Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

53 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

VICAR & TEACHER! -I

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

VICAR & TEACHER! STAINMORE RAGGING AGAIN i Story of Meetings by Ruined Shed j ENQUIRY ORDERED BY BISHOP Ancient Ecclesiastical Court In the Ancient Ecclesiastical Oourt a.t York Minster to-day a further stage in the proceeding* against the Rev. John George La-x, vicar of tstainmore, near Xirkby Stephen, in the D-iocese of Carlisle, was take?:, when Sir Lewis Dibdin, auditor of the Chancery Court of York, sat to hear an application by the promoter, or A. N. Bowman, i'f;g'ietrar of Carlisle, acting for the Bishop of Carlisle, for the admission of articles ag-ainst Mr. Lax. 'Jh:s is really a preliminary stage in the trial. To-day Mr. Lax is appearing in pencil io objwt to the articles being admitted, and should he succeed, the case for the promoters will drop. The promoters aiv scprcaenttd by Br. Barlow. The cec^eoiasticai trial ILl"; excited eitormo.Js interest tlirougiiout the whole of the North of hiijfkuKl. and, needk-as to say, its venae S"ive.s it ail added interest, held, as it is, in 1110 aucieat £ e.ie?>ia««tio;il C0Urt lying- deep in a gloomy rs-tss oi tho magnificent ra:r.s!e: a. smaii chain-be:- of grey stone and sin t-!j <Jiamond-paneu windows, through -which the .iig-.fit jugL mmuigea to iiiuminate the dusky wall. The whole proceedings had a peculiarly i-olemti atmosphere. It will ba remembered that the assault on ttiLhx took pla-ce <>n the iith of ^September at and that a young school teacner, named Mies Ken won, was implicated in tho matter. Mr. La:, then prosecuted his a.auunro. who were as farmers' son* at Kirkoy Stephen, and were fined. Miss Kenison took civil proceedings at the assizes, which eventually wf-xe settled with. au apology by the assailants. The Bishop of Carlisle then took action, -with the result that charges are now made against Mr. Lax, under the Churoh discipline Act, "for I creating a scand.il." At the commencement of the proceedings Sir Lewis Libdin said he understood Mr. Lax. had a technical objection to maie to the citation. Atr. Lax aaid that the objection he wished to make was to the description of the judge in the citation, lie was described as "official principal and auditor," while under the Aot lie should have been, described as "official principal or auditor." sSir Lewis Dibdin: The vital error is the substitution of "and" for "or." Do you think that invalidates the whole proceedings? You have no doubt as to the nature of the court before which you had to appear. You seem to have got here. Mr. Las: Oh, yes. I came here because the cathedral was here Dr. Barlow rise to reply to the objection, but Sir Lewis said he did not require to hear him, and repelled the objection. A long legal argument ensued between Dr. Bartow and the judge as to- why the charge was raised by the promoter under the Church Discipline Act of 1840 instead of the Act of 1892. Dr. Barlow proceeded to cite numerous cases, and delved deep into eooesiastical lore. Sir Lewis then aeked Mr. Lax whether he had any objection to the articles. The respondent proceeded to criticise the nighteen articles at some length, "I am entitled," Mr. Lax first stated, "to argue that the prosecutor will not be able to substantiate his articles by admissible evidence." Kir Lewis: We are not on proof to-day. Mr. Lax: The bishop's inquiry took place- Kir 'Lewis (interrupting): I don't know any- thing about the bishop's inquiry, and I don't want to know anything about it. A r. Lax: My first obj-eetion is in respect to the evidence given at the inquiry. Sir Lewie; That is perfectly irrelevant now. -lir. Lax: Am I entitled to say something about the insinuations contained in the articles? Wir lievris: Yes. Meetings Near a Ruin? I Mr. Lax: Take Paragraph 10, which says certain acts took place in or near a ruinous building or shed. lSir Lewis: That is the para-graph which .-tare* that the respondent had on many occasions in 1909 had meetings -with one Mary Renison, who was then a teacher at the South fcitainmore Elementary School, and that they were seen in the neighbourhood of Stainmore, and walked and consorted with, tjjpe same Mary Renison in a manner likely to oa-aeo scandal. The paragraph went on to say: At 8.45 on the night of the 17th of March, 1909, at a ruinous building or ehed in a field known -as Calva, the respondent kissed the said Mary Reniison several times. Mr. Lax: Yes. May I explain that my Tela- tione with this person were that she aaked me to take her as :her tntor? Sir Lewis: I cannot her that. That will come on at the trial. It is not an insinua- tion; it is a statement. Mr. Lax: This clause is founded on the fact that the footpath from the vicarage to the station passes tha building. Proceeding, Mr. Lax aid hat the two places in which the alleged acts took plaiOe were mentioned in paragraph 10 a* the Church of 8tainmore and in the neighbourhood of Stain more. Yet in the same paragraph a place called Winston was referred to. Winston was twenty-two mailes from Stain- more. That could not be oalled within the neighbourhood of Stainmore. Sir Lewis: That also is a matter of evidence. A Married Man I Lax then referred to Paragraph 11 which he said referred to his being a married man. bir Lewis: Surely, the promoter may refer tA) t"t. Mr. Lax: But he is pleading scandal in relation to my being a married Tcan. •Sir Lewis: I don't see any difficulty about the pleading there. Mr. Lex then drew attention to the next paragraph, which referred to the assault, committed on him, and argued that it wa.s irrelevant, as that matter had been settled in a temporal court. riir Lewis: The paragraph states that twenty or more young men met the respon- dent in a field, accompanied by Mary Renison, tied him to a gate, and carried him to the vicarage. Mr. Lax also took objection to a paragraph which alleged that during the summer of 1909 he was eeen in company with Mary ReniBon near Calva Wood at dusk, under circumstances giving rise to scandal. "The only way I can meet that," Mr. Lax continued, "is to say that I did not put my head outside my own door during the whole of the summer of 1909 upon any evening about dusk. The allega,tion is not sufficiently ex-act in point of time." After hearing Dr. Barlow in reply Sir Lewis said he would reject the last paragraph; aleo another paragraph which stated Mr. Lax's wife left his house on account of the scandal. He also rejected a. paragraph which stated that Miss Kenison subsequently broke the windows of Mr. Lax's house. Judgement on the whole case will be given later.. I

KIRKDALE BYE-ELECTION I

MEDAL FOR SUFFRAGETTE I

I Darran Pit Disaster I !-I

1 Newport Dispute !

STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONSI

A COW BRIDGE WEDDING !

LAND TAXATION FORM

!MOTHER'S AWFUL CRIME

I THE RED RUBE CASEI

NATIONAL ANNUITIESI

ICELLAR CRIME

-BARRY RAILWAY BILL

A MISSING ARCHDUKE I

STATION MASTER KILLEDI

STRiKE SPREADING

The Month of Flowers

- - | Bristol Dock Trouble

I""""'""_' IPENARTH LAWN TENNIS

I——-j AWARDED Yl

[No title]

I TO-DAY'S MOVEMENTS ! -I

I To-Day's Finance. !

i Trade and . Shipping i

i I ¡ WELSH V. IRISH BOWLERS…

I STOKER'S LIFE ON BOARD I

-=-=-"-==-= I HAD SAVED TEN…

I FACTORY EXPLOSION

) ORDINATION SERVICES__I

I NEWMARKET NOTES I

Advertising

I MINOR COUNTIES CHAMPIONSHIP

I——————————— 0 FIRST-CLASS…

KENT V. NORTHAMPTONSHIRE.

MIDDLESEX V. LANCASHIRE.

WARWICKSHIRE V, GLOUCESTERSHIRE.

SURREY V. SUSr-

I..————— I Liverpool Meeting.

j OTHER EVENTS.I

! WINDSOR. I

[No title]

I - OFFICIAL SGRATCHINGS.…

Advertising

I -CARDIFF V. USK VALLEY.…

TO MORROWS MATCHES. I

WEATHER FORECAST ,*

Family Notices

Advertising

IProfessional Golf

SLEPT __ON THE RIVER BANK

A DIVULGED SECRET

Advertising

SURREY V. SUSr-