Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

18 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

[No title]

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

night of the 9th ult. They each pleaded guilty and were respectively fined 10s. and costs.—Wm.. Jones and John Jones were also summoned by the same officer for being drunk and disorderly on the road near Marsh Farm, on the night of the 12th ult. The defendants did not deny the charge, and they were each fined 10s. and costs. DRUNKENNESS AT BAGILLT. John Tat,tum, of Bagillt, was summoned for being drunk and disorderly. Police-constable Knight, who proved the case, said that on the 9th ult. he saw a crowd of people outside the Albion Vaults at Bagillt. where defendant was drunk and disorderly. The landlord told him that the defendant entered the house drunk, and because he refused to serve him defendant became disorderly and be had to turn him out.—Defendant, who pleaded that he was not drunk, was fined 10s. and costs. LICENSE TRANSFERS. The license of the Queen's Head Inn, Greenfield, was transferred to Mr. John Williams that of the Britannia Inn, Holywell,to Mr. Robert Bellis. The licence of the Rose Hill Inn, Gorsedd, was tempor- arily granted to Mr. Edward Anwyl and that of the Harp Inn, Bagillt, to Mr. William Owen, of Mold. SCHOOL ATTENDANCE OASES The following cases were heard on the complaint of Mr. Eliseus Jones, attendance officer of the Holywell School Board.—Thomas Williams, Green Bank, Bagillt, who had been fined five times previously. The child was 12 years of age, had passed no standard, and had only attended school eix times out of a possible ninety. The defendant pleaded that he sent the boy to school every day, but he played truant. Fined 6s. John Roberts, Tattum's-row, Bagillt, fined 5s Edward Davies, Brynford Bank, Holywell, fined 5s Mary Newall, Bagillt, in respect of her son Frederick, aged 13, who had not attended school for the past four months. Mrs. Newall said her son attended Mr. Watson's middle-class school at Flint, but the officer showed that the boy had not been to school twice since the midsummer holidays. Mrs. Newall afterwards admitted that the boy had not been to school for the past two quarters, and she was fined 6s. NEGLECTING TO MAINTAIN HIS MOTHER. William Davies, of Dafarn Dywyll, Halkyn, was summoned at the instance of the Guardians of Holywell Union, for neglecting to maintain his mother, who is an inmate of the Union Workhouse. —Mr. E. J. Davies, clerk to the Guardians, prose- outed, and said that the old woman was in receipt of out-relief from May to December in last year, and received a total amount of JE3 lis. She was subsequently removed to the workhouse, where her maintenance up to the present had involved a cost of 21s. The defendant had previously been pro- ceeded againt at Northop, and an order for 2s. a week was made against him, but it was not en- forced, as the defendant pleaded that he was not in a position to maintain his mother, and that he had a wife and three children to support. The matter had been allowed to remain in abeyance for the de- fendant to show that he was married, but he had failed to do so.—Mr. J. O. Roberts, relieving officer, was called, and proved that the defendant was not a married man and that he had no children. He lived at Dafarn Dywyll with a woman named Elizabeth Lewis, who was the mother of three illegitimate children, and she had applied to him for an order for admission to the workhouse for the purpose of being confined—The defendant maintained that he was a married man with a family to support and that he was compelled to leave his work at the "Red Pits colliery owing to a weakness in his arm. The Relieving officer said that previous to the removal of the old woman to the workhouse she was going about the parish in a wretched state, and she was almost clemmed." —The justices made an order for the payment of 2a. weekly from that day and costs. THE VENTILATION OF A MINE. Dr. Clement Le Neve Foster, Her Majesty's Inspector of Metalliferous Mines, summ oned Capt. Harris, as the agents and manager of the Holway Controls Lead Mining Co., Limited, for not having caused on or about the 22nd January last to be constantly produced in the said mine an adequate amount of ventilation in the footways and working places therein. Mr. Cartwright, Chester, appeared in support of the case, and said that the mine had been in operation for some time, but the present Company was registered in 1883. On the 22nd January last operations were going on in a par- ticular level underground, when an explosion from firedamp took place, and Robert Williams, aged 55 years, and Robert Williams, agod 46 years, were burnt about the hands and face, the return sent in from the mine stating that the injuries were not serious. The return was in the ordinary course sent up to London and laid before the authorities, who considered that it was a matter which should be dealt with by the magistrates, and therefore the present proceedings were taken. He submitted that the bare fact that the gas in this level had reaohedexplosive point at once suggested negligence, and as the Act was passed for the protection of workmen themselves, the agent and manager was made liable for any accidents which may occur in the works where negligence was shown-Dr. Foster produced the certificate of the incorporation of the Company. He received in January last a return from Captain Harris, which spoke of an accident in the mine from fire-damp. He visited the mine nine days after the accident, but he had not been down this particular shaft before. The ventilation of the level (the 110) had been improved by the introduction of a hand fan between the working place and the shaft, and he thought that was enough to have kept the gas sufficiently diluted with air to keep it below explosive point. The natural ventilation was impeded by the bottom level being under water, and therefore the fan should have been kept work- ing with more vigour. He thought that if the fan had been kept working oontinually the accident would not have happened.—Cross-examined by Mr. Bartlett, the chairman of the Holway Consols Company: It was not usual for explosions to occur in lead mines, and in his large district but one had taken place, and that in the Van mines. He saw that several sumps had been sunk to ensure ventila- tion, and he did not complain of them. There were three sumps in the level where the explosion took place. The reason why the water remained temporarily in the 128 level was owing to new machinery being put in. Captain Harris had told him that they were driving the 128 level to secure further ventilation. The Company had taken the precaution of sending down a man every day with a safety lamp to examine the place, but they did not take the precaution of keeping pure air there. He found no evidence of gas when he visited the mine nor did he complain of any want of ventilation on that occasion.—In reply to Mr. Henry, Mr. Bartlett said that when 128 level became submerged, the Company took extra precautions to send down a fireman to examine the place before the men were allowed to go to work. It was true that they were working close on to the coal measures, but they had adopted precautions as if they were working a colliery and not a lead mine. The effect of these proceedings was that whilst the present work was proceeding, between forty and fifty men had to be discharged from their employ- ment. They could not make their mines into drawing-rooms, but yet they endeavoured as far as it was possible to ensure the safety of the workmen in their employ. The accident in this instance was an unexpected and an almost unprecedented one, but if they were to be summoned in this way, with- out any warning of any kind, in the present state of lead mining their better plan would be to shut up the mines entirely.—In reply to Mr. Bartlett— Dr. Foster said that he did not know of any other mine in his district where a fireman was engaged to go down the mine before the workmen were allowed to proceed to their work. He knew that in collieries, where the men were supposed to be approaching old workings they were required to keep driving boreholes in front of them, but should an accident occur, he did not know that an action would be taken against the agent provVded the bore-holes were I I sufficient." -Tht, Rev. Walter Evans said it was admitted that extra precautions were taken, but the contention was that they were not quite enough.—Mr. Bartlett observed that ey had taken more than ordinary precautions that their workmen should be protected, and he thought it a very happy oircumstance that he was in a position to state, having spent some thousands of pounds in the neighbourhood, that they had boen able to carry on their works without having lost a life or limb. Dr. Foster had come forward with regard to the working of the Holway Consols, and he should inform the Bench of the ciroumstances under which that mine was worked, for they had ia reality worked it more like a colliery than a lead mine. From some facts which came to his know- ledge of what had occurred before the property came into the hands of the present company, he gave directions that the mine should be examined by a fireman before the men were allowed to go down to their work. That was a precaution which their agent thought unnecessary as it certainly was unusual in a lead mine, but it was a direction which was carefully followed. Mr. Cartwright had, and he was sure he would excuse him using the expression endeavoured to make the case as hot as possible and said that a serious accident had occurred in the mine. The fact was that the men were not burnt seriously, but as the report sent to Dr. Foster stated only slightly." The Government Inspector should, he submitted, have made allowance for the extreme circumstances of the case, and before sum- moning them to a court of law have pointed out what they could do more than they had done to secure the efficient working of the mine and the safety of the men. Dr. Foster himself had told them that an explosion had taken place previously in one mine only in his large district, and that in the Van Mine, and having been a shareholder for some years in that Company he (Mr. Bartlett) could say that they had not done what had been done in the Holway Consols—securing the daily inspection of the mine in the same way as if it was a colliery. Unfortunately on the morning when the explosion took place one of the miners stuck a lighted candle in his hat, and a little gas in the roof exploded, but without doing any serious injury. He maintained that every precaution had been used and every care taken in the working of the mine. They had done their very utmost to secure the safety of the men, and having spent some thousands of pounds in mining operations in the district without having lost a single life, he asked the Bench not to cast a slur upon them by entering a conviction in the present proceedings.—The magistrates retired for a short time, and on their return to court, the Chairman said they had con- sidered the case very carefully, and they felt that they could not help convicting. The company had done almost all they could in the matter, and to show how little the Bench thought of their neglect had been they would only impose a fine of one shilling. The Rev. Walter Evans said the magistrates were reluctant to come to that decision, but the facts had forced them to it. They may regard the littleness of the fine as evidence of their opinion as to the offence. Mr. Cartwright applied for costs and advocate's fee, but Mr." Bartlett opposed the application. He said that he had been obliged to leave pressing business in London specially to attend to this case, and he did not see why the Inspector required the eloquence of an advocate to support his case.—The Bench allowed 13s. costs, including the charge of the certificate of the incorporation of the Company, and the costs of court, but disallowed the fee for the advocate. RECKLESS COLLIERS. Enoch Hughes and Thomas Edwards, colliers, of Bagillt, were summoned by Mr. David Hughes, the underground manager of Bettisfield Colliery, for unlawfully using a naked light in the colliery, and also for being in possession of a lamp key when at work in the colliery. The defendants did not appear when called upon, and warrants for their arrest were granted. REFUSING TO QUIT AT WALWEN. George Thomas and Samuel Dyson, were sum- moned for refusing to quit the Victoria Inn, Walwen. There were also charges of assault and malicious injury arising from the occurrence in which other men were concerned, but they were privately settled with the permission of the Bench, and that of refusing to quit only was taken. Mr. John Lloyd the landlord of the Inn, said that when he returned to his house, some time after eleven o'clock on the night of the 23rd ult., he saw the defendants sitting on a bench in one of the rooms. He ask<\d his wife what they wanted there at that time of night, and she replied that they refused to go away. He took hold of Dyson and put him into the passage, when he began to abuse him (witness). He afterwards turned Thomas out of the house.—Cross-examined by Mr. Wm. Davies, (who defended Thomas), the complainant said that there had been a benefit night" in his house that evening for a man who had met with an accident with his thrashing machine, and the defendant Thomas was present on the occasion. He went to send the injured man home, a distance of about 150 yards, and when he returned he found the defendants in the house. When he asked the men to leave they said nothing, but Thomas "laughed in his face," Thoma. was neithcr drun k nor sober, "but between." —Mrs. Lloyd was also called and deposed that the defendants refused to leave the house. When she spoke to them Thomas pushed her back, and asked for more beer.—Mr. Davies contended that there was not sufficient evidence to convict on the section under which Thomas was summoned. The charge against him was that of being drunk and refusing to quit, but there was no evidence that the man was drunk, the complainant himself having refused to say that such was the case.—Thomas was fined 20s. and 9s. costs, or in default 14 days' imprison- ment.—A warrant was issued against Dyson, who failed to appear. CHILDREN'S QUARRELS.—A POETICAL YOUNGSTER. John Jones, a lad 10 years of age, summoned another boy named John Williams, for having assaulted him. The boys reside with their parents, at Marsh-row, Mostyn, and the complainant alleged that when he was playing with another boy named Charles Hughes, the defendant put his foot in front of him and threw him down. He also pulled him through the mud and kicked him, and took him up by the leg, and dropped him down again several times,—The defendant denied having thrown the boy down, and produced from his pocket a stone with which the complainant had threatened to strike him. The complainant complained that the defendant had made a song" about him, but as the quarrel appeared to be a petty one, the case was dismissed on defendant's mother paying 4s. 6d. costs. HUSBAND AND WIFE. Mrs. Margaret Mary Tennant, of the Rock Tavern, near Lloc, applied for a separation and maintenance order against her husband, Mr. John Tennant, an auctioneer, formerly of Liverpool. The defendant did not appear, and it was stated that he had said when served with the summons that he would not attend as he was going to leave the country. He had removed his furniture and was said to have gone to Liverpool. As the appli- cant's witnesses were not present, the hearing of the case was adjourned. SURETIES OF THE PEACE. Ellis Jones, of Glanydon, summoned Edward Evans to find sureties to keep the peace.—The applicant said that he simply wanted peace for time to come, as defendant had threatened to abuse him. He had not as yet done anything to him, but one day he had to lock himself and two others up in the fitting shop at Hanrner Colliery because of the defendant's conduct, although they had been work- ing together for many years. He then threatened that he was going to pay him.—The Chairman Pay you in money ?—Complainant: No, in a thrash- ing, but he was a little in drink at the time, and it was the drink that talked.—The Rev. Walter Evans How far do you live from him ?-Complainant: About three or four miles.—The Rev. Walter Evans: Well, cannot you keep away from him ?—Com- plainant I can keep that far off any how.—Wm. Jones and Thomas Roberts deposed to having been locked in the fitting-shop on the day named, and in reply to the Bench Roberts said he did not think the defendant would do much harm. -The defendant, on promising to be more careful of his conduct in the future, was ordered to pay 10s. costs. A REPREHENSIBLE PRACTICE. John Williams was summoned for discharging fire-arms on the highway. The case was proved by Acting-sergeant Jones, who stated that the defendant was on the road between Mostyn Quay and Llinegar Gate, with a gun, and that he discharged the contents across the road. He went up to him, and eautioned him as to the very great danger of such proceedings, and the defendant afterwards went along the road and deliberately fired the gun once up the road and once more across the road. defendant pleaded that as soon as the officer spoke to him he took the gun home, but discharged the barrels so as not to have the gun in the house loaded.- The officer said the defendant understood perfectly well what he told him, and he deliberately fired the gun twice afterwards. The practioe was becoming a very common one on the road.-The defendant was fined 10s. with 8s. costs.

......--IST. DAVID'S DAY DINNER.

4 BAGILLT.

MOSTYN.

GRONANT.

LLANASA.

Advertising

ICorrespondence.

THE APPROACHING LOCAL BOARD…

IMarkets and Fairs.

--BIOGRAPHICAL AND HISTORICAL…

GREENFIELD.

---MELIDEN.

THE V. C. H.

THE FLINT AND DENBIGH HOUNDS

ST. ASAPH CATHEDRAL SERVICES.

HOLY WELL PARISH CHURCH SERVICES.

Family Notices