Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

21 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

THE CONFERENCE.

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

THE CONFERENCE. WHILE party leaders are conspiring towards an amicable adjustment of the relationship between Lords and Commons, wisdom ordains a truce to controversial hostilities. But though observing this prudent attitude, and recognising also that .a satisfactory settlement can be accom- plished only by a compromising policy of "give and take," the County Member, in his address to the Liberal Association, makes plain enough his repudiation of the Peers' claim to interpret the country's will through a stoppage of the legislative machinery whenever they so please. Like every other progressive politician, Mr Davies knows very well that the Lords' re- jection of the Budget was inspired not by any sincere desire to consult the wishes of the people, but by a determination to de- feat the social reforms upon which the Budget was based. For the Licensing and Education Bills the Government had a direct mandate,—as clear and commanding a mandate as was ever given to any Parlia- ment—in face of which the House of Lords arrogated to themselves the right of rejec- tion. For the Balfourian Education Bill there was undeniably no national mandate. On the contrary, that measure of flagrant injustice to Nonconformists marked a universal rising and a revolt, yet these "true interpreters" of the people's will blessed it and passed it. And this unpun- ished arrogance emboldened them to break through all constitutional usage in smash- ing up the Budget, under the belief that they had only to sit tight and see the Lib- eral Government fall to pieces. But the warnings which they jeered at during that fateful performance have now overtaken their partisan perfidy, and lest an impatient, outraged nation should resort to revolution, they make some show of submission to a partial clipping of their claws. Former statesmen, who developed our constitutional government, saw the wisdom of giving the House of Commons full power over finan- cial matters. They could foresee the con- fusion which would arise if the Lords were allowed to reconstruct or reject measures for raising the nation's revenue, and to-day Lord Lansdowne realises this inevitable state of things. Mr Balfour tells us that he wants to "strengthen" the House of Lords by mak- ing it strong enough to resist passing gusts of public feeling." There is no am- biguity about that declaration. The idea of democratising the Upper House is to him unthinkable. But Lord Lansdowne, upon whom, as the head of a predominant Tory party in the Peerage, will rest'the respon- sibility for the future treatment of Liberal legislation, is by no means prone to such levity of utterance. We recall a very sug- gestive passage in the speech which he de- livered on the night when the Budget was permitted to pass through the House of Lords. As a candid confession, it is not likely to be lost sight of at this conference of party leaders. Here it is:—" The Prime Minister announced to the country that the Government would not resume office and would not hold office unless they could se- cure the safeguards which experience shows to be necessary for the legislative ability and honour of the party of progress.' That intimation attracted very great atten- tion, and it is no exaggeration to say that the general election was in a great measure fought upon that declaration." Surely, we have in this statement a very clear admis- sion that the last general election deter- mined the public feeling towards an un- bridled House of Peers. Lord Lansdowne does not want another election with the Lords' Veto as the dominant issue," hence his desire for a compromise. But Liberal- ism will brook no compromise which renders possible the rejection of another Budget, or the ruthless tearing up of Liberal legis- lation. A House of Lords unaffected by public opinion is an anachronism in a democratic constitution it is an enemy of progress, and, therefore, an anomaly among progressive people. The fact that a Liberal vote is not of equal value to a Conservative vote in any part of the country courts no compromise. What is it that this party conference is called upon to determine ? Simply and solely whether the mandate of the country, resultant of a specific reference, is to be fulfilled. What was the mandate which the Liberal Premier sought? "That the absolute veto which the House of Lords at present possesses must go," and the power which it claims from time to time to, in effect, compel us to choose between a dissolution-so far as legislative projects are concerned--and legislative sterility, must go also. In other words, the House of Commons must be vested with supreme control of finance, and the veto of the Lords in regard to general legislation reasonably restricted. Around the definition of reas- onable restriction party leaders are doubt- lessly sparring, individually ambitious to arrive at a compromise, but at the same time conscious of the personal disaster in- evitably attending concessions unacceptable to their respective followers. For our part, we do not believe the conference will evolve a friendly settlement, having regard to Mr Balfour's recent post-prandial pronounce- ments. But this man with the open mind, this prince of opportunists, may, after all, furnish us with another surprising attitude. We can only wait and see."

THE YOUNG LIBERALS LEAGUE.

RECKLESS MATRIMONY.

VOTES FOR WOMEN.

GOLF GOSSIP.

Welshpool Golf Club.

SEEN AND HEARD.

CONFUSING.

MOURNING.

MORE RIGID INSPECTION NEEDED.

AN HONOUR FOR THE BOROUGH…

u. 0. w.

.MACHYNLLETH.

AMONGST THE COLLIERS.I

Another Honour for the Borough…

WELSHPOOL.

ALLEGED BEER ROBBERY

Newtown Post Office

[No title]

[No title]

RECKLESS MATRIMONY.