Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

44 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

MONDAY.

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

MONDAY. Tha Land Trans.e,* Dill. In the Howie of Lords ou Muit^y, the Loan CtJ^NCtX-LOti moved that tne Laud Transfer 1$..1 be read a second timn. Lord ABUMJKI. of WABDOCU moved that the biii be read a second time that day six months. The nobie lor J said the bill was oUd that would iffect the estates and families of peer in that House. He had nothing to say against ita proposals with regard to the transfer of land, but be tip ooped the measure on the ground that it weus uuc of its way to aLolibO the law of primogeniture and entail. The Duke of MARLBOUOCGH hailed with pleasure the advent ul tui& i.'»ll, Lout thought that, instead of merely establishing a registry ..tfice in London, with power to establish othel offices as time went provided at the outset for a complete system of registration, with Ail the requisite inacnineiy. Lord HKiteCHKLL congraculated the Lord Chan- eewor on the manner in winch he had dealt with tb ;,uI.jecc, hut; at the same tune offered some criticisms Oil the measure. He thought it unfor- tunate that the bill was put as an amending biil to tile Act of 1375, muse necessarily lie read along with that Acr, W¡.erØioL¡5 he thougnt would have ueeu better to have put all the provisions into one measure, instead of necessitating the perusal of two. The liable and learned lord expressed his approval uf Ule proposal to aooliall tiittiavv oi primogeniture and entail, and puinted out to tho e who objected tu tliis provision that the biil did uot prevent a man devising his estates to his eldest son if he tnought it. right to do so. Lord BK^JIWIIXL regarded the bill as in sub- stance a rignt, measure winch very properly did away with many oi the existing anomalies of the lD-w. The Marquis of iS-iiiaitCItY admitted that advantage wouid be derived troui a large diffusion of lam>, but did uot see how the abolition of settlement would produce that lehult. Land was an uuremuaerative property,- and the more easy its transfer was made the greater would be its tendency to become massed in ricii ownerships. The ameudtneut beiug withdrawn, the uiQtiou for tile s-cond reading was agreed to, and the 1iou. adjourned at 20 minutes to eight o'clock. In the House of Com mo us, Mr Gladstone criticised the Budget. He said the Chancellor of the Exchequer had hunselt announced that he shwula only be in a position to lay before tne House a humdrum budget, it had been expected tiiat there would be a moderate surplus which would perhaps be available for some few useful reductions, but instead of that they had laid before them a budget which, whetuer tor good or evil, would unquestionably le remembered in future times. (Hear, hear.) It involved considerations, and proceeded upon priu. ciples, wuicÍJ for good or for eVIJ, entltied it to that dist action. Upon ertail1 of tiNS" prin- ciples he entertained a strong opiuiou. The Chancellor of the lijcchtquer, unt; conteut with the modest surp.us which his estimate of revenue and exp>;ii':icuie showed, rai*a«i it by one strolte from :£1,075,000 to £ 2:S00,0C0. He imped that the r.gnt non. gent.eman woa'd be able to lay before the !Iou,.e the case for making the change he was about to mtrcduee in regard to local loans, but he Was ai'raid that while the present block of bulli. ness lioutinued it wouid not bo possible to obtain a fuii a.nd free discussion of the subject. As to the tobacco ditty, if they repealed the fourpeuny addition to the duty tile conclusion was inevitable that it was a mistake on the part of tjir Statiosd Xorthcote to Iw,ke that addition. (Heat, near.) There was no doubt that the addition had led to considerable adulteration, aou he Wa-IS afraid it wouid be much easier to repeal the addition than to get rid of the water. (Hear, h^ar.) He deait next with the equivalent sum of £2&1,000 for England and Scotland,. and a Svm",W1J¡ü different allocation fur Ireland to be awarded in respect of the carnage tax in aid of local taxatiou, and he greatly regretted, that proposal on the pari of the Government. It they weie difccussingf the matter in a p-trty sense, it might be said to be ueariy a precis repetition of wi.at was done by a Government w th which be was connected but that Government never made any scruple of stating they were merely submitting to what they thought to be the imperieu. the manifest and the determined will of tne House of Commons. They made, under the circumstances, the best terms they could for the public, and they uever said that it wad a policy they approved. They merely chose the lighter, in preierence to the greater evil. He agreed with the noble lord, the member for Paduin^too, that the objections to the mode of proceeding were strong aad mauifcid. It was not that he thought the position of the ratepayers deserved no commiseration and no relief. The occupiers in tins couutry weie under covenants wbicii bout,¡J lucui. to meet the charge of the rates, whatever it might be but when that liability Wis laid upon mm the rates were for limited and comparatively narrow purposes whereas within the last 30 or 40 years, local and economi* cal wants had Come iu, making great additions to the burden of the occupier, though the whole of the benefits went ultimately to the owner in the form of increased rents. He greatly regretted that the Cbaucellor of the Exchequer, without any pressure from the House, and without any necessity, had resorted to this exceptionable system, and had thus weakened the ground for the efficient reform cf the ystem of local government, (blear, hear.) Coming to the income-t»x, he obllecve<1 tbat. tht: Cuauceiior ui tue Exchequer was going to make them not a Christinas-box, but an Jiaster offering—(laughter)—and he admitted that the income-tax at 8d in the pound Was a discreditably high rate at a time like this when we had upon us no special burdens, and we had happiiy escaped the foreign complication with wbictJ a few years ..go we were threatened. (Cheers.) One of the great principles of lIOund finance was to operate steadily foe the reo duction of the National Jjebt, aud that was 4 matter most exclusively within the charge of the Government. By ce:i..in!1: to redeem til", debt the Government could at any time repeal taxes, a.nd a proposal by the Government to repeal taxes was one that the House of Commons was almost bouud to accept. When Sir Stafford Northcote under- took with some boldness to induce Parliament to appropriate £28,000,000. year to the redemption of the debt, the great objection to the proposal was that his good intentions would be ji^lile to be interfered with by his successors in the office Finance Minister. When the late Government oanie4inco othce they did their best to maintain tbö arrangement, but the House wars nuw a\¡o;() by a. C •Jnservative Ministry to diminish the ØiDk. ing fund from £7,000,000 to £5,000,000 a year. (Hear, hear.) He sincerely hoped ttiey would be induced to change a proposal which wuulddiminisb the annual provision for the reduction ot the debt to » poillt lower than that at whiQh it had stood withm the recollection of almost asyose of those who heard him. They were going to say tbat this country, with an estimated income of something uke a thousand millions a year, could not bear the application to the payment 1).11 of the debt of a. sum uot nearly so large as wag applied to that same purpose in 1860 when the wealth of the country was not more than two-tbird. what it now was. (Cheers.) He could not believe that serious reflection wonld sanction a pro- posal eo loreigu to the courageous princi- ples of Englishmen in the past, to the far-seeing traditions of British statesmanship, or to the interests of the British nation. (Cheers) g li4DOI.PH ChuhcMll wanted to know what Mr Goscheu's views were on the subject of the efficiency of the pubic departments and the retrenchment or public expendi- ture. It should be borne in mind that economy consisted not only in the way money was expended, but in the way in whicu it was raised, and ho wauied to know whether the right hou. gentleman adhered to the declaration he ntMde at iidmbnrga iu, 1886, when he pledged bimeelf to be a zealous aud ferocious guardian of the public purse. I" Hear, hear," and a laugh.) The effect of tiie proposed remission of taxation fer which two millions was to be drawn from the sinking tund, must lM W lead the public to believe that there could not be any great extra vagauce in public, expenditure, or any K'rea> wallt of øttiaieuI.:1 in our public departments, and he defied tlieHonseoi Commons tv btl ecol1on,ica.1 utiles the, Govern- ment were economical. (Cheers.) He was told that no great retrenchment was possiblr, and that the great increase in the army and navy was what the couutry must bear, but between lióO nnd 1865 there was fI, reduction of five miiliuns in that expenditure, and he challenged the Chancellor oj the I. xchequer to say that a reduction was not now possioio. It was said to be a clever stroke of policy and the act of a master miud to resort to the, suspension of deot for the reduction of. taxa- tion, but it seemed to him that sncli an expedient might have been hit upon by a person of very 1illlid mind. (Laughter.) Mr GOSCHEN having replied, the House ad- journed.

TUESDAY.

WEDNESDAY. :

Advertising

MR GLADSTONE AND THE FORGED…

THE FATHER OF THE HOUSE.

MR GLADSTONE ON RATING.

MR BRIGHT ON FREE TRADE.

LETTER FROM SIR G. TREVELYAN.

MR GLADSTONE WITH THE LABOUR…

THE LOSS OF THE TASMANIA.

Advertising

A ROMANTIC CAREER.

JILTING A WIDOW.

SOON MARRIED.r

ROMANCE BELOW STAIRS,

THE TRAGEDY AT"CREWE.

Advertising

A PUBLICAN'S DIVORCE SUIT.

THE LIBEL ON LADY AYLMER.…

MISHAPS TO A BRIDAL PARTY.

-.-------IMMORAL WOMEN.

OUTRAGE AT EALING

Advertising

LYNCH LAW IN AMERICA.

PECULIAR LIBEL ACTION.

----_-TRIFLES FROM "TRUTH."…

MURDER BY A MOTHER.

[No title]

SINGULAR ASSAULT AT llANEL…

THE LOSS OF THE COUMOUNDOUROS.

CURIOUS-LOCAL LAW CASE,

GORED BY A COW AT BRYN-, MAWR,

Advertising

. THE WELSH IN LONDON.

A FALSE VOTING-PAPER.

MERTHYR GUARDIANS AND GEESE.

ROBBING AN EMPLOYER. ---

THE BOW SHOOTING CASE.

FOND OF HIS OSTLER'S WIFE.

Agricultural Notes. .

THE NEW HOSPITAL AT MERTHYR.

THE HEALTH OF CARDIFF.

[No title]