Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

18 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

THE PENYGRAIG COLLIERY EXPLOSION.

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

THE PENYGRAIG COLLIERY EXPLOSION. At Penygraig on Friday in last week, Messrs. Williams and Grover resumed the joint inquest upon the recent fatal gas explosion in which fourteen men lost their lives. The Hon. A. Lyttelton again repre- sented the Home Office, and Mr. Simons, Merthyr, appeared for Messrs. Morgan and Rowlands, colliery PrEetf £ st witness calledI was Mr. Thomas Burns, mining engineer, Biyncethm, Bridgend, who had assisted m exploring the colhery three days after the explosion. AU Davy safety lamps found in the work- ing were locked. He was told, and his examination fortified the statement, that a shot had been fired on the upper side of the workings. The fireman Williams killed at the explosion had probably fired the shot and so ignited a collection of gas in a roof there. Blasting should only take place between working shifts when there were but few men in a colliery. There was a very large cavity in close proximity to the place where the shot was fired, and he should not have thought of finng a shot there without carefully examining the cavity first. He could not see any indication besides the shot firing to account for the explosion. Pro- vided the ventilation was properly distributed, he con- sidered the entire quantity of ventilation producible by the fan was adequate for the workings. Mr. Lyttelton asked witness whether any prudent man, knowing of the cavity in the roof, the depression in the barometer, and the previous refusal of an official to blast, would have fired the shot on the date of the explosion. Witness replied that he could hardly think so. The next witness of importance was Mr. Daniel Herbert James, certificated manager cf the mine, who stated that he had been manager seven months. The coal at Penygraig did not give off more gas than was observable at Aberdare Valley Collieries. He was away when the explosion occurred. He expressed general acquiescence in the views of Mr. Burns, the first witness. Shot firing was left to the direction of the under manager and conjoint officials. There was nothing in the condition of the workings which rendered it unsafe under ordinary circumstances to fire shots there. Witness had given special directions on the Saturday before the explosion to the officials to be very careful as the barometer had fallen extra- ordinarily. Mr. Lyttelton asked witness whether, considering the barometrical fall, the fissure, and the refusal pre- viously to fire, he should not have absolutely forbidden the shot being fired on the Sunday of the explosion ? Witness replied that it had not been made known to him a shot was going to be fired. It had not been brought to his notice that shots had been fired in the pit when fifty to sixty men were in it until present at this inquiry. The cavity spoken of was not ventilated, though others were. Mr. Randall, deputy inspector of mines, attested that at specified dates he had found ventilation at the colliery defective, and men had to be withdrawn, and deprecated the firing of the shot on the morning of the explosion. Mr. Thomas Wales, chief inspector of mines for South Wales and Monmouthshire, said that the Oxarnination which he had made of the colliery, and the evidence which he had heard, guided him to one conclusion, and that was that the firing of the shot by the fireman, William Williams, on the main level, Was the cause of the explosion. Mr. Wales con- tinued In my opinion, it was most injudicious on the part of the manager to allow shot firing in those parte of the colliery spoken to by the firemen in their evidence, but to allow shot firing on the main level after Beddoe had refused to do so some four Months ago was to my mind most reckless conduct Oil the part of both the owner and manager. In IIIY evidence at the inquest held on the bodies of the men who were killed in this colliery a few years ago I stated that shot firing should be strictly prohibited in all collieries working in the South Wales I steam coal. Had that recommendation been carried out the explosion and consequent loss of life would not have occurred. I would strongly recommend that shot firing should be strictly prohibited in the working of this colliery in future. I hope the present sad cala- mity will act as a warning to such managers as are Dow allowing shot firing in working the South Wales steam coal. If such a dangerous practice be allowed, it will sooner or later in all probability result in similar calamities." In answer to a question, the inspector said he approved of the system of ventilation at the colliery. The jury returned a unanimous verdict that the cause of the death of deceased was accident, and due to shot-firing by William Williams, the fireman, who Perished at the explosion. The jury, however, con- 81dered that the manager ought to have been more explicit in his directions to the shot man as to the tune and place of firing. The death of the three rescuers was formally declared to have been due to suffocation.

FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE.

MURDER IN A CONVENT.

SERIOUS RAILWAY ACCIDENT IN…

AN ADIRONDACK HOSPITAL. ;

UNLAWFULLY WOUNDING A WIFE.

CUTTINGS FROM AMERICAN PAPERS.

[No title]

QUEER SPECIMENS OF FISH.

A SERIOUS CHARGE.

THE DUKE OF CAMBRIDGE ON MILITARY…

MR. MATTHEW ARNOLD IN AMERICA.

THE ALLEGED PLOT TO BLOW UP…

THE FRANCHISE BILL AND RE-DISTRIBUTION.

DISPUTED OWNERSHIP OF A WATCH.

SEED SOWING OPERATIONS.

GYMNASTICS FOR GIRLS.

EPITOME OF NEWS.