Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

18 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

NEW SERIES.

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

NEW SERIES. Edited by the REV. FRANCIS SANDERS, M.A., F.S.A., and :.Tr. WILLIAM FKRGUBSON i[tviNE.] Being Local Gleanings, Historical and Antiquarian relating to Cheshire, Chester and North Wales, from many scattered fields. 0 let me teach you how to knit again, This scattered corn into one mutual Sheaf. Titus Andr»uv;u,8. Aoi V., Scene 3, Line 70. NOTES. [244] NORMAN SURNAMES IN CHESHIRE. (Continued from No. 240.) Tottenham, another early name in Cheshire seems to have come out of Middlesex. The Wilbrahams appear to have come trom Wilbra- ham, in Cambridgeshire, to marry one of the Cheshire Vernons, temp. Henry nI. The only lines now in Hxistence of this family, issued from a younger branch, settled in the 16th century in Nantwich and of these the Delamere Wilbrahams are the stock, and by the extinction of the elder House (of Woodhey) became heirs male of the family-the Lanca- shire Wilbrahams being of the junior branch of Rode. The Stanleys were of Staffordshire; but there was also a distinct family of the same name, which was of no apparent relation- ship to the others, who were of Stoneley, in East Cheshire. Possibly, however, they were of the same male blood. MISCELLANEOUS male branches of afew of the Cheshire houses, of more ramifications than ordinary, by the early gavelling of the inheritance of the elder lines. The earliest Mesnilwaryns (Mainwarings), Venables and Vernons threw out branches of their respective names too numerous to mention. The Leycesters may be noted as a male branch of the Mainwarings, and probably derived their name from Leicester, or the county of the same (adjoining Lincoln- shire), from some estate or great office they had there. The Warburtons came out of the eminent house of Dutton, out of which also came many other early branches. The Cholmondeleys sprang from a younger son of the Malpasses, co.-barons of Malpas, by marriage, whose elder surviving line and heirs male are the Egertons, of Egerton and Oulton. The Malpasses also threw off many other male minor branches of the various names of the manors and townships surrounding, and also a family named Le Little," and one Richardson. To come a little nearer to Chester, the Actons, Eltons, Lees or Leas, Chorletons, Haps- .fords, and probably Woodhouses, and Torfotes (de la Tor-foot), and some shorter lines, were all male branches of the Hellesbies of the 13th and 14th centuries, from subinfeudations of the fief of the elder house. One branch of Acton of Acton, in Delamere, became extinct in Cheshire in 1700. This was Acton of Alderley. The grandfather of Acton, the vendor to the Stanleys, was father-in-law of a Main- waring of Bromborough, and nephew of Bradshawe of Marple, the Regicide' Judge of Car. I. These Actons were one of the most interesting of the minor lines of this county. There still stands in Over Alderley, near the remains of their hall, aged relic of the reign of Edward III. or Richard II. in the shape of a large dark, gloomy Old barn and shippon, of very dark oak, in excellent preservation, though it can scarcely be less than five centuries since it was erected, and is probably one of the oldest in England. It was most likely built soon after the heiress of the Alderleys carried a fourth of that large manor and other outlying estates to Adam de Acton, a younger son of one of the two lines of Acton of Acton, in Delamere Forest. But the largest barn, of solid, light-coloured oak, and one of the oldest and finest in Cheshire, is the great old barn near Arley Hall, built by the Warburtons of Warburton and Arley some 400 years since, about Richard III.'s time, on the ending of the Wars of the Roses, when few erections in places near the highways of the world would escape damage from the partizans of the Red Rose or the White. All the Tattons. who bore, and bear perhaps, the most beautiful armorials in all Cheshire, most probably in the male line came out of the baronial House of Mascie, of Dunham Mascie, as did all the very numerous younger houses of Mascie, Massey. or Massie, in this shire, many of whose junior br?m<'hes, in their turn, founded houses elsewhere—including a flourishing one in }re!and, whither went, in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, also cadets of the Rowleys and Hutters, and Hattoiia and War- burtons, aud many others of Cheshire, just as, -at a much earlier date, they settled in North Wales, and in all ages spread out into every English county. -So probably among others, sprang the Knot- testordes or Kmit.-for<s, of Knutsford, from either the Mascies or the Tattons. There is remaining in the choir of the fine old Collegiate Church of Great Malvern, co. Worcester, a •remarkably handsome and great massive old alter-i'-mb of the reign of Elizabeth, Undoubtedly to one of these Knutsfords, for "there no other place of the name in existence. The-elhgies are those of the handsomest pair, perhaps in all England, in their day-thki husband particularly so, with his magnificent physique in p' tte armour. The inscription points to the original having been a squire •Knut fee lord, lord f some inanorial place-iii the neighbourhood, and perhaps the last descendant of a. marriage of younger Knutsford with some local heiress. [>ut, I confess the discovery as much surprised me (some 12 years ago), as did, some years since, a memorial of Car. lid's time, in the old Church of St. Clement's, at Hastings-which records the decease of Thomas Delves, Esq., one of the Barons of the Cinque Ports—a post which was then something ap- proaching in importance that of a Baron of the Chester Exchequer; the latter often farmed out either to the needy, or grasping men 0f all ancient days. (To be continued). [245] A BREACH OF PROMISE CASE IN 1637. (Continued from No. 241.) ANNE STANLEY testified that aboute three yeares and a halfe since being then free from any marriage or contracte with anyone, and likewise the said Richard Hockenhull as she verlie believeth being then also free from any marriage contracte, and they being soe free, the said Rickard Hockenhull did dyvers tymes repaire to Hooton where she the said Ann Stanley lived and professed much love unto her in;way of marriage, and after divers treaties of love and marriage to be had and solemnized betwixt them from that tyme or thereabouts until they were contracted which was about-e a fortnight before Whitsuntide was a twelve- moneth happening in the yeare of our Lord God 1636 last past, and saith that aboute the same tyme the said Richard Hockenhull and the said Ann Stanley beeing then free from all former contracts as aforesaid did contracte mar- riage together betwixt themselves by wordes following or the like in effecte "\>Ïz. the said Mr. Hockenhull about a fortnighte before Whitsuntide in .anno 1636 aforesaid speaking to the said Ann Stanley being then presente said as followeth vizt. I Richard take thee Ann for my wedded wife for better worse, in sickness and in health this day forwards,' and then said -till this day fortnight,' whereupon one William Coventrie then present asked the said Richard Hockenhull if bee was serious in what he was aboute, or what hee was doing or to that effect, ad then the said William Coventrie gave a ringeto the said Richard Hockenhull, saying I.give this ringe to thee, Dicke, meaning the Said Richard Hockenhull, upon condition that you give itt my sister Ann Stanley, to take her your wife,' and the said Richard said I doe,' and the said Richard Hockenhull upon those ^ertns accepted and tooke the said ringe, and yhen the said Ann Stanley for her parte, speak- *Dg to the said Richard Hockenhull said I Ann Stanley take thee, Richard Hockenhull or to my wedded husband for better for ^orse, in Bickness and in health from this day forward, and then the said Ann Stanley said to the said Richard Hockenhull, do you ane seriouslie and trulie as I doe, and if you. oa, put the ringe upon my finger,' and there- upon the saide Richard Hockenhull replyed and said,c I doe,' and putt the said ringe upon said Ann Stanley's finger, and further saith that the promises were so done in a Qouse in Spittle in the day tyme and after- noone of the same day being then presente ^ith the said Richard Hockenhull and the aid Axin Stanley, the said William jP'^P^ie, and Ann Hastie yet saith that ortlie before the said contracte soe had made, one Edward Hastie and itn Winstanley were in companie *th the said Mr. Hockenhull, Mrs. Ann wtanley, Mr. Coventrie and Ann Hastie and th«8 re1uired to goe out of the roome where C Pe*s°ns aforesaid were by the said William ahonS f°r a space, and then they OF might come in againe, whoe went out, of the said roome, yett staydd neare the said roome, ut credit, for the said Edward Hastie and Ellen Winstanley immediately after the said contracte was had and done as aforesaid returned againe into the same roome at which tyme the said Mr. Coventrie took a poynte from the said Mr. Hockenhull his Clothes and gave it to the said Edward Hastie, and bade him weare itt in honour of the said Richard Hocken- hull and the said Ann Stanley's marriage or wedding, whoe reteined the same and then the said Ellen Winstanley desired a poynte of the said Richard Hockenhull to weare in honour of the said weddinge or marriage and the said Richard Hockenhull pulde one from his breeches and gave it her which shee received, and both the said parties did weare the said poynte accordingly, and alsoe saith that in Lent last the said Mr. Hockenhull did in the presence of the said Ann Stanley, Marie Stanley, Dorothie Stanley now wife to Mr. Roger Hurlston, and the said Ann Hastie say unto the said Ann Stanley, 'I acknowledge you for my wife,' and thereupon kissed the said Ann Stanley, who accepted the same, and kissed each other as man and wife, and toe were and are accompted, reputed, and taken ut credit and the said Ann Stanley saith that the said Richard Hockenhull after the said contracte or matrimonie soe had and made as aforesaid betwixt the said Mr. Hockenhull and the said Ann Stanley with an intent to consummate and corroborate the said marriage hath had the carnell use of the body of the said Ann Stanley, but not before, and before the said Ann Stanley consented to the same, the said Ann asked him whether hee did acknowledge the said con- tracte, and the said Ann to be his wife, and thereupon the said Richard Hocken- hull said 'I doe, for I would not offre that wronge unto you for all Cheshire or Worrall.' And the said Ann Stanley saith and affirmeth that aboute three weeks after Midsomer in the year of our Lord God 1634 last past the said Richard Hockenhull having before beene a suiter unto the said Ann Stanley promised and swore unto the said Ann Stanley hee would marrie her and noe other woman and wished that hee might never prosper in any thinge that hee tooke in hand (say father or frends what they would) if hee did not marrie the said Ann Stanley or to that effect. (To be Continued). [246] MARRIAGE REGISTERS OF ST. OSWALD'S, CHESTER. 1603. Robert Braynes [Pl & Alles Fysher. May 22 William Johnson & Elizabeth Sands, May 30 William Carley A Anne Davie, June 6 Roger Davies & Elizabeth Man, Tune 7 Hugh Stafford & Sicely Frebody, July 5 John Forshew & Jane Luffkyn, Sept. 11 William Richardson & Ktheryne Hyggynson, Sept. 13 Richard Gregory & Lowry Brenton, Oct. 16 Thomas Allerton & Alles Lurkinge, Oct. 16 John Lufkyn & Jane Morris, Nov. 28 Thomas Dean & Anne Gryce, Dec. 23 Nicholas Sheale & Alles Banyon, Jan. 22 William Swyft [?] & Elizabeth Martyndale, Feb. 1 John Taylior & Elizabeth Wilkynson, Feb. 2 Raffe Crumpe & Catheryne Kyrkes, Feb.

Nocal 6ovttiimeut ottings.

Advertising

DISTRICT AND PARISH COUNCILS.

NESTON.

[No title]

THE JULY MAGAZINES.

Advertising

FRODSRAM.""

WHITBY..

WREXHAM.

SAUGHALL.

BURTON.

HELSBY.

ECCLESTON.

IBEESTON.

Advertising

THE JULY MAGAZINES.