Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

24 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

BALLOT TO BE TAKEN.

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

BALLOT TO BE TAKEN. Mr R. Bell at Manchester APPEAL TO RAILWAY DIRECTORS. PLAIN ADVICE TO WORKMEN. Mr R. Beil, M P., the general secretary of the Anulgamated Society of Railway Servants, on. Sunday night attended a mass meeting of rail- waymen in the St. James's Theatre, Manches- ter, and made a speech, in the course of which he announced the result of the deliberations of the Executive Committee upon the question at issue between the railway companies and their employees. The fact that the decision of the committee at their meeting in London during the past week involved the possibility of a strike invested Mr Bell's statement with an unusual degree of importance, and his an- nouncement was awaited with the greatest in- terest by the general public as well as by the railway servants themselves. The theatre in which the meeting was held, accommodating about 2.500 persons, was crowded by an eager audience very soon after the doors were open. Mr H. Bebbington presided, and explained that they were assembled for the purpose of hearing the decision of the Executive and the position of the national movement. He re- minded them that on the 18th January last they submitted a programme of their demands to the railway companies, which have already been published. Unless the companies were conciliatory, he said theposition would become very acute. Mr Bell's Speech. Mr Bell on rising to speak was received with :heers. He said they had been informed that the directors of the railway companies repre- sented the entire view of the railway interest throughout the country, and that he (Mr Bell), as the mouthpiece of the Amalgamated Society oTRailway Servants, did not represent the views of railwaymen. The meetings of rail- wannen he had attended indicated to him that they represented the large majority of the men who were employed in the great centres, and that they were in deadly earnest in regard to this movement. (Cheers.) It had been stated that all such movements as this were the crea- tion of wicked paid agitators—(laughter)—and that he (Mr Bell), was chiefly at the bottom of this movement either for self-aggrandisement or for profit. He gave an emphatic denial to both these suggestions. (Cheers.) It was un- necessary for him to initiate the movement for self-aggrandisement. ifnd he would gain nothing from it personally but additional labour and responsibility. As the general managers did their be for the railway shareholders, so he had to do his best for the railway servants. (Cheers.) The objection which the rail- way companies had to him and his colleagues coming in as they said to inter- fere between them and their workmen was because thev knew that tlwv would have to talk tn th men's representatives in quite a different manner to what they would talk to the employees (Hear, hear.) They also felt that the men had the protection which they would not otherwise have. (Hear. hear.) They knew that it would to some extent interfpre with the power of tyranny on the part of many of the subordinate officials of the rail- ways. (Hear, hear.) REPETITION OF THE DEMANDS. What the railway servants were now asking hrougb their representatives was not being asked for the first time. An effort was made in 1897 to secure what thpv were now en- deavouring to secure, but on that occasion she men were not in such real earnest 1.S the were now. They now recognised that :n order to get fairplay they must get. it through their organisation. (Cheers.) While the railway companies had on many occasions 1897 received deputations from various grades of employees, the results of the inter- views had not been of the satisfactory charac- ter which the men had a right to expect. In consequence of this the men had for two years past been pressing the Executive Committee to sanction this movement. The committee could not resist giving sanc- tion to the movement. They first asked the men to elect delegates to meet in conference and discuss and draft a programme and decide upon a policy. That was done in November last. One of their demands was that their deputations to their employers should be accompanied by their official representatives. Their decision was communicated to the rail- way companies in January last. and nearly all ■of them had replied to the effect that "We cannot meet any third party to discuss the affairs of our own employees." ("Shame.") The result of that was that the Executive Committee, having considered those replies, decided that another effort should be made, and the companies were approached in March, and their reply was in similar terms to the first communication. The committee then rC'^rred the replies to the men throughout the V for their consideration, and a series of mass meetiajs and demonstrations were hdd. und the men wOT"? most emphatic in standing by their prograrruT." and policy, and instructed their delegates to go on. (Cheers.) "THE LAST CHANCE." Following that there was a conference in November, and the delegates there were not unanimous, for a section of them wanted to take immediate action, while the majority accepted the advice which he and the corn. mittee tendered that they should give the rail- wa, cOIDDanies one more chance. (A Voic. It is the last.") They recognised that the railway system of the country was a public service, upon which the welfare of the nation depended, and they felt that to come to any hasty conclusion by which they might paralyse the trade and commerce of the country would be injuring their own fellow-workmen in other industries and that it would be better if they erred at all to err on the side of patience and moderation. (Cheers.) It was important also that in every step they took they should put themselves in line with the sympathy of the general public, so they thought it better to give the companies one more chance. For the ihird time the companies had replied that they had llothirg to add to their previous com- munications. The matter had therefore arrived at that point when it required serious con- sideration and firm determination on the part of those who were leading the movement and on the part of the rank and file. They had con- sidered everything that was reasonable and just, and the executive had arrived at a. decision. Since the last communication with the companies they had speeches delivered by the chairmen of the different companies which absolutly misrepresented the object and de- sires of the men, whether designedly or de- liberately he was unable to say. He referred to several of these speeches in support of his statement. It was said that the men did not desire any third party to come between them and their employers. Now," said Mr Bell, you may answer that now. Is it your desire or not?' (Cries of Yes. yes.") Very well, that is a definite answer to that. (Loud :heers.) I shall expect all of you to stand by that answer." (Cheers.) RIGHT TO REPRESENTATION. Bell went on to contend that the men had a "ight to demand that their official re- presentatives should accompany their depu- tations to negotiate their conditions of employment, to represent their interests sxactly in the same way as the officials of the railways reoresented the shareholders. They had a right to appoint their officials to negotiate with the employers just as the general manager of a company acted on behalf of the share- holders. The companies had said that to carry out their programme would ruin them. They did not want to ruin any company. What hey desired was fair play. Our programme," itinued Mr Bell, is the maximum submitted them. Their minimum is We can give ou nothing. Surely there is room to discuss oetween the minimum of the companies and the maximum of the men in lair and square con- ferences. with full and fair opportunity of negotiating J And then would be the time to begin to talk about ruination, if. after negotia- tion. it was seen what the result would be. The present time is one for demanding con- ferences between the representatives of the men and the employers to see how far we can agree upon the demand submitted to them. Then we should be able to see what the de- mands were and what concessions could be ob- tained, and then we should see what is the balance outstanding and whether or not such a balance was sufficient t warrant extreme measures being taken. Now I think that is a fair way of putting it, and the responsibility therefore is not on our shoulders if no such opportunities and facilities are given in order to discuss these matters. A CRITICAL MISCONCEPTION. I unhesitatingly declare that the chairmen of the companies are under a misconception as to our objects, and for any disruption to take place in our railway system upon a miscon- ception would be a criminal offence on the part of therailway directors to allow it. Three weeks ago I made the suggestion that a num- ber of the representatives of the companies should meet an equal number of the Executive Committee to discuss simply., and oniy for the time being, what is meant and what is intended by recognition of the society.' If they refuse to do that then they take upon themselves the responsibility. They say want to interfere with the management of the railway companies and that we shall be interfering with the discip- line of the men. I have denied both those "wnts. It is not our intention, and the publn- L. ót judge which of us is correct. A BALLOT. Anyhow we know what we want. We have coiuddered it and we have decided at a meet- ing last week. The Executive Committee had several alternatives before them. The rules of the socictv give the Executive Committee a Variety of methods or power. They can order a strike at once if they like and if they think it wise. They can offer to refer the points in dis- pute to arbitration or they can ask the men to signify by ballot whether they desire to press the matter to extremes. Upon either of those three alternatives the committee have power to act. However, after taking the whole of the circumstances into consideration and in order that there shall be no mistake or no mis- understanding, and in order, shall I say, to give a most emphatic refutation to the statements tf the railway directors that this agitation was initiated and carried on by the officials of the Union, the Executive said, 'We will give the men themselves the opportunity by ballot of signi- fying their wishes '—(loud cheers)—and that is the decision of the Executive Committee of last week. (Cheers.) Now your officials-the Executive and permanent officials of the society—have done everything that is fair, honest, and just and above board in the con- duct of this movement. (Cheers.) We have done or said nothing that we are ashamed of. We have felt that our cause is a just one. We have got justice on our side. We have done everything in our power that could be done up to this point, and we await your answer whether we shall proceed further or not— (Voices: "Yes")—and during the course of next week I hope you will all have placed in your hands the ballot paper upon which we ask you to tell us whether it is your desire to press this matter to extremes. (Cheers.) Upon your answer rests the situation. You may rely upon this. ABHORRENCE OF STRIKES. I think I may take a little credit to myself that no one abhors strikes more than I do, no one would avoid them more than I would but I feel that as in national and international disputes, so in industrial disputes, there is a time and there are circumstances sometimes that warrant the bayonet being fixed and the shot being fired—(cheers)—and so far as a movement of this kind is concerned, there never has been in the history of railwaymen a time when extreme measures would be more justified than at present. (Cheers.) I will go further and give you a word of warning. When you have the ballot paper in your hands, having carried on this agitation to this point, having caused great anxiety to your officials and to the directors—(laughter)—if you haul down the flag at this stage, some of you will regret it before many weeks. (Cheers.) I have been one to advocate a strike. I have not been satisfied hitherto that what we have in hand at the moment has perhaps been sufficient to justify a strike taking place, but I am satis- fied in regard to this present movement, that what you are asking in your programme, and when you ask that your representa- tives shall negotiate on your behalf, you are entitled to protection against the tyranny and oppression which does exist in the railway service, and if they refuse that to you then you will be perfectly justified in going on and firing the shot. (Cheers.) ROOM FOR CONCILIATION. Having said so much, I feel that there is still room for conciliation. If the railway com- panies do not know what it is that we are a-sking for, let them meet us, at any rate at a preliminary conference, to know what we mean. To talk as the railway directors have been talking is a lot of tommy rot.' They talk as if we were people clothed in red skin with great horns and long tails." Mr Bell went on to warn the public and railway shareholders as to misleading statements about the strength of their society. Their movement concerned 220.000 men engaged in the manipulation of traffic, and of those 97.000 were in their society, principally in large centres. As to the threap that men could be drafted from the country districts, all he could say was let them draft them. They were men who had not had the experience nece.sary for the work of large centres, and they would soon mike a mess of it. After speaking of the necessity if possible of preventing a strike, and expressing the hope that influential shareholders like the Duke of Devonshire, Lord Farrar and Earl Cawdor would use their influence to prevent a strike on such an issue, Mr Bell proceeded There may be room for negotiation between the companies on the question of the minimum and the maximum of the men's demands, but there is no room for compromise upon the question of receiving the men's official repre- sentatives. (Cheers.) I hope I have made the position clear. It is only now for you to be loyal to those whom you have placed at the movement. When you have decided what is to be done, we on our part shall go on until we have come to the end of it. (Cheers.) Do not be persuaded by anything you hear from any outside source. (Hear, hear.) It is you who have forced this movement on. It is due from you now to your colleagues and'officials to give them your loyal support. I will conclude with a few words from Goethe- Are you in earnest ? Seize this very minute, What you can do, or dream you can, begin. Boldness has genius, power, and magic in it. Only engage, and then the mind grows heated. Begin and the work will be completed." (Cheers.) The meeting, after several speeches, passed the following resolution ;— That this meeting of Manchester railway. men expresses its deep regret at the uncon- ciliatory and arbitrary manner in which the third overture to the railway companies has been received. We therefore heartily sup- port the decision of the executive in ordering a ballot of the service to obtain the indi- vidual opinion as to whether they will with- draw their labour at a given time. We fully recognise the seriousness of the position, but we have no other means whereby our just demands may be conceded.

WHAT THE MEN WANT.

ISSUES AT STAKE.

SEVERE FALLS IN STOCKS.

Position in South Wales.

FEELING IN LOCAL CENTRES.

CONFERENCE SOUGHT FOR.

MEETING AT FISHGUARD.

IN THE PROVINCES.

"OUTSIDE CONTROL" QUESTION.

ABERYSTWYTH COUNCILLOR

YOUTH'S CAREER OF CRIME.

-------t_-DEATH UNDER OPERATION.

UNITED METHODISTS. .

ENCOUNTER WITH POLICE.

RHONDDA TRAMWAYS & T.V.R.…

Injustice to Wales

NEWS IN WAR TIME.

STATION THEFT NEAR LLANELLY.

Isolation Hospitals.

Wreck on Welsh Coast. ..

UNINSURED WORKMEN.

[No title]

Advertising