Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

17 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

I -m- - - AB!-9,{T_YC"0í:'…

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

I -m AB!-9,{T_YC"0í:' I RUABON COUNTY ti I 1UESDAY, MAY zif, imio.—before U. Winston. Jiasq, Deputy Judge. There were 112 caseg entered for trial, manv of which were settled out of court, whilp. those which came on for hearing were chiefly small debts possessing no feature of public interest. A COLLISION. I Richards v. Jonc>,—This was an action brought by John Richards, shopkeeper, against Mr Joseph Jones, farmer, for the recovery of one pound, damazes sustained by the defendant driving against the plaintiff's cart. near the Swan Inn, Penybryn, Wrexham. 'Mr Bucktnn, of Mold, appeared for the plaintiff and Mr Jones, of Wrex- ham, for the defendant. After giving an outline of the case, Mr Buckton called Sarah Richards, who said I am the wife of John Richards, the plaintiff in this action. I was in Wrox- ham 01 the 8th of March—I went to buy buttsr but could not get any. About a quart-r to four I called with my pony and cart at the Swan Inn, PeDvbryo. As I was turning in the yard, the defendant, Joseph Jones, came driving up Penybryn, at full speed. He was in a gig and two females with him. In driving past h*5 struck against my cart and caused it to turn over upsetting the contents on the ground. The contents consisted of three gro33 of pipes—value 5. i confectionary purchased from Mr Stevens, 6s; tincture of rhubarb, 5. i woollen yarn, 4s. 4d. The pipes were nearly rll destroyed. The con- fectionary was unfit for use. The cork came out of ti e tincture of rhubarb bottle and the contents was neart- all lost. The yarn was so much damaged that I could not sell it. The springs of the cart were damaged, but these have been repaired by order of the defendant. Cross-examined by Mr Jones.—The head of the pony Ij was about half a yard within the gateway. There was no timber carriage near. (A letter was here put in hy Mr Jones, written by the plaintiff to the defendant of- fering to settle the whole matter for 10s.) Joseph Edwards stated that he repaired the eart, for which he charged 2s 6d. Mrs Jones, (defendant's mo- ther) gave him the order. Made out the bill to Mrs Jones. (On reference to the bill it was found to be made out to Mrs Jones.) Mr Jones said his answer was that it was an accident and quite unavoidable. When the defendant came up to the Swan he found the plaintiff's cart by the gate of the yard, the pony's head just up to the gate post. On the other side of the road were two timber carriages, and when Mr Jones drew his pony up he reared, and he was compelled to allow him to go forward. He contended that they were not liable, and even if they were, the damage was not more than 10s. according to the plain- tiff's own letter, and as 2s. 6d. had been paid for repair- ing the cart that was now reduced to 7s. 6d. The de- fendant had nothing to do though with getting the cart repaired, these proceedings had been taken by his mother. J oseph Jones, the plaintiff was then called. He said he remembered driving up Penybryn on the day in question. The plaintiff's cart was by the Swan yard, outside the gate, and no one with it. Did not see the plaintiff at all. There were two timber carriages on the road, so that there was no room left to pass. He pulled up the mare and she reared—the females that were with. hiUl shouted and he was obliged to let the mare go on. It was the rim of the nave that upset the cart. Knew nothing about offering to pay for the repairs, that was done by his mother. Miss Evans was next called. She said she was in the gig with Mr Jones and his wife on the day in question. Saw nothing of Mrs Richards at all—there was no one with the pony. Never saw Mrs Richards till that day. i There was scarcely room to pass between the cart and the timber carriages. When Mr Jones pulled the pony up he reared and he was obliged to let him go on. Her shoulder rubbed up to the timber in passing the timber carriage. Judgment for 10s. WOODWARD V. JONES. I This was an action brought by Mr Charles Woodward, of the Cefn, against Mr William Jones, ironmonger, of i Conway, for £208 2d, alleged to be due for grinding Stones, &c. Mr Buckton appeared for the defence. Ten shillings of the amount had been paid, which the plaintiff acknowledged, stating that he omitted to give credit for it. The defence in regard to the balance was, that Mr Woodward offered to send the goods carriage free and free from damage, whereas, the carriage was not paid and the grinding stonef crushed. Mr Woodwarddeniedmakingany such stipulation, as the carriage to him would have been equal to the worth of the goods—the Railway Company would have charged him the same as they would for a truck load. As to the cracks spoken of they were no injury to the stones, and if there had been any damage in the carriage, the defendant's remedy would have been with the Railway Company. The defendant said he wrote to Mr Woodward, complaining of the damage the day after he received the goods, but Mr Woodward said he never received any such letter. The defendant called a person named Thomas Evans, who said he was present in Mr Jones's shop when Mr Woodward was agreeing with Mr Jones for the stones, and he under- stood that they were to be delivered carriage free and free from damage. His Honour said, he thought it was extremely improbable that Mr Woodward should make such an agreement, but there were two oaths against one, and he was bound under these circumstances to give iudgmcnt for the defendant. BRADLEY V. ROBERTS. This was an action to recover £ 28s7d for shop goods. Mr Jones appeared for plaintiff. The only item in dispute -v,-as a credit for L,2, which the defendant contended had teen paid at two several times. The plaintiff explained tltat it was the same amount but hal been twice credited and this view being adopted by the Judge his Honour immediately gave judgment for plaintiff. INSOLVENCY. Thomas Griffiths, an insolvent, had hi3 final order for protection. Mr Jones supported the petitioner. WILLIAMS V. ROBERTS. This was a squabble about a fence, but on the case being called 011 the plaintiff, by the advice of Mr J Buckton, of Mold, his advocate withdrew i. Mr Jones appeared for defendant.

[No title]

[No title]

[No title]

'.a

REVIEW OF THE CORN TRADE.

[No title]

[No title]

[No title]

r- -- - II MISCELLANEOUS.…

I . '?IIE WK?SH CALVIN I STIC…

[No title]

BOROUGH M.AGISTrtATE' COURT.…

WREXHAM COUNTY COURT.I

I MEETING OF THE TOWN COUNCIL.

.MEETING OF THE LOCAL BOARD.I

[No title]