Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

24 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

Roose Petty Sessions.

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

Roose Petty Sessions. These sessions were held at the Shire Hall on Saturday before Messrs R. Carrow (chairman), Joseph Thomas, Jas. Phillips, W. P. Ormond, and J. H. Coram. A MILFORD NUISANCE. In the case of the Milford Urban Council against Mr M. A. Coate, Milford, for alleged nuisance, Mr W. G. Eaton Evans, solicitor for the council, stated that Mr T. H. Lewis the clerk to the council had received a letter from Mr Coate asking for an adjournment and stating that he would pay all costs. He also stated he had abated the nuisance. He asked for an adjournment for a fortnight so that the premises might be inspected. The adjournment was granted. DRUNK AND DISORDERLY. Supt Francis summoned Charles Davies for drunkenness and disorderly conduct at Neyland. A constable stated that at half past twelve on the night in question he saw defendant at Picton Place, Neyland, he ordered him away and when he did so Davies became very dis- orderly and wanted to tight. Defendant who did not appear was fined 5s. and costs. LICENCE TRANSFER. _I Walter John was granted a temporary transfer of the licence of the New Iuu, Portfield Grate. NEYLAXD ASSAULT CASE. Edward Codd, a shipwright at Pembroke Dockyard, appeared to prosecute two of his fellow workers at the same place, named Geo. Lewis aud Jas. Williams, for assaulting him on the IGth inst. Mr W. D. George, solicitor, appeared to prosecute and Mr W. J. Jones, solicitor, represented both defendants. Mr George detailed the circumstances of the case. He said it appeared there had been some family differences arising between Mrs Anne Lewis, mother of one of the defendants, and the plaintiff Codd who was married to a neice of Mrs Lewis. Mrs Lewis claimed some furniture that was at Codd's house and on Saturday, the 14th, as previously armned, she came to take it away. She was then very abusive and Mr Codd said to her only that she was a woman he would have turned her out of the house. On the afternoon of Saturday she and her son sent a message by a little girl threatening personal violence to the complainant Codd. He (Mr George) said he mentioned this merely to show the premeditation of the affair. On the Monday night when coming from the Dockyard Lewis and Williams went in the first beat which landed at Hazelbeach. Sometime afterwards the boat containing Codd landed and the fact that the other men had not gone home showed they remained for some premeditated purpose and that purpose he sub- mitted was the punishment they intended for Codd. Codd on the beach was met by the two defendants Lewis and Williams. Lewis said to him why did you kick my mother" and Codd replied that he didn't. Lewis then struck him and Codd defended himself as best he could Williams got between his legs and knocked him down and kicked him. Codd was so badly beaten that he had to be carried to a neighbour's house where he was attended by a doctor. Edward Codd was then examined, and in reply to Mr George said he was employed at the Dockyard and lived at Waterston. He was a tenant of Mrs Anne Lewis, and there was furniture in the house which belonged to her. In fact she claimed even more. She was very abusive, and he said- Mr Jones asked if this was evidence against his clients. The Clerk said Mr George had better leave the con- versation out. Witness proceeding said that when the furniture was being removed there was some unpleasantness between them. She called me Mr Jones That is the same thing. Mr George Did you use violence on her, or put your hand to her. Witness: No. Continuing, witness said later on the same day (Saturday), himself and others were going into Pembroke. Lewis was in one boat and his party were in another. They helped Lewis to pull his boat up, and during the evening he met him several times and was talking to him. On the Monday evening when coming home from work he was in the second boat to land at Hazelbeach. Lewis Evans and Williams were in the first boat. When he landed he was walking on the beach when Lewis came up to him and said What business had you to kick my mother." Witness replied that he did not. Lewis said he was a b—— liar, and said take that," striking him a blow. He was knocked down and Lewis jumped on him, and shouted kill him." He was trying to get up when Williams pulled him down again. He managed to free himself by Edwards pulling Lewis off. He took off his belt and endeavoured to free himself. Afterwards he Was too weak to stand up, and he was taken to Mr. Howell's heuse and Dr Cook was sent for. He got home that night about ten o'clock, but he had to be taken in a cart. He was not able to go to work for a week. Cross-examined by Mr Jones There were several men in the boat and a few people on the shore. Isn't it a fact that their boat only got ashore just in front of yours ?—About five minutes. When Lewis asked you why did you kick my mother," did you not reply who told you ?"—No, sir. Didn't he say his mother told him ?-I told him to tell his mother I did no such thing. You told him to tell his mother she was as much a liar as he was himself ?—No. Did you then stand back and put up your fists and say to Lewis you are no man ?—No. Didn't you then challenge him to fight ?—No. Did he say he didn't want to fight—No. Was it not then suggested that you should go higher up on the pier and fight it out ?—He struck me and I defended myself. After he struck me the second time I took my coat off. Will you swear you did not take your waistcoat off ?— No, only my coat. Will you swear that "-Yes, sir. Did you then have a fair stand up fight ?—No, not a fair stand up fight. Didn't you eventually take your belt off ?-I had to take it off after I was kicked on the ground. By whom were you kicked ?—By Williams. Didn't Williams do no more or less than try to take the belt from you when you struck Lewis with it ?—He was jumping about and getting in a blow everywhere he could. Do you seriously suggest that Williams struck you r— He kicked me. He didn't strike me with his fist, but he pulled me down, and gave Lewis a chance to get on tke top of me. Do you say you only struck Lewis one blow ?—Yes. A ?dy you also say he struck you first ?-Yes. What were the other men doing. Simply looking on ? -1 don't know were there any other men. After the row did you accuse Jas. Williams of kicking you ?-Yes. And didn't Wm. Rees and John Edwards tell you there and then that there was no use saying that, that no one kicked you ?-I never heard that. I heard George's father saying that if they hadn't given the b-- enough, to give him more and he would pay all expenses. Had you any mark ?-I had it inwardly. Was not that caused by your falling on the stone ?— No, but by Williams kicking me. This is not the first time you have been mixed up in an assault case ?- Y H, I think se. There was a bit of a row with Allen Ridly. Re-examined by Mr George At all events this fight with Ridly was a fair one ?- Yes. Dr. Cook said he examined Codd, who had some bruises and scratches about the forehead. His thumb was partially sprained. He complained of a good deal of pain about the ribs on the left side, where there was a bruise. He appeared to be a good deal shaken. Witness attended him three times during that week. Cross-examined by Mr Jones: The bruises would be consistent with falls on a rough ground. There was not much external evidence of violence on the body, but a man's rib might be broken without showing any external mark. By Mr George The bruises were also consistent with a kick. Miss Anne James was called with the object of stating what took place at the removing of the furniture. Mr Jones objected as his client was not present. Mr George said he would take the opinion of the Bench on the matter. The Clerk advised the magistrates that the evidence 'Was not legal. The assault on her would not justify the other assault. The witness was, therefore, not examined. John Edwards, examined by Mr George, deposed that he worked in the Dockyard, and lived at Waterston. He remembered the occasion in question. He came across in Codd's boat. The other boat was about eight or nine minutes before them. He remained to move the boat and Codd went up to go home. Afterwards he went up the beach. He saw the two men standing up to light, and saw both going to the ground. James Williams Pulled Codd off Lewis. When he came up they were standing up again. They went down again and Codd Was uppermost and James Williams pulled him off. He did not help te take Codd to the house. Lewis went away with him. Cross-examined by Mr Jones: The two men faced each other in fighting attitude. He could not say who struck the first blow it was only a rough and tumble fight. Lewis did not do anything more than any man would do 1n self-defence. Williams did not kick Codd when he Was there. He was not there at the beginning. The whole thing lasted about eight or nine minutes. Codd had his coat and waistcoat off. He was not telling the truth when he said he had his waistcoat on. Lewis had his jacket off only. If James Williams had kicked Codd he (witness) would have stopped him if he could. He did not hear anybody say that Williams did not kick him, but he did not kick him while he was there. He was sorry the thing had happened because it was a family affair. Agnes Jones, a young girl of nine years, deposed that she was a sister of Mrs Codd. She had been on a message to Lewis' and Mrs Lewis said George would meet Edward Codd, and George Lewis said lie would kick Codd. She told this to Edward Codd. Mr Jones then stated the case for the defendants which he said was an absolute denial of the assault as alleged. It WAS clear from the evidence that Codd had taken the initiative when Lewis referred to the insult to his mother. As for Williams there was absolutely no motive suggested why he should assault him and the only thing he did was to try and get the belt. He pointed out that the only witness brought by Codd had absolutely contradicted him in several particulars. George Lewis, one of the defendants, was then called and stated that when he spoke to him about why he kicked his mother Codd said he was a liar, ani then said hit me." Witness said ho did not want to fight but at the same time he was as good a man as Codd. to Codd said he was no man and struck him in the face. Codd fastened on to him and held him and they both fell. After some exchanges Codd hit witness with a belt in the cheek. He did not do any more than to defend himself. By the Chairman Codd struck me first. Cross-examined by Mr George When you met him Codd says that you went up and struck him?—That is not true. Do you mean to say he has come hear to swear what is liot true ?—He has done so. sir. Witufss continuing said When he first met Codd it was about l-> or 20 yards from the waters edge. There was no one near enough to hear their conversation though they could see what was going on. By the Chairman Williams never touched the man. The story is absolutely fal ? James Williams, the other defenrtant, dhLlle( the circumstances as he saw them. He denied h?viu? kwked Codd. The only thing he did was to try to take the belt. By Mr George Codd fell under Lewis twice. Edward Tyndall, Thomas Davies, and Wm. Rees also gave evidence for the defence corroborating both defen- dants evidence in the main. The magistrates then retired to consider their verdict, and after a short time returned. The Chairman announced that a majority were in favour of dismissing both summonses. h ALLEGED INDECENT ASSAULT. Airs Aliva Roch, Freystrop, a young married woman, prosecuted Joseph Warlow for alleged assault on Thursday, 19th October. Mr W. D. George appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr Jones for defendant. Mr George stated that the case was a very serious one. Complainant was a young married woman, and her husband was a miner. Defendant was also a miner and worked in the same colliery. On the evening in question at about 7.30 defendant came to the house while com- plainant's husband was absent, and committed the assault complained of. Mrs Roch deposed that defendant was a first-cousin of her husband. He had previously been several times at her house and she knew him altogether about three years. She was going out for water about 7.30 when somebody spoke to her from the gate. She asked who it was and he said Don't you know me." She saw it was defendant and as a friend of her husband she asked him if he was coming in. He came in and sat down on a settle on one side of the fire while she was at the other rocking the cradle. After a time he complained of a draught and changed to the other side near where she was sitting. He put his arm around her and en- deavoured to assault her indecently. Mr George asked witness to describe for the bench what defendant did. The Clerk pointed out that the summons was for a common assault only. Mr George said he was not aware of that. In that case he would apply for to have the summons amended. The Clerk said they would have to commence over again as the depositions would have to be taken down. The application to amend the summons was granted and the case adjourned for a fortnight.

 ._"-. - _,.-Dates to be…

I Terrible Explosion at Man-…

Jleoieius.I

Family Notices

Special Telegrams to dd The…

TO-DAY'S WIRES.

IDISASTER.

THE BATTLE ON MONDAY.

I THE BHOYS.

1- Do -You - Know ?

MOTHER AND CHILD DROWNED.

------I MILFORD HAVEN.

I PRESENTATIONS TO A POPULAR…

Melancholy Occurrence at I…

Advertising

WEATHER AND THE CROPS.I

! "BETWEEN YOU AND ME."

Rose-lnnes Divorce Suit. I

[No title]

I MONDAY'S DISASTER.

DISASTER AT LADYSMITH

Opinion in Military Circles.…

- - - - -HAVERFORDWEST TOWN…