Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

14 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

Parliament 111 iiikf. ............/'-'''

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

Parliament 111 iiikf. THURSDAY, MARCH 18TH. HOUSE OF LORDS. The House of Lords gave a second reading to the Isle of Man Church Building Acts, and afterwards received the report of amendments to the Working Men's Dwellings Bill, the amendments being agreed to. The Duke of Abercorn asked if the Govern- ment would consent to the appointment of a commission of inquiry into the working of the Irish L'md Act of 1881. The Duke of Argyll also spoke in favour of an inquiry. He was of opinion, he said, that the working of the Act was approved of by neither the landlords nor the tenants. The Land Commission was not a judicial court, but a revolutionary tribunal. Lord Salisbury, in reply, said he had always expressed sentiments of a very similar charac- ter to those of the Duke of Argyll, and he had seen no reason to change them. If he had any hesitation in acceding to the proposal of the Duke of Abercorn it was solely on account of the extreme difficulty of providing machinery by which the investigation could be carried on. He reserved to the Government full liberty at a later period to enter upon an inquiry of the kind desired if, in their judgment, the public interest could becserved by it. If the appoint- ment of a Committee were moved, the Govern- ment would not resist the motion. The Marquis of Londonderry, Earl Spencer, the Earl of Kimberley, and other speakers followed. Earl Spencer urged that the object of the House should be to strengthen the impartiality of tr, l.and Commissioners, instead of throw- ing Hum upon them. Ti Duke of Abercorn said he would suggest that he inquiry should be conducted by three Irish judges. The subject then dropped. HOUSE OF COMMONS. Mr. Ritchie stated, in reply to Mr. E. Ro- bertson, that no application had been made to the Board of Trade to intervene in the dispute in the engineering trade, and he did not think the Board could at present usefully intervene. The Home Secretary, answering Mr. Pic- kersgill, said his attention had nob been drawn to the fact that betting was carried on in Tat- tersall's ring at the Derby Hunt Steeplechases on Tuesday in the manner recently decided by the Queen's Bench Division to be unlawful, but the decision of the High Court was of so recent a date, and involved so many questions requir- ing serious consideration, that it was quite im- possible for him to state what course he intend- ed to pursue at present, Answering Mr. Buncombe, Mr. Chamberlain said he was fully aware of the extent and char- acter of the importation of arms and warlike, stores into the Transvaal, but he was not aware that there was any breach of local or international law in the importation of war- like stores into the colonies and States of South Africa. Mr Dillon asked Mr. Balfour if he could fix Monday, March 29th, for the debate on the report of the Royal Commission on the finan- cial relations between Great Britain and Ireland. Mr. Balfour replied that, subject to the hypothetical vote of censure on the Govern- ment, it would probably be convenient to take he discussion on that day. Mr. Brodrick, replying to Mr. Galloway, said that as there were no facilities at Manches- ter for the training of a cavalry regiment it was not proposed to reoccupy Hulme Barracks with cavalry, but they were used at present for infantry purposes. Mr. Brodrick, in reply to Mr. Hedderwich, said 600 men of the Seaforth Highlanders were under orders for Crete, who were in all respect suitable for the service. Mr. Leuty asked what service Mr. Brodrick referred to, but received no answer. Sir C. Dilke asked whether any declaration of blockade had been issued and notified in connection with the present proceedings of the Powers; and whether the Government had consented, whilst the German Government de- clined, to employ land forces for operations in the interior of Crete. Mr. Morley asked whether the First Lord of the Treasury could inform the House—in view of M. Meline's statement in the French Cham- ber that Greece would once again be invited to accede to the Note of the Powers and that then the coast of Crete would be blockaded- whether Greece had in fact again been invited to accede to the Note of the Powers before the blockade was instituted. Mr. Balfour believed instruction had been sent to the Minister at Athens for notification to the Greek Government of the blockade which would be established in connection with Crete. With regard to the first paragraph of Sir C. Dilke's question, he believed that was in process of being done. With regard to the second paragraph, it was not accurate, so far as he knew, to say that the German Govern- ment had decided not to send troops to the island. They thoroughly agreed with the general policy of the Powers. Mr. Morley asked whether the technical notification which as he understood, had been made to the Greek Government was what M. Meline meant when he said Greece would be invited to accede to the Note of the Powers. Mr. Balfour said he really did not know. He had not much satisfaction in answering ques- tions oi right hon. gentlemen opposite, who embarrassed the Government as much as they could by their speeches out of doors, and who dared not move a vote of censure in the House. Sir W. Harcourt said that before they moved a vote of censure they must ask whether would be allowed to debate it. What M. Meline stated was that Greece would once again be invited to accede to the Note of the Powers, and that then Crete will be blockaded, and the contingent of the troops disembarked, there will be increased.' What did the word 'then' mean ? Mr. Balfour did not feel himself bound to explain M. Meline's speech. He understood Sir W. Harcourt to refer to the speech made by the Prime Minister in another place.' The right hon. gentleman had colleagues there. Let them ask the Prime Minister. With regard to the suggestion that the Government desired to prevent the Opposition from moving a vote of censure, he could assure Sir W. Harconrt he was greatly mistaken. and that he had only got to name his day. The House then went into Committee on the Voluntary Schools Bill. On Clause 2, repealing the 17s. Gd. limit after the current month as.regards day schools in England and Wales, Mr. H. Lewis moved an amendment to defer the operation of the clause for three years, but afterwards withdrew it. A discussion took place on the motion that Clause 2 stand part of the bill. On a division the motion was carried by 267 votes to 62. The Committee then commenced the consi- deration of Clause 3, which declares that no person shall be assessed or rated to or for any local rate in respect of any land or buildings used exclusively or mainly for the purposes of the schoolrooms, offices, or playground of a Voluntary school, except to the extent of any profit derived by the managers of the school jron* the letting thereof. A number of amendments were, after brief discussions, withdrawn, hub on the motion that the clause stand part of the bill Mr. H. Lewis move rejeetion of the whole clause. clause was eventually added to the bill 'by 283 votes to 88. On clause 4, which contains the definitions, Mr, J. A. Pease moved an addition for the purpose of defining what was a necessitous school. The amendment was negatived, and the clause was added to the bill. On clause 5, which excludes Scotland and Ireland from the operation of the bill, Mr. H. Lewis moved to also exclude Wales. This was rejected by 198 votes to 6], and the clause was afterwards added to the bill, In the end the bill was pased through Com- mittee without the slightest alteration.

. FRIDAY, MARCH 19TH.

. MONDAY, MARCH 22ND.

--".'.-'.-'-----TUESDAY, MARCH…

' HOUSE OF COMMONS.

DOLGELLEY.

. PETTY SESSIONS.

/,..,.......... CAERWYS.

. CWM.

. ABERWHEELER.

MELIDEN.

COR WEN.

t LLANARMON YN YAL.

........................ GYFFYLLIOG.