Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

15 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

ACTION FOR LIBEL.

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

ACTION FOR LIBEL. At Nottingham assizes an action for libel, brought by the Nottingham Joint-Stock Bank against the proprietors of the Nottingham, Journal, has been tried. It appeared that the bank, which had been estab- lished since 1865, had been joined by certain persons as directors, of whom Thomas Adams and Stephen Willes, lace manufacturers, were two. The firm of Mr. Willes required accommodation, and overdrew their account with the bank to a large amount. In order to give the bank security, Mr. Willes deposited with them certain shares and stocks, and among other things the personal guarantee of a Mr. Major, a pro- posed partner in his firm and it was agreed that the overdrawn account of the firm should be shortly re- duced to 6,0001., and should never again exceed that amount. This agreement was not kept, and the bank commenced proceeding to compel payment. The creditors intervened, and a report of their meeting was given in the Nottingham Journal; and shortly after appeared the article complained of. It will be seen that the article refers to matters which occurred in a town at a distance from Nottingham, though it was alleged by the plaintiffs that no one could doubt that the article alluded to them. The article commenced with some general remarks upon banks and banking, saying that banks often act with tyranny and caprice, that they are to some people the greatest bugbears in existence," and that they 6i avail themselves of special information to work out special ruin." It then proceeded as follows Only the other day a correspondent named to us a case in point-at a town some distance from Nottingham one in which a firm had a large overdraught from their bankers, a sad thing, no doubt, but according to the accounts of the Bankruptcy Courts by no means an uncommon occurrence in the town our correspondent means. By some means or other the bank succeeded in obtaining securities from the firm, &c.-and the personal guarantee of a friend of the firm The angry creditors of the firm believe the bank acted throughout the whole transaction with unjustifi- able and unwarrantable harshness and severity, and in de- fiance of long previous express stipulations made to the sus- pended firm." It then went on to speak of promises never intended to be fulfilled." It also said there had been a meet- ing of large firms in the town, and that they had determined they would in no case take the acceptances of any firm hav- ing an account at the bank unless the matters complained of were satisfactorily explained. It then continued We are pleased to think we are speaking of a state of things which exists only in an unhappy region elsewhere, where unfor- tunate mortals go into a sweating room' with awe and fear, &e. It is gratifying to know such things could not take place in Nottingham." It then said that such a course of conduct "prompts very religious men to infringe Christian precepts, and enables bank directors to know to a certainty in what hard-pressed quarters they can buy the cheapestgoods." It was alleged by the plaintiffs that this last passage referred to Mr. Thomas Adams, one of the directors of the bank, and a lace broker, a man well known in Nottingham as a very pious man, carrying out his religious views in. his business and among the work- people whom he employs. Immediately after the ap,pearance of the article, the bank directors wrote a letter to the journal demanding a full retraction and apology. The Journal replied that the interpretation put upon the article by the plaintiffs was unjustifiable, and that the article applied only to banks in general, and not to any particular bank. The plaintiffs still pressed to be informed to what bank the article did apply, but the Journal declined to mention any, saying they were not informed of any facts leading them to speak of the Nottingham Bank in the way they had spoken in the article. Another article subse- quently appeared stating that there was no reflection intended upon the Nottingham Bank in the former article that they had stated in that article that it did not apply to Nottingham at all; that they were not cognizant of any facts connected with the Nottingham Bank like those alluded to in their article; that they were informed that the facts were quite the reverse and that they regretted if there was any injury or annoyance caused to the bank. Six witnesses were called by the plaintiffs who stated that in their opinion the article complained of referred to the Nottingham Joint-Stock Bank. His Lordship left it to the jury to say whether, on a reasonable construction of the article and the subse- quent apology or denial of any intention to allude to the plaintiffs, that they could come to the con- clusion that the plaintiffs' bank was referred to in the article. The jury, after a short deliberation, returned a verdict for the defendants.

THE LAND OF THE SNOB.

A WORKING MAN'S VIEW OF REFORM.

EXTRAORDINARY VOYAGE ACROSS…

A FRENCH VIEW of the SHEFFIELD…

_\:i" ---FIVE POUNDS DAMAGES.

BORDERING ON THE INCREDIBLE.…

THE SONG OF A TAILOR-NOT ON…

THE TRADE WE ARE DOING,

[No title]

FEARFUL CATASTROPHE.

SHEFFIELD SENTIMENT.

THE HARVEST IN FRANCE.

MYSTERIOUS DEATH OF A SOLICITOR…

SUDDEN DEATHS.