Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

8 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

COUNTY COURT.

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

COUNTY COURT. TUESDAY.—Before J. M. HERBERT, Esq., Judge. At this court the cases were, old causes, 2 adjourned, 3; new, 136; new trials, 2; commitments, 12; total, 145. Of these, 49 were struck out-, thus leaving 106 for hearing., The following a among the more important j-V* W. v. Shrewsbury.—Claim £ 1 10s., money lent. To pay 5s. per month. Reece v. Gobeg-,n.-Claim for £2 2s. for rent. De- fendant had occupied a house belonging to plaintiff, at lis. per month, from the latter end of 1856, till February last, when he left without notice. To pay os. per month. Same v. Donovan.-Claim for rent, jE2 10s. To pay 4s. per month. Bingham v.Pltillips. -Claim Xl 10s. 10d., for shop goods. To pay 5s. per month. Williams v. Bood.-Claim 8s. 4d., for hay. E. B. Edwards, Esq., for plaintiff. To pay in a month. C. Herbert v. Roger .Newell.-Claim £6 5s. 6d., for board and lodging, which had been owing 6 years. To pay £1 per month. Samex. T. Davics.-Claim £3 2s. 4d., for beer and spirits. His Honour said plaintiff could not recover for spirits, if defendant liked to dispute it. To pay 5s, per month. Cokely v. Quii?,. -Claim 10s., for beer. 4s. per month. Walters v. JF. Herbert.—Claim X,5 17s. Id. Judg- ment for plaintiff, with lis. costs, at 3s. per month. Williams v. Lewis Morgan.—Claim jE6 5s., balance of an account of X14 5s., for tramplates, which de- fendant had ordered. E. B. Edwards, Esq., for defence. Mrs. Morgan, deferifiant's step-mother, had a colliery at the time he had the plates, and was her manager then. By E. B. Edwards It was not arranged for defendant to take to the colliery. She administered to his father's estate. He took the proceeds, but handed them over to her, and took no-ne of the profits. Did not take land or colliery of Evans, of Newport. Did take land which his step-mother gave up to him, but not the colliery. Defendant had a colliery of his own. The plates were in his colliery; his mother lent them to him, but received no benefit from them. Mr. Lawrence claims royalty and rent of first colliery, from his mother. The effects in that colliery were all valued, but not given over to him.His Honour said a clearer case never came into court. Judgment for plaintiff, .vith payment forthwith. b S. Carpenter, an insolvent, came up on his first ex- amination, supported by Mr. Bytheway. Insolvent lives at Pontymoile, and carries on business at Trosnant. His Honour objected to the petition, which stated he resided in Pontypool, but carried on his business at Pontymoil, .in the parish of Panteg In reply to Mr. Bytheway, his Honour said as it was on the face of the petition instead of at the head of the schedule, he had no power to amend it. Dismissed. To file a fresh petition. he had no power to amend it. Dismissed. To file a fresh petition. Crawihay Bailey, Esq., v. Tones.-Claim lis., for rent. To pay 2s. per month. Waters v. George.—Claim £1 6s. 8d., for shop goods. To pay 5s. per month. Harvey V. Pliill?.I-)s.-C-laim XI lis. 6d., for 45 quarts 40 of which had been had on one day. Defendant denied his liabiliiy for the whole, but admitted he signed his name for fifteen quarts, which he was willing to pay. Denied signing his name in the book for the 45 quarts. Adjourned. Secretary of Loyal Britons lodge of A. 0. F., v. D. Thomas.—Claim for rent of house, at 8s. per month. Adjourned for the attendance of a brother. Gibson v. Lexton.-Claim for £1 7s. 6d., for rent. To pay 10s. per month, and a witness allowed. e Morris against Crawshay Bailey.—E. B. Edwards, Esq., for plaintiff. R. Green-way, Esq., for defendant. Claim jS15 15s. wages, for looking after the coke ovens at the Varteg Iron Works, at 30s, per week.Defendant denied the claim; and further stated that he was paid by the ton, not by the week; and that the money had been paid by cheque all the cashier. [His Honour said it amounted to no payment at all under the Truck Act: it should have been a cheque on a banker within a certain number of miles.] A receipt purport- ing' to be IOI tae money was produced. It afterwards came out that plaintiff was a contractor and had men working under him, and did not come under the act.Judgment for defendant. -r Brown against Fowler.—Mr. Greenwav for plaintiff. Claim £ G os. Mr. Bothomley said he was engaged in May last by the plaintiff to sell the stock-in-trade at Manchester House, Beau- fore-street, Brynmawr, by auction, when defendant's tender was accepted. Accoidiner to the conditions of sale the goods were to be cleared out by May 31st. The action was brought for the use and occupation of the premises contrary to the con- (ltions of sale. Mr. Fowler closed the purchase and asked to be allowed to let the goods remain till 31st July on payment of J' 5s. for rent. Wltrlss then produced the stamped agree- ment to 'JI'v E UP possession ..TJLIS Honour gave judgment for plaintiff, and lined iiim in a penalty of i&l for using an improper stamp ior the agreement.

BOARD OF BOADS.

! MONMOUTHSHIRE QTTARTER SESSIONS.~

Advertising

Advertising

POLICE COURT.

APPOINTMENTS FOR THE WEEK.

Family Notices