Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

6 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

» HISTORIK DE JULIUS CESAR."

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

» HISTORIK DE JULIUS CESAR." This long announced work by the Emperor of the French, is on the point of appearing; and we have, In an- ticipation of the work itself, the Preface," published in the Monitcur, of Saturday evening last. From that pre- face, we learn the Emperor's motive in undertaking the work; which appears to be to vindicate Cfesar from be- ing, as he is represented to us, already dreaming of the supreme power from early youth and by insisting up- on an analogy between the missions of the Roman and Jfapolcon Buonaparte, with a view to convince the world that the latter has been, also, greatly misrepresented. As a literary production, the Preface reflects crodit upon its author and there are some parts of it which will obtain an universal assent; its opening sentences for instance :—" Historical truth ought to be no less sacred than religion. If the precepts of faith elevate our souls abo"e the interest of this world, the lessons of history, in their turn, inspire us with the love of what is beautiful and just,—the hatred of that which opposes an obstacle to the progress of humanity." This is true. Equally true it is, that the facts should be produced with ri- corous exactitude that political or social changes should be philosophically analysed that the piquant attraction of details in the life of public men should not turn away from the part they have played in politics, and should not cause their providential mission to be forgotten." When this is done, whatever we may think of Ciesar, we fear the first Napoleon will not appear exactly in the light in which his imperial nephew is desirous of representing him. "When extraordinary facts bear witness to eminent genius, what can be more contrary," asks the imperial writer "togood sense, than to attribute to it all the s ions and all the sentiments of mediocrity ? What can be more erroneous, than not to recognise the pre- eminence of those privileged beings, who appear, from time to time, in history, like luminous beacons, dissipat- the darkness of their age, and lighting up the future?" Such geniuses the Emperor deems Caisar, Charlemagne, and Xapoleoll. to have been and his object is, to prove that when Providence raises up such men, it is to trace out for people the course they ought to pursue, to set the scil of their genius upon a new era, and to accomplish the labour of several ages in a few years. Happy," he adds, the nations who understand and follow them wretch- c- I they who misconceive and strive against them They act like the Jens—they crucify their Messiah. "—This is stroii" language in the next paragraph we have its di- rect application. In effect," we are told, neither the murder of Osar, nor the captivity of St. Helena, have been able irretrievably to destroy two popular causes, overthrown by a league, disguising itself under the mask of liberty. In killing Ctesar, Brutus plunged Rome into the horrors of a civil war he did not prevent the reign of Augustus, but he rendered those of Nero and Caligula possible. Neither has the ostracism of Napoleon by as- sociated Europe, prevented the Empire from reviving; yet, nevertheless, how far are we from the greatquestions resolved, the passions appeased, the legitimate satisfac- tion given to peoples by the first Empire Thus is daily verified since IMS, this prophecy of the captive of St. Helena How many conflicts, how much blood, how many years are not still requisite, before the good I desired to do humanity can be realized Historians do not view the career of Ciesar in tin light imparted to it by Napoleon and many deom that he laid the foundation of most of the evils which subse- quently overwhelmed the empire. The poet Dante, who was a true Italian patriarch, regarded his crossing the Rubicon as the first step in the downfall of his coun- try and we see nothing of that good in his career, whose definitive triumph the Emperor thinks was ar- Tested by bis murderers. Their conduct in committing that crime, we condemn although, if we are to judge men by their acts,—and we cannot decide upon their mo- tives-thcy were better friends to their country and man- kind than Ciesar himself. Then, most certainly, there was but little gool exhibited in the career of Napoleon. He might, and pro- bably did, desire to do good to humanity." But, as already observed, we cannot judge men by their inten- tions, of which we know nothing their acts, which in- fluence, for good or evil, the fortunes of these around them, must speak for them; and Napoleon's public acts say little for him. Ambition animated him the aggran- dizement of himself was his first passion next, that of the members of his family, if they would be subservient to his will. But he tolerated no resistance t, his views hence his conduct to Louis and Lucien, when contrasted with his treatment of Jerome and Joseph. To be the despotic Emperor of France, and the Dictator of Europe was his end and aim and to that object he sacrificed every thing and every body,—wife, relatives, and friends. That Divine Providence had an object in sending both Ciesar and Napoleon into the world, there is no doubt and they carried that object out, as far as they were per- mitted by our All-wise Ruler. But that we are to con- sider their career as one, in which all people ought to have given way, and submitted to them, and that it was "wretched to strive against them," we cannot believe though Napoleon III. asserts it.

INQUEST ON THE BODY OF THE…

BANGOR AND BEAUMARIS UNION.…

RHYL. I

RUTHIN.

I TOWYN. :