Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

12 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

. FRANCE.

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

FRANCE. SPEECH OF LAMARTINE. In the National Assembly, on Tuesday week, M. Sarrans, Jan., pronounced a warm eulogium on the Republic, declar- ing that the day on which the counter-revolution blew on it, M. de Lamartine took it in his hand and flung it into space. M. de Lamartine then rose, and said, The interpellation of the honourable M. Sarrans has been too direct for me to refrain from speaking. Tnat gentleman has at the same time praised and blamed me for the part which I took in founding our glorious and, I hope, eternal Republic (" hear, hear," from the Left). I shall reply but briefly to the hon. gen- tleman. It cannot be believed that the man who contributed to found the Republic, can wish, I will not say to sacrifice it, but even to weaken it in the Assembly which has proclaimed it, and which has rendered such services to the country. No one so much as the members of the Provisional Government have relied on the National Assembly to strengthen the Republic and yet it is wished that the man who has used such exertions to hasten the moment when universal suffrage. should call together the representatives of the people should now abandon that Republic, and throw it at hazard to the shame of new ideas and the confusion cf the country. No; such can never be the case (interruption). I am one of those who do not fear, when France has to throw the die, whilst the fate of the throw is in the hand of God. Never has there anything, in my impartial and unbiassed opinion, proceeded from the will of the nation more energetic, more moderate, more patriotic, or more dis- interested, than the National -Assembly and yet it is I whom you would mix up with all those petitions, with that kind of occult insurrection it is I whom you would suspect of wishing to lay a snare for the National Assembly in order to make it stumble. Oh, you do not know me. How many times have I not said to my friends who thought of sending back to Providence that pre- cious gift which it had made to the Republic, to sound every day the mysteries of universal suffrage, that it would be an act of rash- ness and a tempting of human wisdom. I believe, however, that it might be useful to make a fresh appeal to the country. I do net say that is absolutely necessary, but if your vote decides the contrary, the Republic will not perish it will have violent phases to go through, but you will save it as you have done before. In constituting order we have proclaimed popular sovereignty. As statesmen, we ought to take account of petitions to consider them as symptoms of public fueling but. to accept them as injunctions -mn-er (murmurs). In a question of such a delicate nature, when the subject is in a measure to deliberate on the fate of my colleagues, I hope that the Assembly will listen to me with favour, and spare me those murmurs which only tend to disturb my ideas. In order that the Assembly may produce all the good which the country has a right to expect from it, three things are necessary. In the first place, it is necessary that the Assembly should be in accord with itself; in the next place, that the country should set the Assembly in accord with the legislative power and lastly, that the Assembly should be in accord with the real sovereignty of the country. In the first plr.ce I will ask whether there is such accord in the National Assembly itself as to enable it to present to a ministry its assured co-operation, and without which there can be no strong government? To this I will reply, not in the negative, for the result of yesterday has proved that in important circumstances that co-operation will be again found (hear, hear). That kind of good understanding between the National Assembly and a ministry ought to be as resplendent as the sun. Europe should see that the ministry and the National Assembly were in accord to accomplish the work of France. The intention of that harmony exists in the Constitution, and nevertheless you have seen symptoms of hostility between the legislative and the execu- tive powers, but I am convinced that when the partisans of those opposite doctrines shall have reflected oh might be too absolute in one or the other of those opinions, they will readily find a solution of the difficulty (murmurs on the Left). If I had been allowed to have completed my idea, I should not have been interrup ted by those murmurs, for no one can respect the sovereignty of the legis- lative powers more than myself. The legislative power is the 11ead which orders; the executive power is only the arm which obeys; such has always been my idea, and never have I had rea- son to doubt its correctness. It is necessary to act with prudence in order not to fatigue either one or the other of those great springs of sovereignty. It is in this prudence that will be found the solu- tion of the difficulty. If the legislative power could compel the executive, in He person of the President of the Republic, blindly to submit to all your wills, look at the situation iri which you would place him in the eyes of the country —you would convert him into a being who would have no other functions than to be continually disavowing himself (murmurs from the Left). If such were the spirit of the Constitution, it would be bad; but if it contained a contrary spirit you would force the National Assembly to give to itself that perpetual disavowal of which I have just spoken, and to give itself a certificate of its own weakness. But such is not the case—neither one or the other of these two ex- tremes can be accepted. This accord between the legislative p jwer and public opinion is a thing worthy all our attention. -Public opinion was consulted for the election of the President of the Republic, but had it the same ideas as we had ? When I say we. citizens, I say it considered individually—there is no question of our collective opinion, for we have none. Pubhc opinion has been much bolder and wiser than 'we—it has chosen the person whom we would have set aside. I do not blame it; I should ra- ther blame myself. The country i bas shown more inspiration, more genius, than statesmen themselves (loud interruption). Yes, the country and universal suttrage has shown more sagacity and a better inspiration than statesmen themselves. It has given a proof of sovereign wisdom. For my own part, I admit that it is a r-241 happiness for the country to tind this ray of glory which universal suffrage has pointed cut (renewed and loud interruption from the Left). If those murmurs meaii to imply that I am giving way to an idea of adulation, I reject, it. 1 repeat that, as a sin- cere Republican, I find a subject of congratulation in the result of an election to which a few months before I had expressed my repugnance. I have a lively and a logical faith in the situation of the executive power, of the republican power which the nation has wished, as it were, to incarnate amongst us. I have such a confidence in him that I do not hesitate to serve him, provided that he is and remains the founder of our democracy, of that idea of a free people against which defiance lias been so often hurled. I now arrive at the reflections, sometimes ironical, presented by one of our most gifted colleagues—only I will treat serious things seriously. T will only reply to one objection contained in the speech ot'theht'n.M.Pyat. I respect not only the talent but the sincerity of the opinions put forth by the hon. gentleman to whom I have alluded it is that he and those of his party do not set a proper vaiue on universal suffrage and I ask, if you do not con- fide in the conscience of the country, in what can you place your (Ilear, hear.) Where, I ask the hon. M. Pyat, will he place the principle of sovereignty, if he will not admit it in uni- versal suffrage ? A voice on the Left.—" No one ever said that." M. de Lamartine. —Will you place that principle in divine right, whih has been so long destroyed? Will you place it in that other intermediate right which was broken by the revolution of February ? A voice from the Extreme Left.—" No one has ever denied uni- versal suffrilge." M. de Lama:rtine-If you do not admit this right of universal conscience, you will admit no other, and you would henceforth have no other compass than anarchy (hear). I have another ob- servation to make. It has been said, "Weevery day read in certain journals that France is not republican enough." My reply is, if it be true that France in the majesty and dignity of her man- ners is not enough, or not at all, Republican, how will you com- pel her to be so? (toud and long-continued applause.) I have heard it said that'the country is not ripe for a Republic, that France is not provided with the manners of Republican men and institu- tions -that is to say, France is not Republican, but to render her so she niust h;t ve an arbitrary government; it is necessary to bend that you-'g opinion which has not yet the sentiment of the truth. She must be constrained by a moral pressure, by a dictatorship. To this I loudly reply, as I have frequently done before:—it is precisely from the day when those opinions manifested in your journals and in your clubs became known to the country- it is from the day when you appeared to think of those acts of moral violence, when you wished to intimidate liberty as you formerly ititini da-ed the monarchy—it is from that day that the people were alienated from the Republic. Shall I give you a proof of what I assert? Address yourselves to all the citizens of France- to those who appear the most averse to our Republic. Ask any < ne of them Are you the enemy of the Republic, such as we gave it to you, such as we proclaimed it under the peristyle of this building before proclaiming it in a decree of a Republic of right, of conservatism, of popular interest, 'seriously understood and justly satisfied, without any attack on property of a Repub- lic of peace bbroad, of a Republic regularly and firmly governed at home, and which closes the abyss of rev ',)Iutiotis ? Is it to such a Republic that you are opposed, and from which you alienate y¡,urst::1f?" The general reply will be, Such a Republic we ac- cept: such a Republic we wish for" (renewed cries of Hear, hemr"). Do you, on the contrary, know what kind of a Republic the country holds in such just horror? (hear, hear.) It is that Republic which some incendiary clubs have desired so improperly to substitute ior the dogmas and tendencies of the Republic which we nave lounuea. It is mat riepuouc wnicn, inventing me re- membrance, Sometimes glorious; but always sinister and sangui- nary, of '93, intimidates commerce, and spreads alarm in the country it is the Republic of nroral violence, the Republic of arbitrary governors, the Republic1 of the pro-consulates of opinion (hear, hear, on the Right, and deep murmurs on the Left). It is this Republic which we unfortunately see endeavour to establish itself in some departments at the moment when it was most ne- cessary to restore confidence in the country. It is the Republic of the promenades of 200,000 men, as on the 17th March (hear, hear, on the Right, and great agitation on the Extreme Left). The country will not have the Republic of May 15 or that of June 24 (hear, hear). But the Republic of order and Conservative tendencies which the National Assembly has desired to found— the country is anxious to have that and on every occasion that it has intervened in its own affairsot1 April 27, by the elections on May 15, in protecting the Assembly on June 23, in saving society it has always accepted and sanctioned the Republic (hear, hear). I call on the Assembly to bear in mind the state of things around us; and in the name of Commerce, now in a dying state, of the working classes who suffer, and, in fine, of the safety of the Republic, I ask it to come to a wise resolution. Trust me that my counsel is in conformity with good faith, with the dignity of the Assembly, and with the safety of the Republic that counsel is-" Let us fall (Sensation.) After M. de Lamartine's speech great confusion followed. The greater portion of the Moderate party stopped in their places. The President appeared for some moments to be uncertain what to do, but the noise and confusion continu- ing, he suddenly put on his hat, and, notwithstanding the remonstrances of the Right, declared the sitting- adjourned. On Wednesday the debate was resumed, and the dissolu- tion decided, modified by the adoption of M. Lanjuinais's proposition. The speech of M. de Lamartine has given satisfaction to the friends of order—for he made a vigorous sally against the Red Republic; and although his influence is very far from-being what it was six months ago, it is believed that he is still popular with a large portion of the working classes, and that his appeals to them in the cause of order and true liberty will not be made in vain. The amendment proposed by -Lti-ijuinais will take away from the dissolution everything like an appearance of coercion, for it fixes no (Ial,, it will be in the power of the Assembly still to protract its existence for two or three months. The public at large would have wished the disso- lution to take place at the end of March at the latest; but the feeling in favour of conciliation is so strong that the moderate party will be satisfied if the amendment should p pass. It is said the business in the Assembly will be so arranged that all the measures will be proceeded with simultaneously. It is calculated that the three organic laws and the Budget will occupy the Assembly eighty or ninety days, so that the new Legislative Assembly will not meet till towards the middle of May. It is proposed to set up M. de Lamartine as a candidate for the presidency of the Assembly at the next monthly election. The Moniteur announces that his Excellencv the Mar- quess of Normanby presented to the President of the Re- public, on Wednesday, the letters of her Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, which accredit him as Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipoten- tiary to the Republic. The Marquess of Normanby was hitherto only accredited to the Republic for a special and temporary mission. The Constitutionnel announces that the French Govern- ment has acceded to the proposal to join a congress of Ca- tholic Powers, to be held at Gaeta, to afford the Pope their aid to enable him to exercise his spiritual authority freely, and in a manner worthy of the Catholic population of the world. The Committee of the National Assembly on the Law for Suppressing the Clubs have resolved to recommend the re- jection of the Bill introduced by the Government. The motion of M. Lanjuinais relative to the dissolution passed the second reading, by a majority of 494 to 307. This leaves the Ministry a majority of 187 votes.

.¡AUSTRIA AND HUNGARY.

PRUSSIA.

HILL Ait 17.

THE BARXSLEY COLLIERY EXPLOSION.

[No title]

FRANKFORT.

ROME.

[No title]

;ILUUgilUU3 ;ju!yugmu.! ----

[No title]

EDUCATION IN AMERICA.