Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

22 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. In the House of Lords, Apr:1 19, the Royal assent was given by commission to various bills. Lord Redesdale, in askin the Government whether there wa any intention on their part to propose any altera- tion of the Coronation Oath. or any legislation ill relation thereto, said he had been prompted to do this in conse- quence of the measure for the disestablishment of the Irish Church, which he believed to he associated with the Coro. nation Oith. It was, he contended, incumbent npon the Gove nmcnt to show that the conditions of that measure were not affected by the terms of the oath. The noble lord trand the history of the oath from its origin, and declared that the bill before the House of Commons would place her Majesty in a position it was most undesirable she õhould be placed in regard to the observance of her Coronation Oath. Earl Granville having twitted Lord Redesdale with en- deavouring to raise for the third time a discussion wn the sub- ject of the Irish Chlirch, said it was the opinion of the Government that her Majesty took the oath in an executive and not in a legilillative capacity. It was not to be contended that ecclesistical laws should be- come stereotyped, so that they IIhould be irrevocable, by Parliament in all futurity. With regard to the con- stitutional question, it was a most monstrous doctrine to maintain that under any circumstances, when the Sovereign has tccntered into a Divine cnmpact at the will of her people, if those subjects should wish to depart from the cOlOpact by proper declarations, and by the votes of both Houses of Par- liament. that her Majesty should be placed in a position not to yield to théir wishes without a violation of her oatk. After a brief explanation by Lord Redesdale as to the latter part of this question, the mbject dropped. The Duke of Argyll, in prelilenting a bill with respect to h (government of East India, argued, in reply to some ob- servations made on a former occasion by Lortl Ralishury on ¡ J evils of a Veto which the latter had stated that a hwjoiity of the Council of Inctia possesed on the Secretary Qf Stiite's financial measures that the supposed Veto did not in fact, exist Since the EStahlishment of the Board of Control the East India Company han enjoyed no such Veto aud the Act of 1858, which transferred the remaining powers of the Company to the Crown, could not have ben intellded to limit the powers already belonging to the Crown. Lord Salisbury exprs8ed his sathfactlOn with the Duke's explanation as to the Vito supposed to be enjoyed by the members of the council. Lord Halifax remarked on the peculiar necessity of 1\ council to a Secretary for India comiug, as he generally must, fresh from a Parliamentary hfe to 80 novel a sphere. Lud Lyveden thought the bill far too circumscribed in it Icope. He suggested various modifications which he wouln have been glad to see introduced on the subject of the con- stitution of the Council. He considered it was at present too numerous. The Duke of Argyll, so far as the Government possessed through the telegraph any information, could reassure Lord Lyveden. Lord MaY8 had entirdy adhered to the principle (tf nOIJ-intenen tion. Lord Lawrence, who rose amid cheers from both sirles of the H on-e, signified his IIpproval of the Bill So far from rliminishing the number of the council, it might, he thought be wisely even increased. He recommended the Increasa of facilities hy the grant of penlilions for the retirement of worn- out members of the Council. The Governor-General of India Bill, and the Naval Stores Bill were read a third time, a*id the Colonial Prisoners' Re moval Bill and the Merchant Shipping (Colonial) Bill passed through Committee, and their 1, .rdôhipli adjourned. In the House of Commons, Mr. Sheridan endeavoured to impose nn the Metropolitan Railway Company the obligation to provide smokirJg carriages, which he carried by a majority uf eh:ht last week in the case of the District Metropolitan Railway. On this occasion, however, he was beaten by a majority of 21-188 to 167. The House then went at once into Committee on the Irish Church Bill. Clauses fram II to II inclusive, which relate to the constitu- tion and power of te. Commission, were postponed. On ClaWl8 10, whICh proHIbIts future appointments to any eccle- siastIcal benefice or office, Dr. Ball took exception toits phra- seology as being so wide that no Archhishop or Bishop could hereafter he nominated in ti e disestahlished Church. Sir R. Palmer agreed in this view of the probable operation of the clause, and suggested words which fr. Gladstone, though averse from recognising by law the episcopacy of the future Church, promised to consider. The point was adjourned until the Report, and the clause walil agreed to. On Clame 12-the disendowing clal!se-which vests all the property of the Church in Commissioners, there was a pro- tractd discussion. Mr. Hardy (who in Mr Disraeli's ab- sence from illntss tonk charge of his amendments) moved to postpone the date of this transfer fror". January, 1871, to January, 1872, the additioroal yelir, in his opinion, being ahso lutely necellsary for makinc all theindispensahle preliminary arrangements. Thø amtccndrnent was supported by Dr. Ball. Mr. Gladlltone resisted the ameudment, allegillg that the date had been fixed as the mOJst convenient for the State, and for the Church as well: and that, in the opinion of penolJ8 well acquanted with the Irish Church, who had heen consulted, it was desirable, with a view to stimulating private effort, to make the interval between the passing of the bill and the period of disendowment as short as possible. On a division, the amendment was rejected by 107-301 to 194. Various verbal amendments were made in the clause, and, among others, words were inserted to make it clear that the official, and not the private property of ecclesiastical persons, will pass to the Commissioners. Mr. Gladstone gave his 80nsel,t to an amendment suggested by Mr. Bentinck to pre- vent the vestiug of Church furniture, plate, pictures, &c. The question that the clause be added to the bill led to a very lively scene, and, after a lengthened discussion, the clame was carried on a division, by 111-214 to 103. On Clause 1, which provides for the dissolution of ecclesi- astical corporations and cessation of rights to sit in the House ot Lor", Mr. Charley moved an amendment to pre- serve thei-r rights of peerage to the exbting Bishops, but on the advice of Mr. Hardy he did not press it. On Mr. Hardys motion an addition was made to the clause preserving to the existing Prelates and Deans the title and precedence they now enjoy. On Clause 14, the compensation clause, Mr. Hardy moved the omission of that part which deduct8 the compensation to the curates from the income payable to the incumbent. He contended that the curates ought to be dealt with as a sparate class entirely, and that they ought to be compensated for the "loss of their prospects of promotion and in this he was supported by sir R mndell Palmer, Dr. Ball, Mr. Lefroy, and others. On the one sIde, Mr. C. Fortescue, the Attorney-General for Ireland, aud the Solicitor-General defended the alTanglJIent proposed in the clause, arj,!1ling that, as the incumbent paid the curate's salary now, so he ought hereafter to pay his compensation, and that the curate was substantially benefitted hy having an income for his incumbent's life converted into Itn income for his own. After a lengthentccd conversation the amendment was negatived bv a majority of 98—330 to 232: and the further progress of the ComUJittee was adjourned. The Oyster and Mussel Fisheries Supplemental Bill was read a second time. and referred to a Select Committee. Some other business was disposed of, alold the House adjourned. In the House d Lords, April 20, the Marquis of Clan ricarde, in moving the second reauing tlf the Land Tenure (Ireland) Bid, tiaced the progress or this question during the last fifteen years. The last Act changing the laws of land, IJe contended, was not so satIsiactory as could be dt'slre(1. The noble marquis then tame to the year 1866, when wall introduceLl a bill wInch had the approval of some of the principal judges and lawyers in Ireland. The select committee of this He use which had since inquired int.) the law ot contract in Ireland had con- ducted their inquiry with great impartiality, and their con- clusions were substantially emhodled in Ihe bill now before the House. The object of the bill was to make a certain kind of leases invalid after the year 1871, in on1e to encourage small agreements. Allticipatin Ihe ohjectlOllS that would be raised to the bi 1, tint the presellt was not the time for legislation, and would not meet the popular wishes, the noble Marquis maintained it would prove of great ad- vantage to the Irish people. Earl Granville admitted the courteous manner in which thilil hill had been introrluced with reard to the Government. Stating the views of the Government on the subject, he ad- mitted that the bi'l contained mai y useful provisions but it aimed at a rec01,struction of the law of tenure of land, and Ü was not sufficient to 8attle the que8tion of land in Ireland. He deplored the fact HJat the Lislature had not long since solved the problem of land tenure in Ireland. In the House of Commons, Mr. Hardcastle gave notice that on the second reading of the Game Laws (Scotland) Bil he would move that it was not desirable to proceed to legisla- tion until the whole question of the presei vation of game had been inquind into by a select committee. In nply to Mr. Fordyce, lr. Stansfeld said it was impossible to give a return of the salmon llihings in Scotland still rttained hy the Crown, and of those rallted to lUdIvlùuals hy charters and other titles on account of the uncertainty which attended the rights ac- quired by popsession or iengtn of time. For the same reason the Comlllissionersof Woods and Forests were of opinion that it was not desirable to permit fishing with rod anù line during the open season. In reply to Colonel eruce, Mr. Bruce said that as the churchwardenll had been com- pelled to pay the visitation fees which were formerly legally chürged upon the church rates, cases of great hardships had occurred, which would receive the attention of the Govern- ment. In reply to rr. O'Rei11y, Mr. Gladstone said he had given notice of an amendment to the 38th clame of the Irish Church Rill, which would meet the ca-e of organists. It was impossihle to recognise that appointment as freehold, hut each case would be left to the Commissioners to deal with. i II reply to Mr. Collins, lr. Gladstone said that the question of the future status of tile ordained clergy of the Irish Church was of gTeat im- portance, especially with respect to the r ght to hold prefer- ments in England. With rellpect to the clergy already or- dained, there would, in his opiuion be no disability under the IJill, but they would retain all the and qualifications wliÍ(;h they now enjoyed, which he believed to be precisely those of the clergy of the Church of England. If, how- ever, there was the sJihtest doubt in the matter, care would be taken to make the cae perfectly clear before the bHl passed, S0 that 1\11 the clergy of the Irish Church should retain their personal prIvileges With respect to the future, 1,1' would not speak so positively, He h,.1ieved that, the genernl principle of law was that persons ordained would be t1\lahl\('(l Wr employment in England, unless some statute in- terpo-ed. j n reply to Mr. ScourfleJd, Mr. Bruce said there was not the 811ghtellt foundation for the repurt that Sir Culling Eardley Eardley had been released on the application from his colleagues. Sir Culling Eardley was convicted of bigamy lD January, UW8 In June an application was maoe for a remIsSIOn of his sentence, on the ground that his health was being im- perilJed bill. tlJ1tt was refused by Mr Hardy. In Odobu a se- cond application was made, coupled with a medical certifi- cate. His right hOD. friend directed a special investiga- tion, amI the reult was that the prisoner was suffer- lug from bronchitis and asthma, and that his life was In danger. It had always been the practice to relieve pet Wn8 under these circumstances when the pUR ish- ment was likely to he more s-eveie than was con tem- plated by the original sent ence; but in this case it was complied with, on condition that Sir C. Eargley shoulù expatriate himself during the rest of his term of imprison- ment lie believed that he had done so and was now abroad. With respect to the allusion to his right hon. friend the First L >rd of the Admiralty he would say that neither direetly nor indirectly had he interfered in tile case, and the report was elltircly without foundation.

THE FATE OF DR. LIVINGSTONE.

[No title]

A RUMOUR AND ITS CONTRADICTION.

SECRET HISTORY OF THE BUDGET.

AN APPEAL.

VISIT OF AN ENGLISH BOY TO…

ARCHBISHOP MANNING on EDUCATION.…

THE POPE AND THE LOTTERY.…

PUBLIC OFFICE SERVANTS.

THE PAPAL FETES AT ROME.

A GALLANT RESCUE!'

A COURT-MARTIAL.

EXECUTION OF SHEWARD. --

HIS CONFESSION.

[No title]

SAVAGE LIFE IN ENGLAND.

MR. BENJAMIN HIGGS'S LIBRARY.

[No title]

The MARCHIONESS of LONDONDERRY'S…

EPITOME OF NEWS,

THE MARKETS."