Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

27 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

--BOROUGH ENGINEER. ! -

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

BOROUGH ENGINEER. PBOPOSAL FOR HIM TO RESIGN DEFEATED BY SMALL MAJOIITY rillV ATE PRACTISE FUI) TO BE REFUNDED. At Wednesday's meeting of the Swansea Council the position of the borough engineer wtfc the subject of an important discussion, 11113 Mayer (Alderman Lee) presided. Mr. David Davids introduced the matter by moving an amendment t-o a minute of the Waters and Sewers Committee, which amend- ment was in effect that Mr. Wyrill be a-sked to iisign. In the first place, Mr. Davios said he had not a panicle of feeling with re- gard to the borongb engine, r except the feel- ing of a 'member of the Council towards an official. In fa.ct, be did not know any task mere disagreeable than the one which he was n undertaking from a sense of public duty. There had never been the slightest differ- ences between hIm and Mr. Wyrill, and therefore be (Mr. Davies) was speaking and acting in hIS capacity as a member of the Council towards Mr. Wyrill in his capacity as borough engineer. Some time ago a gub-conjmittee was appointed to inquire into certain, statements with regard to Mr WyriJL That sub-committee met on two or three oc- casions. At this stage the Mayor called Mr. Wyrill to hint and privately told him that he could retire from the Chamber if he cared to do so. The borough engineer decided to remain, and returned his seat. Mr. Navies (continuing) said that he much preferred for Mr. Wyrill to remain and make preferred for Mr. Wyrill to remain and make any correction to the rema.rks that he thongtt necessary. The sub-committee he referr*. d to was called to obtain* cei tain JIl- foru-auon, and various comments were offer- ed in the Council Coun. Colwdl asked it certain allegations were true or not. And ne <Mr. Davies) might say they were true. And Atderman, Morris also suggested. that the composition of the sub-committee was such Uiat they could not expect justice to be done. That to say that the sub-committee wa*s not capable of doing its duty, assuming the allegations were tme. And he had in mind another time when there were complaints in tbe Strewte Committee over certain at Morriston, and when he (Mr. Davies) mad.> the remark that if the allegations! against those men were true they ought to be dismissed, Mr. Owen agreed in that remark. He simply mentioned that in order to say tihat be was there to advocate precisely the same kind of treatment to the man rho cleaned the roods at a small daily wage and the highly-paid official of the Corporation. They ought not to draw a distinction be- tween salaried men and the men with the daily wage. (A voice: "Agreed.") He knew ihf-re had been several things said in favour of Mr. Wyrill. He was told that he had beni for 26 years the borough engineer of Hwansoa, and that he had done during that time some excellent work—that some of the .best reservoirs they had got in Swansea had been designed by him. He (Mr Davies) wanted to do Mr. W yrill every possible jus- tåæ. He >vas told he also really respon- Fibl;- for the Cray Waterworks. There was that fact, and he gave him every possible I credit foi it. And he desired to add that jjjg impression was that Mr. Wyrill was a h.ghslv competent engineer. To. him he wjw- iucfi a fast horse; he could run well, but was a jibber. (Laughter.) His complaint then of Mr. Wyrill was not that he Wa.f incompetent, but that he had so mis- managed his duties that he hnd destroyed the cormdence of the members of the com- mittee—certainly he had lost his (Mr. Davies1 ■ onfidence. In other words, that Mr Wvrill had not given the service which tÍhj Gorpoi nt.inn were ent it led to ex- pect. In this cODnectiou he might say le.-t it should be. said that he was associated wUh what appeared to 'be a merciless pro- cedure- that earlier in the year he took a prominent part in a debate to temper iud'Tnent with mercy in the case of another Corporation official. In that case it had the most happy results, and if he had the slight- est nope that Mr. Wyrill could also be cured of his defects he would be quite happy tc -ive him the same trial as was given to that ether official. When he was member of the Council before his present term he was not member of the Waterworks Com- mit-tee, but he could recall two things in rejard to 'Mr. Wyrill. The first was the disclosure of hopeless mismanagement and wastage in connection with the Cray Water- works, and the manager (Mr. Dix) wa,s di.s- missed. He (Mr. Davies) said then that if Mr. Dix's head wa." to fall then tHe head of the Borough Engineer ought to fall also, because he had produced month after month: a dt'rT showing that he had been going to the Orav almost daily, supervising the work, and vet for months that mismanagement was going on, and there was rfti-t the slight- hint from Mr Wyrill that it was going on. The other thing he remembered that ■was brought before the Council was this: The Council had entered into a large con- tract for the supply of cement to the Cray Works, running into scores of thousands of tons. In f)\I;1.t contract there was a pro- tective olaai.se by which the Corporation could go into. the open market if notice was giver, before 10,000 tons had been supplied. When that time wa.s thought to have ar- Tl ¡yJ, and other offers of a more favourable na' nre were made, it was found that the Council could not exercise its option became Mr. Wyrill had not given timely notice, so that the option had disappeared. Now when he became a member of the Water Works Committee a vea.r ago, one of the first things thev had to onsider was the matter of the I Rond^clds drainage. They passed unanim- ously a .-«cheme for bringing relief to some hundreds of people from the recurring flood- ing in that district. They were unanimous about it. Meeting after meeting went by, and at almost every meeting some question was acted with regard to the matter, and when at length surprise was expressed that no reply had been received from the Local Government Board, the disooverv was made that no application had Keen made T -> the™ for sanction to borrow the money, because tbe plans were not ready. A„d so, bv reason of the dilatory methods of the Local Government Board, and the dilatory methods in the Borough Engineer's department, work- wbieh ought to nave been in hand months asro had a week since orijy reached the staee that, tenders could be accepted for it. And before that d^ne the committee had to tie Mr- V, yT1" own to a certain date when the plans must be read v. He had scarcely body makm^ the delay in tbe Borougb l\h^ Z,r], and the result deaj Gf whicli ouffht to Tvliev Rum- mer. and which V* the fields neonlo months n oie hey Wouy b Peor" y^en serious]v del.n. Iwt that it jthout the knowfil was <kxng ^mH.hr.g^ .ttee. He or authority of the com ^ot gomg into controversial tr>ere were no differences of <>T*and ,,vl,idl Corporal ease he prejudiced i;nble to a lid ''Son"8 thai^igW X'm an hrrnwht (lrgaIn..c;t gt .themf' the water supply to the vario'-1- abso- it was found that the figure? n lutely untrustworthy. Nearly ^hev statistics were found to be v1?i" Wvrill were not kept, it was true, by iiia,t" his himself, but surely he should their subordinates in bis department de. work. He had reminded them of V b>y over the Sandfields' drainage 9t at the same time that district wiv? ?T1 _a ir'g from this cause. Mr. Wy«'!l „ doing two things that were utterly f rary to the terms of his contract. ,J1 v a Water Bill promoted by the R«ral District Council, and a rival 1 n0 Ammanford District Council- The Swansea Corporation, having a monopoly of the supply in an area wanted to confer)"0 It 30 InQch as possible,:and SIO offered cxpfw^^?? two Biiis. **We was a four*" party, the Swansea District Council, whose interests were in direct conflict with Swansea's interests. Swansea were inter- ested in the matter as sellers of water, and desired to keep the area ot supply to them- selves, and so negotiations were opened with the Llanelly and Ammanford bodies. In tl)c case of the Llaneily Council, they could not go to Parliament without help, as they wanted certain leveliings which the Corporation had got. Swansea consequently asked them to put in a protective clause in their Bill, and they immediately con- tented, and the opposition was withdrawn. Subsequently it was discovered that the Borough Engineer, who had been told to give limited information, had in his pocket a telegram asking if ho could be retained by the Llanelly District Council to give evidence in favour of the Bill, and that he had already wired a reply. Mr. Wyrill did not say one word or give one hint of it to the committee that he had accepted a retainer, and it was only from the Llanelly District Councii officials that they learned that Mr. Wyrill had been acting as their engineer ever since ..he death of the late Mr. Morgan Davies, and that that Council were absolutely relying upon him and could not go on without him. To show the posi- tion, Mr. Davies explained that an aPP* cation from the Ammanford Council asiceo for information, and then Swansea de- cided t-o be neutral. The Llanelly Distric Council had already spent thousands of pounds, and without the assistance of J- Wyrill that expenditure would be was e( and as soon as Llanellv gave the Pro^ 1 clause the Swansea District Council otterea opposition to it on the ground that -y had been deprived of a competitive^ "'T'' and so incidentally they were § Swansea Corporation. It was that there should be a joint confeiei^. Information was then District Wyrill bad been reUunod bj the totaot Council, and when they met to what to do with toe oprx)suiono^^ District Council, they were conaonte.1 by report prepared for i>hat bouy by • J wthoutP the knowledge of his committee. rd not a settlement been effected, and if the parties had engaged in a Parliamentary fight, that report would have been iatal to the Corporation to this extent that they could not put the only witness in the box available to them because Mr. Wyrill had committed himself to the District Council in his elai>orate report. Mr. Wyrill, too, had been employed bv a. contractor suing a friendly public body at Maesteg, and had been retained by that man as ail expert aigaanst the Maesteg uistrict Council. And that case occupied 23^ days in preparation, a week in London aitiug for the C<L.e to come on, w-d two days further —more than a month of time. Mr. Wyrill's suggestion was that he had not taken his hoiiiays, and that he was entitled to the time. And in that connectioii Mr. Davies said they ought to have a record of the holidays taken by their officials. At the present time they oould not refer to any re- cord; every man seemed v> go just when he wanted and to choose his own length of time. If a workman stopped away the mat- ter was put on record, and he wanted the officials treated in the same way as the em- ployes of private firms. The Corporation wciv entiilva to t.:e rail service ot their ser- vants Mr. Wyrili suggested the reason why he undertook the work was that he thought he could undertake the same, for in the year 1888, before the duties of sur- veyor and engineer were divided, Mr. WyriH applied for an increase, and it was then refused, he (Mr. Wyrill) stating that he understood from them that he thought hÐ was in order m doing what he had done- The speaker stated that in perfect fairness, to Mr. Wyrill. lie (Mr. Davies) did no think Mr. Wyrill was entitled to place tha* construction, in view of his contract. Davies then proceeded to say that -1 • Wyrill had stated he had the conaen Mr. Hoger Thomas (a former chairin^u the Waters and Sewers Committee) fa to Maesteg. A member of the ■ asked Mr. Thomas, and the lattør ha.d saId, "Yes, I did." The speaker lii-st objected to any chairman giving such leave to an^ o cnil, and se<x>ndly. did Mr. Thomas that it ueant a month's work? Air. levies wanted the moral driven home that ^every official was expected to do his work »airly, and fully render his moneys worth ana (tC- cept the same responsibility as a private servant- Thei«e wae not a single memoer of the committee who, while not approving or the drastic proposition, bat who wished that he should be penalised. Various suggestion^ had been made in that way; one was that the money so earned should be returned to the Corporation. In conclusion Mr. Davies said Mr. Wyrill was an intelligent man, and he should have been able to see that he Wa £ preparing a way for serious consequ^ unless he believed—as some seemed to be- that the members of the Council were only colourable imitations of employers. Jt ,va;. their duty to act. in the same manner' a«' public men as they would do in their private capacity. Aid. W. Morris seconded, and said he had known such facts as Mf Davies had quoted for some time. The representatives of the public were the masters of the officials, and they had a duty to perform to. the rate- payers as well éU; the officials. Their officials they should treat as any private employer would. It was true that some officials ■-reated the Corporation representatives as noneniities but that wa* not to be toler- ated, and if the representatives had not the courage of their convictions, and act ac- cordingly, then they had no right to the suhrag of the people. In Um matter the speaker quite concurred with every ar- gument adduced by Mr. Davies. He main- tained no official of the Corporation had* any right to enter into private business without first consulting the Corporation. Every official received "good screws," and should a committee let an official give expert evi- dence the question of payment should be considered. Officials had certain work to do and certain hours in which to work, and if an official did not comply he should be sent about his business. Thev could not complain, the speaker thought, if Mr. Wyrill had given his services, say, after five o clock. The Mayor hoped the deliberation* would be as brief as possible. Mr. Hopkin defended Mr. Wyrill "to save him from professional destruction." \[r Wyrill had undoubtedly committed an of- fence, but it was not criminal, and was simply one of want of discretion. Mlr. Wyrill had saved the ratepayers from £25,000 to £30.000 in the arbitration case some years a„o "of Baldwin and Yerburgh v. the Cor- poration. There was no superior to Mr. Wvrill as a water works engineer in the country. The first thing Air. Wyrill did Wat, the building of the Upper Lliw Reser- voir—a standing monument to his ability. The dam at Cray, which :111', Wyrill bad de- signed, was the finest in the history of en- gineering works in that • direction. The speaker wanted that one little chance given which every person was entitled to receive. The one little hope to look forward to, and he appealed to members not to let Mr. Wyrill's life be eternally black and damned. He pleaded for the engineer, though he ad- mitted they knew his weaknesses as admin- istrator. Aid. Solomon pointed out that in the case of another official another method was tried with success, and he wanted the same treat- ment extended to one official as another. If it was understood there was to be no quarter, no second chance, very good but until that principle was adopted he could ?°'t go to the length proposed. Mr. Wyrill had rendered them 23 veairs of service, and had been blamed, for one thing, for not 0 £ *ting on the business method at the sult^ earlier. But to lie logical the oon- oft(jm*\ • Rngineers were also liable. How W;H th t-bey find a good professional man He ■ Wors^ tiommercial man in the world, should nl», ^u',c agreed that the Council future, arJ ,r"ake it perfectly clear for the Wvrill b-i^i i'V should condemn what Mr. Mr. W. jj lp, and suggested arwi. me^v" ,.f u boino- +i, 'Kjther amendment, the e-iect av the iunf >,Mr- Wyrill be ordered to i u earned front wt the re™™ce P-Poraiion, and that m P i | i v Slrtlilar the Council would have no alternative but to dispense with his servi^ Hon. Odo Vivian said it was „ ^ost dis- agreeable duty j^ had rforuv The snb-ctannnttee had been accused of aminms, bat tbare was no such, bad. that Mr. W yTill had been retained did not come from Mr. Wyrill in the tiist in-stance at tdl, as he proceeded to explain. Preced- ing, tile Hon. C'do Vivian saiu he aid not wish to say anything against Mr. yrill's integrity, but what tiie ijpe^kei was not only the Engineers wisdom and strength in being able to advise the Council, but he had his uoubts as to his capacity as a,u- engineer. No member would cieny Mr. vs'yrill was not a strong man, and the committee were continually at loggerheads with him when, if they had a man in whom they had absolute confidence, they would not be in that position. The speaker did not know if anyone would say Swansea was properly managed from an engineering, water and drainage point of view. There had been no sea-vice reservoir outside the town, and again they were supplying the town off the mains, and if they bad all accident to the mains the supply to the town would dry up. Concluding, the Hon. Odo Vivian .'«.id a competent man would have no fear in resigning as regards other employment. One official recently left, and was now occupying a high place "m another town. Mr. Livingston said he was not a hard man, and he wished some way could be found ether than the one suggested. Mr. Wyrill, he mentioned, had never expressed sorrow, and had attempted to justify the position he had taken up During nis ex- penenoe he hod Iiever ,u^wn gucli a negleet of public business HiS wtus the ca~se with the engineering ciepajtment. Mr. Loveil s.ud tbey should not allow the consideration of a h'u'iiv-placed official to weigh with tiiem Thev were there to do the best for the whole community, and he did not tliink if thev adopted the resolution of the committee it" would be in accoidanoe with the views outside. The question ot the Engmeer's abilitv had not been raised that a« regards" the drainage question the Council had always been divided. pie Mornston service reservoir q uestion, too, be reminded the Council, had been oon- damiwyi and aften-wards approved. Mr. Wyrill, he submitted, was lacking m lucid explanation." Many of the members per- liaps lacked that quality, aJid if they were pd to that test. ■ j. Mr. Tutton said if th-ey dispensed with Wvrill's services were they going on with the drainage sdieme that he had 1 pre- pared' If so they would be availing them- selves' of m. Wyriii;s services and con- demning the man, Where then would be the Council's oon«sten<y.' Did they tmd f u -+U f,he Cray: lie did not admit -t "'J Perhaps Mr. Wyrill lacked tact and diplomacy and instead of writing a ceri i in letter in the first place if he had come md'fcaid what he had done, and if he had ,/m ,.nZ he was sorry, he thought they done wrong J „ve hoaio the last of the matter. M°U Wvrill had b»en described as a highly pa.id official, but the speaker did not think had been. one. Ald. Martin said )11'. Wyrill contended 1 tj,e teims of his contract had been re- laxed 1° <^se of tlie Maesteg matter the Engineer t.he consent of t.he then chairman- The remedy was a simple one— to withdraw any idea of relaxation and make the Engineer understand he was ex- pected to work on the terms arranged. Mr. VVyrilI's competency had been called into question, lhe reservoir at Upper Lliw was the most satisfactory of the old ones, and in the constructioin of the Cray l-eservoix tiii- Consulting Engineer had never touched Mr Wyriil s design as a design. In 1886 Mr. Wyrih suggested a service reservoir a& Moriiston; in 1801 he called attention to it again, and in 1305, in giving evidence in connection with the second line of pipes, he brought, it u.p again. It was the lin- gnie,^ s le.onirneuaauon that a service reser- voir be put on Kilvey Hill. It was part of the Cray scheme that a i-eservoir should be placed on Town Hill, and Mr. Wyriil had put Cwm- ctoiikin into a service reservoir for the town. To say that Mr. Wyrill had never recom- mended a service reservoir showed that the man w ho said so knew nothing about the matter. The speaker thought the Brynmili outlet was at the bottom of the proposal, and Mr. WyriU held the view that any reasonable man would hold on that matter. Mr. Colwiill said if Mir. Wyriil "pegged" out they would have to get another engineer. The question was whether the Engineer was expected to devote the whole of his time or whether lie was allowed to take private practice. It seemed as though Mr. Wyrill could do as he likea. NIL Wyrill might be a good engineer, but no one would say his estimates were reliable. How could the Council dra.w a distinction between officials and workmen? Were they going to con- done one and penalise anoother? If it was condonod they must apply the same prin- cipie all round. Mr. Sinclair pomted out that it was ex- pected that when they had the Cray water vheie would be a continuous supply. Mr. Tutton said they had not finished yet the second line of pipes. .Mr. Sinclair said as regards Coedsaeson drainage the committee did not know what was going to happen. ,v Mr. Hemmings said while he should be sorry to take drastic action yet he felt it was his duty to vote for the amendment. Mr. 11. W at kins said the suggested punish- ment was out of proportion to the offence. Mr. Ruthen said Mr. Wyrill was not to blame at all for the drainage of the Coed- saeson Estate. The fault was to be found in the constitution of the Waters and Sewers Committee, who had practically ordered him to disapprove of tue pia<u A& reg-ards the water supply, if there WaiS three times the supply some parts of the town would be on short supply under the present condition*. O^e Oxford-street, it had been found, had a leakage of 1,600 gallons pea- hour. After Aid. Payne had spoken to the effect that in his opinion the penalty proposed was too severe, Mx. Merrells said his difficulty was to decide between duty and sympathy. How- ever, he had his obligations to perform to the town, though he hoped some way micdit be found so that Mr. VVyrill eould be °re- tained as consulting engineer. Mi-. Owen aiao did sentiment to stand between him and HIlS duty, ajid iu-g<yj tliat Mr. Wyrill should be treated exactly as they would treat the orrinaiy tx>r|xna tion workmen. Mr. darker, the chairn^n oi the Watere Committee, tsaid lie tiiougu e discussion i»ad amply justified the committee m bring- ing forward tlie subject- I nere nad been no lack of judgmeut, as Mr- Wynl. had Joet the entire confidence oi the committee. The sub-committee had done its work honestly and straightforwardly> and whether Mr. Wyrill be dismissed or not he thought th€ public would see there h-iid been no personal bias in the matter, and that what had been done was in their interests. 1.& corpora- tion officials ought to be kept to their duties like ordinal'y Employers treated tneir offi- cials. It liad been saw* that once a Cor- pwation official aJways a Corporation offi- ciaJ, but. he did not want to go mto that. Mr. Wyrill might, over the \\ater Biil^ haw cost the Swansea l>u»cil thousands of pounds, but fortunately his connection with them was found out in time, and with re- gard to the Engineer's saku'J, it that was not sufficient tlien he should have been given more money, whilst any implied ar- rangement that he was to be aJlowed to do private work should have been told SUc- oeeding committees. He though* Mr. WvriU was ill-advised in siting the letter be did to the committee, and believed that if he had made a frank statement, as Mr. Tutton had suggested, they would not have bad the discussion they had. The Mayor said he had f^llovv^d closely for the last six or nine months of their Engineer, and also the doings of the Waters Committee, whose ™eat h<e noted fT<jm time to time. He .taken a serious view of Mr. Wyrill s positaoo, but i had realised tliat up to nine months ago he had rendered the most, valuable tjervic^ to the town. bad told the Engineer Ul }lig offico his opinion of him, a'nd. betause he had not information tor and other things Mr. Wyrill had baougnt upon himself the resolution t £ ,a^ day. Still, lie would not, for one wrong act dis- oh;wge a man when he h^d done hundreds of good ones, and thought that alter tibe lecturing that day the Engineer would prove a better official. He was be on the lenient side and give Mr. Wynll another chaaice. In reply, Mr. WyriJ1 thanked the Council for giving him the opportnnity of saying something on the matter, aod .saId that one I of the speakers had sumrned up the pevsitioa by saying that the charges, appeaard. to b»' baaed upon certain co-called by a ceitain councillor. It would oe ^'eb to enquire into the arguments to see u wiey were founded on facts, l't was stated tnat there was delay in his department over the drainage scheme, and tliat no plans ooula te got ready for the Local uovernmeiit Board for a long time. In reply to that, lie would sav that on December IGtn, 1G07— nearlv a year age-—those plans, were reauy from "end* to end, and the estimates ready and presented to the Waters and Sewers Committee. -Air. Wyrill consulted the min- utes and went iiit-o cletail, showing, as he said, that CikJ work was proceeded with, then stopped, and another sc.'ieme brought forward, and finally the old scheme adopted. That was really not his delay, whilst one- half of the work in Brymnill-lane was done, and yet it was stated that the work had not bVeii commenced. Tlmi. was an element iiitrodii -3.1 to prejudice him. Further, he had ask.-d for assistance which was declined, though subsequently temporary assistance was granted, and yet the contracts were such that if it was private work he would have employed double the ist.aff. He had only got the final plans i-eady by working at night. Then it was stated that in accept- ing private practice he was acting in direct violation to his terms of service. In 1887 his terms were altered, for he made an application for an increase in salary which was not entertained, but it was cleaxly understood that if he had any opportunity of doing private work he should do it. Not only that, members of his committee had even suggested certain privale wort. though whenever any such work did offer itself he had spoken 'to the chairman of the com- mittee about it. Mr. Corker: Do you refer to me? The Engineer Öh, no: long before this committee. I^1.8 Mayor: I was going to put Mr. WynlI nght it is net in recent years. The Engineer said he was only endeavour- ing to show how the practice arose^and had been allowed ever since. The whole thing was open and above boaro. lie denied that he had been 23 days away in connection with the action taken bv the Ma.esteg con- tractor, and explained that what he told the sub-committee was that he had been reading the matter up and other things for days, but it should lie said that the whole of that time was after office hours, ••i-nd not in the Corporation time. l'nfor- innately the case went into the courts, and dragged on for seven davs. Then in regard to his work in connection with the Water LHHs, that occupied 35 days, a.nd again every minute of that time was his own and not the Corporation's. However, he certainly thought that precedent had established the fact that he could take in private work. Looking over past events he could not but say that it was want of tact on his pajt not to have spoken more freely to the members tv» .committee, but as the friction over the drainage scheme 'became more and more Pronounced it made him shrink into his office more than he should have done. It drove him off the committee, though he wanted to speak about those things freely. 1 lie re was not that frankness between them that there should have been, but somehow the seemed to go against it. The vote was then taken, and Mr. Davies' amendment lost by 14 to 20 votes, the names being :—For (14): Messrs. Morris, Dd. Williams, Colwill, Corker, Dd. iavies, Hemmings, Latimer, Livingston, Morrells, Mcly neux, Owen, Sinclair, Thoirtp- and Vivian. Against (20) Mayor, Howell Lewis, Martin, Matthews. Payne, Solomon, Wm. Williams, Philip Davies, T. xt Devonald, Dommett, Grwvnne, Harris, Hopkin, Bfn Jones, Lovell, Miles, ^uthen, Tutton and Howel Wat-kins. Mr. Miles thon submitted the following further amendment :—"Borough Engineer— In view of the fact that he did, in violation of his contract with this Corporation, en- gage to do certain work for other bodies, he is herebv ordered to pay the amount so earned into" the coffers of the borough, and that he be informod tliat in the event of any recurrence of similar circumstances this Council will have no alternative but to dis- pense with his services." The Mayor did not think any further dis- cussion was needed. Mr. Tutton pointed out that he was not satisfied tltore had been any violation of the terms of service. Mr. Harris: Is it not possible to ref-eir this back to the same sub-committee? (Cries of "No.") The vote was taken, and the amendment carried by 30 votes to three. For: Messrs. Howel Lefwis, Matthews, Morris, Payne, Solom<m, Dd. Williams, Cadwa-lladr, *Coi- will, Corker, Dd. Davies, Philip Davies, T. J. Davies, Dommett, Gwynne, Harris, Hemmings, Hopkin, Ben Jones, Latimer, Livingston. Lovell, Merrells, Miles, MOly- neux, Thompson, and Vivian. Against (3) Mayor, Martin, and Wm. WTilliams. Messrs. Tutton and Devonald did not vote.

SWANSEA MUNICIPAL REFQRM MOVEMENT.…

ENVOY'S EXPERIENCE.

TURKEY'S DEMANDS.

--. -------.----SILF-DESTKUCTIQN.

Advertising

LLANELLY DOCK IMPROVEMNET.…

DEATH OM MR. JN0. iWDON-Ud).

ST. DAVID'S DIOCESAN CONFERENCE.

--TRY THIS TQ-DAY.

EX-SWANSEA PLAYER'S DOWNFALL.

SWANSEA OXF0BD-STB E E T SCHOOLS.

KONTENEU30 ENVOY SEARCHED

_.-----------------PICTURESQUE…

A SCIENTIFIC WONDER.

SWANSEA MOTOR CAR ON FIRE

-.-..--; SWANSEA CHILD'S DEATH…

SWANSEA INSURANCE SUPERINTENDENT

[No title]

Advertising

-------------RESOLVEN CHILE).

-------SWANSEA Y.M.C.A. EAIAAR.

SWANSEA OUTRAGE.¡

CORPORATION ACCOUNTS

BLACKMAIL SENTENCES.

Advertising

_.-----------------PICTURESQUE…