Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

10 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

PALTERING WITH THE PERIL.

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

PALTERING WITH THE PERIL. Ix to-day's Express' the Protectionist farmer will find a most excellent friend, who writes from Machynlleth to suggest that the great social problems of slum- dom, unemployment, and rural depopula- tion may be largely solved by the taxation of foreign wheat. To him it appears quite a simple matter," and we welcome his in- tention to elaborate it in a future issue. Let us hope that the established theories of political economists will be exploded by the practical presentation of a proposal so simple, and that a new social era will dawn in the light that now shines on the southern shore of the Dovey. Our cor- respondent makes it plain that he is no Tariff Reformer of the Chamberlain stand- ard. A duty on foreign corn is the utmost extent to which his protectionist idea will carry him. "No other industry," he says, must be protected in the same way, or we shall soon return to the same relative position as we occupied previously the farmer must receive favoured treatment, and the farmer alone." In other words, a great manufacturing nation cannot bene- fit from a general protection. He does not call for a heavy duty—merely a prefer- ence to the farmer at home, to induce men to grow corn, and to enable them to sell it as a price a little higher than the average price to-day." Of course, the consumer will have to pay," but this he will be able to afford," since a small duty on foreign corn will bring welcome revenue to the Government, and the rates will be lowered on account of the improved conditions of life in the towns, for men will have an in- ducement to remain on the land." From such things, though little and" small," we are asked to conjure visions of "a countryside studded with well-equipped homesteads, around which well-tilled fields will bring forth sustenance in plenty, and fill the tiller's heart with pride." So de- lightfully simple, and yet nobody conceived of it before! Our correspondent has written us several illuminating articles on practical agricul- tural development, but evidently he has more faith than knowledge respecting its advancement by protective means. Let him inquire of farmers around him how many of them would feel disposed to lay down their land in wheat by the encour- agement of a little higher price of corn." Representative associations of farmers have declared that a duty of not less than 10s or 15s per quarter on foreign grain would benefit the home grower. The duty in Germany is 12s, and to-day German agriculture is more depressed than we find it here, not to speak of the deamess of bread to the general German worker. When, under 'the Corn Laws, grain was selling at as much as 80s, what were the conditions of our farmers and farm ser- vants ? Infinitely tvorse than they are to- day. And why ? Because of the high rents exacted by landlords, to whose exclusive advantage it was to maintain the utmost possible prices. That is why they are clamouring for an inflated value for wheat now, regardless of the interests and well- being of the masses, so long as they can set up a good case for higher rentals. While the average farmer would stand to gain nothing from a small duty on foreign corn," how would it affect the dairy farmer and all other classes of agriculturists who must purchase grain as feeding stuff ? How, too, could it benefit the farm servant if it induced a rural drift of labourers from the towns to compete with him in the fields ? Labour is paid for, like goods, according to market value, and unless this tax on foreign corn carried an increase of wages, the farm servant would be decidely worse off than he is at present. Will far- mers promise higher wages in return for a small duty oh corn ? Again, our correspondent apparently for- gets that Britain cannot, under the most favourable conditions, produce all the food which its people require. We have not the room in which to grow it, and we are not blessed by the requisite climate. No amount of taxation put on foreign food would enable us to do without it. That is not a political fact it is simply the recog- nition of physical conditions. Besides, let him reflect upon the fluctuating character of harvests, and try to appreciate the fact that while our ports are open to the whole world, we ensure an abundant and a cheap supply. Two years ago the Russian crop was poor, and the exports to Britain con- sequently small, but Argentina had a great harvest, and made up the deficiency, and saved us from high prices. Last year the Argentine supply fell short, but Rus- sian grain was plentiful. So it is, that when the 'harvest fails in one country, another is available for our needs. What would be our position under Protection if we were to experience that which happened two years tigo, when India, Canada, and Australia all suffered from partial crop failure, or in 1904, when Canada and Australia failed, or again in 1899, when all the three countries failed, and the United Kingdom contrived to obtain only 2,800,000 quarters from the whole of the, British possessions combined or, worst of all, in 1896, when we obtained only 1,800,000 quarters in twelve months ? A precious price we should have to pay for our bread. The farmers of the United States and Canada enjoy not a small," but a heavy protective duty on foreign grain.. How does it affect the consumer ? As much Canadian flour can be bought in London for 28s as will cost 36s in Toronto, and as much bread, and better bread, can be had in London for sixpence as costs elevenpence in the Canadian city. Is that the kind of social blessing which our cor- respondent would impose upon the workers of this country in order to offer the farmer a beneficial preference ? Increased price of food would represent a direct reduction of wages, which fact Mr Chamberlain never tired of pointing out before he performed that amazing somersault upon the fiscal question. We have stated that agriculture in Ger- many is not so profitable as it is in this country, notwithstanding a high duty upon imported wheat. And what of its bottom dog," whose prototypes here this writer would fain try to extinguish by pal- tering with the peril of Protection ? What of unemployment in that German paradise of Protection? Is there no such thing as migration from rural Germany to the congested city F What becomes of the young people of our villages when they go to the big cities ? is the title of an article in a recent issue of 'Die Machbar' ('The Neighbour'). Peruse this extract: "Of the 50,000 men between the ages of 14 and 23 who yearly seek their fortunes in Berlin, the greatest part comes from the villages and the open country. All expect, naturally, to find work and higher wages. But what is the real state of affairs ? Last winter no less than 40,000 unemployed were found in Ber- lin, and although they wandered inces- santly from, place to place in search of work, they could find none. At the corners of some streets the policement kept them in rows of four Berlin had to pay towards the maintenance of the poor in 1907 £ 1,400,000, and 8,000 homeless people had to be provided for every night." Such is a human picture borrowed from the land where agriculture is protected to the extent of 12s a quarter of wheat. Our correspond- ent simply nibbles at the protectionist policy which Mr Chamberlain has forced upon the acceptance of the Tory party, and since such nibbling they would scorn, he would be well employed in his next epis- tolary effort in showing to farmers and all other toilers how immeasurably poorer they should be under that depressing reign of tariffs.

PROPOSED GROUPING OF ASSIZES.

SETTLED.

THE COUNTY YEOMANRY.

MONTGOMERYSHIRE INFIRMARY…

CIVIC WAR AT WELSHPOOL.I

NEWTOWN WATERWORKS.

EFFICIENT FIRE BRIGADES.

--OUR FOOD AND DRINK.

WELSHPOOL'S THIRD PROTEST.