Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

11 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

Lessons from Russia. ;jj '…

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

Lessons from Russi a. ;jj essons rom USSla. ií 1 BY MARK STARR. I From the recent happennings in Russia differ- ent people draw conflicting different lessons. Look at the chaos in Russia and profit by its awful warning," says the conservative person. To some people no denunciations are too strong, no execrations too deep to heap upon the heads of the traitorous Bolsheviks. Even in an Aca- ,ven in an A c -i. demy picture an artist has given expression to his hate for these villains, and in leading ar- ticles and cartoons in the capitalist press of -every land, in its heavy quarterlies as well as its evening newsheets, there has flourished an •universal campaign ofJdaring m isroprosontation -and venomous vituperation. But we wage-workers who can well recall the magnificent inspiration, which we seemed to •share with the whole world, at the glorious Re- volution in 1917 cannot share in this hate or learn the lessons our rulers arc so willing to teach. In the first place we have a debt of gratitude to pay for the joy which was ours when we felt a. dark evil shadow had dis- appeared from the world. Our hearts were glad to know that the knout of a merciless autocracy ,-and the horrors of Siberian torture had been condemned to oblivion. The going of Tsardom we felt wrfs but a token of the toppling of tho might of other tyrants. Surely things could never be the same again. We felt and shared -to some degree "an universal spiritual uplift" with the new Russia. In his « R.ussian Revolu- tion and the War Michael Farbman cite the description of Mr. Harold Williams of the feel- ing in Russia itself: "Life is flawing in a heal- ing purifying torrent. Never was any country in the world so interesting as Russia is now. Old mien are paying Nunc Dimittis young men ringing in the dawn and I have met many men -and women who seemed walking in a hushed I sense of benediction." STILL IN THE BIRTH PANGS. Besides this sensa of gratitude for benefit* re- ceived, we owe it to our Russian fellow-workers especially now to turn a sympathetic eye and -an understanding ear to their endeavours to .solve the social problems which are ours as well vas theirs. Perhaps about much even yet we shall be forced to suspend our judg- Tments the subject is vast; our know- ledge is limited; the revolution is not, made but In the making; and the problem of tactics and reorganisation and the comiccting of principle to practice is involved in the material and men- tal development of the country and its people. This, too, as we shaU later see, will be greatly -affected roy the state of the other sections of the working-class in other lands. However, when the future historian sets out to chronicle the travail and triumph of the workers we c-an be sure the attempts of our Russian comrades will then receive their nieed of praise he will bo -able to answer fully questions which we have now to set aside. Yet, already certain lessons should be drawn. Did not. a well-known Socialist once say: 4, Proletarian revolutions criticise them- solves constantly; constantly interrupt them- selves in their own course; come back to what ■seems to have been accomplished, in order to start over anew; aocrn with cruel thoroughness the half-measuree and meannesses of their first attempts; seem to throw down their adversary only in order to enable him to draw fresh strength from the earth, and again to rise up against them in more gigantic stature. So; to the lessons. NECESSITY THE CAUSE OF REVOLUTION. This lesson needs little empnaws. YarbmaDS little pamphlet, already referred to. contains full details of the crazy mismanagement, the preva.lent corruption and the widespread short- age of materials for peace and war existing in the Tsarist Russia. The oppression of the rulers bad earlier produced the outburst of 1905 from which sprang up the Council of Workmen's and Soldiers' Deputies. This revolution by the timely aid of external finance the Government suppressed, and the organisation was driven un- vderground. The war hastened the breaking up of the old regime, and when the C.W.S.D. ap- peared again it was powerful enough to at first influence and later supersede the Provisional Government; local councils sprang up like mush- rooms, followed later by Councils of Peasants •ateo. The Revolution name, therefore, because the majority of the people were completely fed, np" with their conditions and were willing to make a change. It should, however, be clearly understood that the impoverished workers and so ldiers of Russia did not make the Revolution unaided. The Imperialist section of the Rus- sians, the Cadets, headed by Milyukoff, too were in favour of a. revolution so thnt the knock- "out blow poliey" might be more efficiently car- ried out. We are all familiar with the down- fall of the Coalition Government, with the hos- tile attitude of all the Imperialist powers, the failure of the Stockholm proposals ^the support given to Milyukoff by the Allied Ambassadors and the breakdown of the offensive. Reconcilia- tion of Socialist land proposals and insistence upon the retention of Constantinople as a secret war-aim was impossible. Keremky fell between the two stools. The coram unity of interest in making the Revolution quickly vanished. On Novomlier 6 th, 1917 the Bolsheviks by "an and bloodless triumph took hold of the reins of power and still retain them. They had a powerful secret organisation. Even in a huge country whore 80 per cent, of the people are ^aid to be illiterate and possessing 104 nationali- ties, the power of a resolute clear-thinking Tninority was great. Lenin and his colleagues fituveeded in snatching the fruits of the Revolu- tion from the Imperialists if a minority can do so-much, what will a majority do? The indus- trial organisations wore most advanced in the towns, but the old communal spirit of the mir revived in the North and Centre, while in ilm South where private property had been longer in existence the anti-Bolshevik spirit wns stronger. After all, illiteracy, while Capitalism controls the press, LS not without advantages. THE POSSIBILITY OF A BLOODLESS REVOLUTION. I From the cause of the Revolution we can turn to its character. Revolution, like the term "Bolshevik" has often been used to frighten timid souls. GTÍm associations make many I people connect it with bloodshed and conflict. It calls up a vision of barricades in the Rtrcets and blood in the gutters." But whether this necessary culmination of evolution results in bloody conflict depends always upon the strength of the reactionary for?es. In Russia it depended upon the strength of the White Gua.rds. Yet, while learning this lesson, the fact that the Bol- sheviks use armed. force to enforce their will and secure their power, to retain the dictator- ship of the proletariat," and are arming and training themselves in preparation for the a.n- ticipated future war against the forces of world-capital"—these things challenge us to think out the place of armed force in our Socialist philosophy. To the historical material- ist the use of armed force or of non-resistance cannot be attacked or advocated as principles apart from definite circumstances. It is not un- likely that in a transitory period such force could well be utilised. Those who advocate a League of Nations at the present time contem- plate using military as well as economic force against a recalcitrant nation. The Secretary of the Labour Party, while being hopeful that in effecting the expected transformation that no drop of blood will be spilt, is aware of the con- sequences of war in liabit-,ii,ting the thoughts of men to violence" and fears what may hap- pen if the demands of Labour are not acceded. Mr. Macdonald has also pointed out that the differences between the British people and their European neighbours in the matter of military institutions are practically gone for ever. To some minds the idea of using the Army to make the Revolution is attractive; but experience has proved this to be a foolish hope. Just as the Bolsheviks because they could not meet the Ger- man Junkers in a military contest were forced to employ the power of the idea instead of the sword, so the workei-s of the world will be un- able to beat Capitalism with its own weapons at its own game, and wH- have to rely upon purer if slower and le-s showy methods. If the Em- pires of the West settled their internal squab- bles, then from a military point of view the Bol- sheviks would be as helpless as the Sinn Feiners. But. does this condemn them or us to inacti- vity? By no means, for other factors are pre- sent; offensives are needed in other spheres. \fany politicians after tho failure of tho vote think of the rifle as a means of accomplishing their ends. Yet a new factor is increasingly being developed, and that is the factor of in- dustrial organisation and the might it can exer- cise. OUI^puoceas rests not upon the power of the sword, out the idea; our real work is to put clear conceptions into "heads, not blow them off. rise. Where, after ill, is the centre of tho Our non-resistance to armed force rests upon confidence in a resistance of a more effective sort. We are anti-militarist—apart from hu- manitarian reasons—because we know upon what militarism rests and wish to remove it and help on the day when neither politician, police- man, general, soldier or sailor will be wanted. Because, as soon as we understand, we can en- force political demand s and rights by industrial might; a bloodless revolution, given the educa- tion of the workers, is not only possible but probable. THE REAL WAR AIMS OF IMPERIALISM. I This lesson is much more obvious than the last. The Russian Revolution made known to us the secret treaties. Who will evu forget the soul stirring appeals made to the world by Trotsky at Brest Litovsk f Away with secrecy, said the spirit of the Revolution, the workers have no aim to seize spheres of influence and concessions in the unexploited parts of the earth. They do not wish to carve out schemes for their own aggrandisement. They have no surplus product which they must dispose of to realise the surplus value it contains. They have no capital, i.e., accumulated unpaid labour, to invest abroad. They are not jealously eager to snatch from i!beir rivals the raw materials for modern industry. Let the vegetable and mineral wealth of the world be used for tNe pleasures of all. In place of the "balance of power," with its huge threatening alliances and its "precari- ous equipoise, the workers adopt a foreign policy based upon Workers of the world unite." Domination of the world by ownership of coal and iron is not sought. Though appar- ently it failed, Brest Latovsk can never be with- out. effect. We know how our own Imperialists —the same people who forced an offensive upon a war-weary nation and paevented any British co-operation at Stockholm or at Brest—rejoiced at the unveiling of the barbarous German Im- perialists at the inevitable patched-up peace. But no section of Imperialism has been left shrouded in this unveiling—there it stands in all its horrible nakedness of brutality—and de- spite all obstacles, more and more people see the real reason behind modern war. In this con- nexion one need only refer to the April 'Social- ist," the "Herald" (May 11th, 1918), and I Newbold's" Capitalism and War t' among other books making public these disclosures. THE REALITY OF THE CLASS STRUGGLE. I This is a lesson which need not detain us long. The working-class in Russia Bought for the social ownership of the means of production; their owners did not givo them up without a struggle. When the land was worked by the peasants and the workshops were controlled by the organised workers, the appropriation of sur- plus value was ended. Russian establishments had no profits to declare. Following upon a realisation of this struggle and what it is about, i hould oome a willingness to take our part in bringing about the next step forward. Let us be, not pro-Britiah or pro-German, but pro- working-olass. The former titles Are often given by men who do not understand to those who oppose militarism in their own country. Per- haps the failure of the Socialist International is to be largely explained because many Socialists have never clearly thought out the relation be- tween class and nation. Trotsky (one of the men strangely accused of traitorously selling his fatherland( 1) to Germany) wrote in 1917 in one of his books in explanation of the downfall of the German Socialists: They fell because of their espousal of opportunism or minimalism. Instead of holding resolutely to their rvolu- tionary purpose—maximalism or Bolshevikisre— they sought to gain for tho working class con- cessions hero and now. They devoted their energies to building up a powerful and varied organisation, to Seating a rich and varied press, to organising co-operative effort, to working for labour legislation. Thus they acquired great vested interests which they were unwilling to jeopardise by placing themselves in opposition to the government in a time of national crisis. Nor-War, this the worst consequence of mini- malism. By working for their class advance- ment within the Capitalistic organisation, they unconsciously merged their interests with those of Capitalism. So long as Capitalism remained nationalistic, this did not bring them into con- II flict with the ideal of internationalism. But when German Capitalism burst the national shell and went forth into the world under the banner of Imperialism, minimalist Socialism was forced to tacitly accept Imperialism. Thus the German Socialists have become part of the sys- tem which produced this war and will lead to other wars unless it is overthrown by revolu- tion. Ponder well this lesson. Let us be aware of the danger of repeating previous mis- takes. I I THE END OF THE STATE. Whatever temporary compromiseo may have I to be made in attaining the Bolshevik ideal, and however many apparent, defeats may attend their efforts and baulk them of full success, we are bound to admire their attempts and do out- part to help them. Liberty is not something others can win for us but means complete con- trol over the conditions of our livelihood. The tool users become tool controllers through their own strivingr, and industrial organisations. No- thing is more sure than that the spirit behind (Continued at foot of next column).

[No title]

A REQUEST FOR THE YEAR BOOK.…

"DAISY DAY" RESULT. I

Theatre Royal

Dora .Again !

Liberalism's Local Problem…

I C.O.'s Attacked.

The State and -Industry

Liberalism's Local Problem…

Lessons from Russia. ;jj '…