Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

11 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

CARDIGAN COUNTY COURT.

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

CARDIGAN COUNTY COURT. This court was held on Thursday. 139 cases were en- tered including two in equity and one ejectment. The Registrar disposed of the unopposed cases. Judge Tyrrell took his seat at one p.m., when the equity suits were proceeded with. Thomas Davies Thomas, Jane Thomas, John Thomas, and Elizabeth Ann Thomas, by Thomas Griffiths, their next friend v. Ellen Thomas and John Harries, praying for an account and administration of the estate of one Thomas Thomas, late of Newport, Pembrokeshire, de- ceased, father of the plaintiffs, who died in 1863 at sea, and for other relief. This suit has been several times Before the court. A decretal order had been made, and the Registrar had, in accordance, prepared his certifi- cate, when it was found that the subject matter ex- ceeded the limit in point of amount to which jurisdic- tion is given to County Courts. The suit was conse- quently transferred to Vice-Chancellor Stuart's court, and re-transferred by him to this court on application that the cause be permitted to be heard here, the judge being of opinion that the cause could be well prosecuted here. By an order dated August 26th, 1868, the receiver (High Bailiff) was ordered to realise the outstanding estate, consisting of a note for X100 and shares in ship. ping. The note had been realised. Mr W. G. George now made an application that a certain sum be advanced out of the corpus for the maintenance of the infant plaintiff. After a long conversation with the judge, his Honour stated he would inspect the schedule filed, and then give an order. He further stated he would do his utmost for the widow and children. Dinah Thomas, Globe Inn, Cardigan, v. David Jones, W. W. Mitchell, and Anne Mitchell his wife. This was a plaint by a legateee for an account and administra- tion of the estate of David Davies, late of William- street, Cardigan, deceased. The testator, devised £100 to the plaintiff which she now sought to recover, Mr. Lascelles, instructed by Messrs Jenkins and Evans, appeared for the plaintiff, while Mr Mitchell appeared for himself and co-defendants. Mr Mitchell and the defendants had filed a qualified admission, and now in court admitted the payment of certain legacies out of the personal estate in full be was liable for the re- mainder of the legacies. Mr Mitchell said it was a very hard case. The deeds relating to the real property devised by the defunct testator, subject to the payment of certain legacies, were in the possession of plaintiff. The money was ready to be paid if the deeds were only returned. The testator lodged in plaintiff's house, and when he died a regular scramble was made for the deeds and others things. Mr Lascelles stated that the scramble had been made by the defendants. He would adduce evidence that would bring home the deeds to Mr Mitchell's possession. After a few words from his Honour, Mr Mitchell said that one-half of the legacy was paid through the retention of beddmg and other valuables belonging to the deceased. Mr Lascelles requested his Hononr not to take Mr Mitchell s version its evidence, as he would contradict every particle of it. After some further parleying His Honour ordered that the legacy of 9100 (less £ 6, admitted by plaintiff to have been received by her) be paid by defendants to plaintiff on or before the 22nd of April next. The costs of plaintiff to be paid out of the estate. EVAN EVANS v. EVAN BOWEN.—This was a claim for zC 17 7s 9d balance for goods sold. Mr W. V. George appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr W. W. Mitchell for the defendant. The particulars were voluminous, com- prising 17 foolscap sheets closely written. No parti. cular item was disputed, but the general plea of never indebted" was given. It was ordered that by the consent of both parties. Mr J. P. Howell, High-Bailiff, should be appointed referee, and the result certified to his Honour at the next sitting. ANN JONES V. W. PHILLIPs.-Summons in ejectment (section 11, 30, and 31, Vic. cap. 142), to recover one individual third tart of two messuages and appur- tenances, situate in the village and parish of St. Dog- mells, which share is of the annual value of JE1 6s 8d. Mr Lascelles, instructed by Messrs. Jenkins and Evans, appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr Mitchell for the defendant. On Mr Lascelles proceeding to recite certain indentures relating to the property, Mr Mit- chell rose to admit that one-third belonged to the plaintiff, when judgment was entered for possession and costs. DAVID OWEN v. DAVID JONES.-Claim for 7s 6d for work and labour. The plaintiff and defendant swore against each other, when Mr Mitchell, who appeared for defendant, stated that as it was reduced to the credibility of witnesses, he would ask plaintiff whether he had been convicted of stealing clothes. Nor for stealing clothes was the retort, but for stealing a coat. Judgment was eventually entered for the plaintlff for Is and court fees. Six judgment summonses were disposed of. "V'VV'AA,'V'$V 'V"VV"Vv, ",v.

[No title]

WELSH LIBERAL BANQUET.

DISTRICT NEWS.

IGREAT WESTERN RAILWAY.

[No title]

I-LOCAL MARKETS.

CARMARTHENSRIRE INFIRMARY.

LLUNTING APPOINTMENTS. -77;-…

Family Notices

CARDIGANSHIRE.