Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

8 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

? , ————————————————————————'———…

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

? ————————————————————————'——— I Trade Union Notes .? — I By Trade Unionist. I r THE RAILWAY SETTLEMENT. I The railway dispute which last week wore such a threatening outlook has been settled by a comipromise. The men, it will be remembered, Asked for 10/- a week advance. The railway companies offered 5/ The compromise is 6/- a t weekj to be made retrospective to three weeks. This result is distinctly disappointing, inasmuch as a very large number of railwaymen were of opinion that even the 10/- was far too modest and were in favour of demanding £ 1 a week. It is rather difficult to explain why, if the oompro- anise will dispose of the dispute, things should have reached such a critical and delicate stage as they did. III Ik IWHAT WILL THE MEN OU? I This settlement, has not, at the time of writing, -been submitted to the men, and it ie just pos- sible that the terms will be found not acceptable. There oan be no doubt that the men had looked forward to a, more substantial advance than 6/- a week. To meet the cost of living, and to com- pare anything like favourably with other classes of workmen they were convinced that the 10/- demanded was none too much, and, moreover, they believed that they were strong enough to enforce it. Mr. J. H. Thomas, their general secretary, however, thinks that the settlement arrived at is the best that could be possibly got under the circumstances, and urges the men to loyally accept it,, notwithstanding all the feeling and excitement that has been engendered. But it is no uncommon thing in thase days, for the rank and file to refuse to follow the advice of leaders, and to press forwa-rd their own policy in spitfe of them. THE" CA' CANNY" POLICY. I The most outstanding feature of the recent railway trouble was the adoption of the go slow" method by the large Liverpool section of the men. Is this the forerunner of a more ,general adoption by trades Unions, or by trade unionists, of that method of combating em- ployers ? In this case the leaders and the dele- gate meeting were unsparing in their condemna- -tion of such a policy, Mr. J. H. Thomas describ- ing it as "Tuinoiir, to the country, disasrtrous to negotiations, and injurious to the poor rather than to the railway companies. It is more than probable that the trade unions will have to con- sider this method of industrial warfare. The action of the Liverpool railwaymen is significant of the attitude of at least a minority, and we may be sure than in other industries also there are men, perhaps many men, who would favour "fehe use of this weapon. If this method could be proved effective to realise the legitimate im- provements desired by workmen, they would be perfectly justified in resorting to it. :Ie THE COVENTRY STRIKE. At Coventry a strike of unusual magnitude asd importance ite in progress, and at present there is no prospect of a. settlement. Quite -50,000 persons engaged upon vital munition work have struck work, not for an increase of wages, but for official recognition of their shop ■ stewards committees. The origin of the dispute appears to be that an award was given by the Minister of Labour upon a matter submitted to 'him, upon which a. question of interpretation arose. The firm concerned offered to meet the men and discuss the issue with theru. The men 'declared that they would only state their case through their shop stewards, and refused to re- Cognise any negotiations other than those be- tween the firm and the shop stewards. The firm answered to the effect that they would meet the men, and ask no questions as to who they were. The men, however, insisted that the shop stewards should be met as shop stewards, and on the firm's refusal to recognise them the strike followed. The cause seems to be a very inade- quate one to bring about a stoppage in this most vital industry for the prosecution of the War. The employers object to recognition on the ground that such a break with precedent should be agreed to nationally after the war. Their reason seems of the flimsiest. I & at F TRIVIAL CONSIDERATIONS. Why should Coventry wait until all the en- b oiit the, countrv -it,e gineering firms throughout the country are ready to act ? Besides, the first thought that oc- curs to the ordinary man is, that if recognition •of the stewards' committee will be good after the war, it would be better now, when good re- lations between both parties is so important. Ac- cording to Mr. Kellaway, of the Ministry of Munitions department, the Governmental atti- tude is that recognition would be good if mu- tually agreed upon, but bad if exacted by force from the emplolyers. The Ministry of Munitions Would do well to discard such trivial considera- tions and insist upon the employee also discard- ing their absurd prejudices re recognising shop stewards. I COVENTRY, AND THE WHITLEY REPORT. Indeed, in view of the fact- that the Govern- ment have adopted the Whitley Committee's Re- port and have decided to act upon its proposals, it is difficult to understand their attitude in the Coventry case. These Stewards' Committees seem to be" precisehf the kind of bodies which the Whitley Report contemplated as represent- ing the men on the Works Committees. The Whitley Committee in their report said that" in- the well-organised industries one of the first J "questions to be considered should be the estab- lishment of local and works establishments to supplement and make more effective the work of the central bodies. It was also suggested that the proposed national councils should deal with or allocate to district councils or works Committees this among other questions: "Means for securing to the workpeople a greater share in and responsibility for the determination and observance of the condition under which their "'Work is carried on." Ss 1 GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION. I That being so, it is difficult indeed, as I ha,ve to explain the squeamishness of the Minis- tlry of Munitions. Since writing the above I learn that a settlement of the strike has been ffeüted" Mr. G. N. Barnes, M.P., and General Smuts, representing the War Cabinet, conducted j the negotiations. It is a condition of the agree- meat that the strikers return to work to-day "(Tuesday). The same negotiations will be opened o all the points in dispute, and the Government will urge the necessity for an immediate settle- i meat of the position of shop stewards. ? ? ? ? I IMPORTANT GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE. JThe War Cabinet have taken an important j? j. 'Step .towds minimising labour disputes and for v?i, (Continued at foot 6f next column).

" There is Only One Way to…

Swansea Valley Notes.I

I -I.L.P. MERTHYR CONFERENCE.

Advertising

Gorseinon Notes..I

Advertising

? , ————————————————————————'———…