Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

5 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

.-'----c*. —

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

c*. — GLAMORGANSHIRE SPRING ASSIZES, HELD AT SWANSEA. (Continued from our Inst) On Friday morning, the 6;h February, Sir T, Coltinan attended Divine Service at Spirit .Mary'r Church Hie !lev. Tbos Bowen read the .service the Rev. W Hewsou, D.D., preached the assize sermon from liie I "1'2!1 Psalm, the 6th and following ver¡;f" Pray for the peace "I Jerusalem: the\ shall prosper tnat love thee. Peace be within tli% walls. and prospeiity witl:in thy palaces. For IU} brethren and companions' sakes, I will now say, peace he within thee. Because of the house of the Lord our God, I wiii s,-ek thy good." The rev. gentieni 111 ineu proceeded to shew that the love of our country comprehends, and c;i!i.« into exer- cise, the host a fleet ions of man in all his personal, social, and religions characteristics: and hence to inculcate the, duty of Christian patriotism, by power ful and lucid argum-nts addressed to those several considerations; and concluded a very effective dis- course by pointing at the w isdom and propriety of the established Custom of discharging the dut y ol religious adoration, previous to the solemn deci sions of jutlgment and just-ice. At the conclusion ot Dtviue Service his lordship, attended by the H ig-Ï1 Sheriff, javelin men, &c., pro- ceeded io1 the M;ul at ten iiiir-iii.es past twelve. The following magistrates answered to their names The Most -1 the Marquess of Bl'TK. The llfiv, W. He .son, D.D. Robert Oliver Jones, F.sq J. K. Bicheno, Ksq Jolin Nicholas Lucas, Ksq N:,thini,l Cani,i, I-sq J,i D. Win Chambers, ion, Ksq I Henry Lucas. Ksq n, F,,q Kichil. Frank I vn I sq J. ti. Spencer, Ksq Frederick Kredricks. Fsq Henry Thomas. Esq Richard D. Gondii, Ksq I'iios. 15. Tnomas Ksq Jolin Grove, Ksq Win. Williams, I'sq Howell (Iwyn, Ksq The i!ev. John Col',ins Wm. Ireland Jones, Ksq The Hev. Samuel Davies CORUN £ RS TLos Thomas, K-q, Coroner for the County, tiiebard Lewis !'eecc. Esq, ditto William Davi -s Ksq. ditto William \Ioran. I-sq. ditto for Ogmore Charles Collins, Ksq, ditto for Go.\er Ch-rle!; Coltins, MAYORS: M atthc.v N*rvg2rids;e, Esq. May-or of Swansra. The following gentlemen were sworn on the grand jury John Dill vyn Llewelyn. Rsq. Foreman. Wm. Williams, Ksq I Christopher James. Esq G. I.l.'wt llvn. Ksq Robert Lindsay, ''sq T. K Thomas, Ksq J. U. II. Spencer. K«q L. i.lewelvn Pill'.vvn, Ksq Pouglas (»ongh, Esq John Howlaiul. Ksq I I-,q F. Fieilricks, Ksq William Stroud, Ksq jnn C. H. Smith. Ksq Wm. Chambers, Ksq jun J Nicholas Lucas, F.sq John Grove, Ksq Ho vell G.vvn. Ksq R. A. Mansell, K-q John Matthew Voss. Ksq N;ith. ameron, K*q Chas K Smith. !'sq II. Franklyn, Ksq After the usn tl preliminaries had been gone through the learned jtidgv delivered the following charge to the grand jury — ilenticitit-n of the s;rand inquest,—I shall have very few remarks to trouble you with on this occasion. Although the calendar extendgj.0 a very considerable length. the majority of the cases are of a very unitn portant nature, as far as any case of felony can be considered ftnimportant. which requires no observa- tions to be made by me respecting them, in my charge to you There are one or tv o cases on the calendar respecting wiii' li it will be we!! that I should address a word or two to you; and the first case winch strikes my attention is that which stands 8, 9. and 10 on the calendar, where Thomas Williams, Robert Thomas, and William Davics are charged wlili having unlaw fully assaulted and beaten one William Gubbins. I perceive that it) this case it is intended to indict the prisoners for an assault only. This circumstance may stride you with surprise unless [ explain the whole to JOII, as the man W illiam Oubbiris is now dead, and is supposed to have died trom the efiects of the assault. II J unJrstatld from the depositions, that a very violent beating was given to William Gubbins, from the effects of which he died in the course of a few weeks. From this circumstance it may be thought that the parties ought to be tried on a more serious charge than that of an assault. The rea- tions why they are now to be tried for an assault only are tiie following: — The jury at the coro- ner's inquest returned a verdict of manslaughter against the prisoner Thomas Williams, for which a offence a bill of indictment was preferred against him at the last assizes- He was tried on that charge and acquitted I have no doubt b:it ii« was acquitted on the most satisfactory grounds, and that the jury were perfectly justified HI coaling to the conclusiu:; they d'i J. The fact that the man Gubbins bad iived a con- a time after receiving the beating, and also had been able to work, together with some other cir- cumstances of a aiiailar nature, probably led the jury to the conclusion that lie did not die from the efiects of the beating solely, but that his death was accele rated by some imprudent acta of his own. Conse- quently the charge of manslaughter having tailed to be sustained, they have no other charge to try him on but tliilt of an assault. The next case I u ould mention to yon is that which Øh.ULtll second on the calendar: — Harriet Lewis, who is charged under a late statute with unlawfully, niali c ciously, and feloniously attempting to suffocate her if infant child, by throwing it into a certain privv, witi, intent to murder the said chiid. This offence by the statute lately passed is not a capital offence; but oil,ill. if made out-if fnlly proved, it wiil subject her to a very penalty: if you see sllfficient reason f<;r supposing her guilty of the crime of which she stand* charged you will find a true bill. It may hestati(Iii you wi possibly be made out that the offence was only attempted to be committed. It may be possible that the you woman in endeavouring to deliver herself, left the child in the situatisin in which it was found afterwards; and if you are of opinion that you have reasonable grounds to warrant Oljr coming to such conclusion, you u ill do right to ignore the bill. The next case to which I wish to draw your atten- tion is that of David Lewis number '26 in the calen- tiar; -lie is charged wiih unlawfully and maliciously stabbing with a certain knile, one Lewis Ihomas, with intent to do him some grievous bodily harm. These cases of stahbin". I alll sorry to say, have b?en much too frequent of late times: what it is to be attributed ti), I do not know — I wiii not take upon myself to determine; but these charges of stabbing have become very frequent. ] do not speak altogether of (tie Prin- cipality of Wales: in different parts of the kingdom the use of the knife has become lamentably frequent. When it does occur, it is the dnty of the officers of the law to bring the offending party to justice, that an ad -quitte punishment may be awarded for such a heinous crime, di.sgracef'il "to the character, and repug- nant to the feelings of a Briton. "There is another case to winch I .shall brielfy advert. J wish that when the bid is brought before you, that you will proceed with it at your earliest convenience. It is a very proper case to send for investigation. [We lost two or three sentences here owing to a slight disturbance near us, we understood his lordship to allude to the case of Thomas Protheroe ] I shall desire the bill to be sent before you as soon as possible, and will be glad if taken into consideration by you at your earliest convenience after presentation. riter- igac:tse which stand* Lrst on the calendar, to which it will be necessary to advert for a few iii,jinent.,i -Peter WatScins is charged with burgla riousiy breaking and entering the dwelling house of one John Davies, with intent feloniously and against her will, to ravish and carnally know Alice Davies, y I I-, th* wife of John Davies. Burglary, generally in law, means to obtain possession of properly by break- ing into a house during the night time. In this case the party i, lJot charged with burglariously entering the house for the purpose of obtaining possession of property but for the purpose of using violence against the person ofa youfj, woman in the house. It is uot Ti-cf-tisary to prove that tiieit was the object of the prisoner in order to put him on his trial for felony. If si person breaks into a house for the purpose of com- ia,tting any felony whatever, he is liable to be indicted on a charge of felony, and it convicted, to be punished as the i*w directs. # The ease of Mary Jones is not in the calendar she got possession of a promissory note, or rather of a bill of exchange. The case is somewhat singular Accord- ing to the depositions (I assume thnn to be correct statements of facts), she appears to have signed a bill of exchange on her husband's behnU- VV hen payment is demanded of her, she gets possession of the bid, and endeavours to destroy it: afterwards it is stated that she endeavoured to substitute another for a d'«r It-rent sum of money. The original hiii is described as having been drawn for < £ .>0. Her conduct, if it '0 correc'.ly described, will amount in point of law to a serious offence, and for which she must be put on her trial. If convicted the punishment wiil be serious, as the offence is of a serious nature—taking property from a person and not returning it. You will please give the case the attention it certainly demands, as I beiieve you wiil fin i xome obscurity in the evidence- I do notthiuk it necessary to trouble yoa with any further remarks, it necessary, I snail be, very happy to render you all the assistance in my power; but from .the nature of the cases I do not apprehend that gentlemen ot your inteiJigcucfs uiJl require any assist- aoce." The grand jury then retired. The first case tried was that of Henry Keatoa, a"ed '2'2. mariner, charged with stealing one clot! jacket, of the value of five shillings, a pair of trousers ind various other articles of wearing apparel, of tin oropertv of David Beynon, of .Swansea, ma.stei mariner. Mr Grove the prosecution. David iJevnou, examined On Saturday, the 9th oi January, mv vessel was on the Mumble flats I left her for a short ti,iie, and on my return found they had trokenho open and stolen my things the cabin was broken open and my clothes stolen- William flees, police ex--ttiiiii,"d-On Tuesday, the 15th of January, I apprehended the prisoner, and found on his person the different articles if wearing apparel 1 now produce; when I appre- .ein! m! him, [tnltl him he had Captain Beynon's things «n; he made no reply. [Witness produced several tilings found in prisoner's b-rth, on board of a vessel called the Elizabeth•] Prisoner to d me these things were Captain Beynon's 1 have had them in since. lfr David Beynon was recalled, and identified the clothes to be his property. The prisoner in is defence said, he had bought the articles of a man named Isaac Brown that he had shipped as second mate ot the Elizabetll Raxtull, when he was apprehended. Verdict—Guilty. c;tl(-ti,lar inoi)tiis' uiii>r!Sonijieiit anil hard laoour IU tin? House ot Cor- rection lor the county. William Richmond, aged 17, and John O.ljer, ao-ed 1 <7, pleaded guilty to the charge of having stolen one loaf of bread, the property of William Williams, ot Swansea. Sentenced to one calendar month's imprisonment and hard labour iu the buuse of Correction for the county. llopkin Williams, aged "26, and John Craven, aged *20, charged with stealing a quantity of coal, of the value of two pence, the property of Robert Were Fox and others. Mr James conducted the prosecution; Mr W. H. Smith defended the prisoners. j John Kilner, constable, proved that on Tuesday, the 9th of February, as he lay concealed in a wood, he saw the prisoner, Hopkin. go into a barge, and throw some coal to Craven, who had a wheelbarrow. Mr Smith the jury on prisoner's behalf, contending that it was only done as a lark; and called s ever,,Al witnesses who gave the prisoner a good character. It was also shewn th-it both the prisoners earned-good wages—that they were sing-le men—and that coal might be bought in the neighbourhood for Is fid a waggon. The answer of one of the witnesses, David Williams, deserves to be recordedIn my pélrt of Ihe c..untry I!tl'aJjng coal does not injure a man's character." Several persons gave the prisoners good tharacters, and the jury, after retiring for a short while, acquitted the prisoners. Mary FJhhtfis, aged 38, widow, charged with stealing a piece of bacon, the property ot Robert Hart, of Merthyr. ,Ilr conducted the prosecution. The off-nce was most clearly proved. The jury, without hesitation, returned their verdict-Guilty. S"ntence-Two calendar monlhs' imprisonment in tbe House of Correction for the county. Lewis Daries, aged 12, and John Iftifhlas, aged 1 1, severally pleaded guilty to the charge of stealing two pieces of brass, the property of Mr Wm. Thompson and Mr Thomas Seatou Forman, ironmasters Sentence—To be whipped forthwith, and impri- soned in the House of Correction for the term of three calendar months, and at the expiration of that term, again to be severely whipped and discharged. Mary Price, pleaded guilty to the charge of steal- ing four handkerchiefs, the property of Eli James, of W'lIIseit. <lrap"r. John Miil-vard, constable, ot Merthyr, gave her all rxcelieut character. SenltmGè Three months' imprisonment and hard labour in the House of Correction for the county. 'Hi,hit* Prolh"roe, aged 6n, charged, upon the oaths of Jan« Phi lips, and others, with feloniously and wickedly committing and perpetrating a nameless offence. Mr Vaughan Williams conducted the prosecution; Mr Richards defended the prisoner. After a lengthened in-.esti.ati,)n, the prisoner was acquitted. The court rose at seven o'clock. SATURDAY MORNING. Edward Thomas, aged "25, charged with stealing two sovereigns, and ten pieces of silver coin, called half crowns,and other articles, the property of Sir Robert Price, Bart., and others. Tiie prisoner pleaded Not Guilty. Mr Nichol conducted the prosecution; Mr Hill very ably defended the prisoner. ,)I r John I I (,I I.i er, ex:iiui-.iet]-i aiii cashier to the Tondee Iron and Coal Company; they have an office in the parish of Newcastle, near their works; it is used for the purpose of keeping accounts and paying the men on Suturday. thi 9i.!i ot January last, we paid the men I paid the workmen; on that evening, previous to leaving the office, I put the books, money, 8cc in the iron safe 1 left £ 7 18s 5d, and a bad shilling in my drawer; my son and myself left the office that evening about five o'clock we locked the door; a woman, named Anne Jones, has a key for the purpose, of cleaning the ollicc; on Monday morn- ing following, I was called to the office by Anne Jones; the door had been broken open; the iron safe had been forced; the money was all gone; part e 1 11 of the books and papers were on the floor; the desks had been forced. Cross pxamilled- We pay monthly I do not know exactly how much gold there was in the drawer. Mr John Saunderson llollyer, exainiiieti-I assist IIIV father as cashier on Saturday, the 9th of January I assisted him; I left in my drawer £ 8 3s 3d; there were three or four pounds in gold the remainder was in crowns and half crowns, and copper; I did not see my filler lock the safe; the outer door I am sure was locked. (,I.(,.qs-exailiine(I --I cannot say euctly how much golll was in my drawer. Anne Jones, examined—I keep one of the keys of the Tondee Company's Office; I went to the office on the Monday after the office had been broken open the door was on the latch, and the lock broken I went into the room but did not touch any tiling the books were all about the room, and the locks of the safe and desks had been broken, there had been a fall of snow the previous night, and I observed some fresh foot mark.- about the door I went and called Mr Hollyer. John David exatii-ired-I am a carpenter; in the beginning of January, I was repairing the office of the Tondee Company; on Monday, the 11th ot January, as I was going to my work, Anne Jones told me that something had happened I went on and found that the office had been broken open; one )tl Lewis Powell and myself traced the footmarks that were visible at the door into a field, to a bush the snow enabled us to see the prints very plain; we traced the marks from thence to a liine kiln about four miles off; thence on the road to Taihach, and on in the direction of Neath, to a barn I measured the marks with my rule. [Witness closely described the marks.] I examinell the prisoner's shoes when be was before the magistrates, and am positive that his shoes were exactly similar to the marks on the snow. Lewis Powell, examined In December last, the prisoner was under me in the company's works on the 7th of January, lie asked permission to go to eath, as his wife was very poorly lie promised to be back on Saturday, the pay day, but (lid not come, I traced the marks in the snow alongthe road towards Neath, till within three quarters of a mile ot Neath r wellt to a public house in Neath, called the Butcher's Arms, and the prisoner came in soon after; there was a policeman in the next room, and I desired him to apprehend the prisoner; he did so; when I before the magistrates, I saw the prisoner's shoes taken off; I took them to Tondee, and compared them with the marks; they Goincided precisely. [Witness produced the shoes, which were exaioined by the judge and tlie jury.] William Bees, examinet1-1 am a constable at Neath; on the 11th of January last, met the last wit- ness at the Butcher's Arms; he desired me to take the prisoner into custody; I did so soon after; I searched his pockets and found a few halfpence there; -e- I in his bosom I found three silk handkerchiefs, which lie said he had purchased of Mr Lewis, the draper; iu reply to me, he said qne of his partners was gone to watch one of tlte coaches going to Swansea and the other w as gone to Swansea, since 1*2 o'clock this was about five o'clock in the afternoon I left him in charge of anuther constable, and went in search of another man; Samuel Stephens, the other constable, on my return called my attention to something under prisoner's chair; I looked, and found some money there, wrapped in brown paper. [This witness was Cross- exatiii tied by Mr lliil, but nothing material was elicited.] John David and Lewis Powell were re called, and requested to look at the shoes; th y both declared they were precisely similar to the impressions in the snow. Samuel Stephens, examined—I saw the last wit- ness (William Bees) search the prisoner; 1 observed the prisoner put his hand into his trousers soon after William Ilees, had gone out having the prisoner with lIIe; he put 1118 hand Into the waisthand of his trousers; 1 do not knovr whether it was in the waist- band or in his pocket; he was leaning forward with his hand to the ground, when I heard a "tink" of silver as I thought; I looked on the ground and saw some silver there, and piece of paper; when Bees came back I told him of it, and he lifted the silverand the paper; he reckoned the silver; there were two five shilling pieces, and two half crowns; there were !Q tWj) sovereigns, and two half sovereigns. Cross-examined — f saw the silver drop out of ii!y aand; 1 thought it was silver by the tink" of it; my ear is rather fine sometimes; it was about fivi o'clock; I cannot say whether Griffiths (au accoin pi ice) was taken up or not. Margaret. Hughes, examined—My husband keeps the Ship a Ground, at Neath the prisoner and three others came to our house in the forenoon of the daN they were taken up; they had some beer; one o: them paid for it he soon after went out; I know William Griffiths; lie goes by the name of Will Ing Molly Hussy; he was there, an;! produced a shilling, "m 1 and asked me it it was a good imp; I told him it was a bad one; lie said, "This shall not vex us any more," and flung it into the lire; I heard ilussy sti he would yo to Swansea hy the coach, and directed the nthers to come by the boat; they replied that the canal was frozen; he then toid them "they would c, not be long s eppuig that much.'1 This concluded the ease tor the prosecution. Mr iliil addressed the jury. May it please, your lordship, gentlemen of the jury, -1 appear in this case as advocate for the prisoner who is charged with having committed a very serious offence. 1 must say that on the evidence as adduced by my learned friend the counsel for the prosecution, that it seems to me quite clear that the whule amoud:i ce 11' to llfltlling lIIore than a case of suspicion and there is rio law enacts that a jury shall convict a man on suspicion. That this counting house was broken open. I amllot here for one moment to deny. I do not dispute it. I have no doubt but that it was broken open, and the money taken away from the drawers. But, gentlemen, the question is—Was the prisoner at the bar concerned in that lobbery ? Now with regard to the evidence in this case, and you have heard a great deal ot it, a great number have of ttie inost heen examined; it seems to me to b of the most unsatisfactory description. The marks around the counting house have been spoken of: — How many marks were there, gentlemen? Only the marks of two persons which were traced on towards Neath, (For the remainder of the report see our third page.)

--------_---i3rcC01tøtirc.…

--------LITERA TURE. .-

I--.. IIMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.…

Advertising