Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

12 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

(Sny fmitoit CErapiknt.

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

(Sny fmitoit CErapiknt. fWc de«m it right to state that wet do not at all times identif'- jurselves with our correspondent's opinions.] The close of the London season is definitely marked by the departure of her Majesty for Germany, where she will visit some of those scenes which are so much endeared to her by association with the memory of her deceased husband. No one can be a more staunch admirer of the Queen than is your London correspondent, but I confess I do not like the extreme exclusiveness manifested by her on her depar- ture from our shores. The embarkation at Woolwich was perhaps more private and exclusive than it has ever previously been. Every application to witness the embarkation was refused; the police were in- structed to arrest" any person belonging to the establishment who should be found loitering in or aboutthethoroughfaresduringthetimeappointedforthe Queen's arrival while the clerks and others employed in the establishment were warned not to approach e windows." Any breach of these regulations was to be visited witk summary dismissal. I wonder what would have been the indictment in the event of any one being arrested for loitering about-would it have been for that he, the said John Jones, was found loitering about Woolwich Arsenal with intent to see her most gracious Majesty the Queen ?" Her most gracious Majesty will not thus add to her popularity. Let me, however, mentiwa a circumstance as a set-off. Some short time age the Ptinceas of Leiningen, wife of the Queen s nephew, gave birth to a daughter at Osborne. ow, the Prince, as we all know, is commander o Queen's yacht, the Victoria and Albert, in w i yacht the Queen has taken her departure Her Majesty put off her journey to Germany solely, I am assured, that the Prince might not have to leave his wife till she was thoroughly convalescent. This speaks well for the kindly sympathy of the Queen; but still, I, in common with all her subjects, would have liked to have seen, a little less exclusiveness on her departure. On the return of the Royal Lady to Windsor, the Prince and Princess of Wales are to pay a lengthened visit to this ancient palace of our sovereigns, and pre- paratory to this, a new suite of rooms has been fitted up for the young couple in the York Tower. Several other improvements have also been made in Windsor Castle, which is likely to become a more favoured resort of Royalty than it has hitherto been. When, some little time ago, it was announced that tne Emperor of Austria and the King of Prussia were to meet, and subsequently that they had met (at a place which nobody had ever before heard of), speculation was naturally rife as to the purpose which had induced these two powerful sovereigns to have an interview. On the one hand, all sorts of surmises were set afloat about the Prussian difficulty, the Polish question, and so on while, on the other, there were writers who pooh-pooh'd the meeting, and said that the two sovereigns merely met for friendly personal intercourse. We have now, however, immediately following the in- terview, an announcement which we may reasonably regard as being one important result of the interview. There is to be a conference of all the German sovereigns to consider the propriety of a reorganisation of the German Confederation. This is one of the most significant items of news we have for years had from Germany. The dreanv of a united Germany once more assumes a more definite outline, and whether the dream be realised or not, the Congress is undoubtedly a significant and im- portant one. But what a startling announcement is that, that newspaper reporters are to be admitted to the Congress! The Emperor Francis Joseph it is who pro- poses this innovation, and in doing so he sets a noble ex- ample to these Continental sovereigns..Why, at present the office of reporter on the Continent is a sham. Short- hand must be as useless as a knowledge of Cherokee or Choetaw. A new era, however, seems likely thus to dawn on Austria, already remarkable for some pro- gress towards liberal institutions. It cannot be that the Emperor merely wishes a fair report of the pro- ceedings, for he could easily obtain this without publicly announcing that "reporters shall be ad- mitted." Bravo Francis Joseph I only hope that the proceedings will be reported verbatim—more especially as I do not intend to read them, which I would not do under a penny a line! The theory of our law courts is that they are open to the public, whereas the fact is that there is mar. vellcttisly little public accommodation, and that when- ever there is a trial of public interest there is not room for half the number of people who wish to hear it. But bad as this is, I think the burking a judgment in a public trial is worse. -Such a case occurred a day or two ago, in one of the Sheriff's Courts. The judgment being of some importance, had been written, and was not even read by the judge. The document was handed to an attorney, who handed it to a clerk to get it copied, who handed it to a. third person angular, who walked out of the court with it. A reporter who was present—a recognised scribe for the daily papers—tried to get it and failed; and thus the public know nothing of it. I do not think this is right. If the judgment was worth writing, it was worth printing, in substance at least. I almost question whether auch a course was legal. At all events, it was courteous neither to the press nor the public. There have been one or two cases in the newspapers lately, which I have good reason to believe are only specimena of what frequently occurs without the public hearing anything about it. I mean cases where money is paid to the proprigtors, secretaries, managers, or whatever they call themselves, of benefit societies and sick clubs, the benefits being unobtainable when the hour of need arises. A society whose doings have re- y cently been recorded at length presents a flagrant instance of this. A few sharpers take a room in a poor neighbourhood, send out circulars, establish agents," and all that sort of thing, collect a lot of money, and make no return for it. In another case a so- called life-Msurance society collects money every week for years from a poor man, and then when he dies the survivors are told that he is out of the rules (or some such phrase), because the money had been paid through an agent; I have good reasbn to believe that many cases of absolute swindling, especially through ordinary public-house sick and benefit clubs, transpire. One fruitful cause of this cannot be too widely known. "Rules certified by Mr. J. Tidd Pratt," is a most taking phrase, which ensnares thousands — a fact, which I can personally assure my readers, Mr. Pratt himself deeply regrets. When this phrase is read, the conclusion is too speedily jumped at that Mr. Pratt, "the barrister appointed to certify the rules of benefit societies," thus gives a Government or Parliamentary weight to the society, the rules of which are thus certified. What sort of connection there is between the society and the Government official people would be at a loss to explain, but there is an indistinct notion of Government safety in the minds of intending assurers,and thus members are easily procured. The truth is, however, that Mr. Pratt merely certifi es that th e rules are not in contravention of the Act of Parliament which regulates these societies, though he himself has not the slightest control over the working of these societies, and the directors or committee may privately alter or abrogate the rules as they like without his consent; and this, though strictly speaking illegal, is often done. I cannot but think that the whole subject demands legislative interference, after the working of these societies is fully inquired into. The working classes of this country are now far more provident than they used to be; but they are still too much at the mercy of sharpers. Life assurance has not yet come down to the working community-in fact, the secretary of almost any life assurance society will tell you that the working class is not the class they want. And yet life assurance ought to be one of the principal safeguards against the poverty of helpless widows an d the fatherless. I will not further comment on this subject, but I will just throw out a hint in quitting it. Would it not be possible to combine the Post Office Savings Bank system with the Life Assurance system, the de- positor always taking care to keep a balance of more than the annual premium, and the secretary having authority to draw that amount when due ? Annual premiums, under the present system, at all events, will never do for the working classes. A great deal has been said lately, and very justly, about the danger of tight-rope performances, the re- cent lamentable death, and the propriety of legislative prohibition of such performances. It is remarkable, however, that so far as the element of danger is con- cerned, crinoline slays its hundreds where the rope kills its units only. You can scarcely ever take up a paper without reading of another girl burnt to death through crinoline." Surely, it may be said, the Legislature should rather prohibit the wearing of crino- line (after the model of the sumptuary laws of the Romans) than the walking on a rope. There is this important difference, however, that rope-dancing is a mere amusement which people pay to see, and that it is carried on, or was carried on, in licensed places (thus giving the Legislature a hold over the proprietors), whereas our dress is a matter in which the Legislature cannot possibly interfere in the present state of sociey. I have as yet heard no convincing argumen s a» the legislative prohibition of dangerous performances; and certainly the letter of Mr. Geehni GyngeU, son of the Gyngell, the cotemporary of Richardson an Saunders," does not put the advocates of ^"inter- ference on any better footing. As to, M. Blondms puffery of himself and depreciation of others, it proves nothing but what we all knew before. Our French brethren are very enthusiastic in matters 1 art, and there is in a newspaper before me such a rapturous elegy upon Mdlle. Livry, the poor girl who was burnt to death, that it is worth translating, as showing how gracefully and enthusiastically a French writer can express himself, though it may lose in trans- lation. She has taken her flight towards the azure spheres, that charming butterfly, whom, when alive, we called Emma Livry. Poor night-butterny She has burnt in the fires of the foot-lights her diaper wings; she is dead, a victim to the most fierce suffer- ing-dead in the morning of life snatched to those blue horizons of glory and of love where she can (as a butterly) rifle all the flowers. But yesterday, a chry- salis, her brow glittered with the star of genius; to- day the star has disappeared, and the pale ngni 01 wie tomb illuminates that brow so pure. Death, the pitiless mower, sways his scythe to the right and to the left; he fells indiscriminately both weeds and flowers, and thou hast fallen under his blows, chaste, sylphide, Emma Livry. She is dead as a martyr, after having lived as a saint. But great artists do not die; the implacable scythe can only sever the thread of their material existence; memory, perpetuating them from generation to generation, makes them live eternally in a universal sentiment of regrets and of admiration. And so on. One would really think that this was a passage from a heathen poet.

DEATH OF SIR F. SLADE.

THE AMERICAN HATRED TU NAPOLEON.

THE TEST OF LOVE!

MASSACRED FOR SALT!

[No title]

THE SOP IN THE PAN!!

GOLD AND THE PRICE OF FOOD.

A DESCRIPTION OF THE ASSAULT…

[No title]

"OUR OWN REPORTERS" AT HALIFAX!

THE GAER WILL ROBBERY.