Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

10 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF LORDS.—MAY 31. THE TOXADO CASE. Lord Derby, iu reply to Lord Clanricarde, explained the present position of the correspondence with the Spanish Government in respect to the Tornado case, and stated that a new trial on the merits would take place before the Superior Court. CATTLE PLAGUE. The Duke of Marlborough gave a hopeful account of the cattle plague. Many cases of cattle disease have appeared in London lately, but after conference with the metropolitan authorities it is hoped that sufficient measures have been adopted to prevent the extensiou, of the evil. OFFICES AND OATHS. Lord Kimberley's Offices' and Oaths' Bill was read a second time upon the understanding that the Com- mittee should not be taken until after the Oaths' Com- mission has reported. The Transubstantiation, &c., Declaration Abolition Bill was also read a second time after a brief discussion upon a similar understanding. The Army Enlistment Bill and County Courts' Acts' Amendment Bill were read a second time. HOUSE OF COMMONS—MAY 31. REFORM. The House of Commons is steadily progressing with Reform. Seven seats having been obtained on Thursday by striking off the representation of the corrupt boroughs, thirty-eight other seats were got on Friday by taking a member from every borough with a population under 10,000, which now possesses two members. This pro- posal formed part of Mr. Laing's redistribution scheme. The Government plan draws the limit of population below which the constituencies are asked to surrender their superfluous representation at 7,000. The superi- ority of Mr. Laing's plan, he thinks, consists in this, that it transfers twenty more members from small boroughs of an aggregate population of 158,000 to eight towns of 1,830,000 population and eighteen counties of 3,800,000 not touched by the bill. Mr. Laing expressed a strong opinion in favour of some scheme of voting in three-cornered constituencies which would secure the representation of considerable minorities, and intimated that if the principle of his plan were adopted he would leave the arrangement of the schedules in the hands of the Government. Mr. B:iillie Cochrane(Honiton), Mr. Goldney (Chip- penham), Mr. Samuda (Tavistock), and Mr. H. Sey- mour (Poole) pleaded with sad earnestness for their re- spective constituencies. Sir George Grey urged that no redistribution can be satisfactory which does not give some promise of per- fcianence. The Government plan is meagre ana in- adequate, and if it were passed the only effect would be that a formidable agitation would be commenced for the removal cf the anomalies which the Bill would leave in our system of representation. Without committing himself to all the details of Mr. Laing's plan, he sup- ported his proposal to draw the line at ten thousand population, as that will produce a considerable fund to be disposed of, and, among other things, will enable the Government to increase the representation of Scotland without adding to the numbers of the House—a very inconvenient precedent-and also to increase the county representation. Mr. Disraeli's defence of his scheme was that there must be anomalies in every plan. To disfranchise is easy, to redistribute the representation is the difficulty. The two principles upon which the Government have acted are these-to provide for existing wants by giving members to towns which have sprung into importance since 1832, and which are unrepresented; and at the same time to sustain the relative strength of the county representation. To go beyond these safe and prudent principles—which the Bill applies practically, as far as is possible under present circumstances—would lead to serious difficulties. Numbers have never been accepted as the basis of redistribution, and in accumulating re- presentation, as Mr. Laing proposed, there would be danger unless some plan of providing for minorities can be devised, such as is demanded by the different schools of representation which are rising up in the country. Personally, Mr. Disraeli said, he is in favour of giving one member to each constituency, and the general ten- dency of legislation has been in that direction. Mr. Gladstone replied that, although anomalies can, doubtless, never be altogether got rid of, that is no reason for not trying to mitigate them as far as possible. He differed from the opinion of the Chan- cellor of the Exchequer that to disfranchise is easy in his experience it is the first step in a case of this kind which is the great difficulty. To be bold and decisive in curtailing the excessive representation of unimportant constituencies is essential to a satisfactory settlement of the question. Mr. Gladstone doubted the wisdom of carrying out the principle of three- cornered constituencies in a wholesale manner, and saw no advantage in limiting each constituency to a single member. On a division, Mr. Laing's first amendment was carried by 306 to 179 votes. THE QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY (IRELAND.) The evening sitting was chiefly occupied by a debate on the Queen's University in Ireland, to the present condition of which attention was called by Mr. C. For- tescue. Lord Naas stated that the Government would take no action in the matter till the law courts had de- termined the validity of the charter. A somewhat personal encounter between Mr. Lowe and Mr. Glad- stone as to the relations of the late Government with this question enlivened the discussion. BUKLINGTON HOUSE. In Committee of Supply, the vote of zEI5,000 to com- plete the sum necessary for the adaptation of Burlington House to the occupation of various learned societies was agreed to. On the vote of C20,000 for the new build- ings for the University of London, a resolution mo/ed by Mr. Layard, con derailing the two designs exhibited for these buildings was carried by 52 to 46. HOUSE OF LORDS-JUNE 3. KNIGHTSBRIDGE BARRACKS. Lord Redesclale asked whether there was any inten- tion of removing the cavalry barracks at Knightsbridge, and expressed an opinion that such a step would involve a largo and unnecessary expenditure of -public money soleh- for the benefit of a few private landowners. Lord Lucan strongly opposed the destruction of the barracks, which lie said had been declared to be among the healthiest buildings of that kind in the country. z, Lord Longford stated that the Government had no intention of removing the barracks, although they had intimated to certain memorialists that such a step might be considered if equally suitable accommodation could be found elsewhere without involving additional expense to the country-a condition that was decisive against the removal. The Duke of Cambridge spoke highly of the suitable- ness of the barracks, both in respect of the buildings and of the site, and, referring to the conduct of the military, declared that the investigations he had made had convinced him that the behaviour of the Household Cavalry had been excellent. Lord De Grey having repudiated an imputed condem- nation of the Knightsbridge Barracks, the subject was dropped. INCREASE OF THE EPISCOPATE. Upon the report of the Increase of the Episcopate Bill, a discussion arose upon clause 2, referring to the salaries of the new bishops, which Lord Lyttclton pro- posed to omit, and to which Lord Derby assented, but upon a division the clause was retained by 48 votes against 36. α- The clause relating to the appointment of suffragan bishops provoked considerable discussion, Lord Ellen- borough objecting to the creation of an unlimited number of temporary bishops, and Lord Shaftesbury doubting whether the provision would not tend to the growth of free churches while the Bishop of Carlisle took exception to the clause as giving encouragement to a plan of creating numerous minor sees. Lords Lvttelton and Cranwortli thought the words of the clause were sufficient to prevent the suggested evils, as the consent of her Majesty was requisite for the ap- pointment of suffragan bishops. Upon a division, the clause was rejected by 23 to 20 votes. HOUSE OF COMMONS, JUNE 3. THE REFORM BILL. The Committee on the Reiorm Bill was resumed at Clause 9, on which Mr. Serjeant Gaselee proposed to add to Mr. Laing's amendment, carried on Friday afternoon, a further amendment totally disfranchising all boroughs under 5.000 population. These, he explained, are ten in number, and with all aggregate population of 39,704 and 2,874 voters they at present return fifteen mem- bers though, as five of these had been confiscated from five towns returning two members on Friday, only ten new seats would be placed at the disposal of the Go- vernment. Mr. Goldsmid (Honiton) argued in favour of small boroughs that they afforded an access to Parliament for young men of promise, and that members who repre- sented them having fewer local claims had more time to attend to public business, and urged that disfran- chisement had been carried far enough, and that an extension of it would only lead to the accumulation of members on places already represented. Mr. Schreiber proposed that the towns under 5,000 population now returning two members should be de- prived of one member only. « Mr. Cardwell, in supporting Serjeant Gaselee's amend- ment, quoted from the census returns to show that all the boroughs against which it was directed were decay- ing, and urged that as the vote of Friday had raised tht: iiiie in the Act of 1832 which two members began from 4,000 to 10,000, so now the House ought to raise the line of total disfranchisement from 2,000 to 5;000, To remove these anomalies was indispensable to a per- manent settlement, and after the vote of Friday it was evident that the House was thoroughly in earnest, and would support the Government if they would initiate a wider scheme. The use and value of small boroughs were enforced by Sir L. Palk (North Devon), Mr. J. Hardy (Dart- mouth), Mr. R. Neville-Grenville (West Somerset), Cap- tain Hayter (Wells), and Mr. Harvey (Thetford). Mr. Smollett supported the amendment, in the hope that it would lead to the recasting of the whole scheme of redistribution, and in a caustic speech recommended a large reduction of the numbers of the House, with the view of getting rid of the talking potatoes," who were the real cause of its deliberative inefficiency. > Mr Laing pointed out that as 55 seats at least would be needed for the adequate representation of the counties and thejjunrepresented towns, and for the addition of the Scotch representation, and 45 only had been obtained by his amendment, it was a choice between grouping and the total disfranchisement of these ten boroughs, and pressed the Government for some explanation of their views. The Chancellor of the Exchequer commenced by congratulating the House on the entire absence of party spirit in which the discussion on this part of the subject had been argued, and claimed some share of this happy state of feeling for the Government, whose original plan called for the greatest sacrifices from their own friends. The prime objection to this amendment was that these small boroughs were, in fact" a compensation for the inadequate direct representation of the counties, and he warned the Committee that if it adopted this amend- ment it must be prepared to redress the balance in favour of the counties. The 45 seats provided by Mr. Laing's amendment could no doubt be fairly and sa- tisfactorily disposed of, but if more were needed they might be obtained in other modes, grouping, for instance, without resorting to complete extinction. This method was utterly inconsistent with the original proposition of the Government, and, believing that the House was not disposed to accept it, he strenuously opposed the amendment. Mr. Gladstone argued that the acceptance of the amendment would simply decide that the privilege of sole representation should not be continued to these boroughs it would still remain open to consider whether they should have a share in returning a member. He regarded the amendment as a natural supplement to the vote of Friday, and indispensable to a permanent settlement of Reform. After some observations from Mr. Nevvdegate, the amendment was rejected by a majority of 52-269 to 217. Captain Hayter next moved that the population of all the boroughs semi-disfranchised by Schedule A shall, either by the addition of neighbouring towns or the extension of present boundaries, be raised to 10,000. The amendment was supported by Mr. Yorke and Mr. Dimsdale; but The Chancellor of the Exchequer opposed it, pointing out that the first alternative actually amounted to the elimination of the urban element from the counties, which had been so much objected to by the process of grouping, and that the inclusion of the two or three rural parishes would not add to the real value or import- ance of these small boroughs. Mr. Disraeli also took the opportunity of stating the course the Government intended to take on Mr. Laing's amendment, remarking that it was impossible for him to make the commuuiea- tion until Serjeant Gaselee's amendment was disposed of. They were of opinion that this decision of the Committee necessitated the reconsideration of their whole scheme of redistribution—not merely the disposal of 30, but of 45 seats; and as that could not be done without much deliberation, and would require the pre- paration of new schedules, he proposed that the chair- man should report progress after Clause 9 was agreed to, on the understanding that the Committee would not be resumed until after Whitsuntide. A short conversation followed, in the course of which Sir F. Crossley urged that seats taken from boroughs ought to be distributed among boroughs. Colonel Dyott recommended that the Boundary Commissioners should be instructed, not only to, enlarge boundaries, but to contract them, like Tamworth, for instance, in cases where they had been extended into the surround- ing country to suit a particular purpose; and Lord Galway vindicated this policy by the example of his own borough (East Retford); Mr. M'Laren advocated the claims of Scotland to a still further addition under the altered circumstances Sir R. Palmer hoped that if the principle of grouping were adopted it would be applied equally to all boroughs identically situated but Mr. Hardy guarded the Government against any presumption that they were committed to the principle of grouping. Ultimately Captain Hayter, acting on the advice of Mr. Laing and Mr. Kinglake, intimated his wish to withdraw hiS amendment, but this course was objected to, and it was negatived without a division. Clause 9 was then agreed to, after a protest from Mr. KnatchbulI-Hugessen against, the inadequacy of the scheme, which he insisted ought to dc.il with eighty or ninety seats at least, and the committee was formally adjourned until Thursday week, but on the under- standing that no business would- be taken in it until Monday week. Some further progress was made-with, the Irish Court of Chancery Bill. HOUSE OF LOEDSi—June 4. CONTAGIOUS DISEASES (ANIMALS) BILL. The Contagious Diseases (Animals) Bill passed through committee, a clause bei"'g.added,.at the instance of Lord Walsingham, empowering the Government to order the slaughter of all foreign cattle at the ports of entry. Upon the question of third reading, of the Increase of the Episcopate Bill, Lord Gray, suggested, and Lord Lyttclton assented to, the postponement of further pro- gress until after Whitsuntide, the former peer announc- ing his intention of moving to restore the clauses relating to suffragan bishops which had been rejected by a narrow majority on the previous evening. Lord Stanley of Aldcrlcy, having called attention to the inconveniences arising from the discrepancy between the Standing Orders of the two Houses I elating to rail- way deposits, Lord Redesdale explained the difference of practice, maintaining that the Standing Order of that House operated most beneficially, but suggested a compromise between the two Houses. Lord Derby having suggested the appointment of a joint committee to consider the subject, the Duke of Richmond promised to communicate with the members of the Government in the House of Commons with a view of arriving at some satisfactory arrangement. HOUSE OF COMMONS, JUNE 4. BANKRUPTCY BILL*. The morning sitting in the House of Commons "vas taken up with a discussion on the Bankiuptcj Bill, which, though preliminary tO, going into committee, turned entirely on the details and clauses of the measure. The Attorney-General explained the modifications which had been made in the bill since Hie last stage. Mr. Moffatt followed, condemning the bill as follow- ing too closely the traditions of the old system, and overburdened with officialism, and predicted that the measure would not be more beneficial to the commer- cial community than its predecessors. Mr. Selwyn, Sir R. Palmer, Mr. Karslake, Mr. Goschen, Mr. Freshfield, and Mr. Avrton also entered into a minute discussion of the provisions of the bill. GRIEVANCES OF JURYMEN. At the evening sitting, Lord Enfield (Mr. Hardy consenting on behalf of the Government) obtained a committee to inquire into the law and practice relating to the summoning, attendance, and remuneration of special and common juiies. RAILWAY AND JOINT-STOCK COMPANIES ACCOUNTS. Sir W. Hutt asked and obtained leave to bring in a bill for the better regulation and supervision by the Board of Trade of the accounts of railway and other joint-stock companies. CAPE OF GOOD HOPE. Air Vanderbvl called attention to a petition recently presented from'the Cape,Colony, praying that her Majesty's troops may not be withdrawn, and, among other reasons for retaining them, he alleged the import- ance of the Cape as a station for acclimatizing our troops fcr Indian service, and the danger that, if the next war were conducted by the white settlers alone, it would be so bloody as to lead to the extermination of the natives. Mr. Gorst and Mr. Lamont made some observations, Mr. Addeily replying on behalf of the Government. Yltimately Mr. Vanderbyl withdrew his motion. MASTER AND SERVANT BILL. On the second reading of Lord Elcho's Master and Servant Bill, Mr. E. Potter moved its rejection, and, while admitting that there were hardships in the present law, pointed out that the demand for a change came entirely from the mining districts, for in the cotton districts no one ever thought of resorting to this law, and he urged the impolicy of meddling with the question until the Trades' Union Commission had reported. After some remarks the bill was read a second time. Some other orders were forwarded a stage,. and the House adjourned at ten minutes past one.

[No title]

T I INAUGURATION OF THE STATUE…

COMPOUND RATING.

I THE PARISIAN LADIES.

[No title]

"—-,■,-I— ¡VARIORUM.-

[No title]

OPENING OF THE NEW WING OF…

I IA NAVAL HERO OF THE OLDEN…