Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

9 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

TOWN TALK;

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

TOWN TALK; [BY OUR LONDON CORRESPONDENT.] I NEED not assure you, Mr. Editor, what is still the staple of con- versation, whether on 'Change or in the counting-house, or even in the sanctities of home. Wherever men meet, their talk is still of India. Day by day the newspapers are full of the harrowing details of the cruelties committed cruelties which cannot be adequately described in print and I fear we may not expect very favourable news for some time to come. I see cabinet councils are held almost every day, and an effort is made to effect telegraphic communication with India. And it is said Mr. Vernon Smith will resign his office, so that as regards the future, we may expect better things but we must not be too sanguine. Our handful of troops may waste away beneath the sword or disease before reinforcements arrive. At home we seem to have done our duty. It was on Saturday, the 27th of June, that we first heard of the mutiny of the Bengal army on Wednesday, the 1st of July, the stream of reinforcements from these shores to Calcutta set steadily out. On a single day in July (the 21st), six vessels left these coasts, con- taining 1,700 troops, and the whole number of ships despatched during that month was twenty-nine—all but two for every succes- sive day. The month of August witnessed redoubled efforts. In that month we sent out 15,000 troops, and- in ships of greater size and swiftness than before. Now, as a good ship may reach Calcutta from Portsmouth, under favourable conditions, in sixty or seventy days, we may hope that the Bucephalus and the Barham, which have now been gone more than two months, are within sight of the waters of the Hooghly. It is a long way, no doubt, from Delhi to Calcutta; but, our troops once arrived at the latter place, the know- ledge will soon reach the former locality, and every Sepoy will soon learn that a terrible vengeance will be taken for the outrages done the revenge taken will be fearful. Some of the letters and leaders of the daily press are of the most ferocious character, and, un- doubtedly, in such cases the more terrible is the punishment the greater is the mercy shown. Look, for instance, at a man like Nena Sahib—a man we have made much of this pampered villain, when he found himself on the point of being attacked by General Havelock, brought out thirty Englishwomen to the front of his army, and struck off their heads. Can punishment be too great for such a wretch ? But let me turn to lighter themes. I see some little trumpeting in the daily journals of the wonderful advantages offered by the new omnibus company, by means of correspondence tickets but practically the company has by no means realised the splendid pro- mises it made when it first started into existence. And wherever people can travel by the saloon omnibuses they invariable have re- course to them in preference. Both companies have offices with waiting rooms, in the open space in Cheapside, opposite Peel's statue. But we may still repeat the question so often asked, both in print and in private, "Why is it that almost all omnibuses start from public-houses?" As the public-houses do not charge anything for the accommodation, it is clear they trust to making it answer by the sale of liquors. But a proprietary that would employ and would estimate the services of a respectable body of men would not place such a form of continuous temptation in their way; whilst as to the public themselves, especially females, the plan is particularly objectionable. Why should not a rich proprietary have for their omnibuses termini-houses of their own ? Such places might be made to pay their own expenses by affording at a cheap rate tea and coffee and even dining accommodation for the servants of the company, whilst rooms enough would remain for passengers to shelter and wait in, for the purposes of offices, and as a look-out for time-keepers, whose weather-bearing capabilities seem now to be on a par with a church vane or a weathercock. Let us hope that at every omnibus station the public may soon have a comfortable waiting-room. The Times keeps calling attention to the low code of commercial morality. It recapitulates the disgraceful results of such institu- tions as the British Bank, the great Northern Railway, and London and Eastern Bank crashes, the Surrey Gardens affair, and the delinquencies at Liverpool. Then there is the confessed whole- sale adulteration of food. "What are we," it asks, "to say to these facts ? How are we to admit them without peril to our motto of English honesty?" But it finds a consolatory reflection in re- membering that no classes of tradesmen, however large, are ever discovered in departures from honesty without public indignation being excited. This is all very well; but the best thing perhaps is the recollection that during the late session we have had a batch of bills passed for the punishment of fraudulent breaches of trust. We hope we have now, at last, a bill vnhich will deal with men of this disgraceful character in a manner sufficiently severe to make them pause before they plot. A brood of conseirators, appearing at intervals in a dozen different shapes, have for years infested the metropolis, swindling right and left. Some of them have passed with comparatively small damage through the Court of Bankruptcy. Others nave gone to the Old Bailey, to which. all should have gone. When the most scandalous revelations were made in the case of the British Bank, so deficient was the law that it was for a long time doubtful whether the "perfection of human reason"—the English law-extended so fat as to embrace within the scope of its penalties a pack of desperate adventurers, who had made ducks and drakes of their money. Sir Richard Bethell has done well, first, in prose- cuting these flagrant transgressors and, next, in bringing in a bill which will for ever set at rest any doubt as to their criminal guilti- ness. No bill passed for many years has been so much needed. And if in every other respect the session had been a failure, this gain would have sufficiently redeemed its character. I do not suppose, Mr. Editor, that any of your readers will need to resort to the new law of divorce; but it may, perhaps, be as well to state that among the many alterations introduced by the new law, the abolition of the action for criminal conversation stands prominently forward. Under the new law, instead, the injured husband may, either in a petition for dissolution of marriage or for judicial separation, or in a petition limited to such object only, claim damages from the adulterer. This petition is to be served on the alleged adulterer and the wife (unless such service is dis- pensed with by the court); and the claim, thus made, is to be heard and tried in the same manner as actions for criminal conver- sation have been hitherto tried. The damages are, in all cases, to be ascertained by the verdict of a jury, although the respondents, or either of them, may not appear. After the verdict, the court is empowered to direct in what manner such damages shall be paid or applied, and to direct that the whole or any part thereof shall be settled for the benefit of the children (if any) of the marriage, or as a provision for the maintenance of the wife. And in all cases where the alleged adulterer has been made a co-respondent, and the adultery has been established, the court may order the adulterer to pay the whole or any part of the costs of the proceedings. It will be seen that the control of the application of the damages is vested in the court fur specific objects. No regard is paid to the husband in the matter, except so far as his children are concerned. If the court shall think fit the guilty wife may be benefited out of the damages which, no doubt, will go in ease of the husband to some extent, because upon the final decree for the disso- lution of the marriage, the court, following the rule observed by the House of Lords in such matters, will see that some provision is made for the wife. The children of the parents whose marriage is the subject of proceedings in the new court are placed under its protection, and it may, from time to time, before making its final decree, make interim orders respecting them and in the final decree it may make such provision as it may deem just and reason- able with reference to their custody, maintenance, and in certain cases may take steps for placing them under the protection of the Court of Chancery. As September has now arrived, and we may expect some dis- tressing gun accidents, let me urge upon your readers the necessity of observing the following recommendations. The first and most obvious is never to carry the gun with the muzzle pointed, not merely at, but in the direction of, any human being. The second is that all parties in the field should walk as much in a line as pos- sible, carrying their guns either on the shoulder or under the arm, not swinging across it, as is too commonly done, thereby bringing the trigger into dangerous proximity with boat or waistcoat buttons. In the next place the hammer should always be at half-cock, ex- cept at the very moment when game is expected to rise. In the act of firing the yonng sportsman should always remember that he must never shoot at a bird unless the coast is perfectly clear and in loading that he must avoid hanging over the muzzle of his gun, and never allow his hand or fingers to cover it. As an amusing instance of how members of parliament are hum- bugged, let me quote the following from Mr. Layard's speech at Aylesbury. It seems a member is expected to do all for his con- stituents be can. "I might have carried that feeling," says Mr. Lay aid, to what is popularly called greenness' on one occasion, perhaps you will think, when I tell you a circumstance that one day occurred. Two gentlemen called upon me one morning in London, and mentioned the name of a person in this borough who was well known to me, and whom they represented as the near relation of one of them, and offered to my notice an invention for grinding knives. Of course I felt it my duty to buy some of these instruments, and upon mentioning the circumstance to another member, I found that these gentlemen were the relations of the mosó prominent constituents of every member of parliament (hear, hear). I need not tell you that I was not so green a second time." It is not often members confess to such an amount of greenness as is confessed in the above passage. Yet surely Mr. Layard's Eastern experiences must have taught him to be up to such dodges. The elections about to take place, I suppose, will not witness Mr. Tbackeray again in the field. His defeat at Oxford, where he says he could have got in had he blinked the Sunday question, i imagine has for the present repressed his desire the applause of listening senates to command j" and as he cannot speak extempore, but must write all his compositions and commit them to memory, I fear the chances of his ever doing so are somewhat remote. By the by, you will scarcely believe it, but it is true nevertheless—of all his Oxford constituents but few had heard of Thackeray as an author. It must be remembered that all along the better class of tradesmen were Mr. Cardwell's constituents, and Mr. Thackeray had only the baser sort. But still one would have thought Mr. Thackeray's name was better known, Q.

FRENCH OFFICIALS IN ALGERIA.

THE EMPRESS EUGENIE AT A BULL…

MURDEROUS OUTBREAK OF FANATICISM.I

SUICIDE OF PRINCE GREGORY…

THE MUTINIES IN INDIA. —«—

Scientific. ---

[No title]

iBpitome of K ete, jFateign…