Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

7 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

... HOLYHEAD.

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

HOLYHEAD. ETTi SESSIONS, V*"I'.DNRSDAV, JUNE 25TU.—• Before Majcr General Hughes and Mr R. Roberts. ? jrrsning in "arclt of Oan'—Thomas Hughes, F. „ .re', and David Jones. Baptist-street, both of Boueyin, were charge;! with this offence.— ReU c Roberts, Yaiky. s lid lie was a gamekeeper tji ix. service of Mr IVaxfcou. his district lying in tho parishes ot .Llauyiighetiedl ana Lianlhbio. On the■:h of June nen>w two men in a field belong- ingt) Mr Robert Tycroes. Lianyngke'iedl. They had fvo dogs virh tkiu, ami were beating the gorsc bushes, lie vent up to The place where th'-y were, but befoie he readied them they had gcue over into another field. lie managed to hold cne the dogs back and took it with him. The fa day, the brother of one of the defendants ca:i: J for the dog and .ail it was his brother's. "Witness then accompaitied the brother to the two defendants, who admitted that they were in the fisid on the previous day, and that t aey caught one xabbib—In defence the defendants said that they were returning home from Llanfaehraeth village, and vu crossing the field in question they saw the dogs chasing a rabbit, when they followed about 30 yards distant from the path wb'ch was in rhe field. Thij being their fir-d offeree the defendants Wcro let off on pjying a fine of 2s GJ, and COfltO. Theft of a-.Job ii Harris, a labourer, was charged by Griffith Edwards with stealing a shovel bfcl .-aging to him from the Llwydhirih Arms public house on Whit-Tuesday.—Mr J. B. AUan- sot. defended the prisoner. The prosecutor's evidence went to show that on May 23th, when he V7u; passing the above house, a John Francis Ev ins came to the door and calied him to get a gla.-3 of ale. Jt was then between six and seven in the evening. He went in and placed his shovel, wh c'il he had with him, inside a glass door in the lobby. He then went into the parlour where there were several persons drinking. He stayed there about an hour, the prisoner, who wa-i in the par- lour, going out before him. When he went to se&fcli for his shovel he could not find it. He asked everyone in the house about it, but could get no clue to it. In oJii.-equey.ce of information he afterwards received, he went to the George Hotel and iiibemia Inn in search of the prisoner. He ferrad him at the l.dter house with the shovel in h:s possession, when he went and gave information to police. — lu cross-examination by Mr Allan- Ijz said lie "Too soLoi" c:\ ihat uay.. He had not oeen drinking on Mouday and Tuesday. Who* called into the house he was not asked to play cards, neit^r was there card-playing going goiii- » ou whilst he was there. He did not lay his shovel against sixpence that Evans would win the game 'When he saw the latter was 7 to 5.—John Francis Evsns. fitter, said he lodged ac Liwydiarth Arms. HJ called the prosecutor in on the day in question. The shovel was placed between a glass door in the lei by, and when he went to search for it it could 110'; be found.—Cross-examined by Mr Allanson -i 11 J did not play cards with complainant- neither wi-there-any kin 1 of game in the parlour, nor anything said about betting.— This being the prosecutor's case, Mr Allanson addressed the i ouch, pointing out that the only witnesses were who had the most intere-t in getting 1 e hi i spade, which, he had been instructed, was 1..1.L as a wager on the card playing and lost and tfco p.-r.son who had an interest in keeping up the character of the house. lie would call witnesses prove that prosecutor was called in anH took j. • • t in card plaviug, that there was betting going t_. and that the prosecutor, when he thought there was a chance (f his winning, laid his shovel sixpence, and lost the bet, when he said he could not afford to loose it as he was poor.—He th- v. called William Robeits, who gave his evidence rather unsatisfactorily, bui; he stated that cards were played iu the house when he was there. A second witness not having answered the summons, this was all the evidence for the defence.—The Chairman said the bench were perfectly satisfied that he was guilty of stealing the shovel, but see- in that he committed the act whilst under the of drink-, and the house being one of bad rcputa, they were inclined to be lenient with him, and. sentenced him to 14 days' imprisonment with hard labour, t Frut il Case of Williams, of Summer Hill Terrace, summoned William Wil- liai .13, Cleifiog Isaf, Llanynghenedl, with assaulting t-Vn and biting a pi^ce of his ear on the 8th inst., and a cross-summons was issued by the defendants agr.hist prosecutor for assault committed the same tin Both parties came into court asking per- mission to settle out of court, but the magistrates declined until the particulars were stated to them. U;chard Williams then deposed that William Williams came to him on the day in question at the back of the King's Head Hotel that there were 1.) angry words passed between them, but that foir-other men ca ne there and attacked him at th same time one of them biting oh a piece of his eat. — Wm. Williams said that he was standing at the place mentioned, when he saw Richard Wii- liara.; in a lighting attitude and challenging men to wrestle witii fdm. He then came U") t:» witness and challenged him. Witness re- tire 1, whereupon Richard Williams caught hold of him by the leg and threw him on his back en the shafts of a car which was in the yard. Witness lad to defend himself, and for that purpose he took a firm hold of him. Richard Willi ims had by this time bitten his leg, and kept fast hold of wit- ness with his teeth. When he got up witness struck him a heavy blow on hi," face, which caused Richard Williams to let go. —Michael Parry, Bod- edem, was next called.—Thos. Williams, Bodedern, corroborated the evidence of William Williams, an 1 added that defendant had come to him subse- q » ,tl and threatened him.—The Chairman, after J. i-i the evidence, said he thought the two pre- ,lSjcharges which had been brought against him v, ,d nave been sufficient warning to him, but it f.v a*ed to him that he (defendant) was beginning t-, J (.. y on the same games that he did at Llan- f The bench would give him one chance r. He would not have the opportunity of I j < _»• another fine. The last time he was con- v; t tie was fined £ 2. He would now be fbed -62 at. ■ ,A -)-> co.-ts, or six weeks in default, and he -w -'ii. be o -iiind over to keep the peace for six m iths, in his own recognisances for £ 10, and two sureties' i -r £ 10 each. Etfusing to Abate a Nuisance.—Joseph Fletcher, co +e'-monger, Black Bridge, was charged by Hy. l;' Uis, inspector of nuisances, with this offence. Wh«n asked by Mr Rice Roberts (who acted as magistrates' clerk in the place of Mr J. LI. Griffith) it 1;1: understood English, defendant replied in an gVtiiuritative tone I do, sir, I'm a rale true-bred liiV'man." Henry Evans said that he had v^Ci a* building in the occupation of defendant, ac.'i found a nuisance there in the shape of a c >ty *f decayed fish and other refuse. Witness s,ved aim with a nctioe to remove it on May 9th, and had visited the place last week, when he found the nuisance htid not- oeen abuted. He had to bcautions, as there was a case of small-pox tnet time in tho immediate neighboumood of <?e'Widant's house. The defendant (as is usually tu•• case with hhn) got. very impertinent. He asked ft,I witness, Whiit s >rt oi fish were they He e'thl "Old herrings" Have you a sample of to" «>« Jso I wo tId not carry them with me." then questioned him as to his business in en- f- the shed. &c—Mr Wm. Riva was then t {fe said Lis attention was called to the ."referred to, as.' was asked to visit it. He i r was in sucli a stench. The neighbours com- r that it was abominable. He could not jlv, there but for a v».ry short time. It arose from nutrid matter which was in the shed, but he <- ( not tell what it was, as he could not stop th owing to the stench.—Defendant again com- tn -i Hid to make statements and put questions, but w 11 stopped by the magistrates.—The Chairman j tiiat If he had been a little more reasonable A.v have been iucuued to let him off with «Volition but as he had thought fit to abuse the ir-- U'-totfor doivr l:is duty, he would be fined 10., aid costs, or loai* m days in default Jjruaksnnes#. — l'hoaias Flynn. Turkey-shore, charged by Sergeant Hughes with being drunk and disorderly on the 1st inst, did not appear, and was fined 73 GJ and costs having been previously lined on April 8th. Alexander Gumie, Bod- edem, summoned by the same officer with drunken oeha viour on the 8th inst., did not appear, and was fined 5s and costs. -Catherine Murphy, Black Bridge, was charged by P.C. Toohil with being drunk and disorderly in Stanley-street at 2.3D a.m. on June 9th. She went to the police station ana demanded the release of a Mrs Jones. She would hot leave but IY01, t and sat on a door- step where she made a great noise. Superinten- dent Owen said he heard the officer entreating her to go home. When asked if she had any questions to pat to the witness, she commenced a Jong rigmarole and said: "False. Well, then, this is the first offence in my life and I've been married twenty-four years. He has given wrong evidence in two or three words he said." This was cut short by telling her that she would have to pay 2s 6d fine and 10s 6d co«ts. Patrick Connor, charged by P.C. John Jones with being drunk in Old Market-place; and by P.C. Toohil with sleeping in a lime kilm, was fined 2s 6d and costs. hriving Without Reins.—Isaac Brown, Isallt Fawr, charged by Sergeant Hughes with driving a horse without reins, was let off upon pavmuit of 6s costs. biraying.—P.C. Toohil charged John James, 1, o w travelling hawker, with at. in, his horses to be straying on the road between Valley and Four Mile Bridge. He was ordered to pay (j", co;ts. Stone Throwing.—Edward Gray, Old Market- place, a bay 12 years old, summoned by P.C. Toohil for throwing stones with a catapult on the 13th June, was fined 2s 6d and costs. Assaults.—Robert Roberts. Cymuuod, Bodedern, v. John Rowlands, Bryngwrau.—Settled out of court. Anne Jones, Black Bridge, v. John Jones, her husband, settled in the same way. Jane Jones, Four Mill Bridge, v. Ellen Jones, Biue Bell.—Adjourned to Valley sessions. Sureties of the l',act'Jn'le James, Four Mile Bridge, asked that Ann Griffith, of the same place, be bound over to keep the peace.—Both parties bound over in their ow:i recognisances of £ 10 each. Th -ft by (I S>rcmt Girl. — Mary Murphy, a young girl WilO had been in service with Mrs Pritchard, Llanfair &tch, was brought up charged with steal- ing a stays and other articles of wearing apparel the properly of Mrs Pritchard. It appears that the girl took the articles without the permission of her mistress and wore them, denying all knowledge of them IVfitil They W6 discovered on her per.-o- by the poliee. She admitted tooking than but not with the intention of stealing.—Sentenced to fourteen days' imprisonment. Theft by a Railway Servant.—Thomas Owen, a porter in the employ of the London and North We-tcrn Railway Company, was brought up in custody charged with stealing thirty two herrings, the property of his employers. Detective Sergeant Howells prosecuted on behalf of the company.— Robert Hempenstall, a police officer in the company's employ, said About 6 a.m. to-day I wa. on duty in the yard wlieu I saw the prisoner- taking a bundle from behind an old boat which laid in tile yard. In reply to my questions he said hehad herrings in it which he had got on the deck. He hoped I would not take him into custody, and was sorry he had the fish. He had been employed wirh the fish gang for the last fortnight.—The Chairman, in passing sentence, said he was sorry to see a man who had been in the company's em- ploy charged with stealing their property. People delivered their goods to the company for transit expecting to have them delivered safely, but occa- sionally those goods fell into the hands of unprin- cipled men in their employ, and the company must be protected against such men. As he pleaded guilty and the charge was not severely pressed against him, he would be imprisoned for seven days only with hard labour.

'-Ak' HOUSE OF LORDS.—Tiiuxts-MAT.

WITHDRAWAL Of MR UAXliUltrS…

[No title]

LLANDUDNO.

TERRIBLE VOYAGE OF A CARDIFF…

--UKIVERSm COLLEGE OF WALES.