Gladstone when the Home Rule Bill of 1886 was brought forward. It was this seces- sion a,] one which allowed Sir William to .become the leader, or the tool. of a political coalition of the most odious kind between the Rump of the Liberal party and those Irish ^Nationalists of whom Sir William was not many years ago the most conspicuous reviler. (The great, work on which he prides himself, the Budget of the present year, has, no 'doubt, given immense delight to the people he wished to plea.se, for we none of us like taxation, and a. Chancellor of the Exchequer whc has the impudence to make his political opponents alone pay the increased revenue J1: wants is sure to be very popular with a party which cares nothing for the good of thj State, and only regards politics as a m :ans 0; promoting its own private inte- yrests. It. is labour lost for Sir William •court to pretend that the victims of his jSBudget object to pay their fair share of taxation. Tliis they are perfectly willing to do; what they compiain of is that they &re required by the present Chancellor of the Exchequer to pay other people's shares as JPall. Mr. Jacob Bright. in his speech as chairintn of the banquet, put the Radical ease for the Budget with an indiscreet plain- ness which must have somewhat disconcerted ,the guest of the evening. Th* additional expenditure on the. Navy, Tie "aiŒ was due to a "scare" raised by the Unionists, and, therefore, the bill ought to be paid by the iUnionists. The of; the Navy ,-Iaa.s not, then, according to the statement made by this too candid friend, been adopted by the. Government as a truly national policy for which ..the whole nation ought to pay. It has been forced upon them by the Opposition. The country will bear this confession in mind when at the general elec- tion the Government tries to take credit to 7f for having maintained the efficiency M the Navy. The Duke of Devonshire tar afford to treat with contempt Sir William jjElarcourt's ponderous jeers at the moderate fand well-reasoned exposition he gave in the ,I-Iouse of Lords of the economical ccnse- quenee.s which the Budget will have in country districts. Sir William has revived .recently the practice of garnishing speeches ,-with Latin quotations, and I may, therefore, 1b pardoned for saying that the attitude of the Radicals towards the landed interest, which they expect to bear the main burden iof taxation, reminds one of the well-known line in Juvenal, "Cantabit vacuus coram 3atrone viator," the robber in this instance e being the State. As to the future, Sir William says nothing definite. He tried to console Sir Wilfrid Lawson with the sugges- tion that the Local Veto Bill might pos- sibly be heard of a.gain next year, but what is the value of such an assurance when Lord IBoLtbery ha.s already promised that the iWelsh Disestablishment Bill shall have the first place next session? Sir William said n_ nothing about his respected chief on Wednes- day. but the galling consciousness that not lie himself, but Lord Rosebery, will lay dowr. the policy of the Government hampered liun in his comments on the action of the !Hon.se of Lords and prevented him from indicating any direct line of attack on the Upper House. The note of weariness which made Sir William Harcourt's speech fall flat is percep- tible in all the proceedings of the House of Commons, and it accounts for the readiness with which both parties have welcomed the passing or resolutions which will quickly bring tc. ar. end the discussion of the Evicted Tenants Bill and allow the session to ter- minate before the month is out. I should not be at all surprised to hear that Sir William Harcourt and Mr. Balfour had had a. hearty laugh together over the farce of the Government's pretended eagerness to pass this Bill into law. The Government was obliged to introduce the Bill in order to I please the Irish Nationalists, but it was certain from the outset that in its present form the Bill would be thrown out by the .1 House of Lords. I sympathise with Mr. Courtney in his desire that a compromise should be arranged; but what hope is there that the Bill will do any good after the speeches made on Wednesday by Mr. Dillon and Mr. Redmond, who declared that there 'would be a revival of Boycotting and intimi- dation in Ireland unle«c t-Iie Government consented to add a clause, which Mr. Morlsy felt himself hound to resist, providing for the eviction of even those bona-fide tenants 'who have taken farms of which the former holders were dispossessed for sufficiently good reasons? The Government really neither expects nor wishes to pass any further legislation this session. It is content with the accomplishment of the meritorious feat !()f remaining in office for another year, and :wants to have a little ease and comfort before making an appeal to the country. For all practical purposes, therefore, the session may even now be considered at an ■end. i The political situation is a very curious one. The Government certainly does not enjoy the confidence of the country, but it has procured for, itself a fresh lease of office by putting on one side for a time those measures which excite vehement contro- varrr and lead to the transfer of votes from one side to another. People do not jelearly understand yet what Lord Rosebery is1 aiming at, and they are content to wait for a. further development of his policy. The Opposition, on the other hand, have failed to break the cohesion of the Ministerial forces by mere talking, and a cynic might be. inclined to doubt if they will upset the Government till they have succeeded in foiiying over one or other of the many factions of which the existing majority of the House cf Commons is composed. The pre- fect state of feeling is, of course, largely due to the retirement of Mr. Gladstone. There has not yet been time to settle who is to take his place and who will be the per- manent leader of the Liberal party. The Opposition, again, are still broken up into two parties, which on a great many questions do not act in perfect unison. Mr. Balfour's reputation has grown rapidly this session, but the question of pre-eminence between himself and Mr. Chamberlain has not yet been set at rest, and in both the Conservative and the Liberal Unionist camps there is a growing desire for that fusion under one chief which would secure greater concentra- tion of purpose and energy of action. Lord RfctsSalph Churchill is, of course, now out of the running. His health has so com- pletely broken down that it is doubtful if lL) will ever able to take part in public life agrin. It is impossible not to deplore this collapse of a great career, and Conserva- tives will be very ungrateful if they ever forget that it was the inspiring genius of Lord Randolph which raised their party from the depths of despondency into which it lisd fall&u after the defeat and death or Lord Beticor.s&eld. Mr. Gladstone, having been compelled to give up politics, has turned, for comfort to theology." His plea, for the growth of Christian charity araoag warring Churches is characteristically diiluse and vague, and in reading it one. often asks oneself what the author is driving at. But his meaning has certainly been misconstrued by a critic in the "Westminster' Gaz'tti,' who says that Mr. Gladstone's article k a manifesto against "Diggleism," that is tc say, against the plan of religious "i schools with which Mr. Diggle's name is identified. As Mr- Gladstone expressly declares that the two main doctrines of the Christian faith are the Incarnation and the Trinity, and that with regard to these no compromise is possib'e. and as ail that Mr. Higgle asks is tnat the teaching of these doctrines in elementary schools should be protected against- the aggressive intolerance, of Unitari-ans and Secu- larists, such a piece, of criticism seems to be singularly inept and misleading. It were well not to be too hasty in con- demning the Japanese for the sinking of a Chinese transport with troops on board. To talk of an insult to the British flag is downright nonsense. The transport belonged to British owners, who had chartered her to the Chinese- GOY" "1 ènt for the con- veyance of troops to C, d: and this was a warlike opera,tio-n which the Japanese, in the existing state of affairs., had a perfect right to put a stop to. The neutral flag in such a case cannot be recognised by belli- gerents as affording any protection to the ship, otherwise we should be reduced to the absurd conclusion that an enemy can send reinforcements anywhere by making use of the neutral flag. It appears, again, that the captain of the Japanese man-of-war made several efforts to save the ship and all on board before firing at her, and that he would have been satisfied if the transport had, in obedience to his orders, followed the war- ship to a Japanese port. The Chinese troops, however, frustrated these" humane efforts, as they preferred dying to being taken prisoners. This first action seems to have had the effect of stimulating the Chinese Government to an unwonted display of energy, and it now looks as if the war will become a very serious business- The flight of Londoners fron town this week has been amusingly sudden aaxd com- plete. The fashionable street's arsd squares of the West End are quite desolate, the residents being all supposed to have gone to Goodwood, en route "for Cov>;es, and then to Homburg; but, as a matter of fact, a large proportion of them have betaken them- selves to Margate, Ramsgate, and other sea- side places beloved cf the common people. I mentioned last week that the season has been a much better one for tradespeople than had been anticipated. A West End tailor told me a day or two ago that he had done an exceptionally good trade with American customers, most of whom were kept at home last year by bad trade and the attractions of the Chicago Exhibition. This year they have flocked to London again, and have spent money very freely. It is a. curious thing that all the men of fashion in New York buy their clothes in London, in spite of the heavy duties placed on im- ports into the States. They can, perhaps, get as good materials at home, but they cannot get the English cut and style. The "Pall Mall Magazine" ha's two inte- resting papers this month on the ever-fresh subject of the Waterloo Campaign, one being Lord Wolseley's final article on the decline and fall of Napoleon, and the other a paper by Archibald Forbes on famous war horses, in which, apropos of the duke's charger, Copenhagen, "one of the most obscure and seemingly insolvable problems that military history presents," namely, whether Welling- ton saw Bluoher on the night before the Battle of Waterloo, is carefully discussed. Lord Wolseley deals with this problem also, being of opinion that Wellington "cannot have rt reived any letter giving him specific promise of Prussian support until about three o'clock on the morning of the 18th, is to say, at an hour when., if he meant to retreat, his arrangements for that operation ought to, have been begun." On the other hand, it is certain that at nine o'clock on the morning of the 17tlh Wellington saw an officer sent by Bluoher, and told him he would stand and fight south on the battle-ground he had already selected if Bluclier would support him by two, or even one, Prussian corps. He must, at that time, have leceived from the Prussian officer information as to the state of the Prussian army which satisfied him that this movement could be carried out; and the letter sent by Blucher late the same night merely specified the way in whidh the assistance he relied upon would be given. The duke seems to have feared, however, that he might be said to have acted rashly in waiting at Waterloo before getting a precise and definite statement that Bluoher would be able to come to his aid, for many years afterwards he told a. romantic story of a night ride he made on Copenhagen to see Bluclier. who was twelve miles away. Field Marshal Wolseley discreetly says that "the balance of evidence is rather in favour of the truth of this story" but the more outspoken Mr. Forbes declares that "the external evidence in favour of the authenticity of the duke's ride to Wavre is not strong." Napoleon gave the rein to his imagination very freely with regard to what happened in this campaign is it possible that our own Iron Duke followed his rival's example in telling, twenty years after the battle, this queer story of his midnight ride? One of the beet bits, of criticism in Lord Wolseley's paper is the remark, "At this time' —ten a.m. on the 18th—"neither' Napoleon nor Grouchy dreamed of Blucher's bold and public-spirited movement, with all its risks, direct across from Wavre to Waterloo. Their only dream of a junction by the Prus- sians with Wellington's army was in the direction of Brussels-" "No one," he adds, "can be better aware, no one can be prouder, than I anI of the magnificent co^'age and steadiness of the British soldier at Waterloo; but, when every allowance is made for it the honest historian must admit that- it was the splendid audacity of the P i i move upon St. Lambert and the I nght, due to the personal loyalty of 1 to Wellington and in opposition to the egic views of Gneisenau, that determined the fate of Napoleon's army"; determined its complete rout and utter ruin; but surely toe real crisis ot the battle iiag the attacic of the Imperial Guard on the English right. By that time Napoleon had repulsed the Prussian attack on his own right, and if he could have succeeded in the final charge on the British line the position of the allied a.rmy would haye beer one of extreme peril Now. the Imperial Guard, the very essence a.nd fine, flower of the military svstem of Napoleon, was not merely repulsed, but broken and crushed at Waterloo, by Saltoun's Guards and the 52nd Regiment under Colbome, with no help from any other troops; and from that moment Napoleon's position became hopeless, and the battle ended in the greatest military catas- trophe recorded in history. As I am leaving town for the holidays, this is the last budget of notes I shall "be able to send you for some weeks to come. d

DR. JOSEPH PARRY IN AMERICA.

REMARKABLE DEATH OF AN OFFICER.

Advertising

CAERWENT AND PRINCE GENERAL…

AN ANCIENT CUSTOM.

THE CRUISE OF THE TRAFALGAR.

A DETFItnINED SUICIDE, i

Advertising