Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

9 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

j Why Poverty?

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

j Why Poverty? WORKERS' WAY OUT OF TRAVAIL. I > BY MARK STARR. I i Poverty is a state of being poor, and may be ■chronic, long and continuous, or merely acei- -dent.al, temporary, and occurring by chance. It is the former to which the reader's attention will be drawn. in the first place, bow can poverty be mea- sured ? By the existing possible state of its opp<?ite—plenty and riches is the reply..Mod ern poverty, then, must be clearly distinct from former spates of -No absolute ftau- dard can be given, but one relative, changing .and dependent upon evolving historical eircum- utances. Puny, primitive man, armed with a sharpened iliut, was rich in comparison to his « forefathers, though incredibly poor to the man of the 20th Century with his steam-plough, loco- motive, aeroplane and so forth. In a starv ing city a, man having a dry crust would oe rich. In the Black Hole of Calcutta, fresh ajrJse- where so free to all-would have been a price- less boon.. qf the bread-and-butter problem forced the majority of men to work 18 hours a day, one working only 12 would be comparative- ly rich in leisure. If insecurity, danger and starvation were the unavoidable necessary lot l oi all men, if all stood cowed beneath lam inc. pestilenco and the lightning-Hash—then poverty < in a security of life would not be obtainable and reasonable. It is common knowledge that these things are not so. and modern poverty must be measured not by former conditions, but in rela- tion to modern plenty. As long as the human rac eexists, the plenty of to-day will be the poverty oi to-morrow. In the sense that a minority will over be cultivating liner sensibili- ties and higher appetites, the poor will be with, us always. Poverty can be roughly divided into two kinds, physical and mental. Both words are used in a very wide sense, and the overlapping -and intimate vital connection between the two -cannot be for one moment ignored. The exist- ?nce of physical poverty has been proved up to the hilt, and beyond all shadow of doubt. Skilled investigators have given us their find- ings, and official statistics and countless books -and pamphlets have been compiled and written proving in no uncertain manner that men and women and children have not enough to eat, not enough to wear and not sufficient or sujt-j .able warmth or shelter. These elemental needs .are the foundation of every further advance. Incalculable are the effects, physical and mental, v of overwork and unemployment, of overcrowd- ing and underfeeding, of deadly industrial dan- gers and insanitary working conditions. Why ware the many poor? That, is the social problem which has forced itself into the recognition of <9ven those who would fain deny it and uphold 1 -a profiteering system of society. 1) But a larger interpretation is to-day being { •given to the word poverty than that of a short- ness of the bare necessities of life. As a clasrt, the owners of wealth ummI to make profit can- ( not give to the workers for long less than the value necessary to reproduce their labour-power. The whole history of the Labour Movement is the >torv of an attempt to retain and improve the conditions of the worker. And this improve- ment does not end with the provision of bread- und-eheese and a stable for the workocast, for th4- feeling of poverty is e lastic and stretches in .other directions—from bread we jkiss to roses. -f)ooks-, music and so 011. That these newer, as well as the older appetites,7 can now bo supplied [ is within the rfalm of proof, despite the econo- mists' Law of Diminishing Returns. But in their endeavour to live well and to satisfy their wholesome desires of body and mind, the workers are led to increasingly object to their commodity status and to feel their poverty of self-govern- ment; to see the illusory nature of their free- "dom as wage-slaves, that they have no control over the purpose arid product of industry or over the place, time, method, means of .their work- [ ing life. The awakening process goes further | and s hows food, clothing and housing deter- mined by wages, and that wholly, if not quite, j -education, the press and the pulpit, and the own thought and leisure are made to V serve tiie interest of the non-workjig-elass. This (-)f poverty is far-reaching and probes 'deeper into the social problem than an indict- V tnent of sweating or other easily apparent social ) sores. 'MISCONCEPTIONS AS TO CAUSES. How 11a-- the tact of povvrty been explained j and is its banishment possible." Poverty i caused by drink, says the temperance advocate. Bv lack of carefulness and thrilt, says the capi- talist apologist. By too large families, says the Malthusian. These explanations even fit-ill do duty in certain quarters. But temperance re- form has many of its most earnest supporters among those, who, while recognising that indi- vidual cases of poverty may be aggravated by indulgence, in alcoholics, believe the indulgence Itself, does not explain the general poverty of 1 the working-class, fhe majority ot' which live I forced, abstemious lives. Individual failings '<jannot account for .social ills. Intemperance is an EFFECT and not a CAUSE of poverty. Poverty of knowledge regarding the nature of alchohol and the body, poverty of social Fife and jovial) r environment elsewhere, and poverty of other re- ( creations and powers to enjoy them resulting from overtired body and orain, these are some of the causes of this over-indulgence. This ex- planation is now less heard than formerly, for though temperance is on the increase among the workers, their poverty has not ceased, aDd their •demand for its removal is more icsisbcnt than -<i,mand for- it, removal iq nioro in,,iskat. t-han The person who blames the workers' poverty to lack of carefulness and thrift generally be- lieves that the capitalist achieved his position by the practice of these virtues. It is hardly necessary to point out the very definite differ- ence between savings a.nd capital. That a man to bo a millionaire would have to save about jE200 a week and live a hundred years. That capital is a claim to unpaid labour, and that t the greater part of modern capital is accumu- lated unpaid labour. And that thrift, which is actually practised by the Capitalist class, is forced because of the larger and larger constant -capitals which are necessary in modern key-in- i rhistries. The average worker has little chance to spend his .substance in riotous living. The fear of accident, sickness and unemployment is f never far away, and continually dogs his foot- steps. To live to work and save is repellent to those who have had a glimpse of a fuller, freer life, or who have seen how the financiers use their savings to help produce disastrous conse- ?uenoes to all that they hold dear. But to ? follow that is outside our present scope. Upholders of Capitalism unconsciously in their ,explanibou of poverty tend to perpetuate the "virtues of temperance contentment and indus- Lri?usue-.? so necessary to a servile class. Per- lla. p th 1! does not t,. h e cxplanat,i #n of haps this doe? not apply to the explanation of Mai thus, w liok, v Ole e is lost nowadays amid the demand for future necessary labour-power and cannon-fodder. When first stated it was an at- tempt to show that a natural law and not a wealth-possessing minority was responsible for the very obvious misery of -Ow times. Henry George, Kropotkin, and many others have made special refutations of the theory that too many guests have been invited to life's feast." When 'discussing the need of Capitalism for "a reserve army of labourers Boudin in his Theoretical System shows that this apparent over-popula- tion is artificial, and exists only in relation to the needs of capitalists and not. to the quantity of products available. Here, as elsewhere, capi- talism grumbles at its own effects. Kropotkin proves the rate of increase in production to be greater than the rate of increase in population by a mass of fascinating data drawn from agri- cul ture, the most backward of industries. This directly contradicts the laws of Malthus. In this question of population, even more than in the first supposed explanation of poverty, edu- cation in physiology in human needs and in social welfare is destined to playa great part. We are not yet in sight of the limits of man's productive powers and yet already the tendency is to secure not quantity but quality in human life. With each new mouth comes a pair of hands. PLENTITUDE FOR ALL. I It has already heell inferred that. no mouths need be empty, feet unshod, or head roofless 1)1'- cause food, clothing, firing and shelter cannot. he produced in sufficient quantity for all. Na- ture is not niggardly. The sun shines and the rain fallsupon the just and unjust. The tickled earth smiles with a harvest. The seas are stocked with fish. The earth's surface yields fruits, foods, wood as well as flowers. In it we find fuel and mineral wealth of every kind. Sources of power abound in wind and waterfall as well as in coal and oil. Kropotkin's Fields, factories and Workshops should be read to show the immense possibilities in agriculture of science and intensive culture to learn of what is being, and what might-, be (Ioiii, in the way of making soils and increasing crops in number and size. If we take all into consideration; if we realise the jwogress made of late in the garden- ing culture, and the tendency towards spreading its methods to the open field; if we watch the cultural experiments which are made now—ex- periments to-day and realities to-morrow—and ponder over the resource^ kept- in store bv scieiye, we are bound to say that it is impos- sible to foresee at the present moment the limits as to the maximum nvm kf.k of human beings who could draw their means of subsistence from a. given area of land, or as to what variety of produce they could grow in any latitude. Each day widens former limits and opens new and wide horizons." Despite the temptation to make more quotations from this imagination taxing storehouse of information concerning the food .supply of the future, let us turn to other indus- tries where the natural forces have not so great an influence, and endeavour to see if man's powers of invention and his tools are not effi- cient enough to banish poverty to a deserved oolivion. To state the. question is enough to answer it. \Y hat ever else may be blamed for poverty, the means of productions are guiltless. If the smiling plentitude of earth .gives the lie to poverty, how much more does the machine and science deny its continued justifiable existence. Perhaps even more than from rows of figures concerning the increase of production from a glance at the evolution of the tools it can be proved that poverty should be a thing forgotten. It is a far cry back to the time when man began to point. a stick, kindle a tlanw, and "flak" the flint to a cutfTiig edge." The object, of man's exert ions, tha.t which has to ho shaped, altered or shifted in the labour-process is no longer touched with flint and pointed stick. but with steam-plough and electric coal-cutter. The coracle and the primitive chariot are in the museum, and used in their std is the Cunard liner, the ocean-going palace, the Dreadnought, upon, and the submarine under, tho sea; and, to transport himself and his goods, man puts between himself and nature ever better tools- the bicycle, the motor and electric car, the lo- comotive and the throbbing aeroplane. From the sunbaked pottery man has passed to the age of iron and steel. No wonder that Franklin back in his day put the necessary working day at 5 hours. Alas! that we must look to warfare to see man's ingenuity most highly displayed; chemistry most, utilised in poison gas and deadly explosive; and inventive the ??,(,n i ti5- I)r i n.,7 i ng t b tl bow-and-arrow on to the maxim gun and such ljke-ruost, thoroughly al)plic-(I. The disposal of the product of an iron and steel age has conse- quences so terrible that, beside its intimate con- nection with the poverty already referred to, it iii;i k(, t,)i (' present state of society unendurable. The widespread waste of energy in competi- tion and of lift, in preventible accidents needs special treatment. YET POVERTY ARISES. i A long time ago Beard in his Industrial Re- volution pointed out that one man equipped with modern machinery could respectively supply in the making of bread two hundred others, in cot- ton clothing 250, in woollen clothing 300, and in boots and s hoes 1.000. He also quotes Mul- hall, a conservative stasiscian, who says, "Five men can now do the former work of eleven." That the rate of progress is not only continu- ing but being specially speeded .just now is proved by Sir Robert Hatfield, of Sheffield, who tells us that the output per worker in the eD- gineering industry has doubled since the start of the present war. What more striking proof is required than the present situation when-we is re q ii i t-(-, d than t-he pi-(,, ignore the booldceeping camouflage of the bank- ing England about eight millions of workers—one-half of the total—are engaged in destructive work and yet society is still fed and clothed on so on bv the remaining produc- tive Workers. Make no mistake about it, poverty to-day re- sults from plenty. There is no a lternative to the continued intensification and broadening of but the rise to control of the tools by the workers. Other explanations of poverty we to bc? wort h l(. have seen to be worthless. Men who are busily examining the sources of raw material and pre- paring for the future say that the particular country or Empire which can produce iron and steel goods fche cheapest will triumph in the Tuture economic war, and the munition making machinery now used and developed in this mili- tary war will more rapidly than ever complete the so-called civilisation of the globe. Our pre- sen t. masters seem to be incompetent to esti- mate the Niagara stream which sweeps them on ward. Are the workers, too, incapable of rising out of the wreck and of understanding the hitherto mysterious forces? Are we going to become "a famished race of men looting in search of non-existent food amid the smoulder- ing ruins of civilisation "? Surely not. A new spirit, confined to no particular country, is emerging from the hideous travail. Like the

Accidents in Mines. I

MR. McPHEE AT TROEDYYRHtW.I

Capitalism : Its Origin and…

TO BORROW £2!,300.I

Pioneers! Oh, Pioneers!

The Electric Theatre

COURAGEOUS YOUNG WORKMAN.

j Why Poverty?