Papurau Newydd Cymru

Chwiliwch 15 miliwn o erthyglau papurau newydd Cymru

Cuddio Rhestr Erthyglau

22 erthygl ar y dudalen hon

PARISH COUNCILS. -

Newyddion
Dyfynnu
Rhannu

PARISH COUNCILS. TH* PROFITABLE WORKING OF A1J.OTMF.NTS. The following statement of facts contributed by r. Herbert Watte, a member of the Fernhurst Parish Council, may be of interest as to the working of allotments. When the Council was established 12 juonths Lord Davey, the chairman, was applied to for land- for allotments, and offered an excellent field for the purpose. This was let among some 30 appli- vouts at 3d. per rod, in plots of 10 to 40 rods. Last year was a trying season, owing to want of gain, but Mr. Watts cites numerous cases in which the receipts from 20 rod allotments were 50s. to 70s., from which 10s. to 20s. must be deducted for geed, manure, hired labour, and other items. The crops, however, were not of the must readily dis- posable description, being chiefly potatoes, onions, and roots. Summer produce which is of a more perisbahle character might possibly be difficult to gell at any distance from a big town. Mr. Watts also instances larger allotments at Chadshill, near Birmingham, where an acre of potatoes yielded a net profit of Y-10 16s. 6d. (P,25 7s. 6d. minus Y,14 I Is., total charges for seed, labour, rent, and manure), and £ 50 net profit on an acre of strawberries. A Bad Example.—It is not oftes, we are happy to think (says the Councils' Gazette) that an important Local Authority places itself in such a false and un- dignified position as that occupied by the Uxbridge Urban District Council, with regard to an action brought against them in the Queen's Bench Division on Friday in last week. The plaintiff, a )1r. Murray, sought to recover the sum of £ ,150, being the remainder of an amount of £ 350 altogether, due to him under an jgreeineiit with the Council for work done in cleans- jug the river Colne, on which he owns a fishery. The plaintiff duly performed liis part of the contract, and was paid the sum of £ 200 on account, no com- plaint being made as to the manner in which the grol-k had been carried out. Owing, however, to the condition of an affluent from sewers under the control of the defendant Council, it was impos- sible to effectually cleanse the river, and in January, 1895, the defendants' surveyor refused his certificate, and the Council refused to pay the balance of the sum due under the agreement, not- withstanding the admitted fact that it was solely owing to their own default in not purifying their effluent that the plaintiff's efforts had not proved effectual. At the hearing of the case before the Lord Chief Justice, it was not denied that the plaintiff had done all that was possible to cleanse the river, nor that the effluent alone pre- sented him from doing so effectually. This being 80,. it is difficult to understand why the Council allowed the case to go into Court at all but foolish as was their conduct in this respect, worse yet remains to be told. Determined to avail themselviai; of every opportunity to deprive the plain- tiff of the money to which lie was indubitably .entitled, they took advantage of the fact that their own clerk and solicitor had, in drawing up the contract, omitted to insert a provision as to » pecuniary penalty for non performance. Jhey now alleged that the contract was con- sequently not in accordance with the Public Health Act, 1875, and that the plaintiff's claim against them could, therefore, not be enforced. The meanness and dishonesty of such acourse'of action as this are too obvious to be further insisted upon, and we are glad to note that the Lord Chief Justice axpressed his disapprobation of the defendants' con- duct in such strong and unmistakable terms that they were moved at the last moment to withdraw their defence, and so rendered it unnecessary for judgment to be given. Failure to Elect Sufficient Councillors.-At the annual election of the Parish Council for the town ward of this parish (says a correspondent of the Coitnctts' Gazette), 13 candidates were nominated for Bight seats. A poll was demanded. Eight candidates, of whom five were old Coun- cillors, have since withdrawn, and the returning officer has accordingly declared the remaining five candidates duly elected. There are, consequently, three vacancies. What is the procedure, and who is to take the necessary steps? The present Chair- man of the Parish Council has (since the publication of the returning officer's notice of elec- tion)* under Sec. 47, sub-Sec. 1, approached each "of the old Councillors with a view to filling the three vacancies, but all have refused. Was he right in o going ? Would not sub-Sec. 5 of the same section rather govern the circumstances of the case ? If so, is it the duty of the present Council to acquaint the County Council of the failure to elect sufficient Councillors for the new Parish Council ? Answer The Chairman appears (replies our authoritative con- temporary) to have acted quite properly. Section 47 (1) applies in the first instance, though it is very yague. It is not at all clear whether the vacancies in the Council which now exist (if they cannot be filled under S. 47 (1) ) are casualv acancies, .so that the case comes within S. 47 (4), or not. The safest way out of the difficulty is probably for those Councillors who are elected to apply to the County Council for an order dealing with the difficulty, and if the Council make an order that those Councillors who have been elected should fill up the vacancies, then whether the case comes within S. 47 (4) or an order of the County Council is necessary, in any event the election will be valid. Of course, if sufficient of the outgoing Councillors (whether candidates for re- election or not) are willing to retain office, then the difficulty disappears, and no application to the County Council is necessary. power of Parish Council to liepair Poor Houses. —(1) Houses built by the parish on waste ground at the end of last century. The parish pays ground rent to the lord of the manor and the parish receives the rents of the houses. Is this interest in the houses sufficient to justify the Parish Council in repairing them out of the rates ? (2) Chsrities.-Is it neces- I aary for a list of the recipients of charities under the Control of the Parish Council to be published on the church and chapel doors, &c.? Answer: (1) We should like to know under what Act, and out of what funds, the expenses of building the-houses were defraved. We should expect to find that the repairs must be paid for out of the rents, not out of the rates. (2) Assuming that the charities are "dole charities (which they probably are), the names of ,the beneficiaries must, by Section 14, be published annually in such form as the Parish Council think fit! We think that it would probably be held suffi- cient if a notice were put on the church doors, stating that a list of the beneficiaries was deposited at some place in the parish (e.g., with the Clerk to the Parish Council), and was open to inspection. Qualification of P. C. Candidates.—(1) Is a Re- lieving Officer disqaalified for the office of Parish Councillor? (2) Is the Head Master of a Board School, partly supported by rates, disqualified for the office of Parish Councillor ? (3) Is a District' Highway Surveyor under a Itural District Council disqualified for the office of Parish Councillor? Answer (1) We think (says the Councils' Gazette) that it is clearly advisable to assume that he ip,, though the point is perhaps doubtful. (2) In our opinion he is not. (3) In our opinion (adds our sontemporary) he is not. Assistant Overseer's Salary.-Financial Statement. —(i) Should the new Parish Council see fit to in- crease nty StÙary as assistant overseer, will a new appoin uient be necessary, or will a copy of the lft" 30 ution g'gned by the Chairman be sufficient to fl,, it narrl °Jr! (-) Will the form of financial Btatement ordered iast Jear be avaiiabie for the pre- sent year in the absence of any further order or form for keeping the P.C ac > ? Angwer (1) The resolu io u y entered in the minute book, such minute being properly signed, will be sufficient. (2) Yes.

JGREATER BRITAIN.

[No title]

OLD COACHING INNS.

THE GRASSY WAYSIDES OF ENGLAND.

THE OLDEST RAILWAY PASSENGER.

[No title]

A PEEP AT SANDRTNGHAM.,

AN OLD-TIME FREAK.

THE DOCTOR'S SECRET.

[No title]

NURSING AS A PROFESSION. !

——————————————— COMING VISITORS…

UNDS AS AIDS TO THE POLICE.…

[No title]

--TlN PERSONS BURNT TO DEATH.

i '— THE POST OFFICE BURGLARY.

A BRITISH VICTORY.

TORTURING PER FORMING DOGS.

[No title]

,' LORD HARRIS AND MR. BALFOUR.

ATTEMPT TO WRECK A TRAIN.