Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

10 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

A taB BRIGHTON RAILWAY MUKDER.

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

A taB BRIGHTON RAILWAY MUKDER. I TRIAL OF LEFROY. j trial of Arthur Lefroy Mapleton, 22, journalist, °T the murder of Mr. Gold on the London, Brighton, South Coast Railway, was begun on Friday, 4th inst., at the Maidstone assizes, before Lord ^ef Justice Coleridge, the court being crowded every part. The prisoner pleaded not guilty.— Attorney-General (with whom were Mr. Poland y Mr. A. L. Smith) appeared for the prosecu- v,°H. Mr. Montagu Williams (with whom were Mr. °rrest Fulton and Mr. Kisch) appeared for the pri- mer.—The allegations the Attorney-General mainly „*elt upon were that the prisoner was undoubtedly in v)6 compartment in which the deadly struggle took j^ce, that he had upon his person the watch of tiie ^*4 man, that he had the same morning in his pos- j^sion a pistol with which he could take Mr. v^old s re>. and that there was no sign of any third person tT^g been in the compartment.—Mrs. Gold, ?e Widow of the murdered man, gave evidence !S to her husband's appearance and ordinary habits. identified his umbrella, described the watch he ,^1 and identified a piece of the chain and fragments of his eyeglass. The two Misses ?van, daughters of the Brighton watchmaker cleaned Mr. Golds watch at the beginning ? June, and Mr. Joseph Lo'van himself, gave Science about the character of the watch and its lumber and value.—Ihen Catherine Cross, who r^naged a baker s shop, m Walworth for Mr. Gold, *as called, and stated that on Monday, 27th June, the date of the crinie, lr. Gold had called and re- Oeived from her £ 36 5s.—It was next proved by a jpwsnier irom ine hitechapel branch of the >1^? 1 an estmir.ster Bank that Mr. Gold anri ia saine morning paid in £ 38 into the bank ftr.li <Jrawu nothing out.—Franks, one of the ticket tollector3 at the London Bridge Station, stated fcf .saw Lefroy go into the first-class compart- w, 'n which Mr. Gold was seated, and the train started there was 110 third person yi them. He was acquainted with Mr. Gold as 0 Sequent traveller, and' he knew Lefroy as having thp6 a"emPted to travel without a ticket.—After Ch witne fcses came Mr. Gibson, the Brighton ^ist, who rode in a compartment next he one_ in the murder occurred, and why heardtthe pistol sj°ts fired. These he supposed at the time to be fog j^&ls. He had seen Mr. Gold enter the next com- « trnent, and identified his body after it had been R ft!—Mrs. Brown and her daughter, who from M. cottage window near the line saw two men tilling or "larking" in the train as it passed, were tve next witnesses, and to them succeeded Watson, ffuard, who stated that the train ran at a good leed from East Croydon to Preston Park with the CelJtion of once, slowing down to four miles an <|Ur. jje wa3 watching the train at that time, and A.^le could have left it without his knowledge. IVeston Park Lefroy hailed the ticket collectors .said he had been murderously assaulted in a J^'iuge. Witness-saw a bit of chain hanging out of shoe, and pulled out a watch at the end of chain. He also found some Hanoverian medals "Uh flo^r of the compartment Lefroy had oc- —Gibson, one of the ticket collectors at the W n Pai'k-station, said prisoner staged that he W put the watch in his shoe for safetor-, that he W rfc tide red insensible by a blow, that thr* aggressor a countryman who got out with Mr. Gold on the Prisoner objected tostayfor a night in Brighton *jJWtaI, to which he took him to get his wounds ex- ceed.—1The Preston Park station-master was next bl and was asked by the judge if, after seeing the 'n ^ie compartment, and upon the prisoner's and observing a watch in the latter s shoe, it jj« Sot occur to him to "ive instructions for the deten- ?.f-,the wa-tch or the prisoner. He replied that he in Gibson, whom he sent with the prisoner, to re- fyrt tlie whole circumstances at Brighton.—Mr. Oliver Wi ^ted tbat he was in the station superin- tendent's office when Lefroy was brought in, and the marks of bloody fingers on his neck. He ex- .,ied his wound?, and remarked that they seemed *n<llave been caused by blows from an umbrella, \)(;lie lecornineii(led that he should be taken to the ^it ejstation in a close fly; so as to secure his safe '—Police evidence regarding the conversa- nt at the Brighton Town-hall was followed by flatus ements of Mr. Hall, surgeon, as to the slight '0 Lefroy's wounds and the shocking condition /ch Mr. Gold's body was faund. this point the court rose. hich Mr. Gold's body was faund. ,t this point the court rose. SECOND DAY. Un. the second day of the trial Henry Anscombe, ti ^e>"intendent of the Brighton station, and Detec- ti.Ve Howland, gave evidence as to what occurred in »f,- former's office when Lefroy was brought there »|er leaving the hospital. According to notes by Howland, prisoner said, After passing y(ion, just as we entered the first tunnel, a hi Was fireù, and I heard nothing more until I felt on roy head, which rendered me insensible. n°t recover consciousness until just before tWlnS to Preston Park Station." He further said Rent! Were two other men in the carriage,one an old and the other a countryman, both of *rid ac' fi^t in at London Bridge. He was searched Vas LV. 211 the watch was taken from him, he said it Vo antl that when he recovered conscious- «e found it on the floor of the carriage. He iy ]°st the chain and 25s. in silver.—Detective ",ltnes said he was at the town-hall when Lefroy «H Pr°ught there, and he searched him. He found n f(,m' or'five sovereigns, Is. Gd. in silver, Hi 1^' *n bronze, besides six Hanoverian medals, C ^.e to°^ ^rom coa^ Poc'iet- These the pri- s.a'd he supposed he had received when playing *t\Y. Vr'' Witness returned with Lefroy to his home tljg' 'dhngton. He found the prisoner had given him w.ront{ number of the watch, which he found on v 'niuat'on to be 16,201, the number given by the C.i mak.er as that of ?Ir- Gold's watch. Holmes jL 'her said that he noticed the name in the watch to Griffiths, Mile End-road." He then returned the station, but being informed of a telegram that arrived he returned to the prisoner's house, but Obi, ne(* outsid0 until Inspector Turpin and the r arrived and entered, when the prisoner Vnot to be found.—Evidence was then given of the of Mr. Gold's body, and the fact that though (vi,* Was made no revolver, second pocket-book Gold was said to have had upon him that or skull cap, was found.—Mr. White, car- inspector then described the position of three 'et marks in the carriage. One of these would be <Sot iate>y over the head of a person sitting in the seat with his back to the engine, another im- '^tely over the alarum bell, and the third immedi- opposite it.—John Baines, a police-inspector, ^^ed that he had abstracted a bullet from the Kit S of the carriage.—Dr. Bond, who made the 'Mortem examination of the body, said that the appeared, after having been shot, to have assailed in front by a person armed with a that there were 14 cuts cn the body, that the t>e;iet found in the neck was the size of a small Si,!1]' an<i that even after this shot the old man V11 atde to make resistance. Death resulted Vj,1 syncope, caused by loss of blood and the shock. to.*1 e propiietress of the Brighton Theatre was called '11 eny any acquaintance or business with Lefroy. witnesses who had found them there were pro- the hat and collar alleged to he Lefroy's, and $(, "at, empty purse, and umbrella of Mr. Gold.— jury then proceeded to examine the carriage.— W -Kllis, a bookseller at Wellington,_ and his 'tant, gave evidence as to a trick by which Lefroy, ^tn- morning of June 27, the day of the murder, *Vlli'°d !3s. from the former's shop as change for K^overian medals.—Several pawnbrokers ^de- j^i„, to prisoner having, in the name of "Lee" or pledged articles represented by the pawn-tickets St,, in his coat pocket.—Hetiry Creek, manager, and jioJ^t Allwright, assistant at a pawnbroker's in the t, 0"h, stated that the prisoner pledged a revolver name on the 21st of June in the name of bam Leigh, of Sonthampt, n street, Peckham," deemed the same article on the morning of the VpThom.s Clayton, of 4, Cnthcart-road, Wal- V0h0n- identified a bag which had contained aome Pledged at Croydon as his property. Pri- ^ttr] Was second cousin to witness's wife, O tl'a '°l'sed with them ever since their marriage, r'ttel? ^st °f June, on which date prisoner was re- 5 to have pledged the revolver, Mrs. Clayton Ver Y ill, and prisoner voluntarily remained at the all day for tb- of fetchin* ? doctor ¡ r necessary.—me witness was severely reprimanded by the judge for having withheld this evidence be- fore.—Witness's wife was also called, and corrobo- rated her husband's statement. Mr. Clayton's servant described the return of Lefroy < n the even- ing of the murder, and his subsequently leaving the house on the pretence of going to see a doctor. The court again rose. The cuurt aail1 ru¡,¡e. I THIRD DAY. At the third day's sitting Mrs. Bickers, of Stepnpy, at whose house prisoner went to lodge after the murder, was called and stated that he gave the name of Clarke, and said he was employed on the rail- way. He was without a hat, which he explained by saying he had started by an early train, adding that the luggage would be sent on. He went out for a short time that evening, and again on the morning of the second day, but so far as she observed he did not again leave the house till his arrest. He did not dine with the other lodgers on Sunday, though it was the custom for them to dine together. After being there for some days he received a letter, and he then asked her to go in a cab and get some money for him. She declined, but a neighbour conveyedhis message for him, and the next night he was arrested.—Detective-Inspector Swan- son, who arrested Lefroy 011 the 8th of July, described what passed, when lie and another officer, Jarvis, went to the house. Lefroy admitted to them this identity, but stated that he was not guilty. Jarvis searched the room, finding among other articles a pair of. false whiskers and a moustache, and a pair of scissors, which the prisoner said he had used to nt his moustache and whiskers off. In a drawer in the prisoner's bedroom a waist- coat, scarf, and collar were found with blcod-stalns upon them, and also a woollen shirt with parts cut away. The only money found upon him was a shilling. The very much blood stained collar found on tbQ line near the scene of the jnurder was pro- duced in court, and Compared with those iouna at uie Stepney lodgings, and was found to be slightly shorter. —Inspector Jarvis stated that the prisoner said "I am glad you have found me. I am sick of it. I should have given myself up in a day or two, but I could not bear the exposd I feared certain matters in connec- tion with my family would be made public. I have re- gretted ever since that I ran away. It has put a dif- ferent complexion on the case. "-Inspector Turpin next produced the blood-stained clothing belonging to pri- soner,and found in his Wallington I-odgings.-Willitm Doyle, a neighbour 0.1 Mrs. Bickers, said that on the day before his arrest Lefroy gave him a telegram to send to Mr. Seal, his former fellow-lodger at Walling- ton.—At the close of the case for the prosecution Lord Coleridge adjourned the court for a quarter of an hour. But before this was done Mr. Oliver Weston, whose testimony as to what occurred on the arrival of Lefroy at Brighton was flatly contradicted by the railway officials, implored the judge for mercy's sake to hear him and three witnesses he had brought to substan- tiate his statement, but the judge declined to do so.—Mr. Montagu Williams, in his ope-ning speech for the defence, dwelt with much emphasis on the total absence of any evidence that the prisoner knew anything of Mr. Gold or hishabits.What then became of the theory of the prosecution that the prisoner had deliberately planned the murder of Mr. Gold ? Lefroy's own story was that he had an appointment to go down to Brighton that day with a young lady, and the fact of his looking into the carriage windows in the manner spoken of would be accounted for by his seeking for his travelling companion. The fact was there was a third man in the train, else how 'could they account for the missing of Mr. Gold's second purse, his pocket book, and other articles ? As to the watch which was found in Lefroy's shoe at Brighton, with the chain dangling out, what was more rational than that it should have been placed there by the third man ?—The Attorney-General, in a speech of two hours' duration, replied on the whole case, going over the main points of evidence, and contending that it sufficiently established the guilt of the prisoner. He condemned the hypothesis that Lefroy had engaged to make the journey with a young lady. His whole ccnduct was inconsistent with such a story, and it was incredible, if such a lady existed, that she should not be called as a witness.—At the close of Sir H. James's speech, the court adjourned. I FOUBTIi DAY. On the fourth day the Lord Chief Justice summed up the case in an exhaustive address, dealing fully with the various points in the evidence. With regard to the statements of Mr. and Mrs. Clayton that the prisoner remained at home all day on June 21, and therefore could not, as alleged, have pawned the pistol on that day, his lordship remarked that the enormous preponderance of the evidence was that he did pawn the pistol on that day. Dealing with the theory sug- gested by the defence that there was a third person in the train who did the murder, his lordship pointed out that there was no evidence of a third person. Com- menting upon Mr. Williams's suggestion that the prisoner had appointed to go down to Brighton and really did go down with a young lady, but that pri- soner would not say who she was, and that the young lady herself would come forward, Lord Coleridge asked if anybody could believe that state- ment ? It would be something like suicide if, having a witness whom he could call to corroborate an important part of his story and to shew that he had a real errand at Brighton, the prisoner did not call her. But was there any English girl who would see a man hung sooner than than herself come forward to say why he went to Brighton ? His lordship ccncluded his address at 2.35, having spoken about three hours, and the jury then retired to consider their verdict. I VERDICT. The jury returned at a quarter to 3 with a verdict of Guilty. When asked why sentence should not be passed upon him,Lefroy said he had merely to thank the jury. The Lord Chief Justice then assumed the black cap, and, after a few solemn words referring to the magnitude of the crime, passed sentence of death in the usual form. Lefroy, turning to the jury, then said Gentlemen of the jury, some day, too late, you will know that you have murdered me, He was then led from the dock by the warders.

IDISASTERS AT SEA.

[No title]

f THE COMIC PAPERS.

ITHE SHEERNESS MYSTERY.I

I INSUBORDINATE SEAMEN.

[No title]

I LOED MAYOR'S DAY.

[No title]

-: THE CRISIS IN IRELAND.