Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

24 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

Brutal Assault by a Farm labourer.

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

Brutal Assault by a Farm labourer. BITLN3 A MAN'S NOSE. At the Bangor Petty Sessions, on Tues- day, before Mr T. Lewis arid other magis- trates, a case was heard in which William Williams, Cremlyn, Aber, summoned Wm. Hughes, Tanyfynwent, Aber; and Rowland Williams, Henfaes Farm, Aber, for assault- ing him. Mr S. R. Dew appeared for com- plainant, and Mr W. Huw Rowland for de- fendants.—In opening the case, Mr Dew said tWit the assault, which was a most cowardly one, was committed in the main road ieacjing towards 'Llanfa-irfee hail, on Saturday, the 29th ult. If the case was proved he would ask the Bench to punish defendants with something more than an ordinary fine. Complainant, in his evidence, said that on the day in question he was at the Bulkeley Arms Hotel, Aber. Defendants were also there. Witness left the house at closing time, as lid both defendants and others. On the way witness stayed behind the rest of the m in, and when he proceeded up to the road he met Rowland Williams and others. Witness asked them how they were, ani in reply the defendant Rowland Williams questioned whether he wanted to fight". Witness told him that he did not know why they ShOLd "fight. Williams then struck the witness in the face, and both fell to the ground, the defendant being uppermost. The defendant got hold of his noise between his teeth, and then the defendant William Hughes came on the scene. Rowland Williams called out who was kicking, and Hughes replied that he was at it, but he had made a mistake that ,time. Subsequently jHuighjes kicked the witness several times on the head and chest. By this time a crowd had collected, and when witness was seen on the ground one of them named John Jones raised him on his feet. He was then bleeding profusely, and produced his collar and tie which were very much stained with blood. Defendants were sober at the time, and witness did not give them any provocation. Cross*-exair;ined ibv Mr Rowd, com- plainant said that he went to the hotel about eight o'clock. He was not drunk when he left. He admitted that he sang a little then, and had to be asked by the barman to stop, but denied having handled his fists. When he asked for a bottle to go homo he was refused. Dr Richard Jones, Bangor, said that on the following Tuesday he examined the complainant, and found a severe wound on the nose, a piece having been torn, and would result in permanent disfigurement. There was also a nasty cut on the right cheek. His right eye was much blackened, and his face altogether was one mass of scratches. The wound on the nose could have been caused by one of the defend- ants' biting it. John Jones, of Aber, said that on the night in question he was at the place where the assault was committed, and heard the complainant asking Rowland, who was on the top of him, not to bite. Hugh Griffith, 'Rallt, Aber, deposed to peeing the -defendant Hughes kicking when the complainant was on the ground. Hughes would not allow anybody to go to complainant's rescue. For the defence. Mr Rowland contended that the complainant alone was to be blamed for all that happened on that uight. I He went about challenging Rowland Wil- liams to fight. The complainant was un- doubtedly muddled with drink, whilst de- fendants were sober. A fight ensued, in which complainant came out the worse. Ali that the defendant Hughes did was to separate the other defendant from the com- plainant. William Hughes, said that when leaving the hotel Wm. Williams was not drunk, but rather disorderly, and he continually challenged Rowland Williams to fight. Witness never kicked the complainant, and the only thing he did was to separate the two men. Cross-examined, witness denied having fold Rowland Williams that he had kicked him in mistake. He had no idea how those injuries upon complainant's face had been caused. John Willik, ms gave evidence to the effect that he beard the complainant challenging Rowland Williams to fight, and witness next saw them struggling together. The defendant Hughes went to them, and sepa- rated them. Other witnesses were called to prove that the complainant was the aggressor. The Chairman remarked that the Bench considered that a brutal assault had been committed. The only way to put a stop to such assaults was by imprisoning the offenders, and Rowland Williams would be sent to prison fcr one month with hard labour. There being a doubt in the case df Hughes, thø Bench dismissed; the charge against him.

[No title]

BANGOR SUNDAY SERVICES.

Advertising

SUNDAY SERVICES.

PORTMADOC.

PWLLHELI

Penrhyadendraeth Board of…

[No title]

HOLYHEAD

A TlUED AND TRUE FRIEND.

School Boards and the Welsh…

Family Notices

[No title]

* NATURE'S SWEET RESTORER.

CRICC1ETH

Proposed County Orphanage.

NEVIN

IRONING

MADE:

EASY.

Advertising

BANGOR SUNDAY SERVICES.

Portmadoc Show.