Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

14 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

Ciifach Goch Explosion., -]

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

Ciifach Goch Explosion. Sequel at Bridgend Police J Court. ] Summonses-Dismissed. j The sequel to the explosion which occurred at the Dinas Main Colliery, Gil- ] fach Goch, on 15th December last, and I in which seven men lost their lives, wac, I heard at Bridgend Police Court on Satur- ( day, Monday and Tuesday last,"when D. ( ■oowen Jones, manager of the colliery, < and Enoch Jones, under-manager, were t summoned for alleged breaches of the Coal s Mines Regulation Act. There were three 1 summonses against each of the defen- I dantsi. The alleged offences a,re:-(I) t reach of a Coal Mines Order by using N compressed powder for firing a shot under 0 Prohibited conditions; (2) using material other than clay or other non-inflammable c substance for stemming a shot hole; (3) I tailing to withdraw men when firing a got. Mr. Ivor Bowen (instructed by Mr. t Edward Powell, of Messrs. Cuthbertson t alid Powell, Neath) prosecuted on behalf ? Of the Home Office, and Mr. C. Kenshole (Messrs. C. and W. Kenshole, Aberdare) C defended. Mr John Sankey (instructed 2 ~y Messrs. Walter Morgan, Bruce, and v ■Nicholas, Pontypridd) watched the pro- t feedings on behalf of the South Wales t M-iners' Federation. The summonses had a taken out by Mr. John Dyer Lewis, r ^V-M. Inspector of Mines for the Swansea district. Mr. W. N. Atkinson, H.M. h superintending inspector of mines for the oouth Wales district, was present. s Mr. Ivor Bowen, opening the case for h prosecution, said the only part of the p ^ine traversed by the explosion was a J Portion of the main haulage road for a s distance of 1,700 or 1,800 yards from the u "ottom of the shaft. The prosecution 1 contended that the roofs and sides of this n Portion of the main haulage road were f P:r\r" "1' with line, dry coai oust, ana j at the explosion was a coal dust ex- plosion caused by the firing of a shot at drilled hole which had been found on ^iie haulage road at a spot between the Points where the bodies of Richard Evans John Jenkins were discovered, and ''hat that shot hole had been charged with compressed powder and stemmed with dry coal dust. The working face in this Pit was wet, and compressed powder was, ^erefore, used at the face because it was Q°t prohibited under such conditions, but Was not a permitted explosive on the haulage road; and as to the alleged of the shot hole, coal dust was i11 inflammable substance and must not 0 Used for the purpose. At the time of explosion there were 12 men down, *i.d he understood from what had tran- PU'ed at the inquest that the defence ould be that no shot was fired at the rilled hole between the bodies of Evans Jenkins, but that the explosion was j^Used by gas exuding into the mine from fdjoining workings underlying seams, and ignited at the naked light in cap of one of these workmen. Mr. R. Q M. Pritchard, assistant in- jector of mines, gave evidence that after explosion some undischarged shot jioles were found in the main haulage ?ad. He had cut out two, and they were "ttarged with compressed powder and ^nimed with coal dust. Jn reply to Mr. Kenshole, witness said hat the working places, in the colliery ^ere wet on the whole. The main haulage road was wet, but not the roof and sides. February last the management reported tag in the mine, and he examined, but did 40t find any gas. .Mr. J. Dyer Lewis, H.M. Inspector of jJ^s for the Swansea district, said he a thorough examination of the mine the explosion. He had come to the inclusion, from the indications of force, J}at the explosion originated at the point the drilled hole was to be seen in roof of the haulage road between the gjues of Evans and Jenkins. He con- 1 dered it was a coal dust explosion caused nr sh°t being fired in that hole. .Mr. W N. Atkinson, H.M. Supenn- viiding Inspector of Mines for South Z said he was of opinion that the k P'Osion was a coal dust explosion caused firing of a compressed powder shot i, he bore hole indicated. He considered J^t the sides and roof of the mam (i road wore what would described as dry and dusty," and it was .)lot* Pernissible to use compressed powder der such conditions. The Defence. Kenshole addressed the Bench, and fended that the main haulage road t>not dry and dusty, but naturally wet; v at) as a matter of fact, no shot had i eH fired at the disputed shot hole be- the bodies of Richard Evans and Jenkins, but that the explosion had WffV-Caused by an influx of gas from old at '^ings adjoining, which had been fired of +1. naked light in the cap of either fif i e two men that if a sbot had been Cd at this hole, it was fired by one of two men in contravention of the aX8' and not by Watkin Evans, the fo-^orised shotsman, whose body was a long distance away; that the S^Bament could not be held respon- tfc or such a breach of regulations, as a Z ^d taken oare to properly appoint k?^petent shotsman; that if sW used to stem the undischarged holes found in the main haulage wad kin I? he explosion, it was done by tlw vane, the appointed shotsman, and jjiki Management could not be held resPon" he e' 35 they had no reason to think that a iiatl experienced man, would do such U;hing; that there was no reason to \vfce that Watkin Evans would not have CMrawn the men before he commenced shots. CollT Jjowen Jones, manag^ —~ U>1-y, said that the Dinas Mam Ool- iiavi^as a bouse coal pit worked with of «f. kghts. He was the manager both li,r> mine and of the Britannic Col- V- ft a steam coal pit adjoining, owned same company. Most of his time W V,0<^cupied with the latter colliery, bu *5iirXd a certificated under-manager, Mr. the +• Jones, for the Dinas Main. At A* of ^e accident, a repairing shift Parir, OWn> and Watkin Evans was pre- Pos« o^he main haulage road for the pur- laying electric cables for a new and the sbot holes were being W d hy Evans for the purposes of his Witness had appointed Watkin he wasto do this work in July last because a OAJ3 a most experienced workman and kd petent shot-firer in whom witness confidence. Witness had m- a fj; the Dinas Main workings once Vft;m £ ht from July until the time of lhe ip 0sion, and about a month before ^ana^plosion he bad warned the under- go that coal dust must not be used holes." He thought he had +iT reasonable precautions to see regulations were carried out. aHla& Ssed Powder was used on the mam ?atutSvi road because the road was Had Cly wet. He did not think a shot th at Was fired at the disputed shot hole; Din8 an hole which was used for the signal wires. aepiiJ. explosion was caused through tion of gas from the trespass Mr. Enoch Jones, the under-manager, also gave evidence that the main haulage road was naturally wet. He said he had had no reason to believe that coal dust r was being used for stemming the shot; boles. He had every confidence in Wat- c kin Evans, who was a most experienced 2 [nan. i Evidence as to the wet condition of the main haulage road was given by Mr. < Robert Rees, mining engineer, and Mr. Leonard Llewelyn, agent for the Cambrian v Collieries, who had both professionally i examined the Dinas Main Colliery on v jccasions before the explosion. Both + nought the explosion was caused by an ] Lccumulation of gas fired by the naked ( ight of Richard Evans or John Jenkins. ] MLr. Rees said that the theory of the i nines inspectors that an explosion of gas j vould not spread against the current of dr in the main intake—as this did- mless it was fed by dry coal dust was luite a new theory to him, and Mr. jlewelyn mentioned that in the Clydach /"ale explosion the flame travelled against he current air for a thousand yards to he shaft, although the road was well watered. Mr. Ivor Bowen: The report of Mr. 3ray, the mines inspector, was that, dthough the roadway itself was well watered, sufficient attention had not leen paid to the dust on the collars of he timbers. He also said that more attention might have been paid to the oofs and sides. Mr. Llewelyn: That was in the work- tig faces. The Chairman (Mr. R. W. Llewellyn) aid the magistrates did not require to Lear any more evidence. They were not repai-ed to convict on any of the charges. o doubt an explosive was used and the temming was not what should have been ised, but the party who used it was dead, 'here was no evidence to show that the management were in any way responsible or it and the summonses would be dis- missea. Mr. Bowen said this was a matter of the greatest importance, and he hoped the Bench would be prepared to state a case on the point of law whether a mana- ger relieved himself of responsibility by the appointment of an under-manager and shotsman. Mr. Kenshole It is a matter of fact whether reasonable precaution was exer- cised or not. The Bench have found that it was. The Chairman said that if there was a point of law involved, they would be pre- pared to state a case. Mr. S. H. Stockwood (magistrates' clerk) asked Mr. Bowen to submit his application on this point in writing.

Llantrisant Parish Council.

Opera House, Treherbert.

Porth Higher Grade School.

The Injured Barry Policeman.

Mid Rhondda Male Voice 1 Party.J

I Correspondence. I

Advertising

A Storm of Prayer. 1

-------------------------Straight…

_._-------_----______---.…

-uneral of the late Mr. Lewis…

----__---Ferndale Bakery D-iStroye^'…

Advertising