AN OLD RELIGION. [THE ANCIENT BARDS OF BRITAIN. By D. Delta Evans. Price 5s. Welsh Educational Publishing Co., Merthyr Tydfil.] To give an approximately accurate statement of an apparently extinct religion is well nigh impossible-and it should be attempted only by one who possesses the two rare qualifiations of scholarship and sympathy, or more correctly perhaps, scholarship and enthusiasm. For that very reason there are but very few persons who have attempted to give an account of Druidism, the old religion of the Iberian and Kelt; and, consequently, it is not to be wondered at that we heartily welcome any' contribution to the study of that subject. We had been looking forward for-some time to the appearance of Mr. Delta Evans's book on The Ancient Bards of Britain," and the advertisements had taught us to expect something new and startling in its pages. How far, then, have our hopes and expectations been realised now that the book is the property of the public ? In answer, we must frankly confess that we have been greatly disappointed by this work. Not that the book is by any means worthless. On the contrary, it contains some very bold and occasionally brilliant suggestions, as well as a fair mass of fresh information and the transla- tions and extracts, so adroitly put together, must always prove interesting and occasionally valuable, especially for those who have neither the knowledge nor the inclination to consult originals. On the other hand, the book sadly lacks both scholarship and literary taste. In a short note of this nature we can only point out just one or two of the most glaring deficiencies of the book. To our mind, the author dismisses altogether too peremptorily the theory that the Druids were polytheists. We do not blame him in the least for believing the contrary, but we do unhesitatingly say that the polytheistic theory, so generally accepted by scholars of renown, demands a far more exhaustive treatment than this author deems it worthy of. He has not even condescended to give us his explanation of Lludd Llaw Arian, Myrddin, Math Hen, Ceridwen, Dwynwen, personalities one and all of them, judging from Bardic Mythology and 0 oy Celtic Folklore, bearing the unmistakable characteristics of Gods. The manner in which he explains away the existence of Solar worship among the Druids (or Bards ?) is exceedingly ingenious. We could have believed it bad Druidism been a religion formulated some time in the eighteenth or nineteenth century. His argument, to our mind, is simply an instance of argument in a circle." We are none the wiser after three or four pages of philosophical rhetoric than we were at the start. We expect facts, and a mild sermon on symbolism is given us, and the author must not be surprised if such treatment is resented by all thoughtful readers. Before speaking so dogmatically on this and other subjects, the writer should have taken the trouble to become acquainted with at least the text baoks of the subject-such books as Frazer's Golden Bough Rhys' Hibbert Lectures and some of Professor's Anwyl's, Mr. Nutt's, and Mr. Squire's writings. There is not as much as one line in the whole book indicating any acquaintance with recent research. Less D'lsraeli and more Rhys would have consider- ably improved the book. The writer does not even suggest the existence of the Iberian and Celtic elements of Druidism. In a word, every page lacks historical perspec- tive and method. We never know to what historical period the writer is referring and what is true of Druidism (like all other religions) at one period is decidedly untrue of it at another period. It is quite in vain that we have turned to this book for any deductions as to Bardic philosophy and religion drawn from the Mabinogion, and the old Folk-tales of Wales and Cornwall. The author does not even mention the connection between the Bards and the Mabinogion, nor is there any really serious treatment in the volume of that most interesting of all questions, viz., the influence of Druidism on British Christianity. Surely in a book on The Ancient Bards of Britain — being a critical inquiry into traditions concerning their history, philosophy, religion, ethics, and rites, in the light of science and modern thought," there should be a fair summary of the views of scholars on such subjects as The Holy Grail," and its relations to Druidic lore but there is not a word to be found in the whole book on that important question, and still the author maintains that this work is the result of twenty years patient research and investigation. What a pity that an author with such enthusiasm and perseverance had not the proper guidance when setting out to his congenial task. The book also contains many instances of the lack of literary taste. Whatever may be the exact meaning of such paragraphs as the following The bilingual reader will doubtless notice the absence from these pages of many 0 y current alleoed 11 Bardic maxims and 0 prophecies" which find great favour in much of the oratory of the popular Welsh pdlpits in these days. The inference is obvious. (Preface pp. xi). "And the dead lions of British Bardism have come in for their share of the recurrent kicks of so-called religious orthodoxy ever since the latter gained its proud ascendancy. Pp. 18." they indicate a sad lack of literary taste. Philosophical or heterodox bigotry is even more offensive than that of the so-called religious orthodoxy," because it savours more of snobbery. Every chapter contains instances of this kind of cheap rant, and they materially affect an interesting work, and must inevitably prujudice a great number of readers against an interesting 0 0 and well-written book. The volume is published at the Welsh Educa- tional Publishing Co., Merthyr, and is a very creditable press production.
Gohebiaethau. EIFION WYN A'I WAITH. To the Editor of the LONDON WELSHMAN AND KELT." SIR,-Owing to the holidays, I was unable last week to reply to Mr. W. Arthur Roberts's letter in your issue of December 22nd; but on no account do I wish that letter to pass unnoticed. At last, your correspondent has discovered, evidently by a very great effort of intelligence, that his definition of poetry is different from mine, and now that it has become urgently necessary for him to state his definition, and to illustrate his critical standpoint, he prefers to quit the field. The English language contains a word which accurately describes such gnllant" action, but I shall not go the length of using that expressive adjective in this-my last letter. I feel very sad indeed that owing to Mr. Roberts's decision, this correspondence must be prematurely closed-bcause, in the first place, Mr. Roberts was gradually being convinced of his errors. Your readers can easily see this for themselves by comparing the letter in which he gave expression to that brilliant sentiment, We wonder whether there be a Mrs. Davies," and his last letter. At last, in order to be found in the company of the Great, he admits there is a grain of truth in the words 11 ifac serch yn benyd oes," but he sadly adds, it is not the whole truth. If Mr. Roberts had read the whoIe: poem instead of confining himself to one line, he would have found his heart's desire expressed in it- or at least, suggested in it. Mr. Roberts is the first critic I have known, who believes that Eifion Wyn's or anybody's fate as a poet depends upon one line from a volume of lyrics, and upon one englyn written for an Eisteddfod Genedlaethol. Evidently such a critic is not very well qualified for his seh-imposed task. He has also succeeded at last in bringing the eternal "englyn" into this controversy. Let it be known that I have neither championed nor criticised the englyn for the simple reason that my knowledge of the eynghanedcUon is, to say the least, superficial. He asks me to analyse it-might I refer him to the prolonged correspondence in the Genedl, and ask him why has he not taken Mr. W. J. Gruffydd s advice to heart. Let me inform him, however, that it can be analysed. Verbs are occasionally understood, even in the works of the English poets. I still maintain that my advice gratuitously given to Mr. Roberts—to leave alone the" Lords of the language," especially • after his poor exhibitions in Y Gencdl, and in your columns, is the very best for him-at least for some time. I am very glad to find, however, that he has made one discovery-a discovery that is an evidence of a little intelligence. He has found out that it is TOO DIFFICULT a pastime for him to follow me in this. correspondence. I suspected as much at the very start; indeed, I gave him the hint in my first letter. Two of your readers, as shown by their letters in your columns, find it easy to go even further. How- ever, this discovery may save Mr. Roberts from such shame-if he act upon it. Coming, as it does, at the end of the letter, it is such a relief after the dull wriggling and shuffling of the greater part of it. He declines to waste your space and his own time any further in discussing the subject with me. Well, so be it, then. Still, I am sure your readers, will sympathize with the time and space wasted by his opponents, for not a single one of their statements and questions has he definitely and straightforwardly answered-nor has he yet realised that this Mr. Davies, of Hammersmith, is not Eifion Wyn's only admirer Allow me, however, to thank Mr. Roberts for his kind wishes, and to wish him a very Happy New Year, and to express the hope that in its course he will never commit anything so rash as to enter the lists against a nation's judgment.—Yours sincerely, T. H. DAVIES. Hammersmith, 31st December, 1903. WELSH CLASSES IN LONDON. To the Editor" CYMRO LLUNDAIN A'R CELT." DEAR SIR,-The London County Council has decided to accede to a request that they should provide facilities for the study of the Welsh language in their Evening Schools in London. I need hardly point out the importance of this step, as greatly improving the status of the Cymry in the capital, and enabling those who wish, to gain an accurate knowledge of the tongue of their fathers. There.is- no room to doubt that these classes are urgently needed, and will be greatly appreciated. May I there- fore ask you to give publicity to this matter through the medium of your valuable columns, directing at the same time your readers' attention to the advertise- ment now appearing. All that is now essential to ensure the success of the class is to obtain a good number of students.. I should like to state that this important concession on the part of the L.C.C. is greatly due to the prompt and patriotic efforts of Mr. Howell J. Williams,. L.C.C. I am, dear Sir, yours truly, FF. ITHEL MORGAN. Whitehall House, Charing Cross, S.W.
PEOPLE are not now as anxious to see "art old-fashioned winter as they were a fort- night ago. It is possible to get too much of In a good thing. SIR MARCHANT WILLIAMS' address at the Llanelly County School prize distribution was particularly inspiring. i
Y DYFODOL. 1907. Ion. 3.— Barrett's Grove. Cyngherdd y plant a Darlith. Jan. 19.— Castle Street Mutual Improvement Society Second Concert. Ion. 31.— Barrett's Grove. Cyfarfod Te a Chyngherdd Blynyddol. ChweL 9. Tabernacl, King's Cross. Eisteddfod Flyn- yddol. Mawrth 2.— Cyngherdd Cenedlaethol yn Castle Street, Mawrth 7.— Eisteddfod City Road yn Shoreditch Tows Hall.
PUBLISHERS' NOTE. The Publishers of "The London Welsh- man and Kelt" will be pleased to hear from any Reader or Newsagent who ex- periences a difficulty in obtaining this paper. To avoid any delay a standing order should be given to a Newsagent, or at the Railway Bookstall, so that they can make the necessary arrangements to obtain a supply punctually each week.