Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

17 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

THE BISHOP OF CHESTER'S i…

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

THE BISHOP OF CHESTER'S i SCHEME. 1 A CO-VERSATION. i A CONVERSATION. I A profane rumour has attributed to the rsisnop --of Chester the remark, If I were not a bishop I should like to be a publican." But the desire, if it were there, would not be profane in the Bishop; for in his view a publican who duly appreciates his office is one of the good things that may come out of Galilee; "an agent of morality," in the Bishop's words, "of the highest sort-really quite a possible instructor for my clergy." .The receipt for forming the character of this complete publican may be found printed in that moral drill-book, entitled Instructions to Managers," which is issued by the People's Refresnment-house Association, Limited. lms association is a pioneer company which has been floated, a kite (as an American bishop might say) which has been flown, to test the possibilities in alien soil of the scheme of temperance reform now in force in Gothenburg and elsewhere in Scandinavia. The principle of this scheme, which has for some years been connected in England with the Bishop of Chester's name, is to reform public-houses from within; to allow that drink in itself is not necessarily a bad thing, but to try to lop off the abuses of it; to follow the line of least resistance, and so "get there" (while perhaps others stumble over forlorn am- bitions) as quickly as possible, and, having got there, still to let the man in the street retain the humanising and self-respecting power of choice. And therein lies the difference between the Bishop's scheme and the more exigent ambi- tions of teetotal reformers, with whom the Bishop, in his urbane way, simply does not agree." Mr. Chamberlain, with his more direct and slogging methods of attack, has said that the United Kingdom Alliance has spent more money and has less to shew for it than any temperance body in the kingdom. At all events that great temperance general Sir Wilfrid Lawson has forced Mr. Chamberlain to take cover since 1877, the year in which Mr. Chamberlain brought forward a scheme rather like the Bishop of Chester's. The supporter of the Gothenburg scheme. indeed, feels that he stands between the devil and the deep sea; the drink on his one han d. the teetotallers on the other—his com- panions in reform converted by an ironical but common law of life into the hottest of enemies. I It is a brave position for a bishop to occupy. I have just had a conversation with the Bishop of Chester about his scheme, and he is kindly allowing me to refer to it now. Everyone who knows the Bishop would like to engage his ser- vices as the champion of a cause, for he com- mands in himself an instant recognition of the immense power of polite and scholarly advocacy. The Bishop was not only a classic at Oxford, he was also a legalist and historian; the habit of mind which so often follows a cloistered and academic bent in the case of a fellow in residence was reinforced in his case by a broader and livelier contact with the world. To-day you can see in him that mark of serenity and distinction which is so often impressed on a man by the combination of social Christianity and sound scholarship. The open countenance can be drawn down as though all the resources of thought were being focussed on a pin-point, and when the strain of the momentary problem has passed the countenance opens again like a flower. I think of the face of Archbishop Benson, which ripened in the same social climate, and, again, of the Bishop of Durham's. If you know the latter's face you know the face of a man who, con- trary to the shrewdest expectations entertained of him, exchanged with great success the life of the scholar and the philosophical dreamer for that of the practical administrator; you know a face one side of which is wrinkled with the long concentration on problems of textual and doctrinal exegesis and the other side of which is open-eyed with a frank and buoyant optimism. But enough of faces. Only the faces of some bishops have struck me, and perhaps it is true to say, as a variation of a celebrated saying, that the profession is the face. I asked the Bishop to assume that I knew nothing of the Gothenburg scheme, and perhaps the request was made with more sincerity than he guessed. Anyhow, we agreed that experience shewed increasingly that in every subject it is always best to assume ignorance in everybody (but one's self) and to begin at the beginning. I remember," said the Bishop, how Mr. Chamberlain once insisted on the necessity of assuming no knowledge at all when speaking to the House of Commons—a secret of his force, perhaps. But to begin at the beginning with this temperance scheme, I must tell you about our pioneer company-the People's Refreshment House Association. This company has the same principles as the Trust Companies which we hope to start immediately. The only difference is that this company was started in a much smaller way as a test. The fact is that you can go on writing books, you can go on discussing foreign schemes, you can go on talking about the whole thing and getting some sort of approval for your views, but it is all not of the least use; there is only one way to convince and convert the British people, and that it to have what you advocate working under their eyes. That is the reason for the pioneer company." "And now for the principles. Do you differ in any important way from the Swedish plan?" I asked. "No," said the Bishop, "we accept all the essentials of the Gothenburg plan, though we may work differently in details. We have a common principle, which is that a most dangerous monopoly should not be in private hands. Therefore our Public-house Trust Companies- that is the right name-will acquire new licences and, as far as possible, buy up old ones, and manage the houses in the interests of the com- munity and not for private profit." The Bishop was reading now from a circular issued by Lord Grey, the provisional chairman of the com- panies. You see," the Bishop went on, glancing alternately at the circular and at me, there are two great reasons against public-houses being run for private profit; one in that there is no guarantee that the best liquor that can be ob- tained will be sold at them." The Trust Companies will not sell arsenical beer?" I asked. The Bishop turned and looked into a picture. No," he said, we shall not endeavour to make capital out of glucose." "And the second reason?" The second reason," he went on, is that it is to the interest of the ordinary publican to gush the sale of intoxicants. Of course it is. F. gets a commission. Now our publicans will get no commission except on the sale of non- intoxicants and food. Therefore it will be to their interest not to push liquor. You see the two evils go at a sweep. Further, our public- houses will be refreshment-houses, and not merely drinking-bars. They will always serve food and tea and coffee, and of course would rather do so. But if you wanted a whisky and soda there-well, you could have it." I remembered twice or three times being re- fused tea, when I did not happen to want a whisky and soda, at country inns, and I wished that I could always look forward to having the Bishop of Chester as my host. And about the details of the working of the pioneer houses?" I asked. "Well," said the Bishop, "I really haven't had time to manage one myself, but all the re- ports on them are excellent; and the police have not made a single complaint to the magistrates about our houses." "That is most gratifying." said I. On the contrary," the Bishop continued, "we have had plenty of unsolicited testimonials. But as for the details of the working, you coul d hear far more than I can tell you from Major Crauford. Do you know Major Crauford ?" Yes," said I, foi* I remembered quite well meeting him near Ladysmith when he was in charge of Lady White's gift of stores for the Ladysmith garrison. "But really," said the Bishop, "you must look at this book of instructions for the management of the pioneer houses." He handed me a pamph- let. In it I found the publican invited to regard himself "as an agent in the cause of temperance and good behaviour, who, by the general tone and system of management of his house, will make it a place where recreation and social intercourse of a harmless nature may be enjoyed." Later I came across this passage: 'There can be no doubt that a public-house manager who is actuated by a high sense of his responsibility towards the pub- lic may, by the exercise of his personal influence, do great and permanent good." The gentle periphrasis which insists on the necessity for "chucking out" in an extreme case charmed my fancy. Here it is "The exercise of powers vested ia the manager by law requires much tact and discretion. Persons to whom drink has to be re- fused must be treated, if possible, in such a way as to prevent their becoming violent or offensive; but when the resources of tact and firmness have failed to obtain the desired end, the law must be unhesitatingly enforced." But the prettiest pic- ture of all was afforded by the instructions which require that the battery of spirits shall be masked, so to speak, behind other things. I imagined the delectable ramparts of buns and lemonade. One more extract:—"Special attention is to be given to the making of tea." That is almost an article of salvation in itself. I met the Bishop's smile as I looked up from the instructions. "Our OWIt pioneer houses are 3kot the only ones," he said. Then he told me of some public-houses managed on similar principles in the west of Fife; public-houses in mushroom towns which have sprung into existence, Ameri- can-wise, since coal has been discovered in the district. There is the town Hill of Beath, for instance; a town black in the day and black also at night, for it is unlighted-or rather it was un- lighted until the public-houses held in trust pre- sented their profits not only for the lighting of the town with electric light, but for the erection of a reading-room, bowling green and football park. And this example led the Bishop by a natural transition to speak of the disposal of profits by the pioneer company and by the proposed Trust Companies. "The surplus will be distributed," he said, "for public purposes. The decision as to what those purposes shall be will be made by representative men chosen for the purpose. In the case of the pioneer company the representa- tive men have been chosen mainly from the local authorities, the clergy, and landlords. But there 19 one point to be considered. It may be necessary to set aside a certain amount of the profits as a redemption fund in case people don't like us, after all, and want to get rid of us." "You mean," I asked, "that people might be- came frightened of you after you had fairly been allowed to get to work, and regard you as a sort at Frankenstein?" "Exactly," he answered. "We don't want to f/rve any trouble, and the redemption fund will, ptovide for getting rid of us." "Will a large scheme be started soon?" I asked. "I hope so," the Bishop answered. "We have really got to an important point now. The whole question is, Will enough money be subscribed to begin the thing on a large scale. Lord Grey is floating-that is, starting-a company in North- umberland and another in London, and other companies could be federated with these. But one thing I do wish to be clear. The whole scheme is no longer mine at all. It has passed into the hands of business men." Having given me a characteristically businesslike account of the scheme, it was like the Bishop to smile with some deprecation here, as who should say, "The clergy are notoriously bad business men." "I do not manage the scheme, then," he added, "and am not responsible for it; it would not be desirable that it should be episcopally managed." "By the way," said the Bishop, "you asked for some details of the working of houses that have already been tried. I have just remem- bered a point. The managers of one public- house wanted to sell beer only, and to refuse to sell spirits." It is a common thing, I remember, to regard beer as a more temperance drink, so to speak, than whisky. In Sweden beer used to be sold deliberately as a temperance drink-like Guinness's porter in Ireland. "Well, the managers had their way. But it was found that the cus- tomers went elsewhere for spirits-and bad spirits, too—or else brought .them in surrep- titiously to drink. So in the end it was found best to sell everything. That's what I believe myself. It is no use putting your foot down against a taste." "Does Sir Wilfrid Lawson oppose you much?" I asked, remembering secretly that Lord Grey has received some attention in Sir Wilfrid's genial verse. "Lord Grey has often said," the Bishop answered, "that we ought to pay Sir Wilfrid Law- son at least £1,000 a year for advertising us." Then the Bishop began to sum up the position. "The advantage of this scheme," he said, "is that it avoids legislation altogether. It simply doesn't involve the question of compensation at all. A terrible question! No one will look at it. Will they? You know they won't. The trade is too powerful. Certainly I can tell you that there is no chance of this Government attempting temperance reform, at least till some plan like this of ours has been properly tested. Therefore this plan is the only possible alterna- tive to letting all the public-houses become tied; for the private publican cannot long survive in the competition. What would that mean-all the houses in the hands of large brewery companies? It would simply mean a still greater pressure brought to bear on the sale of drink. Of course I for one do not regard drink in itself as neces- sarily 'the accursed thing.' Perhaps at the back of the minds of Prohibitionists there is the hope that if only things go from bad to worse Pro- hibition is bound to come. I don't agree with them. I don't believe in compulsory teetotalism. I believe the power of choice is a good thing." "Do"you," I said, "regard your scheme as only an expedient course in the circumstances? Do vou think that in other conditions there could be a better? Do you, in short, think of it as a kind of second-best scheme?" The Bishop brought his hand down hard on his chair. "No," he said; "I regard it as a 'first- best scheme.' Then we laughed heartily. J. B. A. in the "Manchester Guardian."

IA DRUNKEN MOTHER.

I FREEMASONRY. j

Advertising

CHESTER PAXTON SOCIETY.___t

MACCLESFIELD'S FIGHTING MEMBER.

Advertising

VIOLENT CONDUCT OF CHESTER,…

MR. TENNYSON SMITH AT I .…

A COSTLY NEW YEAR'S GIFT.

" KRliGtSR AND KHAKI." j

SEQUEL TO A CHESTER ASSIZE…

CITY POLICE COURT.

Advertising

COMM E RCIA L T R A V E LLE…

ICHESTER CASTLE PETTY SESSIONS.

[No title]