Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

12 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

[No title]

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

Mr Parry: One of the pleas is that you were not pos- sessed of them; did these feathers belong to you? plaintiff: They did: I paid for them. ♦»r Parry: And what did you do with them ? • T -Plaintiff: They were sent to the defendant's house in Jttlv. His Honour: Who took them? Plaintiff: The woman from whom I bought them, your Honour. In reply to a further question, Plaintiff stated that this woman was not present as a witness, because there had been an offer of a compromise ty the other side, trusting to wliich'he had not provided imself with witnesses. His Honour: Perhaps you may compromise the matter COw. Mr Parry: Here is Mr John to answer that suggestion. Mr John: I have no instructions. Mr Parry (to defendant) Do you know at all from the defendant what came of the feathers she had from you? -Icouid get no answer of any sort. How do you trace them to her possession ? I bought them of the woman, who took them to her house. How do you prove the weight?—I could have proved 'tlit weight by witnesses, but relying on the letter of Mr John, offering a compromise, I was led not to summon them; ia fact it was too late to do so when it Was known that the case was to go on. His Honour. It was evident to me as soon as I heard the woman was not present that some difficulty might arise, and it was with that view I proposed a compromise. Mr John I think it right to say, your Honour, that I informed Mr Parry on Monday, by letter, that this case Would be defended. Last week there were some commu- nications between us as to a compromise; but being in- ducted to go on with the case, wrote a note to Mr Parry, which was delivered at his office last Monday, bating that the case would be defended Mr Parry: Not being at Haverfordwest I never saw it till yesterday (Wednesday); therefore I have been taken Perfectly by surprise. I shall ask for the case to be adjourned. His Honour: I f you can make an affidavit that you *?ave an impression that the witnesses were not summoned "om some circumstance, it would be a good ground for an adjournment. Mr John: I wrote the letter, and believe it was reeeived at Mr Parry's office on Monday. •, Plaintift: No; for I was present on Tuesday when it to Mr Parry's office. His Honour: It is evident that there are witnesses who ^jght have been called, and who probably would, but for some idea that the case was not to proceed. You; Mr John, acted quite right in sending a note, but still you see the plaintiff was at Haverfordwest when it was deli- *ered, and there has been only one clear day since. There better be an adjournment. Mr John: Did you see the woman yesterday, Mr *razer ? •■Plaintiff: I did; but she was not at all agreeable to eonle unless summoned. His Honour: Take the adjournment; plaintiff to pay 'oe epsts. Perhaps next time you may come to ah ar- rangfiment. NICHOLAS V. PHILLIPS AND BEDDOE. This was a plaint to recover the sum of £ '2 Os 5d. The *jia«»tifF, it appears, succeeded the defendants in the occupation of the Royal William public-house, Jameston lew days prior to the expiration of the current year's jicense. It was alleged by the plaintiff, and admitted by ^defendants, that he paid them a sum of £ 2 17s 10 £ d, ifd 1 ;e question at issue was, whether or not, on receiving j.IIat money, the defendants agreed to pay for the new which in a few days would become necessary, and "hich would cost £ 2 Os 4d. Plaintiff insisted that they ?1(i> but that they failed to fulfil their promise, by which e Was put to the expense himself, hefice his action to recover back the £ 2 Os 4d. The defendants, on the con traryi maintained that they made no such agreement, that the £ 2 17s was made up in this way, namely, 7°r the magistrate's certificate transferred to plaintiff, Jl.7; for a signboard sold to him, 10s; and for the good l/of'the house, £ 2 Os 4d. His Honour, remarking on 101, 1 fo^ tddity the fact tliat t^le defendants should charge the good will of the house, a sum exactly identical the price of the license (viz., £ 2 Os 4d), gave judg- .e*it for the amount sought..Mr Adams appeared for the and Mr Parry for the defendant.

--------------PEMBROKE-DOCK.

MILFOBD.

MILFORD HAVEN.

N ARBERTII.

FISHGUARD.

THE REV. C. H. BARHAM'S ANNUAL…

NEWPORT.

Family Notices

..--,CORRESPONDENCE.

Advertising

ST. DAVID'S.