Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

19 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

THE MAN WHO WOULD CENSURE.

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

THE MAN WHO WOULD CENSURE. IN his day, Disraeli was supposed to have brought the science of artful dodging to the highest state of perfection; but he was, after all, a mere tyro contrasted with the present leader of the Tory party. Of Lord Salisbury's lofty dignity of statesmanship, force of character, stolidity of will, and courageous self-reliance, Mr Balfour has little or nothing, though in mental ability he may not be considered inferior to his ilustrious uncle. What dignity of states- manship could one discern in his notorious hedging and fencing on the fiscal question, fcy which he sought to hypnotise and de- ceive both the Protectionists and Tory Free Fooders, until eventually he was compelled to find political refuge under the Chamber- lain wing! Who can forget that memorable scene in the House of Commons when pressed by his party to abandon his policy eI. thimble-rigging and definitely declare kimself, he posed like a sphinx ? Mr Cham- berlain had claimed him as an apostle of Protection, and the Tory Free Traders re- torted with equal vehemence that he was nothing of the kind. For three hours the two sections appealed for a declaration, but this master of arts and crafts declined to titter a single yea or nay. His policy of deception had not then ripened, his leader- ship was hanging in the balance, and not until he could determine the stronger side would he make the fateful avowal. History records how a disgusted people drove him ignominiously from office, how even his own constituents turned their backs upon him. How cleverly he has since continued to play the part of opportunist. Old age pen- sions he studiously refrained from support- ing or opposing, and the Miners' Eight Hour's Day he dared not order the Peers to reject; but in opposing the Licensing Bill and the Education Bills he saw a path- way back to a favoured place in the heart of Toryism. To-day Mr Balfour assumes the role of an undignified scaremonger, for no other purpose than to excite a public feeling of insecurity, and arouse a national revolt against the Government. Scares are. easy of manufacture, and invariably effect a party purpose. There is conceivably no deadlier dodge in the whole resources of the practiced opportunist ambitious of power than to alarm the country with the fear of invasion. Let us for a moment ex- amine the credentials of the man who thumps the drum, and attempts to terrorise a nation and an Empire by the bogey of German armaments. Is this not the self- same statesman whose Government brought us-to war with the Boers ? This is the man who, before committing us to that terrible conflict, confessedly did not know that the Boers possessed horses, or for an instant contemplated the possibility of the Orange Free State joining forces with the Trans- vaal. This is the man who imagined that only infantry, not cavalry, were necessary for the success of our arms. And how did his Government equip our soldiers to fight ? According to General French, our troops went into battle with depleted ammunition stores, with a sword the very worst that could be used for any mounted men," with H rifles that shot eight inches to the right at a distance of 500 yards," with guns that were completely out-classed by the enemy's ordnance-" Noah's Ark guns," as Lord Wolsley called them—and with antiquated medical and surgical appliances such as Sir Frederick Treves said should "only be found in a museum." This is the man whose Government entered upon that la- mentable war without a plan of campaign and without maps, and actually recalled General Butler because from his unequalled knowledge as the man on the spot he ven- tured to suggest the need for thousands in- stead of hundreds of men. This is the statesman who, like Mr Chamberlain, as- sured us that the conflict would be over in a few months, and would cost but ,a few million pounds. It endured four years, it lost to us upwards of 24,000 soldiers-the flower of our army-maimed as many more, and cost more than £ 200,000,000. Yea, this is the same head of the Tory Government who was conscientious enough to tell us afterwards that there was a time, and that during the very darkest days of the war, when in this country there were not more than 3,300 rounds of small arms ammuni- tion, and no reserve of artillery ammuni- tion except what was actually with the guns we retained at home, which in number were sufficient for a single army corps." This is the same censor who thus allowed the country to be reduced to a state of real defencelessness. "The sins of commission may be few," wrote Sir Conan Doyle in his description of the Boer War, "but those of omission are many. How many criticisms made by civilians in the last few years (those years during which a Tory Gov- ernment was responsible for our naval and military strength) have been proved by the stern test of this war!" Such is the man who dares to censure the Liberal Govern- ment on a charge of neglecting to maintain our naval supremacy. So much for the man. Let us examine his charge.

---A REFLECTION ON CIVILISATION.

A REFUSE DESTRUCTOR FOR NEWTOWN.

IS IT DISSOLUTION ?

THE HEALTH OF SCHOOL CHILDREN.

RETIRING WORTHIES.

[No title]

NEVTOWN RATEPAYEB' ASSOCIATION.

CARNO.

MR. DAVID D IVIES' FOX HOUNDS

Protest Against Lying Tongues.

What is Wrong at Manafon ?

Elementary Schools andI Violin…

" Luke Sharpe" and Dreadnoughts.

DOLFOR.

E. 11MR.

SEEN AND HEARD.

THE APPETITE OF THE PIG.

IS IT DISSOLUTION ?