Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

14 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

KUTHIN GENTLEMAN DIVORCED.¡…

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

KUTHIN GENTLEMAN DIVORCED. „ ♦ PAINFUL CASE. In the Divorce Court, on Saturday, before Mr. Justice Bucknill, Mrs. Florence Gertrude Mary Lloyd-Roberts, the daughter of the Rev. William H. Butlin, vicar of Leonard Stanley, Gloucester- shire, sought a dissolution of her marriage with her husband, Mr. Gabriel Henry Lloyd-Roberts, described as the son of the owner of estates at Plasgwyn, Ruthin, on the ground of his cruelty and adultery. Mr. J. Harvey Murphy, at the opening of the case, said that with regard to the general chargea he was unable to put his client into the box to deny them. I Mr. Hume Williams, K.C., said that the case was an exceptionally bad one. The petitioner was the daughter of a clergyman, and respondent was a son of a gentleman who owned large estates in Den- bighshire. The petitioner and respondent were married at Leonard Stanley, Gloucestershire, on July 21, 1898, and, fortunately, there were no children of the marriage. Almost at once—in fact, during the honeymoon—it appeared that the hus- band was addicted to drinking, a fact of which the petitioner was unaware. Constantly throughout 1898 and 1399 this man, who wa.s supposed to be a gentleman, ill-treated her, using obscene and profane language, shaking her, and treating her with every possible cruelty. On August 9, 1899. petitioner and her husband were stv-y Ing at the vicarage, whan respondent assaulted her violently, and of that assault her father and a servant were witnesses. Respondent was intoxicated. On this occasion he caught his wife by the throat, shook her, and threw her out of the room into the garden. On August 11, 1899, respondent wrote the follow- ing: -"Dear Vicar.—I cannot express in words the absolute and fearful disgust I have for myself for my cruel, violent and blackguardly behaviour. I love little dear Doddy with all my heart, and worship the ground she stands on. The best word for me is 'drunken, jealous brute.' Respondent made promises to amend, but did not keep those promises. In June, 1900, he was again staying at the vicarage, when an assault of a serious character took place. He was in his usual condition of intoxication, and seized his wife by the throat, nearly throttling her. That brought matters to a climax, and petitioner found it was im- possible to live with her husband any more, especially as he was a man who could not keep his promises. Petitioner's father thereupon turned him out of the house, and a deed of separation was drawn up. Respondent then wrote a letter on June 8, 1500, to petitioner, in which he said:—"God bless you, my own darling. I shall repent; do not forget me. I know my vile temper would make anyone more than angry, and the ungentlemanly way that I behaved is more than I can express in words. I am only a worthless brute, but remem- ber, I shall always think of you and love you in my own true heart. Some day we may meet again. Tell your father that for all his kindness I thank him most sincerely, and shall ever re- member his kindness and the generous spirit he has had towards me. All I leave to you.- Lloyd." On August 9 respondent wrote a letter to the vicar "sincerely apologising" and saying that he was "not in his right mind," having given way for some time to intemperate habits. While he was writing in this strain, counsel continued. ho was actually living with a woman as his wife, and that woman was present in court on subpoena, and would give evidence if necessary. Mrs. Florence Gertrude Mary Lloyd-Roberts substantiated counsel's oprning statement as to her husband's conduct. He was always drunk and always ill-treating her, using most, terrible language. On August 9, 1899, she was at a tenants' dance opposite her own house. When she was dancing with her brother, her husband, who was drunk, seized her and threw ljer out of the window, tearing her away from her partner. In July. 1901. a deed of separation was drawn up. The Rev. William H. Butlin corroborated his daughter's statement. He had known respondent for some twelve months before his daughter mar- ried him. Mrs. Ann Hitchin, residing at Hoddesdon, gave evidence as to respondent staying at her house with a Mrs. Hewitt, whom he brought there as his wife. His lordship, after hearing some further evi- dence, granted a decree nisi, with costs. I

CONNAH'S QUAY HOTEL CASE.I

Advertising

| LITERARY NOTICES.

ITHE CHURCHES.

THE CHURCH HOUSE.

ENGLISH CHURCH UNION. -----+---

Advertising

CONNAH'S QUAY'S LOSS.I

NATURAL HISTORY NOTES-

-----THE LORDS AND DIVOriCE.…

-_._---------IRISHMAN'S STRANGE…

[No title]

Advertising