Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

9 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

HAI L LICENSE.

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

HAI L LICENSE. The IUr:v adjourned licensing sessions were held at the >• ■ nic Hall on Friday. The magis- trates prese Charles Williams (Chair- man), (iv, nuro Davies. Preese Owen, John Lewis, Ellis Wilkins, E. Bucklev, and E. W. Davies, Esqrs. OHlELTON HALL. The Chairman said with regard to the applica- tion for licenses for the Orielton Hall and Henblas, the evidence in respect to which was heard at the annual sessions, the magistrates on that occasion retired to their consulting room to arrive at their decision, and they might have brought their de- cision into Court then if they chose, but they thought it was best to go and visit the houses and see personally for themselves. They had visited them, and each. magistrate had sent him in writing his decision. The result of that was this, that with regard to Orielton Hall the magistrates were equally divided—there were three for and three aga:nst. With regard to the Henblas, the majority of the maei-tratcs were in favour of not granting the licer se Mr. Guthrie Jones: The magistrates being equally divided in regard to the Orielton Hall that amounts t a ref isal. Mr. A. J. Hughes (who appeared for the ap- plicant) Of course there must he a majority before a license is granted, but it is quite competent for the Bench to adjourn. The Chairman; There is no chance of our arriving at another decision. Mr. Hughes I thought there might be another magistrate. The Chairman: There can't be. The magistrates have decided the case. There can't be any other magistrate taking any part now. Mr. Hughes It will be competent for you to adjourn the sessions, and if another magistrate is called in, a" is very often done where three magis- trates are equally divided. Mr. Guthrie Jones I submit under the circum- stances the magistrates have no power to adjourn. The Magistrate's Clerk: You can't go beyond the statutory time for licensing. Mr. Hughes: You might adjourn till this after- noon (laughter). The Chairman (after consulting with his col- leagues) The magistrates are all in favour of letting it stand as it is. The case is settled, and there will be no adjournment. CROWS HOTEL. Mr. Samuel Moss, M.F., applied for the renewal of the licence of the Crown Hotel to Edward Wyatt, the present licensee. He was not going into the merits of the case, but he thought. the licence was opposed, and in order to have formal opposition before the Court, he would ask his friend (Mr. Guthrie Jones, who appeared for the opposition party), to prove notice of opposition. Mr. Guthrie Jones thereupon proved having served notice of opposition on the licensee and Mr. William Woodhouse, which was signed by the Rev. E. Arberth Roberts and Mr. William Owen. Mr. Moss then asked whether any instructions were given by the magistrates or the Chief Con- stable that the licensee should be served with notice of opposition. The Magistrates' Clerk No Mr. Moss proceeded to contend that the requisi- tion which the magistrates must make to the licensee to be present must be a requisition in writing, either by their Clerk or by the Chief Con- stable on thc-ir behalf. In this case no such direction was given. He quoted cases in support of his contention that before they could refuse a licence the magistrates must give such directions. This was not a mere irregularity it was a com- plete absence of that which the Act of Parliament said should be inserted in the notice, viz., an order by the Justices that the licensee must attend. What were the facts here At the last meeting the magistrates decided to adjourn it, but that was not a notice to the licensee in writing, and having failed to give formal notice to the applicant to attend at the adjourned meeting they had made a mistake. The Magistrates' Clerk: The magistrates said Mr. Jones had no locus standi." They are with you to that extent. The Chairman: We are with Mr. Moss so far. Mr. Guthrie Jones I have every authority in my favour for coming here to-day. He quoted Section 42, and said the Justices were given power to imitate an objection from one amongst them- selves, and if such an objection was initiated by the Bench, then the Bench had the power to ad- journ or to direct their Clerk or Superintendent of Police to give notice. If they had at the last meeting he admitted then his notice would be bad. But those were not the circumstances. The ap- plication was made at the last sessions. The Magistrates heard no application, but adjourned the application. They gave no direction that notice of objection should be given and he sub- mitted that he was entitled to give the notice he had to the licensee that opposition would be made to the renewal. He had to serve notice seven clear days before the commencement of the the annual licensing sessions. The general annual licensing meeting and the adjourned meeting were only one meeting in law and a notice served by any member of the community before the adjourned meeting must be held good. Mr. Jones was pro- ceeding to quote a case when— Mr. Moss pointed out that he was not finding fault with the notice. What he did find fault with was the absence of notice from the magistrates. Rev. Gwynoro Davies: You admit that the notice was in proper order. Mr. Moss: Yes. Rev. Gwynoro Davies The Sessions were ad- journed and Mr. Guthrie Jones' point is that the adjourned meeting and the first meeting are but one. If it was good for the first meeting it must hold good for the second. Mr. Moss 1 quite agree. I don't know whether you have followed my legal points. Rev, Gwvnoip Davies I simply use my common sense. Mr. Moss Assuming this notice to be good my my point is this—that the Justices must direct a written notice to be given. That has not been done. Mr. Guthrie Jones My locus standi" is quite sufficient in this case because although no notice has been given by the direction of the magitsrates to the applicant to come here I have in conformity 'with section 42 served notice of objection seven days before the hearing of the application. There- fore your worships must hear the opposition that has been made. Mr. Jones was proceedings to quote another case when— Mr. Moss objected to his citing what he called Pattison's opinion which was incorrect, because he (Mr. Moss) himself was in the case. If Mr. Jones produced the law report he would not object. Mr. Jones replied that he had not it with him. and went on to urge that his objection was good, and that the opposition should be heard. If, how ever, the magistrates held that his objection was not good, and he asked them to adjourn the applica- tion to enable him to give the proper notice. The magistrates retired to consult in private and The Chairman, on returning said The decision we have arrived at is that Mr. Jones has no locus standi" in this case, as the proper notice has not been given. (To Mr. Moss) If you want to make application you may. Mr. Moss: Then I apply formally for a renewal. That follows if there is no notice. Mr. Guthrie Jones Will you adjourn the case to enable me to give notice ? The Chairman: No. The magistrates then consulted, and the Chair- man said We refuse the application for a renewal Mr. Moss If that is the decision I say nothing more, I submit, however, it is rather hard if in law the license cant be refused. The Chairman We refuse the application. We allow you to take any further steps. HENBLAS INN. Mr. Moss next applied for the renewal of the license of the Henblas Inn to the existing licensee, Mr. Pugb. No notice of objection, he said had been served' and if the license was refused there was a remedy either by mandamus or by appeal to quarter sessions. The Chairman after consulting with his brother magistrates, intimated that the majority of the Bench were against granting the license. The summonses and charges were then proceeded with. WHEHE DID YOU GET THAT BOTTLE? Thomas Evans, painter, Dolgelley, was charged with being drunk on two occasions—September 24th and 28th.-ai Barmouth. P.C. John Jones proved the case. Thomas Evans now appeared to be very repentant, but a mischievous smile passed over his ruddy countenance when Supt. Jones in- formed the Bench that a bottle was found in his pocket. He was fined 2 6 for each offence, and was given a week to scrape the colossal sum together. ROWDYISM AT DYFFRYN CHAIRMAN SPEAKS OUT. Thomas Lewis, foreman platelayer, was charged with obstructing the highway at Dvffryn and with resisting the police whilst in the execution of their duty. P.C. Morgan stated that at 10.30 p.m., 2nd September, coming from Talybont to DyfFryn on his bicycle, noticed a large crowd by a public- house. He requested them to go away, and they went. The defendant, however, used language that was not fit for any one to hear, and refusing to go away, he was taken to Barmouth. He resisted, and said You've got no business to touch me." Cross-examined by Mr. Hughes The crowd dis- J persed after he dismounted, The defendant was under the influence of drink. Instead of going home he followed witness, and shouted after him. He had no witness, but he was willing that the case should be adjourned in order that Mr. Williams, the Post Office, might give evidence. It was not a fact that the defendant was going home, nad that he (witness) followed him. The defendant gave evidence. He said he was standing on the road with Humphrey Humphreys and Evan Evans when P.C. Morgan came along on a bicycle, and remonstrated that he had no room to pass. Witness denied having done anything to obstruct the constable, who, he said, caught hold of him without any provocation. Humphrey Humph] eys gave confirmatory evid- ence. Replying to P.C. Morgan the witness denied having been drinking freely with the defendant that evening. Nor did he say" Cardis are no good at any time" (laughter The Chairman: As a local magistrate living in that neighbourhood I am not surprised that the [1 police have brought this up. It is high time they should, because of the rowdyism that goes on. I think the police ought to be thanked, and I per- sonally do thank them for bringing this case forward. The rowdyism on Saturday nights in the neighbourhood is disgraceful and I am only sorry we are obliged to dismiss this case, because the policeman has not brought any witnesses. Mr. Hughes Because it has been disproved. The Chairman: No, no. The next time P.C. Morgan bring forward a case with sufficient evidence I promise a stop will be put to it. It is high time, I hope, the Press will take notice of the remarks I am making. Major Best: In future, on Saturday evenings I shall put two constables there. The Chairman It is high time you should do so. The nuisance is not only in this neighbourhood, but the whole district. Major Best: If we had a cell there, it would be a good thing for Dyffryn. Mr. Hughes: Oh! no, we don't want cells. We are still in a civilised state (laughter). Rev. Gwynoro Davies: The black spot is the public house there, isn't it ? We hear it in evidence to-day that had it not been for that they would not have been about. HUMOUR AND THREATS. Wrm. Rider, Pendwnen, Barmouth, was summoned for using threats towards Jane White, a married woman, of the same place. Mr. Oswald Davies appeared for the prosecutrix. The prosecutrix stated that on September 2nd., about midnight, she and her husband were in the house when he heard a knock at the door. On opening it she found him on the fiooronone knee with I a stone in his hand, He said he would kill her. He remained there some time and used threatening language. She had been under a doctor since, she was afraid of her life. She saw him again, sub- sequently, and the effect of seeing him and his demeanour was that she was frightened, and afraid to go out at night. Defendant: How did I go to the door, Jane ? (laughter).—Witness You knocked. Defendant: It was her husband who started the bother. Harry White, the husband of the prosecutrix, gave confirmatory evidence. The effect of the threats was that he was seriously ill on the follow- ing Monday and had to see Dr. Williams. Defendant said Let the rotten mare come out on the sands and I'll do for her." Defendant: That's a lie, Harry (laughter). I want to know what I was doing on my knees, if I was on my knees (laughter). His missus went for the poker and he said I'll split your skull." Witness: No, we didn't have a poker. Defendant: Yes you did. P.S. Williams stated that he was called to the defendant on the night in question. Defendant was near the house of the prosecutor and he said he was waiting there to do for Jane," and that he would wait months for her before he would leave her alone. Witness asked him to go home several times but he refused. This was at half past one in the early morning. Witness left him saying I'll give you a chance, if you don't go away soon you will be locked up." Witness went the Police Station, and sent P.C. Jones to the spot, and he found the defendant still there. Defendant was then taken to the Police Station. Rev. Gwynoro Davies Was he sober ?—Witness: He was in drink. Defendant I never had a drink since my Missus died (laughter.) Defendant was bound over in the sum of £5 to keep the peace, and ordered to pay the costs. Defendant: I have no money, and I have two children. Defendant added that he could not walk the streets for these people, and burst out crying. BONTDDU ROWDYISM. Robert Roberts, labourer, Bontddu, was charged with being drunk and disorderly. P.C. Benjamin Evans proved the case.—The defendant was fined 5s. and costs, the chairman informing him that if he appeared again, they would not deal so leniently with him, as they had heard the same complaints from Bontddu, that they had had from DyfFryn. EJECTMENT ORDER. Mr. Oswald Davies applied on behalf of Mrs. Ellen Lloyd, for an order of ejectment against Hugh Hughes who occupied a house in Gibraltar Terrace. —The order was granted. <,

Extraordinary Case at Barmouth.

Rural District Council.

County Court.

[No title]

A DISCLAIMER.

THE ABERYSTWYTH LEASE QUESTION.

ARDDANGOSFA ARDDWROL CORRIS.

Advertising