North Wales Gazette

I "I I/O N DON, MQS L) 4 Y, APRIL 9. Tlv :H-spr;i tent-proceedings in the House of have been followed by a charge of preach of privi- lege a gains' Sir Franrw Unrdett, for a late j'jblication* The publication was 'voted to fee Lbeiious ay a large majority of the House P: (iimtiioiij: But as to the mode of pro- ceeding against tne Baronet, there seemed to be much difference of opinion and the majo- rity ftyr h'.s: cwmnritfal to the tower, only amounted to 38. We are apprehensive that this bu..iness will uot be terminated without niucti mischief. Tl^-re hasTio question of importance been agitated in either 'house of parllamcnt during the week, but what we have just alluded to. The division oi the House of Commons yes- terday morning for the committal of Sir F. Burdett to the tower, has heell productive of the most serious occurrences in the metro- The warrant for cormniHing fir Francis Burdett to tJn» tower was signed by the Speak- er soon after the vote of the House had pass- ed, and given to Mr. Colmau-, Uie Serjeant at Arms, to execute.—In the mean time Mr. Jous Burdett, who had remained m the vici- n; of Ilie House of Commons throughout, the night, proceeded to Wimb) 'toa to apprize 1:i. brother of the restilt of the debate—Sir 1 r uscis returned to town with It,s brother, und reached Ins house in Piccadilly about one o'clock, v.here T^e understand, he received a not.- from the Serjeant at Arms, informing him o( the erder oi the House l«#riiiscommit- tal, and requesting So ktio'v when he shouid v ait upon "imu" -ÍJh She .jH-.ikrr's vvarrani, for the purpos-* -I accompanying him to the r Francis iiiitd twelve (j'rjock tt-is d. v 5 bet b) an order from the Speaker, the Serjeant returned, and staled to him, itiat his instructions were itnnt-rative and that he nv:s» liirn surrender himself. :ir Francis de c ;ued ne ouki not go with h:m, ami, ex- pr-^scd a deterxi.inat'ou oi repelling force by f: rft 1 he Serjt -'i.t at Arms retired. lii ti,e C'Hivs- of. t! e a!cra;>on» large concourse <;f j ople had -samihied o; posite the baronet's f e, wi u ufed hurdett tor e*er! and in- ti)e e.. f,1 rr). aiid iiii)e iii the eveiiiii, n detachment ot-tlveni proceeded to the suppos- ed residence ot Mr l.ethbndge, but winch is iii>w in ihe, possession ot a Mr. liaikes. — Be- f :>e they wet convinced of their mistake, thes did co«>ui- rahie d nna^e, hy demoiisliing t eO, illtl;)\s. &r Lord Castlereagh s house v, »s then ahackfd, whose windows, biinds. &i". were ins aut ) demoli^ ed. lie oi the Lad "t tiarta outh, Mr. Perceval, (k- ri rai Stewart, Liuke-of Momrose, iCarl of Westmoreland, Farl of Chatham, Mr. Yorke, Sii- hi» AoAtfuther, and a great number oi' others, were visited with similar marks ot jiopniur vengeance. Alt the streets and squares in the neighbourhood were obliged to .ii'lnmi- jvite, as expressions o) rejejcing that fcu Francis had net surrendered. The Udntan, coiis. >ii^ of horse and foot guards caijed OU., and In their whole el,!I, ed [hill hi(i i-ct,ive(i oi-tiers n >t to proceed to violence 'ill he last extre mi J—a line of roi duct which entitles those by WiiOXI iustruct.ws they acted, to a couti- derabJa share of praise, for klic consequence of a different mode of procedure might have been most calamitous and dreadful. It was not uutii two o'clock this morning th^t the populace dispersed. Second Edition. Two o'clock. The crowd assêinhled at ir Francis's house is very great, many thousands, About one hundred of the horse guards are drawn up in three rows, swords drawn, immediately facing Sir Francis's house. The mob is very noisy. A II theshops in the neighbourhood, about the ends ofBond- strect, St. James-street, and in Piccadilly, arc shut; the windows and balconies are full of people. The streets arc crowded. An officer of the horse guards has just-rode off towards Whitehall. It is said the riot act has been read. it was reported Sir Francis slept at Wimbledon last night, and thither three post- chaises with the Serjeant and Constables set off"' this niorunig to take him. lie slept in Piccadilly; and this forenoon he went out on horseback lolake the air. ()is*liisrelurt: about, haIr past twelve, the mob saluted and shook hands with him. Sir Francis intends to resist his arrest as far as his power enables him, he denying the power of the Speakers warranty but he intends also to submit to force. As soon as the Serjcantcanbc brought from Wim- bledon with the warrant, it is supposed Sir Francis will be forced to submit, and proba- bly he will be carried to the tower within an hour or two.—Courier A third edition of the Courier, dated three o'clock, says the Serjeant at Arms had been at Sir Francis's I)oi).w.-Was refirsed admit- tance :—horse and foot guards parading the streets.—The mob rapidly increasing. Freemason's Tavern.—A very numerous and reflect able party dined at the freemason's Tavern yesterday, for the purpose 01 contri- buting to the Fluid for the support of the de- clining years of tiie veteran Charles Dihdin.— Incledou in the Chair, and was most ably sup- ported by Ueliamy, Taylor, Philipps, Muuden, iilanchard, and illost of the first singers from iwthTheatrcs, wfco severally sang most of Dibdin's songs. Incledou, with much feeling, explained the intention of the meeting. II iras, he observed, to assist elltlls in distress, Kid contribute towards the comfort of a man who had done much towards the sr.iace of sir !1iS,!re hours oi our brave tars, alld inspi1" { them when going to meet the enemies of their country. For his own part, he (elt pride in owning that he had served his country on the ocean, and before the mast—(Shimtiers of ap- Iause)—and in that situation, lie siii: the songs of Dibdin with enthusiastic admira- oil.-( I he teas here repeated-)—He concluded iih observing., that the merits of (hose productions were too well known to re- quire any euiogitmi on his part, and thai, the full attendance of that, evening spoke more ■effectually than any words could express, the public feeling upon the subject—(Universal- I)Itiiiye !)-After some excellent songs had been sung, Mr. O'-Brieu, in a short neat speech staled his intention h: propose that a collection should he made, which proposition was imme- diately acceded It); alldalHJut'iOoL were a!. most instantly subscribed.

Sill FRANCIS BU.ROETT, Sir Francis Burdett has resolved to avail himself of his Constitutional melHlsofdcfclIcc to what he apprehends to be all illegal War- rant. Sir Francis sent on Saturday night the iw! lowing letter to the Sheriff's of Middlesex; Obstj-embe, In furtherance of an attempt to deprive nie of ni) liberty, under the uuthority of an insMu- lnent vliich i know to be illegal, viz. a Warrant by the Speaker of t-he House of Commons inv house is, at this monsent, beset by a Military Force. As I atn determined never to yield a, volun- taryobcdicGce to an act contrary to the Laws, t am resolved to resist the execution of such a N'Vai,.rai,t, I)y ill-tlie le'jjal means in my power; and, as you are the Constitutional Officers .ap- to protect the anti of yo-it- Baili- wick from violence ami oppression, from what- ever quarter they may come, i make this requi- sition to you, t(i.enlleinen, to furnish me with your aid, with which the Laws have provided you, -either by calling out the Posse Cowitatus, or such oilier as the case <Judcin.:umstames UIa) rCUlllre. I t is for you to consider, how far you may be liable, should I, by any unlawful force, acting wmler an'URfanrftil authority, be taken from my house. 1 have the honour to be, Gentlemcu, Your very obedient humble Servant, '(Signed) 44 FRANCIS BURDETT.' 1810. MATTHEW WOOD, l Sq. and •l JOilN ATKINS, Esq. Sheriffs of Middlesex." Immediately on receipt of Sir F. Burdell's letter addressed to the Sheriff's, they tralls- mitted a copy of it to the Secretary of Slate, aud the Speaker and Mr. Sheriff' Wood wait- ed personally on the Speaker, requesting his advice. The Speaker's answer was short— ,4 That he had done his doty, and he had no doiibi the -8 doubt Lhc Sherif fwould d> his." From the Secretary of state the answer received was nearly the same, with the addition —" That II was tohe.prcslIIned. that thc Shcritr would rather be inclined to upport the authority of the Speaker, than to oppose if. The II)eii called out the Constables and their -own-officers—determined, if possi- hi*, to preserve the peace without the aid of the military", and issued the following no- tice NOTICC. Desirous of preserving the Peace by the means of the Civil Power, without the aid of the JVIi 1 i- tary, All are hereby ordered not to assem- ble in numbers, or in any respect, to iuterruj the paSSä¡!;C ,.(. his l\1ajcsty' subjects, or otherwise j disiurh the public, tranquillity, on pain of being apprehended, and dealt wilh according to Law. ,N A JOHN ATKINS, Sheriffs of Middlesex, Sunday, April 8th, 18 It). Whilst this notice was preparing, the Po- | lice Magistrates called in the aid of the mili- Mary, and superseded the authority of the S Sheriff'. Frowithal time nothing but Military coercion was. eiuployed they cleared the >treel from Cleveland-row, permitting nothing but stage-coaches to pass, and stationed strong | ;«rties.at every avenue leading to Piccadilly, within that space. The populace, beyond a jiltk cliuuoui-, were nuL itctively, rl-otous, tI/ #" f. The Sheriff, to shew Che sufficiciacy,oribe c-ivilpower to "naiutaiu tranquillity, paraded the street thrcMgh t! dense of persons 'col- lected together with half a doseu Constables; the mob making way, crying out" •CiYfl Power fur ever! lO Military Coercion 1" We midcrstaird that the Sheriffs mean, thrs day, at twelve o'clock, to attend in their offi- cial capacity, and assum > ibeir public right of protecting the peace of the country, with- out the intervention of the military. MONDAY, 9 O'OLOCK. We have just ben favoured with a sight of the instrument, viz. the Speaker's Warraat, which Sir F. Burdett deems unlawful in its-ori- gin and terms. Clmy of the Speaker's H'arrant for apprehend- ,ingSir Francis liurdfiit. 1810 Whereas the House of Commons bath this day adjudged that Sir Francis Bnrdett, Baronet, who hath admitted that a JeHcr eigned Francis jjurdett, and a further part of a paper iHtituied, Argument in Cobbett's Weekly Register <«fMarch 24, 1810, was printed by his authority, (which Letter and Argument the said House huh resolv- ed to be a tibellous and scamlallous paper, re- flecting or the just Rights aud Privileges of the said House) has been thereby guilty of a Breach of the Privileges of the said House. And whereas the House of Commons hath thereupon ordered, that the said Sir Francisllur- ilett by for his said offence committed to 14is Ma- jesty's Tower of London. These are therefore to require you forthwith to take into your custody the body of the said Sir Francis IJorJett, andlhell forthwith to deliver, liiiii over inio the custody of (tie Lieutenant of his Majesty's Tower of London. And all Mayors, BailitiV Sheriffs, Under Sheriffs, Constables, and Headborooghs, and every other person, or persons, are'hereby re- quired to be aidin aud assi-sting to you in the e v edition hereof; for which this shall he your siulieienf Warrant.' GilCII under iii v. hand the (5th day of April, I;¡IO, CII AS., ABBOT, Speaker. To lilt; Serjeant al Arms at lending tite House uf C,J};Wi(!I!, or hit A t an early hour on Friday a Placard, of whieh the following is a copy, was posted allover West- minster: 14 BUFtDETT.—"V\ ESTMI>; STETt, A Reqinsilion is signing for a public Meet- ing of .hc Electors of itie.City and Liberties of estniinster to adopt such measures as may-be i expedient, if? of the House of Com- mons having depn-v-ed us of one of o., Iteprsell- sathes."

SEIZURE OFSIR FRANCIS BURDETT, and COSFEYANCE TO THS row Elf, At ten o'clock this inornin^. D 1 he Serjeant at Arms, attended by a suffi- cient force, went to the house of ir Francis Bindetf, in Piccadilly, and hy stratagem one ohhcKSsistaotsgot into theana over lh iron railing, and forced his way inlo the kitchen through flit; front window, and alter openilig the street door, to ad mi I his assistants, forced i his way up stairs and intõ) the room where Sir Francis was. All attempt had previously, (jr about the same tinve, been made to force"a passage into Ihesawie room from the slreet, hy playing a ladder against the window of the first floor, -butiio entrance could be obtained, as Ibe wiiKiowss were-too stro-ngly banicadoed within. Sir Francis tlieti iaid lie would not surrender unless hy compulsion, in consequence a set- of, liii person was formerly ma-de for the ptirpoKc ofascerlailling the fact, and Sir Fran- cis afterwards sbumilted to the arraii"eineiit for his beircg conveyed to the Tow-kip.. A coach wits in attendance immediately, into which lie,eiitered, -,icct)iii,i)tliiied by liis Bi-otlici- and the Serjeant at Arms. Tht-y proceeded through the North streets into the New Road, and passed through Islington on their way to the Tower, attended hy a Troop of Light I Horse and about JOQf the Horse Guards. Another party of about 400 Foot. Guards proceeded through the Strand and the City, in order to he ready on his arrival at the Tower to act as circumstances might require. He had not arrived at the Tower when this Paper was put to press at twelve o'clock. We shall publish a New Edition of this Paper at Six o'Clock, witha continuation of the pro- ceedings up to that time, as fully as can be ascertained.—Bell's Messenger,

SECOND EDITION. At twelve o'clock Sir Francis Burdett en- tered the Tower, guarded hy thirty Horse Guards on each side of his own carriage, in which Sir Francis and his Brother were seated accompanied by the Serjeant at Arms. The party entered the Tower hy the Gateway — without, any interruption. Several lives were lost in Fenclinrch-street. The particulars it is impossible to ascertain, from the general con- fusion that reigns in the city.

THIRD EDITIO. Two o'Clock. The following Nofice has just been issued to the Eift'tors of Westminster Sir,-—Yon are requested to meet a num- her of your fellow Electors and the Sheriff" of Middlesex, at the Glocester Coffee-House, Piccadilly, in consequence of one of YOllr He- presentaLives being illegally arrested hy a Mi- litary force. ,¡ Signed by order of the Sheriffs." 41 Monday, 12 o'Clock." 1"

ACCIDENTS, OF FES Cm, A youth of nineteen, the son of Mr. Alton, farmer, of Baslord, near Nottingham, on Thursday, the 2d lilt. went into the house at lea-time lor his usual refreshment, when his mother asked what he should. prefer, he re- plied, 1 have one more job to do, and I will come in again at the same taking all anxi- ous look at the whole family, who were sit- lintr in the room. lie then waikcd out, and immediately hunr; himsdf in one of his father's back sheds." V A thatcher of the name or Leaman, vvliiie standing on Monday at the window of a house in Norwich, viewing the operation ot a saw- ing machine, the wheel burst, and forced a large piece of iron against the temple of the ^unfortunate man, who was killed on the spot. Earty on Wednesday morning, the shop of ,unfortunate man, who was killed on the spot. Earty on Wednesday morning, the shop of Messrs. Griffith and Adams, jewellers and sil- versmiths, in the Strand, near Salisbury-street, was robbed of twenty-seven valuable gold watches, other jewellery and silver-plate, to the amount of upwards of ioooi. The rob- bery was effected in rather an extraordinary manner. The goods in the show-window, as well as the outside, which has proved that it is not possible to be too secure, as the precao- tion, it is supposed, actually prevented a man who sleeps in the shop, and a dog that watches it, from hearing the noise, or noticing the robbers-^ the robbers cut a large piece of one of the shutters out, and broke one of the squares of glass, to get out the goods. A public and a private watchman are stationed near the house. Pafgluse and Co. v., Maddy-.—This cause was tried the Glocester Assizes. It was an action brought by the plaintiffs, who are iiraudj -merchants in Bristol, against the de- tendant, an iim-keeper at Hay, to recover -the amount of a cask of brandy sold and delivered. The defence set up was, that when the brandy came toitand it wag considerably under the legal strength for dealers, &nd was, j in consequeirce, seized by the Officer of Excise on his surveying the defendant's stock. It was proved in evidence, however, that the brandy was of a proper strength when delivereil to the carrier, and the Jury, under the direction of the learned Judge, fÚund a verdict for the Plaintiffs to the full amount of their demand. A ludicrous circumstance occurred a few evenings since in Oxford-street. A chimney sweeper's boy got into a butter basket, at a cheesemonger's door, and fell asleep; one of his companions, in a joke, shut down the lid and fastened it. Two thieves passiushortly afterwards, a nil coiicei-VHig the basket to be tilled with butter or eggs, carried it away to a public-house in the neighbourhood, to (It. the -spoil,when io instead of a rich booty, out sprang the young knight of the brush. The rogues, as may be imagined, made a precipitate retreat on his unexpected appearance.

lit •PRICE OF STOCKS. Consols, C>8{^ .-7 Reduced, • • • 6"i§ 4 per Cents; .84^85 5 per Cents ii 1

■BANKRUPTS. William King, Bream's-bnildings, GhlJlJccry- hmc, Loudon, cabinet-maker.'—William Llo'yd, Chester, chair-iiiaker —Benjamin f'iides, Upton- upon-.S'evern, Worcestershire, builder.— David' Taylor, Great 't'oitiain, Essex, grocer.—William Hem, Bincksev, Berks, victualler.—J.-olmShafe, Shoe-lane, London, copfpor-plate maker.—-Mark Dixon, Boroiigh-Higlv-street, Surrey hop-mer- chant.—■—James Page, Ilornsey, Middlesex, butcher.—Abraham Perkins, Stamford, Lincoln- shire, grocer,— Louis Rene de Joachim, llowl- ing-green-buildings, Middlesex, distiller.-—Deci- mus Lomas, Watford, Hertfordshire, corn-mer- chant,—-William Riddiford,- U/ey, Gloucester- shire,cloiiiicr.—Joseph Hot-wood, Woodchesteiy Gloucestershire, miller and corn dealer.—Henry Fleming, Hanway-street, Oxford-street, Mid- dlesex, jeweile-r.—Robert William Brown,, lxtm- beth-road, Surrey, merchant.—William Burt, Too ley-street, /Southwark, Surrey, oil merchant. William Barber-, Alnwick-) Northumberland, brewer.— Edward Banfou, Wa'sall, Stafford- shire, saddler's ironmonger and factor.-—William Fennell Spencer, Gusporf, mercer iijid di-ai,ei- John Parkin, Sheiffeld, Yorkshire, iuukceper.- Francis Ingham, Norland, Yorkshire, clothier. James Fefton, West Tliurrock, Essex, I)aker.- Joseph luman, Kent-road, Surrey, broker.— James Maclean, Old Change, Londol1, victualler. Roliert West, Oxford-street, Middlesex, draper. John Baker, sea-coal-lane, London, carpenter & press-maker. — Waiter Foy, Beech-street, Lon- don, linen-draper,-—George Henzell, Little East- cheap, London, underwriter.

IN CHANCERY. CoTl B HIT V. CORBETT. We insert the following as a correct statement of the molion lately made in the Court of Chancery in this Cause, and of the Lord Chancellor's opinion of it. THIS was a motion lo dispanper the plain- tiff, grounded on the following facts, which were verified by affidavit of Air. Rosser, so- licitor, alld aient to the defendants in the former suit, instituted by the plaintft', and in the present, viz. That in June, 1791, the present plaintiff ii led h is bill in formi pauperis against the lale Hohert CorDelt, Esq. Richard Flint, John Flint, and the present defendant, the devisees for life under the three codicils to the will of the late Sir Richard Corbelt, Bart, bearing date 9th June, 1771, 31st Au- gust, 1771, and 31st July, 1773, and ag-mtist: -irle -1)(!t t John Plyniley the eider, and Charles Corbelt (the plaintiff's own father), praying to set aside the said several codicils, and to establish the will, and two other codicils to the same.* That the answers of (he said several defend- ants (except the said Richard Flint, who died soon alter iffing of said Bill,) were put-in May 1792, insisting- on their rights and inter- ests devised to them by the said codicils, and that the plaintiff had no right or interest what- ever to Lllc sajd estates, except to all annuity of 1001. a-year in case he the said plaintiff should survive the said Charles Corbelt his father That after other proceedings, a com- mission was awarded to delcndanls to examine witnesses, which commission was executed at a conslderahle ex-pencc in October 1794 and in Trinity Term 1795, the fnid calise having been set down for hearing at the instance of the defendants, the said I Io i d an order to dismiss his own bill, and (having sued as a pauper) without cosh, that after

It is a fact, 'perhaps", not generally under- stood, that the late Robert Corbett, Esq. was related to the 1 esijjtor, one degree nearer in blood than the late Sir Charles Corbett—and by the original limitations in the will, Mr. Corbett was next iu remainder in default of issue by the Charles Corbett-oy the codicil of JUlie 1771, Charles Corbett and his issue, -were taktn l out of such iiuiiiafiou. this dismissal of the plaintiff's bilK and read* ing the depositions taken in the cause, it waf considered by the defendants that the plaiulitf had relinquished his claim to the said eslales; but after a lapse of 14 years, advertisements were publicly and generally circulated, ca!V ing upon the iiobility and gentry for subscrip- tions to enable the famiiy to prosecute theif claims in the Court of Chancery, and stated" that all sums subscribed would be carefully applied for that purpose, under the direction of the respective persons who had proposed the plan That the present bili wa filled in October 1809 and notwithstanding the sub- scriptions collected and received for the avow. ed purpose of carrying on this suit, on the 13th of the same month the plaintiffobtaineJ an order from the Master of the Itolls to pro, secute his suit in forma pauperis, having madt an affidavit that he was not worth 51. iii tilt: world after payment of all his debts. That although the order was obtained 9C long ago as October, 1800, the same was il(),' entered, or made known to the defendant* uutil the 3d of February, 1819 that the pre- sent bill was nearly, and in point of fact, a r(W petition ol the former bill, tiled in 1791, pro- secuted by the said plaintiff'iu/"«»•»?« pauperi' and which had been dismissed by order oi' tained by plaintiff'himself, without costs, an- no further steps faken for the last 15 years.*— That, the said plaintiff", soon after the 41-eal 1) his father, Iwmdy, ill Sept. 1808, wrote to defendant, Archdeacon Corbett, requesting to be paid his half-years annuity, then be- coming due, and given him by the codicil of the testator, dated 9th June, 1771, wtilch codicil the plaintiff', as well by the present a» his fornwl" bill, prayed may be set aside, and which half years annuity was paid to bun l compliance of such request. In our former paper we the state- ments of the counsel for (he plaintiff; we shall do lio triol-C tlj,,iii flot ice Nl r. ii i observation on the facts of the defendants. That he was well with the proof* m the former cause adduced hv the delei'd' alils, that •still having heen conducted on thc-if behalf, under his direction; and he particu- lady referred to the evidence of Mr. I.oxda^" since dead, one of the witnesses examined (?fSl the commission, who was Town Clerk Shrewsbury, and of high character-and that other persons had also been then examiiuHl, who had opportunities of well knowing the Testator, and they, one and ali most distinctly declared, that whet; he made the codicils he* was as competent asever he had been in bis life- And Mr. Richards stated, with reference a the whole of the evidence taken in the for reef suit, that it was as strong a case for the de- fendants as could he brought illto a court, anti condemned the measures which had been taken on the part of the plaintiff, by advertisement aud circulation of papers, tending to prej"* dice the minds of the public; and added, thal: after dismissing his former bill on his own t»u" tion, he had tiled Ibe present bill, afler a'la{»se of many years, when the witnesses to the u1" strumeuts in question, and others best able to give evidence were dead and that the plain- tiff should not be permitted, after the steps llff had taken, to prosecute his suit. as a pauper, as he had done in the former suit. The Lord Clransellor took time to consider the cases referred to, and in ¡.(i\,jng j"1ge" ment, his Lordship said, he had looked ail the books of justice aud all the reports of cases in law and equity to which tw beea able to have recourse, and he thought the tact was to be represented? That ;i hi'l filed some years ago in this court, hy this indi- vidual plaintiff, who was admitted to fUe foniiapauperisilhuhuch bill proceeded through all its stages, and not being proceeded in, a19 dismissed, and as he took il from a benevolei^ feeHng in the mind of the defendant withtH'* costs:—And his Lordship said, he had per" suaded hi IIlSel f, from the best considerate"^ he could give it, and from the doctrine fol/lld in the cases he had met with, that if the de-" fendant in that case had thought ()Il)ervvi-sc ao to costs, that he might have had Hie bill dis- missed with costs. Another bill was then filed, after several years had elapsed, by thO same party, again suing,in forma pauperis He would not then enter into thequestion, hOl" far there was a rational prospect of success |U the suit which the plaintiff bad then instil"' led; though, his Lordship said, he coul suppose there was very little certainty in man affairs, it that suit was likely to come 10 a fortunate termination neither did he eide £ into the consideration, how far the rules' the court, NN-itil to i.lie evi(telice, WI)ich arc necessary for the protection of properlY, would be in lact broken, il such a suit, as ll'1^ could be maintained.—but as it Nvi,4 llsat the termination of the former suit cwf. not be pleaded iu bar of tlie present suit? was ouf. of place for him to consider topics of that sort: the question was, whether regard being had !,o the fact, that that bill was dis' missed withouteosts—io the conduct, of tito parly before the institution of this suit, and to what is stated in the affidavits as to in 11 subscriptions, collected, he could dispaiipef- the plaintiff ? His Lordship then entered ifito, a long aud learned argument upon the quest'" e on, and upon the cases which appeared m books. On the ground of, tllc C(,Il(illct of party, his Lordship said he was ready 10 sldtf I" I ao that he very highly disapproved of a grea^ part of the conduct stated iu the ftffid-avil,by' he did not see how he could act upon this JJl, the way it was wished. if a man instituted^ suit as a pauper, supposing it is a tirsi, suit. no further inquiry is made, than whether b1? establishes the fact by affidavit that he if- a, pauper, and whether he establishes.ii Ivy tba* suit of pledge from counsel, ",)i, liavil; cause of suit, and which perhaps wasto"b¡¡f. tily handed to the Court by counsel; and;!1'* Lordship said, he was alraid his leelings mUi! ltil-ic lt-d Iiiiii into error, but that there no duly which counsel owed more to the Co1" nor the Court to the suitors, not to be mis', too hastily by ones feelings in a case of sort. Upon the head of vexation (and he not avvai e any tiling had been done in th.e sec^1'' cause,) he referred to a case, where a iiinti'?'* might have been made to stay the second cause,) till the costs of the ^"iS were paid but (he said) that will not helf in tlie present cause, because there are cosls in tiie first. His Lordship concluded "X saving '♦ 1 ani therefore of opinion, "cannot grant the: motion, but I give p no costs iu it." f i i •